95-3877. Order Modifying License  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 9063-9065]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-3877]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket No. 030-12279, License No. 45-17151-01 EA 95-003]
    
    
    Order Modifying License
    
        In the Matter of Material Testing Laboratories, Inc.
    
    I
    
        Material Testing Laboratories, Inc. (Licensee) is the holder of 
    Byproduct Material License No. 45-17151-01 (License) issued by the 
    Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or Commission) pursuant to 10 CFR 
    parts 30 and 34. The License authorizes, in part, possession and use of 
    byproduct material not to exceed 200 curies of Iridium-192 per source 
    in the operation of radiography exposure devices. The License further 
    authorizes the Licensee to perform radiography at temporary job sites 
    in accordance with the conditions specified therein. The License, 
    originally issued on March 17, 1977, was renewed on December 16, 1993, 
    and is due to expire on December 1, 1998.
    
    II
    
        On November 15, 1994, an inspection of NRC-licensed activities was 
    conducted at a temporary job site in Northern Virginia and at the 
    Licensee's office in Norfolk, Virginia. As a result of the inspection, 
    apparent violations of NRC requirements were identified, which are the 
    subject of a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil 
    Penalty issued this date. The violations identified during the NRC 
    inspection include:
        1. Use of NRC-licensed material by an unauthorized and unqualified 
    individual, in violation of 10 CFR 34.31(b);
        2. Failure to maintain direct surveillance of radiographic 
    operations by an authorized and qualified individual, in violation of 
    10 CFR 34.41;
        3. Failure to perform an adequate survey following a radiographic 
    exposure, in violation of 34.43(b);
        4. Failure to post a high radiation area, in violation of 10 CFR 
    34.42; and
        5. Failure to post the Licensee's radiography vehicle as a 
    radioactive material storage area at a temporary job site, in violation 
    of Condition 20 A. of the License.
        A transcribed enforcement conference was conducted in the NRC 
    Region II office in Atlanta, Georgia, on December 20, 1994, to discuss 
    the violations, their cause, and the Licensee's corrective actions. 
    During the enforcement conference, the Licensee acknowledged that 
    weaknesses in management and in Radiation Safety Officer oversight of 
    the Lorton, Virginia, field office activities contributed to the 
    violations. These weaknesses included a lack of appreciation by 
    management and the Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) of the effect of 
    excessive overtime work on employees' performance and failure to 
    promptly monitor work practices of the radiographer involved in the 
    November 15, 1994, violations following the indications of his poor 
    performance by a State of Maryland inspection which identified a 
    failure to maintain a radiography exposure device under constant 
    surveillance and control.
    
    III
    
        Based on the above, the NRC has concluded that the Licensee has 
    violated NRC requirements. The performance of NRC-licensed activities 
    requires use of appropriate safety procedures, training of personnel 
    regarding those procedures, meticulous attention to detail by personnel 
    conducting radiography, and proper oversight by Licensee management to 
    ensure these activities are conducted safely and in accordance with NRC 
    requirements. This attention is particularly important during the 
    performance of radiography given the high radiation levels that can 
    result from use of the sources. The failure to properly control the use 
    of the radiography devices could result in significant radiation 
    exposure to individuals, both employees and members of the general 
    public. The radiographer who had primary responsibility for use and 
    control of NRC-licensed material at the temporary job site failed to 
    maintain proper control and surveillance during radiographic 
    operations. The radiographer, as noted above, one month earlier also 
    failed to maintain constant surveillance and control of a radiography 
    exposure device in the State of Maryland. In addition, based on the 
    violations and weaknesses identified above and information and 
    statements obtained during the transcribed enforcement conference, the 
    RSO, who has the responsibility for ensuring that NRC requirements are 
    met, had not adequately controlled or maintained oversight of the 
    Licensee's NRC-licensed activities in the Northern Virginia area to 
    ensure compliance with all NRC requirements including the conditions of 
    the License.
        The violations described in Section II of this Order and the 
    concerns set forth above demonstrate a significant lack of attention to 
    required radiation safety requirements by the radiographer and lack of 
    management control and oversight of radiographic operations by the RSO 
    and Licensee management. Specifically, after the incident in Maryland, 
    the ROS did not identify the root causes of the violations, the RSO did 
    not perform a field audit of the radiographer's performance, and the 
    retraining of the involved radiographer was not sufficient to prevent 
    the November 15, 1994 incident which had similar violations. 
    Consequently, I lack the requisite reasonable assurance that the 
    Licensee's current operations can be conducted under License no. 45-
    17151-01 in compliance with the Commission's requirements and that the 
    [[Page 9064]] health and safety of the public, including the Licensee's 
    employees, will be protected. Therefore, the public, health, and safety 
    and interest require that the License be modified as described below in 
    Section IV. Furthermore, pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202, I find that the 
    significance of the violations described above is such that the public 
    health, safety and interest require that this Order be immediately 
    effective.
    
    IV
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to sections 81, 161b, 161i, 161o, 182 and 186 
    of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Commission's 
    regulations in 10 CFR 2.202 and 10 CFR parts 30 and 34, it is hereby 
    ordered, effective immediately, that license no. 45-17151-01 is 
    modified as follows:
        A. The Licensee shall retain and maintain the services of an RSO 
    approved by Region II to oversee the activities of its radiographers 
    based at the Lorton, Virginia, facility. The RSO duties must take 
    priority over any other duty. The Licensee shall within 30 days submit 
    the name and qualifications of the Lorton RSO for approval to the 
    Regional Administrator, Region II.
        B. The Licensee shall retain the services of an independent 
    individual or organization (consultant) to perform an initial 
    assessment of the Licensee's radiation safety program in Lorton, 
    Virginia, and quarterly audits thereafter for a period of one year to 
    determine compliance with all NRC requirements. The consultant shall 
    also provide recommendations for program improvements to ensure 
    effective management oversight and control of radiography operations. 
    Within 30 days of the date of this Order, the Licensee shall submit to 
    the Regional Administrator, NRC Region II, for review and approval, the 
    name and qualifications of the consultant it proposes to conduct the 
    assessment and audits. The consultant shall be independent of the 
    Licensee's staff and have experience in the management and 
    implementation of a radiation safety program, including activities 
    similar to those authorized by the License.
        C. Within 60 days of the date of NRC approval of the consultant 
    selection, as described above, the Licensee shall have the consultant 
    submit its assessment report to the Licensee and to the Regional 
    Administrator, NRC Region II. Within 30 days of the end of each 
    quarterly audit period, the Licensee shall have the consultant submit 
    its audit report and any recommendations for improvements to the 
    Licensee and to the Regional Administrator, NRC Region II. The 
    assessment and audits of the Licensee's radiography program shall 
    include, but not be limited to:
        1. A review of the adequacy of the Licensee's management control 
    and oversight in ensuring that radiographer and equipment requirements, 
    personnel monitoring requirements, radiation safety procedures in 
    radiographic operations, and other NRC requirements are followed 
    including:
        (a) The Licensee's program for training, retraining, and qualifying 
    all individuals involved in using, supervising, inspecting, and 
    auditing activities involving NRC-licensed material;
        (b) The scope, methods, and frequency of the Licensee's program of 
    surveillance and audits to determine compliance by individual users of 
    NRC-licensed materials with NRC requirements, the conditions of the 
    License, and the Licensee's own procedures for the safe use of 
    radioactive materials;
        (c) The RSO's functions and oversight activities, including the 
    methods of monitoring the radiation of safety program to ensure that 
    problems or violations are promptly identified and corrected; and
        (d) The Licensee's radiation safety program for developing and 
    implementing operating and emergency procedures for the safe use of 
    NRC-licensed material, and record keeping and documentation.
        2. On-site reviews at the Licensee's Lorton, Virginia, office of 
    activities and records maintained for users, and interviews and 
    observations of selected authorized users working at various locations.
        3. Direct observation during each quarterly audit of, at a minimum, 
    one radiographer employed at the Lorton, Virginia, office performing 
    industrial radiography activities with NRC-licensed material. The 
    audits should ensure that all radiographers at the Lorton, Virginia, 
    office are observed within the year.
        D. Within 30 days of the date of the initial assessment report and 
    of each quarterly audit report, the Licensee shall submit to the 
    Regional Administrator, NRC Region II, the Licensee's response to the 
    report either describing the implementation of each of the necessary 
    corrective actions or recommendations from the audit report, or 
    justification for not needing any corrective action or for not adopting 
    one or more of the specific recommendations. Each Licensee response 
    shall include a status report on action items completed or to be 
    completed with appropriate priorities assigned and any schedules for, 
    or dates of, completion of each specific item.
        E. The Licensee shall ensure that the work of the radiographer 
    involved in the November 14, 1994 violations, as a radiographer using 
    NRC-licensed material, is audited by the independent consultant within 
    30 days of the radiographer's return to unsupervised work and quarterly 
    thereafter for one year. All audits shall include direct observation of 
    the radiographer performing industrial radiography with NRC-licensed 
    material.
        F. For a period of one year from the date of this Order, the 
    Licensee shall notify NRC Region II, by 9:00 a.m. (Eastern Time) Monday 
    (or Tuesday, if Monday is a federal Holiday) of each week, of the 
    location in non-Agreement states where the radiographer involved in the 
    November 15, 1994 violations will be conducting radiography operations. 
    This notification shall include the date, time, and specific location 
    where radiography is planned to allow NRC to conduct an unannounced 
    inspection. If unplanned work arises after the Monday notification, the 
    new work can be performed by the involved radiographer in a non-
    Agreement state provided that the NRC has been given prior notice. 
    Notification shall be made by telephone to Mr. Douglas M. Collins, 
    Chief, Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards Branch, or his 
    designated representative, at (404) 331-5586 or by facsimile at (404) 
    331-5559.
        The Regional Administrator, Region II, may, in writing, relax or 
    rescind any of the above conditions upon demonstration by the Licensee 
    of good cause.
    
    V
    
        In accordance with 10 CFR 2.202, the Licensee must, and any other 
    person adversely affected by this Order may, submit an answer to this 
    Order, and may request a hearing on this Order, within 20 days of the 
    date of this Order. The answer may consent to this Order. Unless the 
    answer consents to this Order, the answer shall, in writing and under 
    oath or affirmation, specifically admit or deny each allegation or 
    charge made in this Order and set forth the matters of fact and law on 
    which the Licensee or other person adversely affected relies and the 
    reasons as to why the Order should not have been issued. Any answer or 
    request for a hearing shall be submitted to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Chief, Docketing and Services Section, 
    Washington, D.C. 20555. Copies also shall be sent to the Director, 
    Office of Enforcement, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    [[Page 9065]] Commission, Washington, D.C. 20555, to the Assistant 
    General Counsel for Hearings and Enforcement at the same address, to 
    the Regional Administrator, NRC Region II, 101 Marietta Street, Suite 
    2900, Atlanta, Georgia 30323, and to the Licensee if the answer or 
    hearing request is by a person other than the Licensee. If a person 
    other than the Licensee requests a hearing, that person shall set forth 
    with particularity the manner in which his interest is adversely 
    affected by this Order and shall address the criteria set forth in 10 
    CFR 2.714(d). If a hearing is requested by the Licensee or a person 
    whose interest is adversely affected, the Commission will issue an 
    Order designating the time and place of any hearing. If a hearing is 
    held, the issue to be considered at such hearing shall be whether this 
    Order should be sustained.
        Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.202(c)(2)(i), the Licensee, or any other 
    person adversely affected by this Order, may, in addition to demanding 
    a hearing, at the time the answer is filed or sooner, move the 
    presiding officer to set aside the immediate effectiveness of the Order 
    on the ground that the Order, including the need for immediate 
    effectiveness, is not based on adequate evidence but on mere suspicion, 
    unfounded allegations, or error.
        In the absence of any request for hearing, the provisions specified 
    in Section IV above shall be final 20 days from the date of this Order 
    without further order or proceedings. An answer or a request for 
    hearing shall not stay the immediate effectiveness of this order.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 9th day of February 1995.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Hugh L. Thompson, Jr.,
    Deputy Executive Director for Nuclear Materials Safety, Safeguards, and 
    Operations Support.
    [FR Doc. 95-3877 Filed 2-15-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/16/1995
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-3877
Pages:
9063-9065 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 030-12279, License No. 45-17151-01 EA 95-003
PDF File:
95-3877.pdf