96-3384. Disqualification of a Clinical Investigator  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 6177-6178]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-3384]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Proposed Rules
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
    the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
    notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
    the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 33 / Friday, February 16, 1996 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 6177]]
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Part 312
    
    [Docket No. 95N-0138]
    
    
    Disqualification of a Clinical Investigator
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is proposing to amend 
    the investigational new drug regulation that provides for 
    disqualification of clinical investigators for submitting false 
    information. It has come to the agency's attention that, as written, 
    the regulation may be unclear. The proposed amendment would clarify the 
    agency's authority to reach sponsor-investigators under the existing 
    regulation.
    
    DATES: Written comments by May 16, 1996. FDA proposes that any final 
    rule based on this proposal become effective 60 days after its date of 
    publication in the Federal Register.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit written comments to the Dockets Management Branch 
    (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, rm. 1-23, 12420 Parklawn Dr., 
    Rockville, MD 20857.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard P. Muller, Center for Drug 
    Evaluation and Research (HFD-7), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 
    Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 301-594-1046.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    I. Introduction
    
        FDA is proposing to amend the regulations governing 
    disqualification of clinical investigators to clarify that existing 
    Sec. 312.70 (21 CFR 312.70) reaches sponsor-investigators. Although the 
    proposed amendment would not signify a change in policy, it has come to 
    the agency's attention that, as written, the regulation may be unclear.
        Generally, clinical investigators who conduct clinical trials to 
    investigate new drugs submit their data to individual or corporate 
    sponsors. Part 312 (21 CFR part 312) requires sponsors to monitor the 
    progress of clinical investigations and to submit clinical 
    investigation reports to the agency. Thus, data generated by the 
    clinical investigator become the subject of reports that are submitted 
    to the agency.
        Sponsor-investigators both directly conduct investigations and 
    report data to the agency. Section 312.3(b) defines ``sponsor-
    investigator'' as ``an individual who both initiates and conducts an 
    investigation, and under whose immediate direction the investigational 
    drug is administered or dispensed.'' The definition specifically states 
    that ``[t]he requirements applicable to a sponsor-investigator under 
    this part include both those applicable to an investigator and a 
    sponsor.'' Therefore, existing Sec. 312.70 covers the disqualification 
    of sponsor-investigators. However, the language of Sec. 312.70, as it 
    applies to sponsor-investigators, may be confusing.
        Under existing Sec. 312.70(b), the agency may disqualify an 
    investigator who has ``deliberately or repeatedly submitted false 
    information to the sponsor in any required report.'' However, unlike 
    investigators, sponsor-investigators submit information directly to FDA 
    and not to a separate sponsor. Although FDA believes that Sec. 312.70 
    encompasses the disqualification of sponsor-investigators, because a 
    sponsor-investigator does not submit information to a sponsor, the 
    existing regulatory language may be ambiguous. Therefore, the agency is 
    proposing to amend Sec. 312.70 for clarity.
        The proposed rule, if finalized, would clarify that the agency can 
    disqualify clinical investigators and sponsor-investigators for 
    submitting to sponsors, or to FDA, false information in any required 
    report.
    
    II. Environmental Impact
    
        The agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.24(a)(8) that this action 
    is of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a 
    significant effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an 
    environmental assessment nor an environmental impact statement is 
    required.
    
    III. Analysis of Impacts
    
        FDA has examined the impacts of the proposed rule under Executive 
    Order 12866 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act (Pub. L. 96-354). 
    Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits 
    of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, 
    to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including 
    potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other 
    advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The agency believes that 
    this proposed rule is consistent with the regulatory philosophy and 
    principles identified in the Executive Order. In addition, the proposed 
    rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by the Executive 
    Order and so is not subject to review under the Executive Order.
        The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires agencies to analyze 
    regulatory options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule 
    on small entities. Because this proposed regulation does not impose 
    paperwork or recordkeeping burdens, the agency certifies that the 
    proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities. Therefore, under the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act, no further analysis is required.
    
    IV. Effective Date
    
        FDA proposes that any final rule based on this proposal become 
    effective 60 days after its date of publication in the Federal 
    Register.
    
    V. Request for Comments
    
        Interested persons may, on or before May 16, 1996, submit to the 
    Dockets Management Branch (address above) written comments regarding 
    this proposal. Two copies of any comments are to be submitted, except 
    that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to be identified 
    with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of this 
    document. Received comments may be seen in the office above between 9 
    a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
    List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 312
    
        Drugs, Exports, Imports, Investigations, Labeling, Medical 
    research, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Safety.
    
    [[Page 6178]]
    
        Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under 
    the authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, it is 
    proposed that 21 CFR part 312 be amended as follows:
    
    PART 312--INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUG APPLICATION
    
        1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 312 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: Secs. 201, 301, 501, 502, 503, 505, 506, 507, 701 of 
    the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 321, 331, 351, 
    352, 353, 355, 356, 357, 371); sec. 351 of the Public Health Service 
    Act (42 U.S.C. 262).
    
        2. Section 312.70 is amended by revising the first sentences of 
    paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 312.70  Disqualification of a clinical investigator.
    
        (a) If FDA has information indicating that an investigator 
    (including a sponsor-investigator) has repeatedly or deliberately 
    failed to comply with the requirements of this part, part 50, or part 
    56 of this chapter, or has submitted to FDA or to the sponsor false 
    information in any required report, the Center for Drug Evaluation and 
    Research or the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research will 
    furnish the investigator written notice of the matter complained of and 
    offer the investigator an opportunity to explain the matter in writing, 
    or, at the option of the investigator, in an informal conference. * * *
        (b) After evaluating all available information, including any 
    explanation presented by the investigator, if the Commissioner 
    determines that the investigator has repeatedly or deliberately failed 
    to comply with the requirements of this part, part 50, or part 56 of 
    this chapter, or has deliberately or repeatedly submitted false 
    information to FDA or to the sponsor in any required report, the 
    Commissioner will notify the investigator and the sponsor of any 
    investigation in which the investigator has been named as a participant 
    that the investigator is not entitled to receive investigational drugs. 
    * * *
     * * * * *
    
        Dated: February 9, 1996.
    William K. Hubbard,
    Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
    [FR Doc. 96-3384 Filed 2-15-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/16/1996
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
96-3384
Dates:
Written comments by May 16, 1996. FDA proposes that any final rule based on this proposal become effective 60 days after its date of publication in the Federal Register.
Pages:
6177-6178 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95N-0138
PDF File:
96-3384.pdf
CFR: (1)
21 CFR 312.70