96-3582. Air Pollution Control; Proposed Action on Clean Air Act Grant to the Pima County, Arizona, Department of Environmental Quality  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 6241-6242]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-3582]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [FRL-5422-3]
    
    
    Air Pollution Control; Proposed Action on Clean Air Act Grant to 
    the Pima County, Arizona, Department of Environmental Quality
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Proposed determination with request for comments and notice of 
    opportunity for public hearing.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The U.S. EPA has made a proposed determination that a 
    reduction in expenditures of non-Federal funds for the Pima County, 
    Arizona, Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) in Tucson, Arizona 
    is a result of a non-selective reduction in expenditures. This 
    determination, when final, will permit the PDEQ to be awarded financial 
    assistance for FY-96 by EPA under section 105(c) of the Clean Air Act 
    (CAA).
    
    DATES: Comments and/or requests for a public hearing must be received 
    by EPA at the address stated below by March 18, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: All comments and/or requests for a public hearing should be 
    mailed to: Douglas K. McDaniel, Air Grants Section (A-2-3), Air and 
    Toxics Division, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San 
    Francisco, California 94105-3901; FAX (415)744-1076.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas K. McDaniel, Air Grants 
    Section (A-2-3), Air and Toxics Division, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 
    Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901 at (415) 744-
    1246.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the authority of Section 105 of the 
    CAA, EPA provides financial assistance to the PDEQ to aid in the 
    operation of its air pollution control programs. In FY-95, EPA awarded 
    the PDEQ $331,207, which represented approximately 25.4% of the PDEQ's 
    air pollution control program budget.
        Section 105(c)(1) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7405(c)(1), provides that 
    ``[n]o agency shall receive any grant under this section during any 
    fiscal year when its expenditures of non-Federal funds for recurrent 
    expenditures for air pollution control programs will be less than its 
    expenditures were for such programs during the preceding fiscal year.'' 
    EPA may still award financial assistance to an agency not meeting this 
    requirement, however, if EPA, ``after notice and opportunity for public 
    hearing, determines that a reduction in expenditures is attributable to 
    a non-selective reduction in the expenditures in the programs of all 
    Executive branch agencies of the applicable unit of Government.'' CAA 
    section 105(c)(2). These statutory requirements are repeated in EPA's 
    implementing regulations at 40 CFR 35.210(a).
        In January of 1996, the PDEQ submitted to EPA final documentation 
    which shows that its actual FY-95 expenditures of non-Federal funds for 
    recurrent expenditures (or its maintenance of effort (MOE)) were 
    $973,959. In its FY-96 Sec. 105 grant application the PDEQ projected 
    MOE of $537,821. This amount represents a shortfall of $436,138 from 
    the MOE for the preceding fiscal year (FY-95). In order for the PDEQ to 
    be eligible to be awarded its FY-96 grant, EPA must make a 
    determination under section 105(c)(2).
        In December 1995, the PDEQ submitted documentation to EPA 
    establishing that its reduced expenditures for FY-96 result from a loss 
    of permit revenue, due to changes to Pima County's air quality rules 
    mandated by new Arizona state law which required Arizona localities to 
    amend their air quality rules that were more stringent than state 
    rules. Rule changes adopted on November 14, 1995 
    
    [[Page 6242]]
    by the Pima County Board of Supervisors included both raising permit 
    thresholds and lowering fee schedules to make them identical in 
    structure to the state program. Due to these changes, there will be a 
    severe decline in permit revenue in FY-96.
        The PDEQ's MOE reduction resulted from a loss of fee revenues due 
    to circumstances beyond its control. EPA proposes to determine that the 
    PDEQ's lower FY-96 MOE level meets the section 105(c)(2) criteria as 
    resulting from a non-selective reduction of expenditures. Pursuant to 
    40 CFR section 35.210, this determination will allow the PDEQ to be 
    awarded Sec. 105 grant funds for FY-96.
        This notice constitutes a request for public comment and an 
    opportunity for public hearing as required by the Clean Air Act. All 
    written comments received by March 18, 1996 on this proposal will be 
    considered. EPA will conduct a public hearing on this proposal only if 
    a written request for such is received by EPA at the address above by 
    March 18, 1996.
        If no written request for a hearing is received, EPA will proceed 
    to a final determination. While notice of the final determination will 
    not be published in the Federal Register, a copy of the determination 
    can be obtained by sending a written request to Douglas McDaniel at the 
    above address.
    
        Dated: February 3, 1996.
    David P. Howekamp,
    Director, Air and Toxics Division, U.S. EPA, Region 9.
    [FR Doc. 96-3582 Filed 2-15-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/16/1996
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Proposed determination with request for comments and notice of opportunity for public hearing.
Document Number:
96-3582
Dates:
Comments and/or requests for a public hearing must be received
Pages:
6241-6242 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-5422-3
PDF File:
96-3582.pdf