99-3602. Alf M. Landon; Notice of Petition for Adjustment  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 7638-7639]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-3602]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
    [Docket No. SA99-11-000]
    
    
    Alf M. Landon; Notice of Petition for Adjustment
    
    February 9, 1999.
        Take notice that on January 12, 1999, Frank M. Rice (Rice), the 
    attorney for Alf M. Landon, a/k/a/ Alfred Mossman Landon (Landon), 
    filed a petition for staff adjustment in Docket No. SA99-11-000, 
    pursuant to section 502(c) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978. Rice, 
    on behalf of Landon and the Kansas University Endowment Association 
    (KUEA), contends that neither Landon nor the KUEA owe the gas 
    purchaser--Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company (Panhandle)--a refund 
    under the Commission's September 10, 1997 order in docket No. RP97-369-
    000 et al.,\1\ because the price that Panhandle paid to Landon and the 
    KUEA, inclusive of the ad valorem tax reimbursements, was not in excess 
    of the applicable maximum lawful price (MLP). The subject petition is 
    on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ See: 80 FERC para. 61,264 (1997); order denying rehearing 
    issued January 28, 1998, 82 FERC para. 61,058 (1998).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The petition indicates: (1) that Panhandle served Landon with a 
    $32,944.63 refund claim; (2) that Panhandle purchased the gas produced 
    from the Davis Unit, in Stevens County, Kansas, under a January 27, 
    1961 gas purchase contract (Contract No. 0538); (3) that Landon and 
    D.E. Ackers were the co-owners of that unit, each with a 50% working 
    interest in the unit; (4) that the KUEA became the successor-in-
    interest to D.E. Ackers' 50% working interest in the unit; (5) that 
    Landon is deceased; \2\ (6) that the price that Panhandle paid Landon 
    and the KUEA, from 1983 through 1988, inclusive of the ad valorem tax 
    reimbursements, was not in excess of the applicable MLP; and (7) that 
    neither Landon, successor-in-interest to Landon, nor the KUEA owe a 
    refund to Panhandle.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \2\ The subject petition includes a copy of the death 
    certificate for Alfred Mossman Landon [a/k/a Alf M. Landon], showing 
    that he died on October 12, 1987.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Rice adds that Panhandle terminated the subject gas purchase 
    contract in January of 1991, and that one of the signers of the 
    termination agreement, as a Seller, was the KUEA. Rice further asserts 
    that K.S.A. 55-708(7) [a/k/a House Bill No. 2419] prohibits First 
    Sellers such as Landon or the KUEA from taking action against royalty 
    owners, or obtaining the ad valorem tax royalty refunds ordered by the 
    FERC. Therefore, Rice contends that it would be inequitable to require 
    Landon, Landon's successor(s) or the KUEA to make such refunds, when 
    Kansas law prohibits them from attempting to obtain the refunds from 
    the royalty owners.
        Any person desiring to be heard or to make any protest with 
    reference to said petition should on or before 15 days after the date 
    of publication in the
    
    [[Page 7639]]
    
    Federal Register of this notice, file with the Federal Energy 
    Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE, Washington, DC 20426, a 
    motion to intervene or a protest in accordance with the requirements of 
    the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214, 
    385.211, 385.1105, and 385.1106). All protests filed with the 
    Commission will be considered by it in determining the appropriate 
    action to be taken but will not serve to make protestants parties to 
    the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party to a proceeding or 
    to participate as a party in any hearing must file a motion to 
    intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules.
    Linwood A. Watson, Jr.,
    Acting Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-3602 Filed 2-12-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6717-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/16/1999
Department:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-3602
Pages:
7638-7639 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. SA99-11-000
PDF File:
99-3602.pdf