99-3667. Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, Incorporated; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Regarding an Interpretation With Respect to Rule 344 (``Supervisory Analysts'')  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 7680-7681]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-3667]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-41021; File No. SR-NYSE-98-44]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange, 
    Incorporated; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Regarding an 
    Interpretation With Respect to Rule 344 (``Supervisory Analysts'')
    
    February 4, 1999.
    
    I. Introduction
    
        On December 3, 1998, the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE'' or 
    ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``SEC'' or ``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 
    thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change amending an interpretation 
    regarding the meaning and administration of NYSE Rule 344 
    (``Supervisory Analysts''). Notice of the proposal appeared in the 
    Federal Register on December 30, 1998.\3\ The Commission received no 
    comments on the proposal. This order approves the proposed rule change.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
        \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
        \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 40812 (December 21, 
    1998), 63 FR 71991 (December 30, 1998).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Description of Proposal
    
        The Exchange proposed to amend an interpretation concerning the 
    meaning and administration of NYSE Rule 344. NYSE Rule 344 establishes 
    standards for qualification of candidates for Supervisory Analyst 
    designation at member organizations. The Exchange intends to publish 
    the interpretation as an Interpretation Memorandum for inclusion in the 
    Exchange's Interpretation Handbook.
        Research reports issued by a member organization must, under the 
    provisions of NYSE Rule 472(b) (``Communications with the Public''), be 
    prepared or approved by a Supervisory Analyst. NYSE Rule 344 requires 
    that, to be approved by the Exchange, Supervisory Analysts must provide 
    evidence of ``appropriate experience'' and pass the Supervisory Analyst 
    (Examination (the ``Series 16 Examination'') or complete the Chartered 
    Financial Analysts Level I Examination and pass Part I of the Series 16 
    Examination. The examination consists of two parts: Part I, Regulatory 
    Administration, and Part II, Review of Security Analysis. Currently, 
    the interpretation of NYSE Rule 344 requires Supervisory Analyst 
    candidates to have ``at least three years prior experience as a 
    securities analyst.'' The interpretation, as amended, requires 
    Supervisory Analyst candidates to have ``at least three years 
    experience, within the most recent six years, involving securities or 
    financial analysis.'' The Exchange will continue to require candidates 
    for the Supervisory Analyst designation to pass the Series 16 
    Examination.
        The Exchange also proposed to include in the interpretation the 
    following as examples of appropriate experience: (1) Equity or fixed 
    income research analyst; (2) credit analyst for a securities rating 
    agency; (3) supervising preparation of materials prepared by financial/
    securities analysts; (4) financial analytical experience gained at 
    banks, insurance companies or other financial institutions; and (5) 
    academic experience relating to the financial/securities markets/
    industry.
    
    III. Discussion
    
        After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule 
    change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and 
    regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange \4\ 
    and, in particular,
    
    [[Page 7681]]
    
    the requirements of Section 6 and the rules and regulations 
    thereunder.\5\ The Commission believes that the proposal is consistent 
    with the provisions of Section 6(c)(3)(B) of the Act \6\ providing that 
    an exchange may examine and verify the qualifications of an applicant 
    to become a person associated with a member in accordance with 
    procedures established by the rules of the exchange and that an 
    exchange may bar a natural person from becoming a member or person 
    associated with a member, if such person does not meet such standards 
    of training, experience, and competence as are prescribed by the rules 
    of the exchange.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ In approving this rule, the Commission has considered the 
    proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital 
    formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
        \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
        \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(c)(3)(B).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission believes the Exchange has developed standards to 
    help ensure that persons associated with Exchange members and member 
    organizations as Supervisory Analysts are appropriately qualified and 
    experienced to approve communications with the public. The Exchange 
    represents that requiring three years experience as a ``securities 
    analyst'' is too restrictive in light of the current business 
    environment. Because the role of Supervisory analyst has changed to 
    consist primarily of reviewing research reports prepared by others, as 
    opposed to, the preparation of research reports, ``appropriate 
    experience'' need not be limited to exclusively experience as a 
    ``securities analyst.'' The Commission believes that expanding the 
    definition of industry experience as set forth in the proposal is 
    consistent with the requirements of the Act.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\7\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-98-44) is approved.
    
        \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 99-3667 Filed 2-12-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/16/1999
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-3667
Pages:
7680-7681 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-41021, File No. SR-NYSE-98-44
PDF File:
99-3667.pdf