98-3845. Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Alternative Strategies for the Long-Term Management and Use of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 31 (Tuesday, February 17, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 7771-7773]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-3845]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    
    
    Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Alternative 
    Strategies for the Long-Term Management and Use of Depleted Uranium 
    Hexafluoride
    
    AGENCY: Department of Energy.
    
    ACTION: Notice of availability.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 7772]]
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) announces the availability of 
    the draft ``Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Alternative 
    Strategies for the Long-Term Management and Use of Depleted Uranium 
    Hexafluoride'' for public review and comment. This draft programmatic 
    environmental impact statement (PEIS), prepared pursuant to the 
    National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), assesses the potential 
    environmental impacts of alternative strategies for long-term storage, 
    use, and disposal of DOE's 560,000 metric tons of depleted uranium 
    hexafluoride (UF6) currently stored in steel cylinders at 
    sites in Paducah, Kentucky; Portsmouth, Ohio; and Oak Ridge, Tennessee. 
    Alternative management strategies evaluated in the draft PEIS include a 
    no action alternative. DOE's preferred alternative for the long-term 
    management of depleted UF6 is to use its entire inventory as 
    either uranium oxide, uranium metal, or a combination of both. DOE 
    invites the general public, other government agencies, and all other 
    interested parties to comment on this draft PEIS. The information 
    obtained during the comment period will assist DOE in preparing the 
    final PEIS.
    
    DATES: To ensure consideration, comments should be transmitted or 
    postmarked by April 23, 1998. Comments submitted after that date will 
    be considered to the extent practicable.
        DOE will hold public hearings near Paducah, Kentucky; Portsmouth, 
    Ohio; Oak Ridge, Tennessee; and Washington, D.C., to discuss issues and 
    to receive oral and written comments on the draft PEIS. The dates, 
    times, and locations for these public hearings are listed below and 
    will be announced in local media prior to the hearing dates.
    
    February 19, 1998
    
    5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Executive Inn and Conference Center, One 
    Executive Boulevard, Paducah, Kentucky 42001
    
    February 24, 1998
    
    5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Ramada Inn and Suites, 420 South Illinois 
    Avenue, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831
    
    February 26, 1998
    
    5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Vern Riffe Pike County Vocational School, 23365 
    State Route 124, Piketon, Ohio 45661
    
    March 10, 1998
    
    1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building, 
    Room 1E-245, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments and requests for copies of this draft PEIS can be 
    submitted by calling the toll-free number 1-800-517-3191, by faxing 
    them to 301-428-0145, or by mailing them to: Charles E. Bradley, Jr., 
    Program Manager, Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride Management Program, 
    Office of Facilities (NE-40), Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and 
    Technology, U.S. Department of Energy, 19901 Germantown Road, 
    Germantown, MD 20874-1290.
        Comments and requests for copies of this draft PEIS may also be 
    submitted electronically via the Depleted UF6 World Wide Web 
    site at http://www.ead.anl.gov/uranium.html or via electronic mail at 
    depleted__uf6@ccmail.gmt.saic.com.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information on the DOE 
    NEPA process, please contact: Carol Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA 
    Policy and Assistance, Office of Environment, Safety and Health, U.S. 
    Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 
    20585-0119, 202-586-4600 or 1-800-472-2756.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On January 25, 1996, DOE issued a Notice of Intent (61 FR 2239) to 
    prepare a programmatic environmental impact statement on alternative 
    strategies for the long-term management and use of depleted 
    UF6. The unique properties and value of depleted 
    UF6, such as its high purity and density, as well as the 
    large volume (about 560,000 metric tons) in storage, make it 
    appropriate to evaluate, analyze, and decide the long-term management 
    of this material separately from other DOE materials in storage or 
    awaiting disposition.
        The purpose of the PEIS is to assess and consider the potential 
    environmental impacts of a range of reasonable alternative strategies 
    for the long-term management of depleted UF6 currently 
    stored at DOE sites near Paducah, Kentucky; Portsmouth, Ohio; and Oak 
    Ridge, Tennessee. A management strategy is a series of activities 
    needed to achieve the safe long-term storage, use, or disposal of the 
    depleted UF6 inventory. The PEIS addresses the potential 
    environmental impacts of the activities that make up each strategy. 
    Following the issuance of the final PEIS and a Record of Decision, DOE 
    will prepare additional project-specific NEPA documents as appropriate.
        During February 1996, public scoping meetings were held in Paducah, 
    Kentucky; Piketon, Ohio; and Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The draft PEIS 
    incorporates the public comments received during scoping.
        Copies of this PEIS and related documents prepared by DOE are 
    available at the following locations:
    
    Kentucky
    
    U.S. Department of Energy, Environmental Information Center, 175 
    Freedom Boulevard, Kevil, Kentucky 42053, 502-462-2550
    
    Ohio
    
    U.S. Department of Energy, Environmental Information Center, 105 West 
    Emmitt Avenue, Suite 3, Waverly, Ohio 45690, 614-947-5093
    
    Tennessee
    
    U.S. Department of Energy, Information Resource Center, 105 Broadway, 
    Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, 423-241-4582
    
    Tennessee
    
    U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Operations Office, Public Reading 
    Room, American Museum of Science and Energy, 300 South Tulane Avenue, 
    Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, 423-241-4780
    
    Washington, DC
    
    U.S. Department of Energy, Freedom of Information Reading Room, Room 
    1E-190, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585-0117, 
    202-586-3142.
    
    Alternatives Considered
    
        The draft PEIS evaluates alternative management strategies for the 
    depleted UF6 inventory, including a no action alternative. 
    These alternative management strategies are described briefly below:
         No Action Alternative:
    --Continued storage as depleted UF6 at the existing sites
    
         Long-Term Storage Alternatives:
    
    1--Storage at a consolidated site as depleted UF6
    2--Storage at a consolidated site after conversion to uranium oxide
    
         Use Alternatives:
    
    1--Use as radiation shielding after conversion to uranium metal
    2--Use as radiation shielding after conversion to uranium oxide
    
         Disposal Alternative:
    
    --Disposal after conversion to uranium oxide
    
         Preferred Alternative:
    
    --Use the entire inventory as either uranium oxide, uranium metal, or a 
    combination of both
    
    [[Page 7773]]
    
    Preferred Alternative
    
        DOE has identified a preferred alternative in the draft PEIS. This 
    preferred alternative does not represent a decision by DOE. The Record 
    of Decision, when issued after completion of the final PEIS, will 
    present DOE's decision for the long-term management of depleted 
    UF6.
        DOE's preferred alternative for the long-term management of 
    depleted UF6 is to use its entire inventory of material. 
    Some (potentially all) of the depleted UF6 would be used as 
    an oxide, some (potentially all) of it would be used as metal, and some 
    of it might be used in other DOE programs pursuant to other NEPA 
    reviews and decisions. This alternative would include continued storage 
    and safe, effective management of the cylinders prior to conversion, 
    conversion of the depleted UF6 into depleted uranium oxide 
    and/or depleted uranium metal, and fabrication of depleted uranium 
    products for uses by government and/or industry. The fluorine in the 
    UF6 would also be used. Potential uses for the depleted 
    uranium include radiation shielding in both the oxide and metal forms 
    and as metal in specialty markets, including industrial counterweights. 
    Current possibilities for use of fluorine include use in the nuclear 
    fuel cycle. The schedule and rate of conversion of the depleted 
    UF6 inventory into the oxide and/or metal forms would be 
    determined by market demand for the conversion products.
    
    Subsequent Document Preparation
    
        DOE intends to prepare a response to comments received during the 
    review of the draft PEIS and to complete the final PEIS in 1998. The 
    availability of the final PEIS will be announced in the Federal 
    Register. Additional NEPA analyses, as appropriate, will be prepared 
    once a long-term depleted UF6 management strategy has been 
    selected and announced in a Record of Decision.
    
        Issued in Washington, D.C., February 6, 1998.
    Terry R. Lash,
    Director, Office of Nuclear Energy, Science and Technology.
    [FR Doc. 98-3845 Filed 2-13-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/17/1998
Department:
Energy Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of availability.
Document Number:
98-3845
Dates:
To ensure consideration, comments should be transmitted or postmarked by April 23, 1998. Comments submitted after that date will be considered to the extent practicable.
Pages:
7771-7773 (3 pages)
PDF File:
98-3845.pdf