99-3526. Approval of the Clean Air Act, Section 112(l), Delegation of Authority to Three Local Air Agencies in Washington; Correction and Clarification  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 7793-7794]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-3526]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    
    40 CFR Parts 61 and 63
    
    [FRL-6233-6]
    
    
    Approval of the Clean Air Act, Section 112(l), Delegation of 
    Authority to Three Local Air Agencies in Washington; Correction and 
    Clarification
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Direct final rule and delegation of authority; correction and 
    clarification.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This action provides a correction and clarification to a 
    direct final Federal Register action published on December 1, 1998 (see 
    63 FR 66054), that granted Clean Air Act, section 112(l), delegation of 
    authority for three local air agencies in Washington to implement and 
    enforce specific 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 federal National Emission 
    Standards for the Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) regulations which 
    have been adopted into local law. This action corrects several 
    typographical errors in the EPA Action section of the preamble of the 
    December 1, 1998, direct final rule, and also clarifies the extent of 
    that delegation with respect to Indian country.
    
    DATES: This action is effective on February 17, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of the requests for delegation and other supporting 
    documentation are available for public inspection at the following 
    location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region X, Office of Air 
    Quality (OAQ-107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Wullenweber, US EPA, Region X 
    (OAQ-107), 1200 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, (206) 553-8760.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I Administrative Requirements
    
        Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review 
    (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ``significant 
    regulatory action'' and is therefore, not subject to review by the 
    Office of Management and Budget. In addition, this action does not 
    impose any enforceable duty, contain any unfunded mandate, or impose 
    any significant or unique impact on small governments as described in 
    the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4). This rule 
    also does not require prior consultation with State, local, and tribal 
    government officials as specified by Executive Order 12875 (58 FR 
    58093, October 28, 1993) or Executive Order 13084 (63 FR 27655, May 10, 
    1998), or involve special consideration of environmental justice 
    related issues as required by Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, 
    February 16, 1994). Because this action is not subject to notice-and-
    comment requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any 
    other statute, it is not subject to the regulatory flexibility 
    provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 
    This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
    April 23, 1997), entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental 
    Health Risks and Safety Risks,'' because EPA interprets E.O. 13045 as 
    applying only to those regulatory actions that are based on health or 
    safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of 
    the Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This rule is 
    not subject to E.O. 13045 because it does not establish an 
    environmental standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks.
        The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
    Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
    provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
    the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
    to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
    United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
    required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
    Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
    to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This rule is not a 
    ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
        Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
    of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
    the appropriate circuit by April 19, 1999. Filing a petition for 
    reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
    the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
    it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
    filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
    This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
    requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
    
    II Clarification
    
        On December 1, 1998, EPA promulgated direct final approval of the 
    Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) request, on behalf of three 
    local air agencies, for program approval and delegation of authority to 
    implement and enforce specific 40 CFR parts 61 and 63 federal NESHAP 
    regulations which have been adopted into local law (as apply to both 
    Part 70 and non-Part 70 sources). The three local air agencies that 
    will be implementing and enforcing these regulations are: the Northwest 
    Air Pollution Authority (NWAPA); the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control 
    Agency (PSAPCA); and the Southwest Air Pollution Control Authority 
    (SWAPCA). In the direct final rule and delegation of authority, an 
    explanation of the applicability of that action to sources and 
    activities located in Indian country was inadvertently omitted. 
    Beginning on page 66054, in the issue of Tuesday, December 1, 1998, 
    make the following correction, in the EPA Action section of the 
    preamble, at the end of the Delegation of Specific Standards 
    subsection. On page 66057, in the second column, after the first 
    paragraph, add the following statement:
        ``The delegation approved by this rule for NWAPA, PSAPCA, and 
    SWAPCA to implement and enforce NESHAPs does not extend to sources or 
    activities located in Indian country, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 1151. 
    Consistent with previous federal program approvals or delegations, EPA 
    will continue to implement the NESHAPs in Indian country because the 
    local air agencies did not adequately demonstrate their authority over 
    sources and activities located within the exterior boundaries of Indian 
    reservations and other areas in Indian country.
        ``The one exception to this limitation is within the boundaries of 
    the Puyallup Indian Reservation, also known as the 1873 Survey Area. 
    Under the Puyallup Tribe of Indians Settlement Act of 1989, 25 U.S.C. 
    1773, Congress explicitly provided state and local agencies, such as 
    PSAPCA, authority over activities on non-trust lands within the 1873 
    Survey Area. After consulting with the Puyallup Tribe of Indians, EPA's 
    delegation in this rule applies to sources and activities on non-trust 
    lands within the 1873 Survey Area. Therefore, PSAPCA will implement and 
    enforce
    
    [[Page 7794]]
    
    the NESHAPs on these non-trust lands within the 1873 Survey Area.''
    
    III. Correction
    
        In the December 1, 1998, direct final rule and delegation of 
    authority for the three local air pollution control agencies in 
    Washington, there were several minor typographical errors in the EPA 
    Action section of the preamble, in the Delegation of Specific Standards 
    subsection. Beginning on page 66054, in the issue of Tuesday, December 
    1, 1998, make the following corrections:
        On page 66056, in the second column, in the last paragraph, in the 
    eighth line; in the third column, in the first line under the table; 
    and on page 66057, in the first column, in the last paragraph, in the 
    eleventh line, ``63.6(I)(1)'' should read ``63.6(i)(1)''. On page 66056 
    in footnote number three, in the first line, ``112(I)(1) and (3)'' 
    should read, ``112(i)(1) and (3)''. On page 66057, in the first column, 
    in the last paragraph, in the eighteenth line, ``(63.7(e)(2)(I))'' 
    should read, ``(63.7(e)(2)(i))'.
    
    List of Subjects
    
    40 CFR Part 61
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Arsenic, Asbestos, 
    Benzene, Beryllium, Hazardous substances, Mercury, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements, Vinyl Chloride.
    
    40 CFR Part 63
    
        Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous 
    substances, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: February 1, 1999.
    Chuck Clarke,
    Regional Administrator, Region X.
    [FR Doc. 99-3526 Filed 2-16-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/17/1999
Published:
02/17/1999
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Direct final rule and delegation of authority; correction and clarification.
Document Number:
99-3526
Dates:
This action is effective on February 17, 1999.
Pages:
7793-7794 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FRL-6233-6
PDF File:
99-3526.pdf
CFR: (2)
40 CFR 61
40 CFR 63