99-3760. Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Air Travel; Compensation for Damage to Wheelchairs and Other Assistive Devices  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 7833-7834]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-3760]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    14 CFR Part 382
    
    [Docket OST-99-5099; Notice No: 99-2]
    RIN 2105-AC77
    
    
    Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Air Travel; 
    Compensation for Damage to Wheelchairs and Other Assistive Devices
    
    AGENCY: Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary.
    
    ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department is proposing to amend its rules implementing 
    the Air Carrier Access Act of 1986 to lift an existing cap on the 
    amount of compensation airlines would have to pay to passengers for 
    loss or damage of their wheelchair users and other assistive devices. 
    The proposal is intended to provide additional relief to passengers 
    using expensive assistive devices when they are destroyed or seriously 
    damaged in the course of airline travel.
    
    DATES: Comments are requested by May 18, 1999. Late-filed comments will 
    be considered to the extent practicable.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments should be sent, preferably in triplicate, to Docket 
    Clerk, Docket No. OST-99-5099, Department of Transportation, 400 7th 
    Street, S.W., Room PL-401, Washington, D.C., 20590. Comments will be 
    available for inspection at this address from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., 
    Monday through Friday, and are also viewable through the dockets link 
    on the Department's web site (www.dot.gov). Commenters who wish the 
    receipt of their comments to be acknowledged should include a stamped, 
    self-addressed postcard with their comments. The Docket Clerk will 
    date-stamp the postcard and mail it back to the commenter.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert C. Ashby, Deputy Assistant 
    General Counsel for Regulation and Enforcement, Department of 
    Transportation, 400 7th Street, S.W., Room 10424, Washington, D.C., 
    20590. (202) 366-9306 (voice); (202) 755-7687 (TDD); 202-366-9313 
    (fax); bob.ashby@ost.dot.gov (e-mail).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This NPRM concerns the issue of compensation 
    for loss of or damage to wheelchairs or other assistive devices. The 
    current regulation provides that
    
        With respect to domestic flights, carriers shall not limit 
    liability for loss, damage or delay concerning wheelchairs or other 
    mobility aids to any amount less than twice the liability limits 
    established for passengers' luggage under 14 CFR Part 254. (14 CFR 
    Sec. 382.43(b)).
    
    This means that carriers can refuse to pay compensation exceeding 
    $2,500 for loss of or damage to wheelchairs or other assistive devices, 
    given the present $1,250 liability limit for luggage that Part 254 
    permits carriers to impose in domestic transportation. People with 
    disabilities have complained that this does not provide adequate 
    compensation for the loss of or serious damage to expensive equipment, 
    such as power wheelchairs that may cost $15,000 or more. Given that a 
    passenger whose wheelchair is lost or seriously damaged will lose his 
    or her mobility at the destination, people with disabilities believe 
    that the Department should require airlines to do more, such as pay 
    full compensation for the loss and make repair or loaner service 
    available.
        The Department considered this issue in the original Air Carrier 
    Access Act (ACAA) rulemaking (see 55 FR 8038; March 6, 1990). In 
    response to similar disability group comments at that time, the 
    Department responded that requiring carriers to pay full replacement 
    value did not sufficiently recognize the ability of passengers to 
    purchase insurance for such expensive items. Consequently, the final 
    rule permitted airlines to cap their liability at twice the liability 
    limit for general baggage.
        Nevertheless, the Department believes it may be useful to reopen 
    the issue at this time. The Department believes, based on anecdotal 
    information, that the majority of wheelchairs used in air travel are 
    manual wheelchairs, many of which cost less than $2500. However, other 
    travelers use power wheelchairs, which typically are stowed in checked 
    baggage and many of which, if lost, damaged, or destroyed, could cost 
    substantially more than $2500 to repair or replace (e.g., over $13,000 
    in one recent case brought to our attention). Consequently, there may 
    be relatively few instances of wheelchair loss or damage that would be 
    affected by the proposed rule change, limiting cost exposure to 
    airlines. However, the proposed rule would mitigate the potentially 
    severe financial hardship to individuals whose expensive wheelchairs 
    are lost or damaged. We seek comment on need for raising or eliminating 
    the current cap on carrier liability for damage to wheelchairs.
        We also seek comment on whether additional regulatory guidance is 
    necessary on how compensation should be calculated (e.g., depreciated 
    value vs. replacement cost). In addition, the Department seeks comment 
    on whether it is desirable and practical to include other requirements, 
    such as a requirement that airlines provide a ``loaner'' device or 
    ensure the repair of wheelchairs or other assistive devices that have 
    been damaged in transit. This NPRM is intended to be a vehicle for 
    comment on all these issues. The Department has not determined what, if 
    any, changes to make in its rules.
        In connection with this NPRM, we request that interested parties, 
    including disability groups and airlines, provide information on the 
    following points, which will help us to evaluate the necessity for 
    rulemaking and the potential costs of a rule:
        (1) The number of domestic passenger complaints (including letters 
    of phone calls, ``Mishandled Baggage Reports,''
    
    [[Page 7834]]
    
    and claims for compensation) about lost, damaged, or destroyed 
    wheelchairs or other assistive devices;
        (2) The number of such complaints in which passengers assert that 
    their monetary loss (e.g., the cost of repair or replacement) would 
    exceed $2500;
        (3) The average amount by which assertions of passengers' monetary 
    losses exceeded $2500; and
        (4) The availability and cost of insurance for expensive 
    wheelchairs and other assistive devices.
        We also seek information about the need, design, costs, and 
    logistics of a ``loaner'' system.
    
    Regulatory Analyses and Notices
    
        This NPRM does not propose a significant rule under Executive Order 
    12866 or a significant rule under the Department's Regulatory Policies 
    and Procedures. The Department does not currently have data allowing it 
    to estimate the probable cost of the rule. The preamble asks for data 
    that, if provided, should allow the Department to make a reasonable 
    estimate of the costs of any final rule based on this proposal.
        The Department certifies that this rule, if adopted, would not have 
    a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small 
    entities. The basis for this statement is the probability that the 
    overall national annual costs would not be great. Nevertheless, the 
    Department seeks comment on whether there are impacts on small entities 
    the Department should consider, and what those impacts are. If comments 
    provide information that there are significant small entity impacts, 
    the Department will provide a regulatory flexibility analysis at the 
    final rule stage. The Department does not believe that there would be 
    sufficient Federalism impacts to warrant the preparation of a 
    Federalism Assessment.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 382
    
        Aviation, Individuals with disabilities.
    
        Issued this 8th day of February, 1999, at Washington, D.C.
    Rodney E. Slater,
    Secretary of Transportation.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department proposes 
    to amend 14 CFR part 382 as follows:
        1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 382 is proposed to 
    continue to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 41702, 41705, and 41712.
    
        2. In Sec. 382.43, paragraph (b) is proposed to be revised to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 382.43  Treatment of mobility aids and assistive devices.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) With respect to domestic transportation, the baggage liability 
    limits of 14 CFR part 254 do not apply to liability for loss, damage, 
    or delay concerning wheelchairs or other asssistive devices.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 99-3760 Filed 2-16-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-62-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/17/1999
Department:
Transportation Department
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
Document Number:
99-3760
Dates:
Comments are requested by May 18, 1999. Late-filed comments will be considered to the extent practicable.
Pages:
7833-7834 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket OST-99-5099, Notice No: 99-2
RINs:
2105-AC77: Compensation for Damage of Expensive Mobility Aids in Air Travel
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2105-AC77/compensation-for-damage-of-expensive-mobility-aids-in-air-travel
PDF File:
99-3760.pdf
CFR: (2)
14 CFR 382.43(b))
14 CFR 382.43