99-3777. Draft Guidance for Industry on Waiver of In Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Containing Certain Active Moieties/Active Ingredients Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 31 (Wednesday, February 17, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 7897-7898]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-3777]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    [Docket No. 99D-0121]
    
    
    Draft Guidance for Industry on Waiver of In Vivo Bioavailability 
    and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage 
    Forms Containing Certain Active Moieties/Active Ingredients Based on a 
    Biopharmaceutics Classification System; Availability
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
    availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Waiver of In 
    Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate Release 
    Solid Oral Dosage Forms Containing Certain Active Moieties/Active 
    Ingredients Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System.'' When 
    final, the guidance will provide recommendations to sponsors of 
    investigational new drug applications (IND's) and applicants submitting 
    new drug applications (NDA's), and abbreviated new drug applications 
    (ANDA's) who intend to perform bioavailability and bioequivalence (BA/
    BE) studies for immediate release solid oral products during either the 
    preapproval or postapproval periods.
    
    DATES: Written comments on the draft guidance document may be submitted 
    by April 19, 1999. General comments on the agency guidance documents 
    are welcome at any time.
    
    ADDRESSES: Copies of this draft guidance for industry are available on 
    the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm. Submit 
    written requests for single copy of the draft guidance for industry 
    entitled ``Waiver of In Vivo Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies 
    for Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms Containing Certain Active 
    Moieties/Active Ingredients Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification 
    System'' to the Drug Information Branch (HFD-210), Center for Drug 
    Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers 
    Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to 
    assist that office in processing your requests. Submit written comments 
    on the draft guidance to the Dockets Management Branch (HFA-305), Food 
    and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 
    20852.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ajaz S. Hussain, Center for Drug 
    Evaluation and Research (HFD-940), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
    Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-5927.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the availability of a 
    draft guidance for industry entitled ``Waiver of In Vivo 
    Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies for Immediate Release Solid 
    Oral Dosage Forms Containing Certain Active Moieties/Active Ingredients 
    Based on a Biopharmaceutics Classification System.'' When it becomes 
    final, this guidance for industry will provide recommendations on when 
    in vivo BA/BE studies may be waived for NDA's and ANDA's submitted to 
    the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research during either the 
    preapproval or postapproval period.
         In 1974, the Office of Technology Assessment's Drug Bioequivalence 
    Study Panel made eleven recommendations, one of which stated:
         It is neither feasible nor desirable that studies of 
    bioavailability be conducted for all drugs or drug products. Certain 
    classes of drugs for which evidence of bioequivalence is critical 
    should be identified. Selection of these classes of drugs should be 
    based on clinical importance, ratios of therapeutic to toxic 
    concentrations in blood, and certain pharmaceutical characteristics.
    Based on this and other recommendations of the panel, FDA proposed and 
    finalized regulations in 1977 entitled ``Bioequivalence Requirements 
    and In Vivo Bioavailability Procedures'' (42 FR 1624, January 7, 1977). 
    In these regulations, now at 21 CFR 320.33, under the title ``Criteria 
    and Evidence to
    
    [[Page 7898]]
    
    Assess Actual or Potential Bioequivalence Problems,'' FDA provided 
    criteria to assess actual or potential BE problems. Drug products 
    meeting these criteria were deemed ``bioproblem'' drug products, with 
    the understanding that other drug products would be able to document 
    BA/BE through in vitro studies. FDA applied these criteria to decide 
    whether a Drug Efficacy Study Implementation (DESI) effective drug 
    could demonstrate bioequivalence through in vitro studies alone, or 
    whether a combination of in vivo and in vitro approaches were required. 
    The list of DESI effective bioproblem drug products appeared in 
    Sec. 320.22 (21 CFR 320.22) (1992). Beginning in 1979, DESI effective 
    oral immediate release drug products that were not considered to 
    contain bioproblem drugs were allowed to document BE via in vitro 
    studies and achieved an AA rating in FDA's ``Approved Drug Products 
    with Therapeutic Equivalence Ratings'' (the Orange Book). In a 1981 
    document (46 FR 27396, May 19, 1981), FDA instituted a policy termed 
    the ``paper NDA policy,'' which provided for approval of some duplicate 
    versions of post-1962 drugs. As part of this policy, FDA required 
    demonstration of in vivo BE for all duplicate post-1962 nonsolution 
    drug products, including locally acting drug products, prior to 
    approval for marketing. With the passage of the Drug Price Competition 
    and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 (Waxman-Hatch), this general 
    approach was recommended for all post-1962 nonsolution drug products 
    (54 FR 28872 at 28882 through 28883, July 10, 1989).
         Although the approach to require in vivo documentation of BA/BE 
    for many drug products, both pre- and post-1962, has been generally 
    followed, FDA has in some cases allowed in vitro methods for 
    documenting BA/BE even for post-1962 drug products. Furthermore, as 
    noted both at Sec. 320.22 ``Criteria for Waiver of Evidence of In Vivo 
    Bioavailability or Bioequivalence'' and at 21 CFR 320.24 ``Types of 
    Evidence to Establish Bioavailability or Bioequivalence,'' many options 
    exist to allow waivers of in vivo documentation of BA/BE and to 
    demonstrate BA/BE through in vitro methodology. The draft guidance 
    describes when waivers of in vivo BA/BE studies will be allowed under 
    specified circumstances depending on the solubility, intestinal 
    permeability, and dissolution characteristics of the drug substance and 
    the drug product and based on the biopharmaceutic classification 
    system.
         To further justify the objective of reducing regulatory burden 
    while maintaining adequate documentation of BA/BE, FDA encourages the 
    submission of data that support or refute the recommendations in the 
    guidance, specifically the submission of in vivo and in vitro data that 
    document bioinequivalence of pharmaceutically equivalent immediate 
    release products that are rapidly dissolving, and contain a highly 
    permeable, and highly soluble drug.
         Following receipt of public comments on this draft guidance, FDA 
    intends to discuss the draft guidance before a meeting of the Advisory 
    Committee for Pharmaceutical Science. After receipt of the public 
    comments, the advisory committee deliberation, and further discussion 
    within the agency, the guidance document will be finalized. FDA does 
    not recommend that any provisions of the draft guidance be implemented 
    at this time.
         This draft level 1 guidance document is being issued consistent 
    with FDA's good guidance practices (62 FR 8961, February 27, 1997). It 
    represents the agency's current thinking on BA/BE approaches for 
    immediate release solid oral products. It does not create or confer any 
    rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the 
    public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies 
    the requirements of the applicable statute, regulations, or both.
         Interested persons may submit written comments on the draft 
    guidance to the Dockets Management Branch (address above). Two copies 
    of any comments are to be submitted, except that individuals may submit 
    one copy. Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in 
    brackets in the heading of this document. The draft guidance and 
    received comments are available for public examination in the Dockets 
    Management Branch between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
        Dated: February 10, 1999.
     William K. Hubbard,
     Associate Commissioner for Policy Coordination.
    [FR Doc. 99-3777 Filed 2-16-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/17/1999
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
99-3777
Dates:
Written comments on the draft guidance document may be submitted by April 19, 1999. General comments on the agency guidance documents are welcome at any time.
Pages:
7897-7898 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 99D-0121
PDF File:
99-3777.pdf