97-3932. Zeneca Ag Products; Pesticide Tolerance Petition Filing  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 33 (Wednesday, February 19, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 7454-7456]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-3932]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
    [PF-699; FRL-5585-5]
    
    
    Zeneca Ag Products; Pesticide Tolerance Petition Filing
    
    AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    
    ACTION: Notice of filing.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces the filing of a pesticide petition 
    proposing the establishment of a regulation for residues of lambda-
    cyhalothrin and its epimer in or on rice. The names for lambda-
    cyhalothrin and its epimer are as follows: lambda-cyhalothrin, a 1:1 
    mixture of (S)-alpha-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-(Z)-(1R,3R)-3-(2-chloro-
    3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and 
    (R)-alpha-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-(Z)-(1S,3S)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-
    trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate. Epimer of 
    lambda-cyhalothrin, a 1:1 mixture of (S)-alpha-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-
    (Z)(1S,3S)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-
    dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate and (R)-alpha-cyano-3-phenoxybenzyl-
    (Z)-(1R,3R)-3-(2-chloro-3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-enyl)-2,2-
    dimethylcyclopropanecarboxylate. The summary was prepared by the 
    petitioner, Zeneca Ag Products.
    
    DATES: Comments, identified by the docket control number [PF-699], must 
    be received on or before March 21, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written comments to: Public Response and 
    Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of 
    Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., 
    Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to: Crystal Mall #2, 
    Room 1132, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington VA.
        Comments and data may also be submitted electronically by sending 
    electronic mail (e-mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov. Electronic 
    comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the use of special 
    characters and any form of encryption. Comments and data will also be 
    accepted on disks in WordPerfect in 5.1 file format or ASCII file 
    format. All comments and data in electronic form must be identified by 
    the docket control number [PF-699]. Electronic comments on this notice 
    may be filed online at many Federal Depository Libraries. Additional 
    information on electronic submissions can be found in Unit II. of this 
    document.
        Information submitted as a comment concerning this notice may be 
    claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as 
    ``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI). CBI should not be 
    submitted through e-mail. Information marked as CBI will not be 
    disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 
    2. A copy of the comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted 
    for inclusion in the public record. Information not marked confidential 
    may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written 
    comments will be available for public inspection in Room 1132 at the 
    address given above, from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    excluding legal holidays.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail, George LaRocca, Product 
    Manager, (PM 13), Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, 
    Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. 
    Office location, telephone number, and e-mail address: Crystal Mall #2, 
    1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA, 703-305-6100, e-mail: 
    larocca.george@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has received a pesticide petition (PP-
    6F4769) from Zeneca Ag Products, 1800 Concord Pike, P.O. Box 15458, 
    Wilmington, DE 19850-5458. The petition proposes, pursuant to section 
    408 of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 
    346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180 to establish tolerances for residues 
    of the insecticide lambda-cyhalothrin in or on the raw agricultural 
    commodities rice
    
    [[Page 7455]]
    
    grain at 1.0 parts per million (ppm), rice straw at 1.75 ppm, and in or 
    on the processed commodity rice hulls at 5.0 ppm. EPA has determined 
    that the petition contains data or information regarding the elements 
    set forth in section 408(d)(2) of the FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully 
    evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether 
    the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data may be 
    needed before EPA rules on the petition. EPA has determined the 
    proposed analytical method is gas liquid chromatography with an 
    electron capture detector. As required by section 408(d) of the FFDCA, 
    as recently amended by the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) Pub. L. 
    104-170, Zeneca Ag Products (Zeneca) included in the petition a summary 
    of the petition and authorization for the summary to be published in 
    the Federal Register in a notice of receipt of the petition. The 
    summary represents the views of Zeneca; EPA as mentioned above, is in 
    the process of evaluating the petition. As required by section 
    408(d)(3) of the FFDCA, EPA is including the summary as a part of this 
    notice of filing. EPA may have made edits to the summary for the 
    purpose of clarity.
    
    I. Petiton Summary
    
    A. Residue Chemistry
    
        1. Plant metabolism. The metabolism of lambda-cyhalothrin has been 
    studied in cotton, soybean, cabbage, and wheat plants. The studies show 
    that the metabolism generally follows that of other pyrethroid 
    insecticides. The ester linkage is cleaved to form 
    cyclopropanecarboxylic acids and the corresponding phenoxybenzyl 
    alcohol. Overall the studies show that unchanged lambda-cyhalothrin is 
    the principal constituent of the residue on edible portions of these 
    crops.
        2. Analytical method. An adequate analytical method (gas liquid 
    chromatography with an electron capture detector) is available for 
    enforcement purposes.
        3. Magnitude of residues. Sixteen field trials were carried out on 
    rice during 1995 in the United States. The trials were conducted in the 
    states of Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, Texas, and 
    California. These states account for 100% of the production acres of 
    rice in the United States. The number and geographical distribution of 
    the trials agrees with the recommendation given in the ``EPA Residue 
    Chemistry Guidance'' (1994). In these trials, the maximum combined 
    residues of lambda-cyhalothrin and epimer were 0.88 ppm in or on rice 
    grain and 1.62 ppm in or on rice straw. In addition, a single field 
    trial was conducted during 1995 in the States of Mississippi and 
    Arkansas for the purpose of determining if lambda-cyhalothrin residues 
    in rice, concentrate in or on processed rice fractions. Data from these 
    trials demonstrated that residues of lambda-cyhalothrin may concentrate 
    up to 6.1 times in or on rice hulls but do not concentrate in rice bran 
    or polished rice.
    
    B. Toxicological Profile
    
        The following toxicity studies have been conducted to support the 
    request for a regulation for residues of lambda-cyhalothrin in or on 
    rice.
        1. Acute toxicity. Acute toxicity studies with the technical grade 
    of the active ingredient lambda-cyahothrin: oral LD50 in the rat 
    of 79 milligram/kilogram (mg/kg) (males) and 56 mg/kg (females), dermal 
    LD50 in the rat of 632 mg/kg (males) and 696 mg/kg females, 
    primary eye irritation study showed mild irritation, and primary dermal 
    irritation study showed no irritation.
        2. Genotoxicity. The following genotoxicity tests were all 
    negative: a gene mutation assay (Ames), a mouse micronucleus assay, an 
    in vitro cytogenetics assay, and a gene mutation study in mouse 
    lymphoma cells.
        3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. i. A three-generation 
    reproduction study in rats fed diets containing 0, 10, 30, and 100 ppm 
    with no developmental toxicity observed at 100 ppm, the highest dose 
    tested. The maternal no observed effect level (NOEL) and lowest 
    observed effect level (LOEL) for the study are established at 30 (1.5 
    mg/kg/day) and 100 ppm (5 mg/kg/day), respectively, based upon 
    decreased parental body weight gain. The reproductive NOEL and LOEL are 
    established at 30 (1.5 mg/kg/day) and 100 ppm (5 mg/kg/day), 
    respectively, based on decreased pup weight gain during weaning.
        ii. A developmental toxicity study in rats given gavage doses of 0, 
    5, 10, and 15 mg/kg/day with no developmental toxicity observed under 
    the conditions of the study. The developmental NOEL is greater than 15 
    mg/kg/day, the highest dose tested. The maternal NOEL and LOEL are 
    established at 10 and 15 mg/kg/day, respectively, based on reduced body 
    weight gain.
        iii. A developmental toxicity study in rabbits given gavage doses 
    of 0, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg/day with no developmental toxicity observed 
    under the conditions of the study. The maternal NOEL and LOEL are 
    established at 10 and 30 mg/kg/day, respectively, based on decreased 
    body weight gain. The developmental NOEL is greater than 30 mg/kg/day, 
    the highest dose tested.
        4. Subchronic toxicity. i. A 90-day feeding study in rats fed doses 
    of 0, 10, 50, and 250 ppm with a NOEL of 50 ppm and a LOEL of 250 ppm 
    based on body weight gain reduction.
        ii. A 21-day study in rabbits exposed dermally to doses of 0, 10, 
    100, and 1,000 mg/kg/day, 6 hours/day, 5 days/week with a systemic NOEL 
    >1,000 mg/kg/kg. There were no clinical signs of systemic toxicity at 
    any dose level tested.
        5. Chronic toxicity. i. A 12-month feeding study in dogs fed dose 
    (by capsule) levels of 0, 0.1, 0.5, and 3.5 mg/kg/day with a NOEL of 
    0.1 mg/kg/day. The LOEL for this study is established at 0.5 mg/kg/day 
    based upon clinical signs of neurotoxicity.
        ii. A 24-month chronic feeding/carcinogenicity study with rats fed 
    diets containing 0, 10, 50, and 250 ppm. The NOEL was established at 50 
    ppm and LOEL at 250 ppm based on reduced body weight gain. There were 
    no carcinogenic effects observed under the conditions of the study.
        iii. A carcinogenicity study in mice fed dose levels of 0, 20, 100, 
    or 500 ppm (0, 3, 15, or 75 mg/kg/day) in the diet for 2 years. A 
    systemic NOEL was established at 100 ppm and systemic LOEL at 500 ppm 
    based on decreased body weight gain in males throughout the study at 
    500 ppm. The Agency has classified lambda-cyhalothrin as a Group D 
    carcinogen (not classifiable due to an equivocal finding in this 
    study). Zeneca concludes that no treatment-related carcinogenic effects 
    were observed under the conditions of the study.
        6. Animal metabolism. Metabolism studies in rats demonstrated that 
    distribution patterns and excretion rates in multiple oral dose studies 
    are similar to single-dose studies. There is an accumulation of 
    unchanged compound in fat upon chronic administration with slow 
    elimination. Otherwise, lambda-cyhalothrin was rapidly metabolized and 
    excreted. The metabolism of lambda-cyhalothrin in livestock has been 
    studied in the goat, chicken, and cow. Unchanged lambda-cyhalothrin is 
    the major residue component of toxicological concern in meat and milk.
        7. Metabolite toxicology. The Agency has previously determined that 
    the metabolites of lambda-cyhalothrin are not of toxicological concern 
    and need not be included in the tolerance expression. Given this 
    determination, Zeneca concludes that there is no need to discuss 
    metabolite toxicity.
    
    [[Page 7456]]
    
    C. Aggregate Exposure
    
        1. Dietary exposure-- i. Food. For the purposes of assessing the 
    potential dietary exposure for all existing and pending tolerances for 
    lambda-cyhalothrin, Zeneca has utilized available information on 
    anticipated residues and percent crop treated. For all existing and 
    pending tolerances the anticipated residue contribution (ARC) is 
    estimated at 0.0002682 mg/kg/body weight (bwt)/day.
        ii. Drinking water. Laboratory and field data have demonstrated 
    that lambda-cyhalothrin and its degradates are immobile in soil and 
    will not leach into groundwater. Other data show that lambda-
    cyhalothrin is virtually insoluble in water and extremely lipophilic. 
    As a result, Zeneca concludes that residues reaching surface waters 
    from field runoff will quickly adsorb to sediment particles and be 
    partitioned from the water column. Zeneca concludes that together these 
    data indicate that residues are not expected in drinking water.
        2. Non-dietary exposure. Other potential sources of exposure are 
    from non-occupational sources such as structural pest control and 
    ornamental plant and lawn use of lambda-cyhalothrin. Zeneca has no data 
    upon which to estimate exposure from these uses. However, given the 
    extremely low vapor pressure of lambda-cyhalothrin (1.5 x 10-9 
    millimeters (mm) of mercury (Hg)) and the low use rates, it is 
    anticipated that inhalation and dermal exposure from these uses Zeneca 
    concludes will be insignificant.
    
    D. Cumulative Effects
    
        At this time, Zeneca cannot make a determination based on available 
    and reliable information that lambda-cyhalothrin and other substances 
    that may have a common mechanism of toxicity would have cumulative 
    effects. Thus, Zeneca concludes that for purposes of this tolerance it 
    is appropriate only to consider the potential risks of lambda-
    cyhalothrin in an aggregate exposure assessment.
    
    E. Safety Determination
    
        The acceptable reference dose (RfD) based on a NOEL of 0.1 mg/kg/
    bwt/day from the chronic dog study and a safety factor of 100 is 0.001 
    mg/kg/bwt/day. A chronic dietary exposure/risk assessment has been 
    performed for lambda-cyhalothrin using the above RfD. Available 
    information on anticipated residues and percent crop treated was 
    incorporated into the analysis to estimate the ARC. The ARC is 
    generally considered a more realistic estimate than an estimate based 
    on tolerance level residues.
        1. U.S. population. The ARC from established tolerances and the 
    current and pending actions are estimated to be 0.0002682 mg/kg/bwt/day 
    and utilize 26.82% of the RfD for the U.S. population.
        2. Infants and children. The ARC for children, aged 1 to 6 years 
    old, and non-nursing infants (subgroups most highly exposed) utilizes 
    57% and 65% of the RfD, respectively. Generally speaking, the Agency 
    has no cause for concern if ARC for all published and proposed 
    tolerances is less than the RfD.
    
    F. International Tolerances
    
        There are no Codex maximum residue levels (MRL) established for 
    residues of lambda-cyhalothrin in or on rice.
    
    II. Public Record
    
        EPA invites interested persons to submit comments on this notice of 
    filing. Comments must bear a notification indicating the docket control 
    number [PF-699].
        A record has been established for this notice under docket control 
    number [PF-699] (including comments and data submitted electronically 
    as described below). A public version of this record, including 
    printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does not include 
    any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection from 8:30 
    a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
    public record is located in Room 1132 of the Public Response and 
    Program Resources Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Crystal Mall 
    #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
        Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
        opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov.
    
    
        Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the 
    use of special characters and any form of encryption. The official 
    record for this notice, as well as the public version, as described 
    above will be kept in paper form. Accordingly, EPA will transfer all 
    comments received electronically into printed, paper form as they are 
    received and will place the paper copies in the official record which 
    will also include all comments submitted directly in writing.
        The official record is the paper record maintained at the address 
    in ``ADDRESSES'' at the beginning of this notice.
    
     List of Subjects
    
        Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
    Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
    recordkeeping requirements.
    
        Dated: February 6, 1997.
    
    Peter Caulkins,
    Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
    [FR Doc. 97-3932 Filed 2-18-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/19/1997
Department:
Environmental Protection Agency
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of filing.
Document Number:
97-3932
Dates:
Comments, identified by the docket control number [PF-699], must be received on or before March 21, 1997.
Pages:
7454-7456 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
PF-699, FRL-5585-5
PDF File:
97-3932.pdf