98-4227. Medicare Program; Update of Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Rates Effective for Services on or After October 1, 1997  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 33 (Thursday, February 19, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 8462-8465]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-4227]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Health Care Financing Administration
    [HCFA-1897-N]
    
    
    Medicare Program; Update of Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment 
    Rates Effective for Services on or After October 1, 1997
    
    AGENCY: Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA), HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This notice announces the update of Ambulatory Surgical Center 
    payment rates effective for services on or after October 1, 1997. It 
    implements section 1833(i)(2)(C) of the Social Security Act, which 
    mandates an inflation adjustment to Medicare payment amounts for 
    ambulatory surgical center (ASC) facility services during the years 
    when the payment amounts are not updated based on a survey of the 
    actual audited costs incurred by ASCs.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: The payment rates contained in this notice are 
    effective for services furnished on or after October 1, 1997.
        Copies: To order copies of the Federal Register containing this 
    document, send your request to: New Orders, Superintendent of 
    Documents, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954. Specify the date 
    of the issue requested and enclose a check or money order payable to 
    the Superintendent of Documents, or enclose your Visa or Master Card 
    number and expiration date. Credit card orders can also be placed by 
    calling the order desk at (202) 512-1800 or by faxing to (202) 512-
    2250. The cost for each copy is $8. As an alternative, you can view and 
    photocopy the Federal Register document at most libraries designated as 
    Federal Depository Libraries and at many other public and academic 
    libraries throughout the country that receive the Federal Register.
        This Federal Register document is also available from the Federal 
    Register online database through GPO Access, a service of the U.S. 
    Government Printing Office. Free public access is available on a Wide 
    Area Information Server (WAIS) through the Internet and via 
    asynchronous dial-in. Internet users can access the database by using 
    the World Wide Web; the Superintendent of Documents home page address 
    is http://www.access.gpo.gov/su__docs/, by using local WAIS client 
    software, or by telnet to swais.access.gpo.gov, then login as guest (no 
    password required). Dial-in users should use communications software 
    and modem to call (202) 512-1661; type swais, then login as guest (no 
    password required).
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joan Haile Sanow, (410) 786-5723.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background and Legislative Authority
    
        Section 1832(a)(2)(F)(i) of the Social Security Act (the Act) 
    provides that benefits under the Medicare Supplementary Medical 
    Insurance (Part B) program include services furnished in connection 
    with those surgical procedures that, under section 1833(i)(1)(A) of the 
    Act, are specified by the Secretary and are performed on an inpatient 
    basis in a hospital but that also can be performed safely on an 
    ambulatory basis in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC), in a rural 
    primary care hospital, or in a hospital outpatient department. To 
    participate in the Medicare program as an ASC, a facility must meet the 
    standards specified under section 1832(a)(2)(F)(i) of the Act and the 
    basic requirements for ASCs set forth in our regulations at 42 CFR 
    416.25.
        Generally, there are two elements in the total charge for a 
    surgical procedure: A charge for the physician's professional services 
    for performing the procedure, and a charge for the facility's services 
    (for example, use of an operating room). Section 1833(i)(2)(A) of the 
    Act authorizes the Secretary to pay ASCs a prospectively determined 
    rate for facility services associated with covered surgical procedures. 
    ASC facility services are subject to the usual Medicare Part B 
    deductible and coinsurance requirements. Therefore, Medicare pays 
    participating ASCs 80 percent of the prospectively determined rate for 
    facility services, adjusted for regional wage variations. This rate is 
    intended to represent our estimate of a fair payment that takes into 
    account the costs incurred by ASCs generally in providing the services 
    that are furnished
    
    [[Page 8463]]
    
    in connection with performing the procedure. Currently, this rate is a 
    standard overhead amount that does not include physician fees and other 
    medical items and services (for example, durable medical equipment for 
    use in the patient's home) for which separate payment may be authorized 
    under other provisions of the Medicare program.
        We have grouped procedures into nine groups for purposes of ASC 
    payment rates. The ASC facility payment for all procedures in each 
    group is established at a single rate adjusted for geographic 
    variation. The rate is a standard overhead amount that covers the cost 
    of services such as nursing, supplies, equipment, and use of the 
    facility. (For an in-depth discussion of the methodology and rate-
    setting procedures, see our Federal Register notice published on 
    February 8, 1990, entitled ``Medicare Program; Revision of Ambulatory 
    Surgical Center Payment Rate Methodology'' (55 FR 4526).)
    
    Statutory Provisions
    
        Section 1833(i)(2)(A) of the Act requires the Secretary to review 
    and update standard overhead amounts annually. Section 
    1833(i)(2)(A)(ii) requires that the ASC facility payment rates result 
    in substantially lower Medicare expenditures than would have been paid 
    if the same procedure had been performed on an inpatient basis in a 
    hospital. Section 1833(i)(2)(A)(iii) requires that payment for 
    insertion of an intraocular lens (IOL) include an allowance for the IOL 
    that is reasonable and related to the cost of acquiring the class of 
    lens involved.
        Under section 1833(i)(3)(A), the aggregate payment to hospital 
    outpatient departments for covered ASC procedures is equal to the 
    lesser of the following two amounts:
         The amount paid for the same services that would be paid 
    to the hospital under section 1833(a)(2)(B) (that is, the lower of the 
    hospital's reasonable costs or customary charges less deductibles and 
    coinsurance).
         The amount determined under section 1833(i)(3)(B)(i) based 
    on a blend of the lower of the hospital's reasonable costs or customary 
    charges, less deductibles and coinsurance, and the amount that would be 
    paid to a free-standing ASC in the same area for the same procedures.
        Under section 1833(i)(3)(B)(i), the blend amount for a cost 
    reporting period is the sum of the hospital cost proportion and the ASC 
    cost proportion. Under section 1833(i)(3)(B)(ii), the hospital cost 
    proportion and the ASC cost proportion for portions of cost reporting 
    periods beginning on or after January 1, 1991 are 42 and 58 percent, 
    respectively.
        Section 13531 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 
    (OBRA 1993) (Public Law 103-66), enacted on August 10, 1993, prohibited 
    the Secretary from providing for any inflation update in the payment 
    amounts for ASCs determined under section 1833(i)(2) (A) and (B) of the 
    Act for fiscal years (FYs) 1994 and 1995. Section 13533 of OBRA 1993 
    reduced the amount of payment for an IOL inserted during or subsequent 
    to cataract surgery in an ASC on or after January 1, 1994, and before 
    January 1, 1999, to $150.
        Section 141(a)(1) of the Social Security Act Amendments of 1994 
    (SSAA 1994) (Pub. L. 103-432), enacted on October 31, 1994, amended 
    section 1833(i)(2)(A)(i) of the Act to require that, for the purpose of 
    estimating ASC payment amounts, the Secretary survey not later than 
    January 1, 1995, and every 5 years thereafter, the actual audited costs 
    incurred by ASCs, based upon a representative sample of procedures and 
    facilities.
        Section 141(a)(2) of SSAA 1994 added section 1833(i)(2)(C) to the 
    Act to provide that, beginning with FY 1996, there be an application of 
    an inflation adjustment during a fiscal year in which the Secretary 
    does not update ASC rates based on survey data of actual audited costs. 
    Section 1833(i)(2)(C) of the Act provides that ASC payment rates be 
    increased by the percentage increase in the consumer price index for 
    urban consumers (CPI-U), as estimated by the Secretary for the 12-month 
    period ending with the midpoint of the year involved, if the Secretary 
    has not updated rates during a fiscal year, beginning with FY 1996.
        Section 141(a)(3) of SSAA 1994 amended section 1833(i)(1) of the 
    Act to require the Secretary to consult with appropriate trade and 
    professional organizations in reviewing and updating the list of 
    Medicare-covered ASC procedures.
        Section 141(b) of SSAA 1994 requires the Secretary to establish a 
    process for reviewing the appropriateness of the payment amount 
    provided under section 1833(i)(2)(A)(iii) of the Act for IOLs with 
    respect to a class of new technology IOLs. A proposed rule entitled 
    ``Adjustment in Payment Amounts for New Technology Intraocular Lenses'' 
    (BPD-831-P) was published in the Federal Register on September 4, 1997 
    at 62 FR 46698.
        Section 4555 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Pub. L. 105-33) 
    (BBA) amends section 1833(i)(2)(C) of the Act to require, in each of 
    the FYs 1998 through 2002, that the CPI-U factor by which ASC rates are 
    to be adjusted be reduced (but not below zero) by 2.0 percentage 
    points.
    
    ASC Survey
    
        Regulations set forth at Sec. 416.140 (``Surveys'') require us to 
    survey a randomly selected sample of participating ASCs no more often 
    than once a year to collect data for analysis or reevaluation of 
    payment rates. In addition, section 1833(i)(2)(A)(i) of the Act 
    requires that, for the purpose of estimating ASC payment amounts, the 
    Secretary survey not later than January 1, 1995, and every 5 years 
    thereafter, the actual audited costs incurred by ASCs, based upon a 
    representative sample of procedures and facilities.
        In July 1992, we mailed Form HCFA-452A, Medicare Ambulatory 
    Surgical Center Payment Rate Survey (Part I), to the nearly 1,400 ASCs 
    that were on file as being certified by Medicare at the end of 1991. 
    Part I data provided baseline information for selecting a sample of 320 
    ASCs to complete Form HCFA-452B, Medicare Ambulatory Surgical Center 
    Payment Rate Survey (Part II). The sample was randomly selected and is 
    representative of ASCs nationally in terms of facility age, 
    utilization, and surgical specialty.
        Part II of the ASC survey was mailed to the sample of ASCs in March 
    1994. Part II of the ASC survey asked for data on costs incurred by the 
    facility that are directly related to performing certain surgical 
    procedures, such as cataract extraction with IOL insertion, as well as 
    information on facility overhead and personnel costs. We asked 
    facilities to report total volume, Medicare volume, operating room 
    time, and their average billed charge for the Medicare covered 
    procedures that were performed at the facility during the survey year. 
    We audited 100 randomly selected Part II surveys between November 1994 
    and February 1995. We plan to use the 1994 survey data to rebase ASC 
    payment rates. In accordance with rulemaking procedures, we will 
    publish the rebased rate in the Federal Register and solicit public 
    comments.
        We published our last ASC payment rate update notice on October 1, 
    1996 (61 FR 51295).
    
    II. Provisions of This Notice
    
        During years in which the Secretary has not otherwise updated ASC 
    rates based on a survey of actual audited costs, section 1833(i)(2)(C) 
    of the Act, as amended by BBA, requires application of an inflation 
    adjustment. That inflation adjustment must be the
    
    [[Page 8464]]
    
    percentage increase in the CPI-U as estimated by the Secretary for the 
    12-month period ending with the midpoint of the year involved, reduced 
    (but not below zero) by 2.0 percentage points in each of the fiscal 
    years 1998 through 2002. (The CPI-U is a general index that reflects 
    prices paid by urban consumers for a representative market basket of 
    goods and services.)
        Based on estimates prepared by Data Resources, Inc./McGraw Hill, 
    the forecast rate of increase in the CPI-U for the FY that ends March 
    31, 1998 is 2.6 percent. Reducing the CPI-U factor by 2.0 percent 
    results in an adjustment factor of 0.6 percent. Increasing the ASC 
    payment rates currently in effect by 0.6 percent results in the 
    following schedule of rates that are payable for facility services 
    furnished on or after October 1, 1997:
    
    Group 1--$314
    Group 2--$422
    Group 3--$482
    Group 4--$595
    Group 5--$678
    Group 6--$789 (639+150)
    Group 7--$941
    Group 8--$928 (778+150)
    
        ASC facility fees are subject to the usual Medicare deductible and 
    copayment requirements. Under section 13531 of OBRA 1993, the allowance 
    for an IOL that is part of the payment rates for group 6 and group 8 is 
    $150.
        A ninth payment group allotted exclusively to extracorporeal 
    shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) services was established in the notice 
    with comment period published December 31, 1991 (56 FR 67666). The 
    decision in American Lithotripsy Society v. Sullivan, 785 F. Supp. 1034 
    (D.D.C. 1992), prohibits payment for these services under the ASC 
    benefit at this time. ESWL payment rates were the subject of a separate 
    Federal Register proposed notice, which was published October 1, 1993 
    (58 FR 51355).
        We will continue to use the inpatient hospital prospective payment 
    system (PPS) wage index to standardize ASC payment rates for variation 
    due to geographic wage differences in accordance with the ASC payment 
    rate methodology published in the February 8, 1990 notice. The PPS wage 
    index final rule published on August 29, 1997 (62 FR 45965), for 
    implementation on October 1, 1997, will be used to adjust the ASC 
    payment rates announced in this notice for facility services furnished 
    on or after October 1, 1997.
    
    III. Regulatory Impact Analysis
    
    A. Introduction
    
        This notice implements section 1833(i)(2) of the Act, which 
    mandates an automatic inflation adjustment to Medicare payment amounts 
    for ASC facility services during the years in which the payment amounts 
    are not updated based on a survey of the actual audited costs incurred 
    by ASCs.
        Actuarial estimates of the cost of updating the ASC rates by 0.6 
    percent are as follows:
    
                       Projected Additional Medicare Costs                  
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Fiscal year                         In millions* 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1998....................................................              15
    1999....................................................              15
    2000....................................................              15
    2001....................................................              15
    2002....................................................              15
    2003....................................................             15 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    * Rounded to the nearest $10 million.                                   
    
        The BBA is considered in the estimate, including the prospective 
    payment system for hospital outpatient services to be implemented on 
    January 1, 1999, and the formula-driven overpayment elimination 
    effective October 1, 1997.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        We generally prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis that is 
    consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 
    through 612) unless we certify that a notice will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. 
    For purposes of the RFA, most ASCs and hospitals are considered to be 
    small entities either by non-profit status or by having resources of $5 
    million or less annually.
        Section 1102(b) of the Act requires us to prepare a regulatory 
    impact analysis if a notice may have a significant impact on the 
    operations of a substantial number of small rural hospitals. This 
    analysis must conform to the provisions of section 604 of the RFA. For 
    purposes of section 1102(b) of the Act, we define a small rural 
    hospital as a hospital that is located outside of a Metropolitan 
    Statistical Area and has fewer than 50 beds.
        Although we believe that this notice will not have a significant 
    impact on a substantial number of small rural hospitals, it may have a 
    significant impact on a substantial number of ASCs. Therefore, we 
    believe that a regulatory flexibility analysis is required for ASCs. In 
    addition, we are voluntarily providing a brief discussion of the impact 
    this notice may have on hospitals.
    1. Impact on ASCs
        Section 1833(i)(2)(C) of the Act requires that for FYs 1998 through 
    2002, we automatically adjust ASC rates for inflation during an FY in 
    which we do not update ASC payment rates based on survey data by a CPI-
    U factor reduced (but not below zero) by 2.0 percent. Therefore, we are 
    updating the current ASC payment rates, which were published in our 
    October 1, 1996 Federal Register notice (61 FR 51295), by incorporating 
    the projected rate of change in the CPI-U for the 12-month period 
    ending March 31, 1998 minus 2.0 percentage points, a net 0.6 percent 
    increase. There are other factors, however, that affect the actual 
    payments to an individual ASC.
        First, variations in an ASC's Medicare case mix affect the size of 
    the ASC's aggregate payment increase. Although we uniformly adjusted 
    ASC payment rates by the CPI-U forecast for the 12-month period ending 
    March 31, 1998, we did not adjust the IOL payment allowance that is 
    included in the payment rate for group 6 and group 8 because OBRA 1993 
    froze the amount of payment for an IOL furnished by an ASC at $150 for 
    the period beginning January 1, 1994 through December 31, 1998. 
    Therefore, because the net adjustment for inflation for procedures in 
    group 6 is 0.51 percent and for group 8 is 0.54 percent, ASCs that 
    perform a high percentage of the IOL insertion procedures that comprise 
    these groups may expect a somewhat lower increase in their aggregate 
    payments than ASCs that perform fewer IOL insertion procedures.
        A second factor determining the effect of the change in payment 
    rates is the percentage of total revenue an ASC receives from Medicare. 
    The larger the proportion of revenue an ASC receives from the Medicare 
    program, the greater the impact of the updated rates in this notice. 
    The percentage of revenue derived from the Medicare program depends on 
    the volume and types of services furnished. Since Medicare patients 
    account for as much as 80 percent of all IOL insertion procedures 
    performed in ASCs, an ASC that performs a high percentage of IOL 
    insertion procedures will probably receive a higher percentage of its 
    revenue from Medicare than would an ASC with a case mix comprised 
    largely of procedures that do not involve insertion of an IOL. For an 
    ASC that receives a large portion of its revenue from the Medicare 
    program, the changes in this notice will likely have a greater 
    influence on the ASC's operations and management decisions than they 
    will
    
    [[Page 8465]]
    
    have on an ASC that receives a large portion of revenue from other 
    sources.
        In general, we expect the rate changes in this notice to affect 
    ASCs positively by increasing the rates upon which payments are based.
    2. Impact on Hospitals and Small Rural Hospitals
        Section 1833(i)(3)(A) of the Act mandates the method of determining 
    payments to hospitals for ASC-approved procedures performed in an 
    outpatient setting. The Congress believed some comparability should 
    exist in the amount of payment to hospitals and ASCs for similar 
    procedures. The Congress recognized, however, that hospitals have 
    certain overhead costs that ASCs do not and allowed for those costs by 
    establishing a blended payment methodology. For ASC procedures 
    performed in an outpatient setting, hospitals are paid based on the 
    lower of their aggregate costs, aggregate charges, or a blend of 58 
    percent of the applicable wage-adjusted ASC rate and 42 percent of the 
    lower of the hospital's aggregate costs or charges. According to 
    statistics from the Office of Strategic Planning within HCFA, 12 
    percent of Medicare payments to hospitals by intermediaries is 
    attributable to services furnished in conjunction with ASC-covered 
    procedures.
        We would not expect an ASC rate increase in every instance to keep 
    pace with actual hospital cost increases, although we would fully 
    recognize cost increases resulting from inflation alone in the portion 
    of the blended payment that includes aggregate hospital costs. The 
    weight of the ASC portion of the blended payment amount, which would 
    reflect the ASC rate increase, is offset to a degree when hospital 
    costs significantly exceed the ASC rate. Another element that would 
    eliminate the effect of the ASC rate increase on hospital outpatient 
    payments is the application of the lowest payment screen in determining 
    payments. Applying the lowest of costs, charges, or a blend can result 
    in some hospitals being paid entirely on the basis of a hospital's 
    costs or charges. In those instances, the increase in the ASC rates 
    will have no effect on hospital payments. The number of Medicare 
    beneficiaries a hospital serves and its case-mix variation would also 
    influence the total impact of the new ASC rates on Medicare payments to 
    hospitals. Based on these factors, we have determined, and we certify 
    that this notice will not have a significant impact on a substantial 
    number of small rural hospitals. Therefore, we have not prepared a 
    small rural hospital impact analysis.
    
    IV. Waiver of 30-Day Delay in the Effective Date
    
        We ordinarily publish notices, such as this, subject to a 30-day 
    delay in the effective date. However, if adherence to this procedure 
    would be impractical, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, 
    we may waive the delay in the effective date. The provisions of this 
    notice are effective for services furnished on or after October 1, 
    1997. These provisions will increase payment to ASCs by 0.6 percent (as 
    modified by any change to the wage index), in accordance with section 
    1833(i)(2)(C) of the Act, as amended by the BBA. As a practical matter, 
    if we allowed a 30-day delay in the effective date of this notice, ASCs 
    would be unable to take timely advantage of the increase in payment 
    rates contained in this notice. Moreover, we believe a delay is 
    impractical and unnecessary because the statute, as explained earlier, 
    provides that ASC payment rates be increased by the percentage increase 
    in the CPI-U if the Secretary has not updated rates during an FY, 
    beginning with FY 1996. Therefore, we find good cause to waive the 
    delay in the effective date.
        In accordance with the provisions of Executive Order 12866, this 
    notice was reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    
    (Sections 1832(a)(2)(F) and 1833(i) (1) and (2) of the Social 
    Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395k(a)(2)(F) and 1395l(i) (1) and (2)); 42 
    CFR 416.120, 416.125, and 416.130)
    
    (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Programs No. 93.774, 
    Medicare--Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)
    
        Dated: October 9, 1997.
    Nancy-Ann Min DeParle,
    Deputy Administrator, Health Care Financing Administration.
    
        Dated: October 30, 1997.
    Donna E. Shalala,
    Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-4227 Filed 2-18-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
10/1/1997
Published:
02/19/1998
Department:
Health Care Finance Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
98-4227
Dates:
The payment rates contained in this notice are effective for services furnished on or after October 1, 1997.
Pages:
8462-8465 (4 pages)
Docket Numbers:
HCFA-1897-N
PDF File:
98-4227.pdf