99-3728. Airworthiness Directives; Saab Model SAAB SF340A and SAAB 340B Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 8227-8229]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-3728]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 97-NM-236-AD; Amendment 39-11042; AD 99-04-17]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Saab Model SAAB SF340A and SAAB 340B 
    Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Saab Model SAAB SF340A and SAAB 340B series 
    airplanes, that requires inspections to detect discrepancies of the 
    support straps of the flaps and adjacent areas, and corrective action, 
    if necessary. This amendment also requires replacement of the support 
    straps with new straps made of steel. This amendment is prompted by 
    issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign 
    civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are 
    intended to prevent fatigue cracking of the support straps of the 
    flaps, which could result in further damage to the flap structure, and 
    consequently lead to reduced controllability of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Effective March 26, 1999.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of March 26, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Saab Aircraft AB, SAAB Aircraft Product Support, S-
    581.88, Linkoping, Sweden. This information may be examined at the 
    Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the 
    Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 
    700, Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, International 
    Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, 
    SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2110; fax (425) 
    227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Saab Model SAAB SF340A and 
    SAAB 340B series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on 
    November 7, 1997 (62 FR 60191). That action proposed to require 
    inspections to detect discrepancies of the support straps of the flaps 
    and adjacent areas; corrective action, if necessary; and replacement of 
    the support straps with new straps made of steel.
    
    Actions Since Issuance of Proposal
    
        Since the issuance of the proposal, Saab issued Service Bulletin 
    340-57-033, Revision 02, dated January 29, 1998. The inspection and 
    modification procedures described in Revision 02 are substantially 
    equivalent to those described in Revision 01 (which was cited in the 
    proposal as the appropriate source of service information for 
    accomplishment of the actions). The only change effected by Revision 02 
    is to clarify certain procedures. The final rule has been revised to 
    require accomplishment of the actions in accordance with either 
    Revision 01 or Revision 02 of the service bulletin.
    
    [[Page 8228]]
    
    Comments
    
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
    
    Support for the Proposal
    
        One commenter supports the proposal.
    
    Requests To Accept or Include Manufacturer's Approved Repairs in 
    Final Rule
    
        One commenter, the manufacturer, requests that the proposal be 
    revised to accept repairs based on approval by Saab, in lieu of 
    approval by the FAA, in the event cracking is detected. The commenter 
    notes that the LFV has authorized Saab to approve such repairs. Another 
    commenter requests that the final rule be revised to specifically 
    reference or incorporate repair instructions provided by the 
    manufacturer. That commenter states that operators that are required to 
    accomplish repairs will likely incur a sizable delay or cancellation 
    while awaiting repair approval by the FAA.
        The FAA does not concur. Specific repair instructions were not 
    included in the referenced service bulletin, and have not been provided 
    to the FAA by the manufacturer, so cannot be included in this AD. 
    Additionally, despite the LFV's current authorization of repair 
    approval by Saab, the FAA cannot delegate authority for general 
    approval of repairs on the FAA's behalf to Saab, because the status of 
    Saab's delegation by the LFV could change without notice. However, in 
    light of the type of repair that would be required to address the 
    identified unsafe condition, and in consonance with existing bilateral 
    airworthiness agreement with Sweden, the FAA has determined that, for 
    this AD, a repair approved by either the FAA or the LFV (or its 
    delegated agent) is acceptable for compliance with this AD. Paragraphs 
    (a) and (b) of the final rule have been revised accordingly.
    
    Request To Cite Earlier Version of Service Bulletin
    
        One commenter requests that the proposed AD be revised to refer to 
    the original version of Saab Service Bulletin 340-57-033, dated May 29, 
    1997. (Revision 01 of the service bulletin, dated August 18, 1997, was 
    referred to in the proposed AD as the appropriate source of service 
    information for accomplishment of the actions.) The commenter states 
    that it already has accomplished certain actions in accordance with the 
    original version of the service bulletin, and requests credit for this 
    work.
        The FAA concurs. The FAA has determined that the actions described 
    in the original version and Revision 01 of the service bulletin are 
    substantially equivalent. Therefore, a NOTE has been added to the final 
    rule to refer to the original issue of the service bulletin as an 
    acceptable means of compliance with this AD. (Operators should note 
    that, as discussed previously, the final rule has been revised to 
    additionally cite Revision 02 as an appropriate source of service 
    information for compliance with this AD.)
    
    Request To Revise Compliance Language
    
        One commenter (the manufacturer) requests that the compliance 
    language of the proposal be revised to be consistent with the intent of 
    the service bulletin. The commenter requests that paragraph (a) of the 
    proposal be revised to identify compliance in terms of flight cycles on 
    each flap, rather than flight cycles on the airplane. In addition, the 
    commenter requests that paragraph (b) of the proposal be revised to 
    require accomplishment, for flaps that have accumulated 16,000 flight 
    cycles, at a time ``not later than either at the next scheduled 
    structural inspection of the flaps or within 3,000 flight cycles, 
    whichever occurs later.'' By contrast, the proposal specified 
    compliance in terms of ``the next scheduled structural inspection of 
    the flaps, but not later than the accumulation of 3,000 flight 
    cycles.''
        The FAA partially concurs with the commenter's request to revise 
    the compliance language of the proposed AD.
        The FAA does not agree that the compliance should be specified in 
    terms of flight cycles on the flaps. Because the FAA requires operators 
    to document flight cycles on each airplane, but not on individual flap 
    assemblies, operators may be unable to ascertain the exact number of 
    flight cycles on an individual flap. The final rule will retain 
    compliance in terms of flight cycles on the airplane.
        The FAA agrees that the detailed visual inspection and replacement 
    should be performed at the next scheduled flap inspection or within 
    3,000 flight cycles, whichever occurs later. However, the FAA finds it 
    necessary to more precisely define the ``next scheduled flap 
    inspection'' interval because some U.S. operators may follow different 
    inspection schedules. Therefore, the FAA finds that this compliance 
    time should be defined as ``Prior to the accumulation of 6,000 flight 
    cycles after the last scheduled detailed visual inspection (if any) of 
    the flaps accomplished prior to the effective date of this AD'' (which 
    may have been accomplished in accordance with the Saab 340 Maintenance 
    Review Board document). Additionally, the FAA concurs that the 
    inspection specified by paragraph (b) of this AD is not required until 
    the airplane has accumulated 16,000 total flight cycles. Paragraph (b) 
    of the final rule has been reformatted and revised accordingly. A new 
    paragraph (c) has been added to the final rule to specify the 
    terminating action for paragraph (a) of this AD [which was specified 
    previously in paragraph (b) of the original NPRM].
    
    Additional Change to Proposal
    
        The FAA has become aware that the inspection requirement in 
    paragraph (b) of the proposed rule could be misinterpreted contrary to 
    the FAA's intent. Paragraph (b) of the final rule has further been 
    revised to clarify that the required inspection is a ``detailed visual 
    inspection'' rather than simply a ``detailed inspection.''
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes described 
    previously. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither 
    increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of 
    the AD.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 252 Saab Model SAAB SF340A and SAAB 340B 
    series airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.
        It will take approximately 30 work hours per airplane to accomplish 
    the required visual inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per 
    work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact on U.S. operators of 
    the visual inspection required by this AD is estimated to be $1,800 per 
    airplane.
        It will take approximately 180 work hours per airplane to 
    accomplish the required detailed visual inspection and concurrent 
    replacement, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Required 
    parts will cost approximately $4,580 per airplane. Based on these 
    figures, the cost impact on U.S. operators of the detailed visual 
    inspection and replacement required by this AD is estimated to be 
    $3,875,760, or $15,380 per airplane.
        The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions 
    that no
    
    [[Page 8229]]
    
    operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD 
    action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    99-04-17  Saab Aircraft AB: Amendment 39-11042. Docket 97-NM-236-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model SAAB SF340A and SAAB 340B series airplanes, 
    as listed in Saab Service Bulletin 340-57-033, Revision 01, dated 
    August 18, 1997; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent fatigue cracking of the support straps of the flaps, 
    which could result in further damage to the flap structure and 
    reduced controllability of the airplane, accomplish the following:
    
        Note 2: Accomplishment of the inspections and replacement 
    specified by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD, in accordance with 
    Saab Service Bulletin 340-57-033, dated May 29, 1997, is also 
    considered acceptable for compliance with the requirements of those 
    paragraphs.
    
        (a) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this AD: Prior to the 
    accumulation of 16,000 total flight cycles, or within 1,500 flight 
    cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, 
    perform a visual inspection to detect discrepancies (i.e., cracking 
    and/or damage) of the support straps of the left- and right-hand 
    flaps and adjacent areas, in accordance with Saab Service Bulletin 
    340-57-033, Revision 01, dated August 18, 1997; or Revision 02, 
    dated January 29, 1998. If any discrepancy is detected, prior to 
    further flight, repair it in accordance with a method approved by 
    either the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport 
    Airplane Directorate, or the Luftfartsverket (LFV) (or its delegated 
    agent).
        (b) Perform a detailed visual inspection to detect discrepancies 
    (i.e., cracking and/or damage) of the left- and right-hand flaps in 
    the area adjacent to the support straps, and replace the support 
    straps of the left- and right-hand flaps with new straps made of 
    steel; at the latest of the times specified by paragraphs (b)(1), 
    (b)(2), and (b)(3) of this AD; in accordance with Saab Service 
    Bulletin 340-57-033, Revision 01, dated August 18, 1997, or Revision 
    02, dated January 29, 1998. If any discrepancy is detected during 
    the detailed visual inspection, prior to further flight, repair it 
    in accordance with a method approved by either the Manager, 
    International Branch, ANM-116, or the LFV (or its delegated agent).
        (1) Prior to the accumulation of 6,000 flight cycles after the 
    last scheduled detailed visual inspection (if any) of the flaps 
    accomplished prior to the effective date of this AD; or
        (2) Within 3,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this 
    AD; or
        (3) Prior to the accumulation of 16,000 total flight cycles.
        (c) Accomplishment of the inspection and replacement specified 
    in paragraph (b) of this AD constitutes terminating action for the 
    requirements of paragraph (a) of this AD.
        (d) As of the effective date of this AD, no person shall install 
    a flap assembly having part number 7257800-501 through -508 
    inclusive, -571, -572, or -851 through -858 inclusive, on any 
    airplane, unless that flap assembly has been modified in accordance 
    with Saab Service Bulletin 340-57-033, Revision 01, dated August 18, 
    1997, or Revision 02, dated January 29, 1998.
        (e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their 
    requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International 
    Branch, ANM-116.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
    
        (f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (g) Except as provided by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this AD, the 
    actions shall be done in accordance with Saab Service Bulletin 340-
    57-033, Revision 01, dated August 18, 1997, or Saab Service Bulletin 
    340-57-033, Revision 02, dated January 29, 1998. This incorporation 
    by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in 
    accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be 
    obtained from Saab Aircraft AB, SAAB Aircraft Product Support, S-
    581.88, Linkoping, Sweden. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 
    Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North 
    Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
        Note 4: The subject of this AD is addressed in Swedish 
    airworthiness directive SAD No. 1-117, dated June 9, 1997.
    
        (h) This amendment becomes effective on March 26, 1999.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 9, 1999.
    John J. Hickey,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-3728 Filed 2-18-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/26/1999
Published:
02/19/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-3728
Dates:
Effective March 26, 1999.
Pages:
8227-8229 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-NM-236-AD, Amendment 39-11042, AD 99-04-17
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-3728.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13