96-3652. Administration of Tobacco Tariff-Rate Quota  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 6332-6334]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-3652]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    [[Page 6333]]
    
    
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
    
    19 CFR Part 132
    
    
    Administration of Tobacco Tariff-Rate Quota
    
    AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
    
    ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) is 
    soliciting comments and views on the administration of the tariff-rate 
    quota on leaf tobacco, established on September 13, 1995, which is 
    currently operating on a first-come, first-served basis.
    
    DATES: Public comments are due by noon May 20, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be sent to: Sybia Harrison, room 222, Office of 
    the U.S. Trade Representative, 600 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 
    20508, attention: Tobacco Tariff-Rate Quota.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Tom Perkins, Senior Economist, Office of Agricultural Affairs, USTR, 
    (202) 395-6127; or Rachel Shub, Assistant General Counsel, USTR, (202) 
    395-7305.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Presidential Proclamation 6821 (60 FR 47663 
    (September 13, 1995)) established a tariff-rate quota (TRQ) on imports 
    of flue-cured, burley and other light air-cured tobaccos that are 
    imported for the manufacture of cigarettes. Under the TRQ, a tariff 
    equal to the concession rates negotiated in the Uruguay Round is 
    applied to tobacco imports until the in-quota quantity is filled, after 
    which a tariff rate of 350% ad valorem is applied. For the quota year 
    beginning on September 13, 1995, the in-quota quantity of the TRQ is 
    150,450 tons, which is subdivided into specific allocations for 
    Argentina, Brazil, Chile, the European Union, Guatemala, Malawi, 
    Philippines, Thailand, Zimbabwe, and a general allocation for countries 
    other than those allocated specific TRQ quantities. Presidential 
    authority to establish the TRQ is provided by section 125(c) of the 
    Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2135(c)), section 421 of the Uruguay Round 
    Agreements Act (19 U.S.C. 2135 note) and other provisions of law 
    referenced in Presidential Proclamation 6821. The proclamation also 
    provides that the quantitative limitations of the TRQ are subject to 
    regulations as may be issued by USTR or its designated agency.
        The TRQ is currently operating on a first-come, first-served basis, 
    under the U.S. Customs Service's quota regulations at 19 CFR 132 
    (``Customs Quota regulations''). These regulations establish 
    requirements for determining priority and status for importers 
    presenting tobacco for importation and set forth specific procedures 
    for prorating a TRQ category (such as a country-specific allocation) in 
    the event the category is oversubscribed. Customs Quota regulations 
    currently are applied to U.S. TRQs on beef, peanuts, peanut butter, 
    certain sugar-containing products, certain cotton and cotton waste, and 
    certain dairy products, as well as TRQ's applicable to Mexico (under 
    the North American Free Trade Agreement) on orange juice, tomatoes and 
    other safeguard products commodities.
        Some cigarette manufacturers have suggested that the TRQ should be 
    administered by means of import licenses issued to manufacturers in 
    order to permit the orderly marketing of tobacco in the U.S. market. 
    Accordingly, the Office of the United States Trade Representative 
    (USTR) is soliciting comments on the administration of the TRQ. If 
    comments reflect substantial problems or concerns regarding the current 
    operation of the TRQ, USTR will consider alternative approaches, 
    including an import licensing program. Any alternative method should 
    aim to facilitate reasonable, efficient and orderly access to the U.S. 
    tobacco market for those countries to which a quota allocation has been 
    made, and provide equitable and efficient access for U.S. importers, 
    manufacturers and other entities that import or use tobacco affected by 
    the TRQ.
        To better assess the need for change and the significance of that 
    need, USTR invites public comment on the current operation of the TRQ. 
    Comments should address the extent to which the current system is 
    orderly, economically efficient and equitable. USTR is interested in 
    aspects of the current system such as (1) the costs and benefits to the 
    U.S. economy as a whole as well as firms, foreign and domestic, that 
    participate in the markets for imported tobacco and related markets; 
    (2) the distribution across firms of the TRQ, including market 
    competition and concentration; (3) market access for small businesses; 
    (4) the effect on the U.S. price support program; and (5) the impact on 
    timing and storage of imports, and related costs and benefits; (6) the 
    impact on exporters if other countries were to adopt similar practices 
    for TRQs on products from the U.S.; and (7) administrative costs.
        With respect to any alternative approaches, USTR would appreciate 
    views on how such programs might be administered. For example, for 
    licensing, comments could address: (1) the reasons and legal basis for 
    adopting such an approach; (2) to whom and by what mechanism import 
    licenses should be issued; (3) on what basis licenses should be issued 
    (including eligibility criteria, license validity period and license 
    renewability); (4) how licenses could be issued in light of the 
    country-specific allocations and market demand for different types of 
    tobacco; (5) how to address failure of importers to utilize their 
    licenses; (6) the extent to which new importers should be issued 
    licenses, taking into account the desirability of issuing licenses in 
    sizes that are commercially viable; (7) whether licenses should be 
    transferable, and under what conditions; (8) the benefits, costs, and 
    administrative and distributional considerations associated with a 
    market in licenses, including secondary markets; (9) the effect of any 
    proposed alternative on the U.S. economy as a whole as well as firms, 
    foreign and domestic, that participate in the markets for imported 
    tobacco and related markets; (10) any effect on the U.S. price support 
    program for tobacco; (11) effect of any proposed alternatives on small 
    businesses; (12) effect of any proposed alternatives on market 
    competition and concentration; (13) administrative costs that might be 
    associated with a proposed alternative; (14) the impact of proposed 
    alternatives on timing and storage of imports, and related costs and 
    benefits; (15) the impact on exporters if other countries were to adopt 
    similar practices for TRQs on products from the U.S.; and (16) any 
    other issues arising in the context of a particular alternative to the 
    current operation of the TRQ.
        Persons submitting written comments should provide a statement, in 
    ten copies, by noon, May 20, 1996 to Sybia Harrison, Office of the U.S. 
    Trade Representative, Room 222, 600 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
    20508, attention: Tobacco Tariff-Rate Quota. Non-confidential 
    information received will be available for public inspection by 
    appointment, in the USTR Reading Room, Room 101, Monday through Friday, 
    10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. For an appointment 
    call Brenda Webb at (202) 395-6186. Business confidential information 
    will be subject to the requirements of 15 CFR 2003.6. Any business 
    confidential material must be clearly marked as such on the cover 
    letter or page and each succeeding page, 
    
    [[Page 6334]]
    and must be accompanied by a non-confidential summary thereof.
    Michael Kantor,
    United States Trade Representative.
    [FR Doc. 96-3652 Filed 2-16-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/20/1996
Department:
Trade Representative, Office of United States
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.
Document Number:
96-3652
Dates:
Public comments are due by noon May 20, 1996.
Pages:
6332-6334 (3 pages)
PDF File:
96-3652.pdf
CFR: (1)
19 CFR 132