96-3680. Exemption of Records System Under the Privacy Act  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 1996)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 6317-6318]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-3680]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
    28 CFR Part 16
    
    [AAG/A Order No. 114-96]
    
    
    Exemption of Records System Under the Privacy Act
    
    AGENCY: Department of Justice.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Department of Justice is exempting a Privacy Act system of 
    records from subsections (c) (3) and (4), (d), (e) (1), (2), and (3), 
    (e)(5) and (e)(8), and (g) of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a. This 
    system of records is the ``Bureau of Prisons, Office of Internal 
    Affairs Investigative Records, Justice/BOP-012.'' Information in this 
    system relates to official Federal investigations and law enforcement 
    matters of the Office of Internal Affairs (OIA) of the Federal Bureau 
    of Prisons (BOP), pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978, 5 
    U.S.C. App., as amended by the Inspector General Act amendments of 
    1988. The exemptions are necessary to avoid interference with the law 
    enforcement functions of the BOP. Specifically, the exemptions are 
    necessary to prevent subjects of investigations from frustrating the 
    investigatory process; to preclude the disclosure of investigative 
    techniques; to protect the identities and physical safety of 
    confidential informants and of law enforcement personnel; to ensure 
    OIA's ability to obtain information from information sources; to 
    protect the privacy of third parties; and to safeguard classified 
    information as required by Executive Order 12356.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: February 20, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia E. Neely, 202-616-0178.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 29, 1995 (60 FR 44901), a proposed 
    rule with invitation to comment was published in the Federal Register.
        One late comment was received in which the individual was under the 
    erroneous impression that the exemption of a Privacy Act system of 
    records is promulgated to protect the record from disclosure to third 
    parties. Subsection (b) of the Privacy Act already prohibits disclosure 
    to third parties, except as otherwise expressly authorized by that 
    subsection. As permitted by subsections (j) and (k) of the Privacy Act, 
    the proposed rule was promulgated to permit BOP, where necessary and 
    appropriate, to exempt itself from certain of the Act's provisions as 
    they apply to the record subject. The exemptions are essential for the 
    reasons stated in this final rule.
        This order relates to individuals rather than small business 
    entities. Nevertheless, pursuant to the requirements of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, it is hereby stated that the order 
    will not have ``a significant economic impact on a substantial number 
    of small entities.''
    
    List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 16
    
        Administrative Practices and Procedures, Courts, Freedom of 
    Information Act, Government in the Sunshine Act, and the Privacy Act.
    
        Pursuant to the authority vested in the Attorney General by 5 
    U.S.C. 552a and delegated to me by Attorney General Order No. 793-78, 
    28 CFR part 16 is amended as set forth below.
    
        Dated: February 7, 1996.
    Stephen R. Colgate,
    Assistant Attorney General for Administration.
    
    PART 16--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority for Part 16 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 552, 552a, 552b(g), 553; 18 U.S.C. 
    4203(a)(1); 28 U.S.C. 509, 510, 534; 31 U.S.C. 3717, 9701.
    
        2. 28 CFR 16.97 is amended by adding paragraphs (g) and (h) to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 16.97  Exemption of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Systems-
    limited access.
    
    * * * * *
        (g) The following system of records is exempt pursuant to the 
    provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) from subsections (c) (3) and (4), 
    (d), (e) (1), (2), and (3), (e)(5) and (e)(8), and (g) of 5 U.S.C. 
    552a. In addition, the following system of records is exempt pursuant 
    to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a (k)(1) and (k)(2) from subsections 
    (c)(3), (d), and (e)(1) of 5 U.S.C. 552a:
    
    Bureau of Prisons, Office of Internal Affairs Investigative Records, 
    JUSTICE/BOP-012
    
        (h) These exemptions apply only to the extent that information in 
    this system is subject to exemption pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a (j)(2), 
    (k)(1), and (k)(2). Where compliance would not appear to interfere with 
    or adversely affect the law enforcement process, and/or where it may be 
    appropriate to permit individuals to contest the accuracy of the 
    information collected, e.g., public source materials, the applicable 
    exemption may be waived, either partially or totally, by the Office of 
    Internal Affairs (OIA). Exemptions from the particular subsections are 
    justified for the following reasons:
    
        (1) From subsection (c)(3) because release of disclosure accounting 
    could alert the subject of an investigation of an actual or potential 
    criminal, civil, or regulatory violation to the existence of the 
    investigation and the fact that they are subjects of the investigation, 
    and reveal investigative interest by not only the OIA but also by the 
    recipient agency. Since release of such information to the subjects of 
    an investigation would provide them with significant information 
    concerning the nature of the investigation, release could result in 
    activities that would impede or compromise law enforcement such as: the 
    destruction of documentary evidence; improper influencing of witnesses; 
    endangerment of the physical safety of confidential sources, witnesses, 
    and law enforcement personnel; fabrication of testimony; and flight of 
    the subject from the area. In addition, release of disclosure 
    accounting could result in the release of properly classified 
    information which could compromise the national defense or disrupt 
    foreign policy.
    
        (2) From subsection (c)(4) because this system is exempt from the 
    access provisions of subsection (d) pursuant to subsections (j) and (k) 
    of the Privacy Act.
    
        (3) From the access and amendment provisions of subsection (d) 
    because access to the records contained in this system of records could 
    provide the subject of an investigation with information concerning law 
    enforcement activities such as that relating to an actual or potential 
    criminal, civil or regulatory violation; the existence of an 
    investigation; the 
    
    [[Page 6318]]
    nature and scope of the information and evidence obtained as to his 
    activities; the identity of confidential sources, witnesses, and law 
    enforcement personnel; and information that may enable the subject to 
    avoid detection or apprehension. Such disclosure would present a 
    serious impediment to effective law enforcement where they prevent the 
    successful completion of the investigation; endanger the physical 
    safety of confidential sources, witnesses, and law enforcement 
    personnel; and/or lead to the improper influencing of witnesses, the 
    destruction of evidence, or the fabrication of testimony. In addition, 
    granting access to such information could disclose security-sensitive 
    or confidential business information or information that would 
    constitute an unwarranted invasion of the personal privacy of third 
    parties. Finally, access to the records could result in the release of 
    properly classified information which could compromise the national 
    defense or disrupt foreign policy. Amendment of the records would 
    interfere with ongoing investigations and law enforcement activities 
    and impose an impossible administrative burden by requiring 
    investigations to be continuously reinvestigated.
        (4) From subsection (e)(1) because the application of this 
    provision could impair investigations and interfere with the law 
    enforcement responsibilities of the OIA for the following reasons:
        (i) It is not possible to detect relevance or necessity of specific 
    information in the early stages of a civil, criminal or other law 
    enforcement investigation, case, or matter, including investigations in 
    which use is made of properly classified information. Relevance and 
    necessity are questions of judgment and timing, and it is only after 
    the information is evaluated that the relevance and necessity of such 
    information can be established.
        (ii) During the course of any investigation, the OIA may obtain 
    information concerning actual or potential violations of laws other 
    than those within the scope of its jurisdiction. In the interest of 
    effective law enforcement, the OIA should retain this information as it 
    may aid in establishing patterns of criminal activity, and can provide 
    valuable leads for Federal and other law enforcement agencies.
        (iii) In interviewing individuals or obtaining other forms of 
    evidence during an investigation, information may be supplied to an 
    investigator which relates to matters incidental to the primary purpose 
    of the investigation but which may relate also to matters under the 
    investigative jurisdiction of another agency. Such information cannot 
    readily be segregated.
        (5) From subsection (e)(2) because, in some instances, the 
    application of this provision would present a serious impediment to law 
    enforcement for the following reasons:
        (i) The subject of an investigation would be placed on notice as to 
    the existence of an investigation and would therefore be able to avoid 
    detection or apprehension, to improperly influence witnesses, to 
    destroy evidence, or to fabricate testimony.
        (ii) In certain circumstances the subject of an investigation 
    cannot be required to provide information to investigators, and 
    information relating to a subject's illegal acts, violations of rules 
    of conduct, or any other misconduct must be obtained from other 
    sources.
        (iii) In any investigation it is necessary to obtain evidence from 
    a variety of sources other than the subject of the investigation in 
    order to verify the evidence necessary for successful litigation.
        (6) From subsection (e)(3) because the application of this 
    provision would provide the subject of an investigation with 
    substantial information which could impede or compromise the 
    investigation. Providing such notice to a subject of an investigation 
    could interfere with an undercover investigation by revealing its 
    existence, and could endanger the physical safety of confidential 
    sources, witnesses, and investigators by revealing their identities.
        (7) From subsection (e)(5) because the application of this 
    provision would prevent the collection of any data not shown to be 
    accurate, relevant, timely, and complete at the moment it is collected. 
    In the collection of information for law enforcement purposes, it is 
    impossible to determine in advance what information is accurate, 
    relevant, timely, and complete. Material which may seem unrelated, 
    irrelevant, or incomplete when collected may take on added meaning or 
    significance as an investigation progresses. The restrictions of this 
    provision could interfere with the preparation of a complete 
    investigation report, and thereby impede effective law enforcement.
        (8) From subsection (e)(8) because the application of this 
    provision could prematurely reveal an ongoing criminal investigation to 
    the subject of the investigation, and could reveal investigation 
    techniques, procedures, and/or evidence.
        (9) From subsection (g) to the extent that this system is exempt 
    from the access and amendment provisions of subsection (d) pursuant to 
    subsections (j)(2), (k)(1), and (k)(2) of the Privacy Act.
    
    [FR Doc. 96-3680 Filed 2-16-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4410-05-M
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/20/1996
Published:
02/20/1996
Department:
Justice Department
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
96-3680
Dates:
February 20, 1996.
Pages:
6317-6318 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
AAG/A Order No. 114-96
PDF File:
96-3680.pdf
CFR: (1)
28 CFR 16.97