[Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7778-7780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 97-4114]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[PF-714; FRL-5589-4]
Abbott Laboratories; Pesticide Tolerance Petition Filing
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of filing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the filing of a pesticide petition
proposing regulations establishing tolerances for residues of the
biochemical pesticide aminoethoxyvinylglycine in or on apples and
pears. This notice includes a summary of the petition that was prepared
by the petitioner, Abbott Laboratories.
DATES: Comments, identified by the docket control number [PF-714], must
be received on or before March 24, 1997.
ADDRESSES: By mail, submit written comments to: Public Response and
Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St. SW.,
Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to: Rm. 1132, Crystal
Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Hwy., Arlington, VA.
Comments and data may also be submitted electronically by sending
electronic mail (e-mail) to: opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov or by
submitting disks. Electronic comments must be submitted either in ASCII
format (avoiding the use of special characters and any form of
encryption) or in WordPerfect in 5.1 file format. All comments and data
in electronic form must be identified by docket control number [PF-
714]. Electronic comments on this notice may be filed online at many
Federal Depository Libraries. The official record for this rulemaking,
as well as the public version described above, will be kept in paper
form. Accordingly, EPA will transfer all comments received
electronically into printed, paper form as they are received and will
place the paper copies in the official rulemaking record, which will
also include all comments submitted directly in writing.
Information submitted as a comment concerning this notice may be
claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as
``Confidential Business Information'' (CBI). Information so marked will
not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40
CFR part 2. No CBI should be submitted through e-mail. A copy of the
comment that does not contain CBI must be submitted for inclusion in
the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed
publicly by EPA without prior notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Greenway, Regulatory Action
Leader, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7501W),
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460, Office location,
telephone number, and e-mail address: Crystal Station I, 2800 Crystal
Dr., Arlington, VA 22202. (703) 308-8263; e-mail:
greenway.denise@epamail.epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has received a pesticide petition (PP-
6F4632) from Abbott Laboratories, 1401 Sheridan Road, North Chicago, IL
60064-4000. The petition proposes, pursuant to section 408 of the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a, to amend
40 CFR part 180 to establish tolerances for residues of the biochemical
pesticide aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) in or on apples and pears at
0.08 part per million (ppm). EPA has determined that the petition
contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in
section 408(d)(2); however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency
of the submitted data at this time or whether the data support granting
of the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the
petition. The proposed analytical method is high pressure liquid
chromatography (HPLC).
As required by section 408(d) of the FFDCA, as recently amended by
the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) (Pub. L. 104-170), Abbott
Laboratories included in the petition a summary of the petition and
authorization for the summary to be published in the Federal Register
in a notice of receipt of the petition. The summary represents the
views of Abbott Laboratories; EPA, as mentioned above, is in the
process of evaluating the petition. As required by section 408(d)(3),
EPA is including the summary as a part of this notice of filing. EPA
may have made minor edits to the summary for the purpose of clarity.
I. Abbott Laboratories' Petition Summary
A. Residue Chemistry
1. Plant metabolism. AVG signifies the active ingredient L-alpha-
(2-aminoethoxyvinyl)glycine hydrochloride in its pure form. An
alternative nomenclature for AVG is [S]-trans-2-amino-4-[2-
aminoethoxy]-3-butanoic acid hydrochloride. N-acetyl AVG is the primary
metabolite of AVG in apples.
2. Analytical method. Abbott Laboratories has determined that
residues of AVG are not expected in/on apples and pears at detectable
levels when orchards are treated at the label use rate and pre-harvest
interval. The Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) is 0.075 ppm and the Limit of
Detection (LOD) is 0.03 ppm by HPLC analysis. There is no concentrating
of residues in the processed commodities (i.e., apple juice or wet
apple pomace).
3. Magnitude of the residue. In the magnitude of the residue study
in apples, the maximum residue at day 0 following treatment at the
label use rate was 0.131 ppm. By day 21, there were no quantifiable
residues present. The exposure assessments (below) indicate that there
will be large margins of exposure (MOEs) from aggregate exposure to
AVG. The proposed HPLC method used is deemed adequate by Abbott
Laboratories to measure residues and the company argues that no
additional analytical method for detecting and measuring residue levels
is needed.
B. Toxicological Profile
1. Acute toxicity. The acute mammalian toxicological data
considered in this proposed tolerance for AVG include: an acute oral
toxicity study in rats, an acute dermal toxicity study in rabbits, an
acute inhalation toxicity study in rats, a primary eye irritation study
in rabbits, a dermal irritation study in rabbits, and a dermal
sensitization study in guinea pigs.
The results of these studies indicate that AVG has an acute oral
LD50 of 6,400
[[Page 7779]]
milligrams active ingredient per kilogram of body weight (mg a.i./kg
bwt) in rats, an acute dermal LD50 greater than 2,000 mg a.i./kg
bwt in rabbits, an acute inhalation LD50 of 1,130 mg/m3 in
rats, causes slight eye and dermal irritation in rabbits, and is not a
dermal sensitizer in guinea pigs.
2. Genotoxicity. Abbott Laboratories concludes that AVG was not
mutagenic in an Ames Salmonella gene mutation assay with or without
metabolic activation. The company maintains that there was no mutagenic
activity associated with AVG in cultures of mouse lymphoma cells
(L5178Y tk ) with or without metabolic activation. In a rat
bone marrow cell micronucleus test in vivo, Abbott Laboratories reports
that there was no indication that AVG was genotoxic.
3. Developmental toxicity. In a developmental toxicity study in
rats by oral gavage, a no observable effect level (NOEL) of 1.77 mg
a.i./kg bwt/day was determined for both developmental and maternal
toxicity.
4. Subchronic toxicity. A Reference Dose (RfD) of 0.002 mg a.i./kg
bwt/day was derived from a 90-day feeding study in rats in which there
was decreased food consumption, body weight and food efficiency (body-
weight gain/food consumption), and fatty changes in kidney and liver at
dosage levels of 9 mg a.i./kg bwt/day or higher. The NOEL in this study
was 2.2 mg a.i./ kg bwt/day.
In a 21-day dermal toxicity study in rats, the NOEL was greater
than 1,000 mg a.i./kg/day.
In a 28-day dietary immunotoxicity study in rats with a NOEL of 5
mg a.i./kg/day, decreases in several immune response parameters are
considered secondary to the decreased food consumption, body weight,
and food efficiency in the treated rats.
5. Reproductive toxicity; chronic toxicity; animal metabolism;
metabolite toxicity. AVG is classified as a biochemical due to its
proposed use pattern, its low use rate, and its natural occurrence. Due
to the nature of this biochemical pesticide, the requirements for
reproductive and chronic toxicity studies as well as animal metabolism
and metabolite toxicity have not been triggered in the Tier Toxicity
Testing approach.
C. Aggregate Exposure
Dietary exposure--food and drinking water/non-dietary exposure.
Expected dietary exposures from residues of AVG would occur through
apples, pears, and processed apples and pears. Spray drift may lead to
exposure to residues in drinking water. There are no proposed home and
garden uses for AVG. AVG is used in a commercial floral preservative.
There is no exposure to infants and children through this floral
preservative. The only potential exposure from this floral preservative
would be dermal exposure.
For estimations of maximum anticipated residues, non-detectable
residues were assigned a value one half of the LOD. For the two
instances in which residues were detectable on one of the replicates,
the full LOD was used. The maximum anticipated residues of AVG were
calculated to be 0.018 ppm in the apple raw agricultural commodity.
The processed commodities examined were apple juice and wet apple
pomace. Processing factors were calculated from apples without washing
prior to processing to provide the highest possible estimate of
anticipated residues in the juice and pomace. The mean apple juice
processing factor was determined to be 0.8; for wet apple pomace the
processing factor was 0.9.
A chronic dietary exposure analysis was conducted for AVG using the
anticipated residues in apples for both apples and pears. Residues were
rarely detected in field trials conducted at the maximum rate and
minimum interval between application and harvest. The anticipated
residue of 0.018 ppm represents about half of the LOD.
Low residues are expected in wet apple pomace, so finite residues
of AVG are not expected in meat and milk; therefore, these foods were
not included in the exposure analysis.
Tap water, non-tap water, and water in commercially prepared food
were also included in the analysis. Residue levels in water were
assumed to be 0.0012 ppm. This was based upon calculations for airblast
application of AVG onto late season trees. It is estimated that a
negligible amount of the applied dose could drift into nearby drinking
water sources. The following table summarizes the results from the
chronic aggregate exposure analysis based upon anticipated residues for
the overall U.S. population and the five most highly exposed population
subgroups. The exposure estimate was compared against the RfD of 0.002
mg a.i./kg bwt/day:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exposure mg a.i./
Population subgroup kg bwt Percent of RfD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Population................. 0.000055.......... 2.5
All Infants..................... 0.000206.......... 10.3
Non-nursing Infants < 1="" yr......="" 0.000258..........="" 12.9="" children="" 1-6="" yrs................="" 0.000099..........="" 5.0="" children="" 7-12="" yrs...............="" 0.000077..........="" 3.8="" females="" 13-50="" yrs...............="" 0.000040..........="" 2.0="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" as="" seen="" in="" the="" above="" table,="" even="" for="" the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" population="" subgroup,="" less="" than="" 13%="" of="" the="" rfd="" was="" used.="" chronic="" aggregate="" exposure="" to="" avg="" also="" was="" estimated="" using="" proposed="" tolerance-level="" residues.="" exposure="" was="" estimated="" using="" the="" same="" consumption="" data="" that="" were="" used="" for="" the="" anticipated="" residue="" exposure="" calculation.="" the="" following="" table="" summarizes="" results="" of="" the="" chronic="" exposure="" analyses="" using="" proposed="" tolerances="" for="" the="" overall="" u.s.="" population="" and="" the="" five="" most="" highly="" exposed="" population="" subgroups.="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" exposure="" mg="" a.i./="" population="" subgroup="" kg="" bwt="" percent="" of="" rfd="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" u.s.="" population.................="" 0.000111..........="" 5.6="" all="" infants.....................="" 0.000538..........="" 26.9="" non-nursing="" infants="">< 1="" yr......="" 0.000638..........="" 31.9="" children="" 1-6="" yrs................="" 0.000324..........="" 16.2="" children="" 7-12="" yrs...............="" 0.000173..........="" 8.7="" females="" 13+/nursing.............="" 0.000133..........="" 6.7="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" an="" examination="" of="" the="" summary="" table="" demonstrates="" that="" chronic="" aggregate="" exposure="" represents="" no="" more="" than="" 32%="" of="" the="" chronic="" rfd="" for="" any="" population="" subgroup.="" these="" calculations="" were="" performed="" assuming="" that="" 100%="" of="" the="" apple="" and="" pear="" crops="" in="" the="" united="" states="" would="" contain="" avg="" residues="" at="" tolerance="" levels.="" assuming="" that="" 100%="" of="" all="" apple="" products="" consumed="" would="" contain="" tolerance-level="" residues="" is="" the="" worst-case="" scenario="" and="" yields="" a="" gross="" overestimate="" of="" dietary="" exposure.="" an="" acute="" exposure="" analysis="" based="" upon="" anticipated="" residues="" was="" conducted="" using="" epa's="" tier="" 2="" method="" with="" anticipated="" residues.="" for="" blended="" commodities="" (e.g.,="" apple="" juice="" and="" pear="" nectar),="" the="" mean="" anticipated="" residue="" level="" was="" used.="" for="" single="" serving="" commodities="" (e.g.,="" raw="" apples="" and="" pears),="" the="" loq="" of="" 0.075="" ppm="" was="" used="" as="" a="" worst-="" case="" estimate="" of="" high="" end="" exposure="" because="" avg="" residues="" were="" not="" quantifiable="" in="" the="" few="" samples="" in="" which="" residues="" were="" detected.="" a="" separate="" exposure="" analysis="" was="" conducted="" for="" infants="" because="" baby="" foods="" are="" blended="" commodities.="" for="" these="" analyses,="" only="" raw="" forms="" of="" apples="" and="" pears="" were="" assumed="" to="" be="" consumed="" as="" single="" servings="" containing="" the="" high-end="" residue="" value="" of="" 0.075="" [[page="" 7780]]="" ppm.="" all="" prepared="" and="" processed="" foods="" were="" assumed="" to="" be="" blended="" foods="" containing="" the="" mean="" anticipated="" residue="" of="" 0.018="" ppm.="" the="" following="" table="" summarizes="" the="" exposure="" analysis="" at="" the="" 95th="" percentile:="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" exposure="" mg="" a.i./="" population="" subgroup="" kg="" bwt="" moe="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" u.s.="" population.................="" 0.000276..........="" 6,510="" all="" infants.....................="" 0.000598..........="" 3,009="" non-nursing="" infants="">< 1="" yr......="" 0.000551..........="" 3,269="" children="" 1-6="" yrs................="" 0.000756..........="" 2,381="" children="" 7-12="" yrs...............="" 0.000448..........="" 4,022="" females="" 13-50="" yrs...............="" 0.000198..........="" 9,091="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" the="" moe="" of="" the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" population="" subgroup,="" children="" 1="" to="" 6="" years="" old,="" is="" more="" than="" 23-fold="" higher="" than="" a="" level="" considered="" to="" provide="" adequate="" protection.="" the="" acute="" exposure="" summary="" (below)="" in="" which="" proposed="" tolerance-="" level="" residues="" were="" used="" shows="" that="" estimated="" exposures="" provide="" adequate="" moes,="" even="" at="" the="" 95th="" percentile="" of="" exposure.="" in="" this="" analysis,="" acute="" exposure="" was="" calculated="" for="" the="" entire="" population="" rather="" than="" for="" consumers="" only,="" a="" procedure="" recommended="" by="" the="" epa="" in="" their="" proposed="" method="" for="" acute="" dietary="" risk="" assessment.="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" exposure="" mg="" a.i./="" population="" subgroup="" kg="" bwt="" moe="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" u.s.="" population.................="" 0.000406..........="" 4,432="" all="" infants.....................="" 0.002188..........="" 823="" non-nursing="" infants="">< 1="" yr......="" 0.002191..........="" 822="" children="" 1-6="" yrs................="" 0.001384..........="" 1,301="" children="" 7-12="" yrs...............="" 0.000663..........="" 2,845="" females="" 13-50="" yrs...............="" 0.000245..........="" 7,336="" ------------------------------------------------------------------------="" the="" most="" highly="" exposed="" population="" subgroup,="" non-nursing="" infants,="" has="" an="" estimated="" moe="" of="" 822,="" greater="" than="" 8-fold="" higher="" than="" a="" level="" considered="" to="" provide="" adequate="" protection.="" d.="" cumulative="" effects="" avg="" is="" a="" structurally="" unique="" biochemical="" pesticide="" and="" is="" a="" naturally="" occurring="">-amino acid. Its proposed mode of action
for mammalian toxicity is the inhibition of the enzyme-
cystathionase. Other agents which inhibit this enzyme include naturally
occurring amino acids such as alanine, cysteine, glutamic acid, and
homoserine. Given the expected exposure, Abbott Laboratories maintains
that inhibition of this enzyme would not occur at levels that would
pose a human health risk.
E. Endocrine Effects
Abbott Laboratories reports that there have been no indications of
treatment-related effects from AVG to suggest that the pesticide may
have an endocrine disruption activity.
F. Safety Determination
1. U.S. population. AVG is a naturally occurring amino acid. Based
upon expected residues in apples, pears, and water, Abbott Laboratories
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty of no harm resulting
from aggregate exposure of AVG to the general population.
2. Infants and children. The effects demonstrated in the
developmental and immune toxicity studies are considered secondary to
the adverse effects upon body weight gain, food consumption and food
efficiency in the treated rats. These data indicate to Abbott
Laboratories that AVG is not a developmental or immunological toxicant,
and that infants and children are not sensitive subpopulations. The
company concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result from aggregate exposure of AVG to infants and children.
G. International Tolerances
There are no Codex maximum residue levels established for residues
of AVG on apples or pears.
Therefore, based on the completeness and reliability of the
toxicity data and the conservative exposure assessment, Abbott
Laboratories concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result from aggregate exposure to residues of AVG, including
all anticipated dietary exposure and all other non-occupational
exposures.
II. Public Record
EPA invites interested persons to submit comments on this notice of
filing. Comments must bear a notation indicating the docket control
number [PF-714].
A record has been established for this notice under docket control
number [PF-714] (including comments and data submitted electronically
as described below). A public version of this record, including
printed, paper versions of electronic comments, which does not include
any information claimed as CBI, is available for inspection from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
public record is located in Room 1132 of the Public Response and
Program Resources Branch, Field Operations Division (7506C), Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Crystal Mall #2,
1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
Electronic comments can be sent directly to EPA at:
opp-docket@epamail.epa.gov
Electronic comments must be submitted as an ASCII file avoiding the
use of special characters and any form of encryption.
The official record for this rulemaking, as well as the public
version, as described above, will be kept in paper form. Accordingly,
EPA will transfer all comments received electronically into printed,
paper form as they are received and will place the paper copies in the
official rulemaking record which will also include all comments
submitted directly in writing. The official rulemaking record is the
paper record maintained at the address in ``ADDRESSES'' at the
beginning of this document.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and
pests, Reporting and recordkeeping.
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 346a.
Dated: February 10, 1997.
Janet L. Anderson,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 97-4114 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
