97-4181. WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding Hungary's Export Subsidies on Agricultural Products (Docket No. WTO/D-14)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 7815]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-4181]
    
    
    
    [[Page 7815]]
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
    
    
    WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding Hungary's Export 
    Subsidies on Agricultural Products (Docket No. WTO/D-14)
    
    AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
    
    ACTION: Notice; request for comments.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 127(b)(1) of the Uruguay Round Agreements 
    Act (URAA) (19 U.S.C. 3537(b)(1)), the Office of the United States 
    Trade Representative (USTR) is providing notice that the United States 
    has requested the establishment of a dispute settlement panel under the 
    Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (WTO), to examine 
    Hungary's export subsidies on agricultural products. More specifically, 
    the United States alleges that Hungary's export subsidies are 
    inconsistent with the obligations of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture, 
    including, but not limited to, Article 3.3, Article 8 and Article 9.2. 
    USTR also invites written comments from the public concerning the 
    issues raised in the dispute.
    
    DATES: Although USTR will accept any comments received during the 
    course of the dispute settlement proceedings, comments should be 
    submitted on or before March 17, 1997, to be assured of timely 
    consideration by USTR in preparing its first written submission to the 
    panel.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted to Ileana Falticeni, Office of 
    Monitoring and Enforcement, Room 501, Attn: Hungary Export Subsidies 
    Dispute, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, 600 17th Street, 
    N.W., Washington, DC 20508.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    William D. Hunter, Attorney, (202) 395-3582, or Marilyn Moore, Senior 
    Economist, (202) 395-6127.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 9, 1997, the United States 
    requested establishment of a WTO dispute settlement panel to examine 
    whether Hungary's export subsidies on agricultural products are 
    inconsistent with the obligations of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. 
    Argentina, Australia and New Zealand also requested the establishment 
    of a panel. The WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) considered the U.S. 
    request at its meeting on January 22, 1997. Under the WTO Understanding 
    on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes, the DSB 
    must establish a panel at the next DSB meeting where a panel request is 
    on the agenda, unless the DSB determines by consensus otherwise. The 
    next scheduled DSB meeting will be held on February 25, 1997. Under 
    normal circumstances, the panel, which will hold its meetings in 
    Geneva, Switzerland, would be expected to issue a report detailing its 
    findings and recommendations within six to nine months after it is 
    established.
    
    Major Issues Raised by the United States and Legal Basis of Complaint
    
        In Hungary's Schedule annexed to the Marrakesh Protocol to the 
    General Agreements on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (Schedule), Hungary 
    provided an exclusive list of the agricultural products or groups of 
    products that would be eligible for particular categories of export 
    subsidies. Hungary's Schedule also specified the maximum level of 
    expenditure for such subsidies that may be allocated or incurred for 
    each year with respect to each agricultural product or group of 
    products, and the maximum quantity of each agricultural product or 
    group of products for which such subsidies could be granted each year. 
    In 1995, Hungary provided export subsidies on agricultural products 
    that are not specified in its Schedule. In addition, in the case of 
    agricultural products that are specified in its Schedule, Hungary 
    provided export subsidies in excess of its specified budgetary outlay 
    and quantity commitment levels. Both sets of circumstances continued in 
    1996.
        Hungary's export subsidies appear to be inconsistent with Hungary's 
    obligations to limit its export subsidies under the Agreement on 
    Agriculture, including, but not limited to, Article 3.3, Article 8, and 
    Article 9.2.
    
    Public Comment: Requirements for Submissions
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
    concerning the issues raised in the dispute. Comments must be in 
    English and provided in fifteen copies. A person requesting that 
    information contained in a comment submitted by that person be treated 
    as confidential business information must certify that such information 
    is business confidential and would not customarily be released to the 
    public by the commenter. Confidential business information must be 
    clearly marked ``BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL'' in a contrasting color ink at 
    the top of each page of each copy.
        A person requesting that information or advice contained in a 
    comment submitted by that person, other than business confidential 
    information, be treated as confidential in accordance with section 
    135(g)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155(g)(2))--
        (1) Must so designate that information or advice;
        (2) must clearly mark the material as ``SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE'' 
    in a contrasting color ink at the top of each page of each copy; and
        (3) is encouraged to provide a non-confidential summary of the 
    information or advice.
        Pursuant to section 127(e) of the URAA (19 U.S.C. 3537(e)), USTR 
    will maintain a file on this dispute settlement proceeding, accessible 
    to the public, in the USTR Reading Room: Room 101, Office of the United 
    States Trade Representative, 600 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 
    20508. The public file will include a listing of any comments received 
    by USTR from the public with respect to the proceeding; the U.S. 
    submissions to the panel in the proceeding; the submissions, or non-
    confidential summaries of submissions, to the panel received from other 
    participants in the dispute, as well as the report of the dispute 
    settlement panel and, if applicable, the report of the Appellate Body. 
    An appointment to review the public file (Docket WTO/D-14 (``U.S.-
    Hungary Export Subsidies'')), may be made by calling Brenda Webb, (202) 
    395-6186. The USTR Reading Room is open to the public from 9:30 a.m. to 
    12 noon and 1 p.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    A. Jane Bradley,
    Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Monitoring and Enforcement.
    [FR Doc. 97-4181 Filed 2-19-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3190-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/20/1997
Department:
Trade Representative, Office of United States
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice; request for comments.
Document Number:
97-4181
Dates:
Although USTR will accept any comments received during the course of the dispute settlement proceedings, comments should be submitted on or before March 17, 1997, to be assured of timely consideration by USTR in preparing its first written submission to the panel.
Pages:
7815-7815 (1 pages)
PDF File:
97-4181.pdf