94-3925. Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Eureka Slough, CA  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-3925]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: February 22, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Coast Guard
    
    33 CFR Part 117
    
    [CGD 11-93-001]
    
     
    
    Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Eureka Slough, CA
    
    AGENCY: Coast Guard, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: At the request of the North Coast Railroad, the Coast Guard is 
    amending the regulation for the North Coast Railroad Bridge crossing 
    Eureka Slough, mile 0.3 at Eureka. The existing regulation requires 24 
    hour advance notice for openings. The amended regulation stipulates 
    that the draw need not open for the passage of vessels, however the 
    draw must be restored to full operation within six months of 
    notification to take such action from the District Commander. This 
    amendment will relieve the bridge owner of the burden of maintaining 
    the machinery and of having a person available to open the draw, and 
    will still provide for the reasonable needs of navigation.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective March 24, 1994.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Jerry P. Olmes, Bridge Section, Eleventh Coast Guard District, at (510) 
    437-3514.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Drafting Information
    
        The principal persons involved in drafting this document are Jerry 
    P. Olmes, Project Manager, and Lieutenant Robin Barber, Project 
    Attorney.
    
    Regulatory History
    
        In 58 FR 7497, Feb. 8, 1993, the Coast Guard published a notice of 
    proposed rulemaking to amend the regulation that the draw no longer 
    need open for the passage of vessels. In addition, the Commander, 
    Eleventh Coast Guard District also published the proposal in a Public 
    Notice dated February 16, 1993. Six comments were received on the 
    proposal. A public hearing was not requested and one was not held.
    
    Background and Purpose
    
        Presently, the North Coast Railroad Bridge is required to open on 
    signal if at least 24 hours advance notice is given. The North Coast 
    Railroad had requested that the draw no longer need open for vessels 
    since there had been no requests for opening for at least eight years. 
    Except for tests, Coast Guard bridge records show no bridge openings 
    for at least thirty-six years.
    
    Discussion of Comments and Changes
    
        The Coast Guard received 6 comments on the Notice of Proposed 
    Rulemaking. Four offered no objection. The California Department of 
    Boating and Waterways (CalBoating) requested that the Coast Guard 
    reevaluate the need for persons to be available to operate the bridge 
    if boating activities increase. The Humboldt County Association of 
    Governments (HCAOG) objected to the original proposal, as they felt 
    that permanent closure was too final an action to take. Even though no 
    vessel had requested an opening for many years, the HCAOG's Technical 
    Advisory Committee (TAC) felt that the bridge should remain functional, 
    and suggested possibly a 30 day window for notice of opening. The TAC 
    advised that many business and properties upstream of the bridge had 
    dikes which were in some disrepair, that fuel spills or hazardous 
    material in the slough could be inapproachable should the bridge be 
    closed on a permanent basis, and that bridge closure could impact 
    future economic development along reaches of the Eureka Slough by 
    eliminating waterfront access.
        The Coast Guard found that dike and levee maintenance is presently 
    done by dragline instead of dredges and that pollution response would 
    likely be done from landside as well. The bridge would not prevent 
    small motorboats from reaching sites upstream of the bridge to 
    transport pollution containment booms or investigate spills. The 
    regulation would prevent larger vessels from travelling upstream or 
    mooring upstream. The CalBoating and HCAOG comments prompted the Coast 
    Guard to develop a compromise proposal that the bridge need not open 
    for vessels, but in the event of development requiring bridge openings, 
    the bridge would be restored to service in six months upon order of the 
    District Commander. On September 22, 1993, the HCAOG agreed to the 
    compromise, and on January 6, 1994, the North Coast Railroad also 
    agreed.
    
    Regulatory Evaluation
    
        This rule is not considered a significant regulatory action under 
    Executive Order 12866 and is not significant under the Department of 
    Transportation Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11040, 
    February 26, 1979). The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this 
    rule to be so minimal that a Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
    
    Small Entities
    
        Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), the 
    Coast Guard must consider whether this rule will have a significant 
    economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. ``Small 
    entities'' include independently owned and operated small businesses 
    that are not dominant in their field and that otherwise qualify as 
    `'small business concerns'' under section 3 of the Small Business Act 
    (15 U.S.C. 632). Because it expects the impacts of this change to be 
    minimal, the Coast Guard certifies under section 605(b) of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) that this rule will 
    not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small 
    entities.
    
    Collection of Information
    
        This rule contains no collection of information requirements under 
    the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    
    Federalism
    
        The Coast Guard has analyzed this proposal under the principles and 
    criteria contained in Executive Order 12612 and has determined that 
    this rule does not raise sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
    
    Environment
    
        The Coast Guard considered the environmental impact of this rule 
    and concluded that, under section 2.B.2.g.(5) of Commandant Instruction 
    M16475.1B, promulgation of operating requirements or procedures for 
    drawbridges is categorically excluded from further environmental 
    documentation. A Categorical Exclusion Determination is available in 
    the docket.
    
    List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
    
        Bridges.
    
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
    CFR part 117 as follows:
    
    PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
    
    Subpart B--Specific Requirements
    
        1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
    
        Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 49 CFR 1.46; and 33 CFR 1.05-1(g).
    
    
        2. Section 117.155 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 117.155  Eureka Slough.
    
        The draw of the North Coast Railroad Bridge, mile 0.3 at Eureka, 
    need not be opened for the passage of vessels. The owner or agency 
    controlling the bridge shall restore the draw to full operation within 
    six months of notification to take such action from the District 
    Commander.
    
    
        Dated: February 3, 1994.
    R.D. Herr,
    Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eleventh Coast Guard 
    District.
    [FR Doc. 94-3925 Filed 2-18-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-14-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/24/1994
Published:
02/22/1994
Department:
Coast Guard
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
94-3925
Dates:
This rule is effective March 24, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: February 22, 1994, CGD 11-93-001
CFR: (1)
33 CFR 117.155