95-4183. United States Standards for Corn  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 1995)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 9790-9792]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-4183]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Proposed Rules
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
    the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
    notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
    the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 60, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 22, 1995 / 
    Proposed Rules
    [[Page 9790]]
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration
    
    7 CFR Part 810
    
    RIN 0580-AA14
    
    
    United States Standards for Corn
    
    AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In its periodic review of existing regulations, the Federal 
    Grain Inspection Service (FGIS), a program of the Grain Inspection, 
    Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA), proposes to amend the 
    U.S. Standards for Corn to: Report test weight (TW) to the nearest 
    tenth of a pound, eliminate the count limit on stones and reduce the 
    U.S. Sample grade aggregate weight tolerance from more than 0.2 percent 
    by weight to more than 0.1 percent by weight, and offers stress crack 
    testing as official criteria. This proposed rule is intended to 
    facilitate the marketing of corn.
    
    DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before April 24, 1995.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments must be submitted to George Wollam, GIPSA, 
    USDA, Room 0623-S, P.O. Box 96454, Washington, DC 30090-6454; FAX (202) 
    720-4628.
        All comments received will be made available for public inspection 
    at Room 0623 South Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, 
    DC during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)).
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: George Wollam, address as above, 
    telephone (202) 720-0292.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    
    Executive Order 12866
    
        This rule is exempt from Executive Order 12866 review.
    
    Executive Order 12778
    
        This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, 
    Civil Justice Reform. This action is not intended to have a retroactive 
    effect. the United States Grain Standards Act provides in Section 87g 
    that no State or subdivision may require or impose any requirements or 
    restrictions concerning the inspection, weighing, or description of 
    grain under the Act. Otherwise, this proposed rule will not preempt any 
    State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they present any 
    irreconcilable conflict with this rule. There are no administrative 
    procedures which must be exhausted prior to any judicial challenge to 
    the provisions of this rule.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
    
        James Robert Baker, Administrator, GIPSA, has determined that this 
    proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
    substantial number of small entities as defined in the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 602 et seq.) because most users of the 
    official inspection and weighing services and those entities that 
    perform these services do not meet the requirements for small entities. 
    Further, the regulations are applied equally to all entities.
    
    Background
    
        During October 1993, the Federal Grain Inspection Service (FGIS), 
    prepared a discussion paper concerning the U.S. Standards for Corn. 
    This paper addressed a number of issues relating to the standards and 
    was distributed throughout the grain industry. The paper also served as 
    a starting point for discussions with producers, trade associations, 
    processors, handlers, and merchandisers to better understand their 
    views on changes needed to improve existing standards. FGIS received 
    positive feedback from the grain industry regarding the corn discussion 
    paper; and, in fact, numerous industry representatives suggested that 
    FGIS continue to develop and distribute similar documents before 
    amending other standards.
        FGIS received a total of 12 written comments concerning the 
    discussion paper: 3 from research associations and universities, 1 from 
    a producer organization, 4 from handler and processor associations, 1 
    from an industry consortium, 2 from grain inspection and weighing 
    associations, and 1 from a grain company. In addition to receiving 
    written comments, FGIS reviewed the corn standards with representatives 
    of the Iowa Department of Agriculture, the Grain Quality Workshops, and 
    other corn-related associations.
        On the basis of all comments and other available information, FGIS 
    is proposing three changes to the corn standards that reflect current 
    market needs and also serve to improve the effectiveness of the 
    standards. The proposed amendments include: (1) Reporting TW to the 
    nearest tenth of a pound, (2) eliminating the count limit on stones and 
    reducing the U.S. Sample grade aggregate weight tolerance from more 
    than 0.2 percent by weight to more than 0.1 percent by weight, and (3) 
    offering stress crack testing as official criteria.
    
    Test Weight (TW)
    
        FGIS proposes to revise Sec. 810.102(d) of the United States 
    Standards for Grain to report TW in corn to the nearest tenth of a 
    pound. This change will bring the reporting requirement for TW into 
    line with the reporting requirements for other factors, such as total 
    damaged kernels and broken corn and foreign material (BCFM).
        This is not the first time that FGIS has proposed to revise the 
    reporting requirement for TW in corn. In 1986, (51 FR 35224) to promote 
    greater uniformity among the grain standards, FGIS proposed to reformat 
    the grain standards and solicited comments regarding certification 
    requirements for factors not expressed to the nearest tenth. FGIS 
    proposed to report all percentages (except ergot) and all TW values to 
    the nearest tenth. The proposal included TW in corn which is certified 
    in whole and half pounds with fractions of a half pound disregarded.
        The majority of commentors who opposed the proposal indicated that 
    sufficient data were not available to determine how a change in 
    reporting requirements would affect reproducibility of results--
    especially for TW in coarse grains. FGIS decided not to revise the 
    reporting requirements, except for dockage in wheat (52 FR 24414). FGIS 
    does offer, upon request, the recording of TW results to the nearest 
    tenth pound in the Remarks section of the grade 
    certificate. [[Page 9791]] 
        An extensive review of FGIS grain inspection and monitoring data, 
    which represent over 4,200 samples, provides standard deviation values 
    for each of the mandatory factors across all grade levels within the 
    corn standards. Standard deviation is a measure of variation; and a 
    particular type of standard deviation, the standard deviation of the 
    difference (SDD), can be used as a measure of reproducibility. When a 
    sample is reanalyzed for a particular factor, the reproducibility of 
    results improves as the SDD becomes smaller.
        The review of inspection data resulted in separate SDD values for 
    each grade level for both domestic and export corn samples. Only the 
    export SDD values, however, were calculated from raw TW data reported 
    to the nearest tenth of a pound. Comparison of SDD values between 
    factors will therefore focus on the export values. For TW, the SDD 
    value was the same, 0.366, for all grade levels, thus indicating an 
    insignificant range and a consistent reproducibility in TW values 
    across all grade levels. For damaged kernels total (DKT), the SDD 
    values ranged from 0.853 to 1.814 for U.S. Grade Nos. 1 to 5. For BCFM, 
    the corresponding values ranged from 0.197 to 0.359 for U.S. Grade Nos. 
    1 to 5. The range in SDD values reflects the range in DKT and BCFM 
    levels and the variance in the reproducibility of results across grade 
    levels.
        The TW SDD values are either close to or lower than the SDD values 
    for the other factors when all raw data used in the calculation of the 
    SDD values had been reported to the nearest tenth. It can be inferred 
    from SDD values that the reporducibility of TW results is similar to or 
    better than the reproducibility of DKT and BCFM results. The industry 
    accepts the current practice of reporting DKT and BCFM results to the 
    nearest tenth. Therefore, based on the comparison of SDD values, the 
    industry may also find the reporting of TW to the nearest tenth of a 
    pound acceptable.
        Another consideration for the industry is that virtually all TW 
    results are currently rounded down. For example, under the current 
    reporting method, a scale reading 53.99 pounds per bushel is certified 
    as 53.5 pounds per bushel which would meet the TW grade limit for U.S. 
    No. 3 corn. If the results, however, were rounded to the nearest tenth 
    of a pound, the resultant 54.0 pounds per bushel would meet the grade 
    limit for U.S. No. 2 corn. In general, the current practice of rounding 
    down causes TW to almost always be underrepresented throughout the 
    marketing channel. Furthermore, the rounding of TW results to the 
    nearest tenth of a pound will not significantly affect the assigned 
    grade, since in most cases the rounded result will fall within the 
    grade requirement.
    
    Stones
    
        FGIS proposes to eliminate the count limit on stones and reduce the 
    aggregate weight tolerance from more than 0.2 percent by weight to more 
    than 0.1 percent by weight. Stones have a harmful effect on corn 
    quality and milling. Several industry representatives have requested 
    that the count limit on stones be eliminated and the aggregate weight 
    tolerance be reduced from more than 0.2 percent by weight to more than 
    0.1 percent by weight. The elimination of the count limit would serve 
    to further tighten the tolerance of stones by allowing a smaller number 
    of heavy stones to downgrade a sample.
    
    Stress Crack Testing
    
        FGIS proposes to offer corn stress crack (SC) testing as official 
    criteria under the United States Grain Standards Act. This testing 
    service will be optional and FGIS will recover the cost of providing 
    this service through the applicable inspection fees as set forth in 
    section 800.71(a) of the regulations.
        Corn kernels which contain stress cracks tend to break apart, and, 
    as a result, are undesirable in the corn dry milling, wet milling, and 
    food manufacturing processes. In the dry milling process, cracked 
    kernels yield lower percentages of large flaking grits which are the 
    highly valued prime product (ref. 1). Starch recovery, which is an 
    essential component of the wet milling process, is also lower from 
    kernels possessing numerous stress cracks. To the food manufacturer, 
    stress cracks are of concern because of the adverse effect on soaking 
    which is an essential component of the manufacturing process. Some 
    snack food companies currently limit the percent of kernels with stress 
    cracks to values less than 20 percent (ref. 2). Cracked corn is also 
    more difficult to store than undamaged corn, since cracked corn is more 
    readily attacked by microorganisms and is difficult to aerate 
    uniformly.
        Cracked corn could also contribute to increased elevator dust 
    levels and, thus, negatively impact elevator safety.
        Commentors addressed the various detrimental effects of stress 
    cracks and broken corn, and the majority of commentors recommended that 
    FGIS offer stress crack testing as part of the national inspection 
    service. Due to the importance of stress crack testing, GIPSA proposes 
    to offer stress crack testing, upon request, as official criteria. 
    GIPSA and the official agencies of the national inspection system will 
    use the method recommended by the Illinois Crop Improvement 
    Association's Identity Preserved Grain Lab (IPGL) which performs stress 
    crack tests on over 4,000 corn samples per year. FGIS will use this 
    method because it is cost-effective, easy to use, and quick.
        As described by the IPGL, stress crack tests are performed on 
    random subsamples of 100 kernels. The kernels are inspected visually on 
    a back lighting lightboard and separated into four categories: no or 
    zero stress cracks, and more than two or multiple stress cracks. The 
    percentage of kernels falling into each category is used to calculate 
    the percentage of stress cracks and a stress crack index as follows:
    
    % TSC = [% single SC + % double SC + % multiple SC]
    SCI = [(% single SC) + (% double SC  x  3) + (% multiple SC  x  5)]
    where SC = stress cracks, SCI = stress crack index,
    and TSC = total stress cracks
    
        The stress crack index is an indication of the multiplicity of 
    stress cracks in each kernel. The weighting factors indicate that corn 
    kernels with double and multiple stress cracks are more susceptible to 
    breakage than kernels with single stress cracks.
        FGIS seeks comments not only on the proposal to offer stress crack 
    testing as official criteria but on the reporting method for results. 
    Since the information will be readily available, commentors should 
    address whether the percentage of stress cracks in each of the three 
    categories, single, double, and multiple, should, be reported. If no 
    comments are received on the reporting method, FGIS will report only 
    the total percent of stress cracks and the stress crack index.
    
    Miscellaneous Changes
    
        FGIS proposes to revise the format of the grade chart in 
    Sec. 810.404, Grades and grade requirements for corn, to improve the 
    readability of the grade chart.
    
    Proposed Action
    
        FGIS proposes to revise Sec. 810.102, Definition of other terms, by 
    revising section (d), Test weight per bushel. It is proposed that TW in 
    corn be reported to the nearest tenth of a pound.
        FGIS proposes to revise Sec. 810.404, Grades and grade requirements 
    for corn, by revising the definition of U.S. Sample grade by 
    eliminating the count limit on stones and reducing the aggregate weight 
    criteria from more than 0.2 percent by weight to more than 0.1 percent 
    by weight.
        Comments including data, views, and arguments are solicited from 
    interested [[Page 9792]] persons. Pursuant to Section 4(b)(1) of the 
    United States Grain Standards Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 76(b)(1)), upon 
    request, such information concerning changes to the standards may be 
    orally presented in an informal manner. Also, pursuant to this section, 
    no standards established or amendments or revocations of standards are 
    to become effective less than one calendar year after promulgation 
    unless, in the judgement of the Administrator, the public health, 
    interest, or safety require that they become effective sooner.
    
    References
    
    (1) Reid, J.F., Kim, C., and Paulsen, M.R. 1991, ``Computer Vision 
    Sensing of Stress Cracks in Corn Kernels'' ASAE, Sept/Oct, v.34 p. 
    8-9.
    (2) Stroshine, R. 1991, ``Breakage Susceptibility Technology, 
    Uniformity by 2000,'' Scherer communications, Urbana. p. 410-416.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 810
    
        Exports, Grain.
    
        For reasons set out in the preamble, 7 CFR Part 810 is proposed to 
    be amended as follows:
    
    PART 810--OFFICIAL UNITED STATES STANDARDS FOR GRAIN
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 810 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: Pub. L. 94-582, 90 Stat. 2867, as amended (7 U.S.C. 
    71 et seq.).
    
        2. Section 810.102(d) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 810.102  Definition of other terms.
    
    * * * * *
        (d) Test-weight. The weight per Winchester bushel (2,150.42 cubic 
    inches) as determined using an approved device according to procedures 
    prescribed in FGIS instructions. Test-weight in the standards for corn, 
    mixed grain, oats, sorghum, and soybeans is determined on the original 
    sample. Test-weight in the standards for barley, flaxseed, rye, 
    sunflower seed, triticale, and wheat is determined after mechanically 
    cleaning the original sample. Test-weight is recorded to the nearest 
    tenth pound for corn, rye, triticale, and wheat. Test-weight for all 
    other grains, if applicable, is recorded in whole and half pounds with 
    a fraction of a half pound disregarded. Test-weight is not an official 
    factor for canola.
    * * * * *
        3. Section 810.404 is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 810.404  Grades and grade requirements for corn.
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             Grades U.S. Nos.                       
                    Grading factors                 ----------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          1            2            3            4            5     
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Maximum limits of:                                               
                                                                                                                    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Test Weight (lbs/bu)...........................         56.0         54.0         52.0         49.0         46.0
                                                                                                                    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               Maximum percent limits of:                                           
                                                                                                                    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Damaged kernels Heat (part of total)...........          0.1          0.2          0.5          1.0          3.0
                                                    ----------------------------------------------------------------
          Total....................................          3.0          5.0          7.0         10.0         15.0
    Broken corn and foreign material...............          2.0          3.0          4.0          5.0          7.0
    Animal filth...................................          0.2          0.2          0.2          0.2          0.2
    Stones.........................................          0.1          0.1          0.1          0.1          0.1
                                                                                                                    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                Maximum count limits of:                                            
                                                                                                                    
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Other materials:                                                                                                
        Castor beans...............................            1            1            1            1            1
        Cockleburs.................................            7            7            7            7            7
        Crotalaria seeds...........................            2            2            2            2            2
        Glass......................................            1            1            1            1            1
        Unknown foreign substance..................            3            3            3            3            3
    U.S. Sample grade:                                                                                              
        U.S. Sample grade is corn that:                                                                             
            (a) Does not meet the requirements for                                                                  
             the grades U.S. Nos, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5;                                                                 
             or                                                                                                     
            (b) Has a musty, sour, or commercially                                                                  
             objectionable foreign odor; or                                                                         
            (c) Is heating or otherwise of                                                                          
             distinctly low quality.                                                                                
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Harold W. Davis,
    Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards 
    Administration.
    [FR Doc. 95-4183 Filed 2-21-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-EN-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/22/1995
Department:
Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
95-4183
Dates:
Comments must be submitted on or before April 24, 1995.
Pages:
9790-9792 (3 pages)
RINs:
0580-AA14
PDF File:
95-4183.pdf
CFR: (2)
7 CFR 810.102
7 CFR 810.404