94-4022. Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Granting of the Application for Interim Waiver and Publishing of the Petition for Waiver of DOE Furnace Test Procedures From Goodman Manufacturing Company  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-4022]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: February 23, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
    Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
    [Case No. F-067]
    
     
    
    Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products: Granting of 
    the Application for Interim Waiver and Publishing of the Petition for 
    Waiver of DOE Furnace Test Procedures From Goodman Manufacturing 
    Company
    
    AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, DOE.
    
    ACTION: Notice.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: Today's notice publishes a letter granting an Interim Waiver 
    to Goodman Manufacturing Company (Goodman) from the existing Department 
    of Energy (DOE) test procedure regarding blower time delay for the 
    company's GMN series central furnaces.
        Today's notice also publishes a ``Petition for Waiver'' from 
    Goodman. Goodman's Petition for Waiver requests DOE to grant relief 
    from the DOE furnace test procedure relating to the blower time delay 
    specification. Goodman seeks to test using a blower delay time of 40 
    seconds for its GMN series central furnaces instead of the specified 
    1.5-minute delay between on-time and blower on-time. The Department is 
    soliciting comments, data, and information respecting the Petition for 
    Waiver.
    
    DATES: DOE will accept comments, data, and information not later than 
    March 25, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Written comments and statements shall be sent to: Department 
    of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Case No. 
    F-067, Mail Stop EE-43, room 5E-066, Forrestal Building, 1000 
    Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-7140.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Cyrus H. Nasseri, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy 
    Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Mail Station EE-431, Forrestal 
    Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 
    586-7140.
    Eugene Margolis, Esq., U.S. Department of Energy, Office of General 
    Counsel, Mail Station GC-72, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence 
    Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-9507.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Energy Conservation Program for Consumer 
    Products (other than automobiles) was established pursuant to the 
    Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA), Public Law 94-163, 89 Stat. 
    917, as amended by the National Energy Conservation Policy Act (NECPA), 
    Public Law 95-619, 92 Stat. 3266, the National Appliance Energy 
    Conservation Act of 1987 (NAECA), Public Law 100-12, the National 
    Appliance Energy Conservation Amendments of 1988 (NAECA 1988), Public 
    Law 100-357, and the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (EPAct), Public Law 102-
    486, 106 Stat. 2776, which requires DOE to prescribe standardized test 
    procedures to measure the energy consumption of certain consumer 
    products, including furnaces. The intent of the test procedures is to 
    provide a comparable measure of energy consumption that will assist 
    consumers in making purchasing decisions. These test procedures appear 
    at 10 CFR part 430, Subpart B.
        The Department amended the prescribed test procedures by adding 10 
    CFR 430.27 on September 26, 1980, creating the waiver process. 45 FR 
    64108. Thereafter, DOE further amended the appliance test procedure 
    waiver process to allow the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency 
    and Renewable Energy (Assistant Secretary) to grant an Interim Waiver 
    from test procedure requirements to manufacturers that have petitioned 
    DOE for a waiver of such prescribed test procedures. 51 FR 42823, 
    November 26, 1986.
        The waiver process allows the Assistant Secretary to waive, 
    temporarily, test procedures for a particular basic model when a 
    petitioner shows that the basic model contains one or more design 
    characteristics which prevent testing according to the prescribed test 
    procedures, or when the prescribed test procedures may evaluate the 
    basic model in a manner so unrepresentative of its true energy 
    consumption as to provide materially inaccurate comparative data. 
    Waivers generally remain in effect until final test procedure 
    amendments become effective, resolving the problem that is the subject 
    of the waiver.
        The Interim Waiver provisions added by the 1986 amendment allow the 
    Secretary to grant an Interim Waiver when it is determined that the 
    applicant will experience economic hardship if the Application for 
    Interim Waiver is denied, if it appears likely that the Petition for 
    Waiver will be granted, and/or the Assistant Secretary determines that 
    it would be desirable for public policy reasons to grant immediate 
    relief pending a determination on the Petition for Waiver. An Interim 
    Waiver remains in effect for a period of 180 days or until DOE issues 
    its determination on the Petition for Waiver, whichever is sooner, and 
    may be extended for an additional 180 days, if necessary.
        On November 29, 1993, Goodman filed an Application for Interim 
    Waiver regarding blower time delay. Goodman's Application seeks an 
    Interim Waiver from the DOE test provisions that require a 1.5-minute 
    time delay between the ignition of the burner and starting of the 
    circulating air blower. Instead, Goodman requests the allowance to test 
    using a 40-second blower time delay when testing its GMN series central 
    furnaces. Goodman states that the 40-second delay is indicative of how 
    these furnaces actually operate. Such a delay results in an energy 
    savings of 0.6 to 1.0 percent. Since current DOE test procedures do not 
    address this variable blower time delay, Goodman asks that the Interim 
    Waiver be granted.
        The Department has published a notice of Proposed Rulemaking on 
    August 23, 1993, (58 FR 44583) to amend the furnace test procedure, 
    which addresses the above issue.
        Previous waivers for this type of time blower delay control have 
    been granted by DOE to Coleman Company, 50 FR 2710, January 18, 1985; 
    Magic Chef Company, 50 FR 41553, October 11, 1985; Rheem Manufacturing 
    Company, 53 FR 48574, December 1, 1988, 56 FR 2920, January 25, 1991, 
    57 FR 10166, March 24, 1992, and 57 FR 34560, August 5, 1992; Trane 
    Company, 54 FR 19226, May 4, 1989, 56 FR 6021, February 14, 1991, 57 FR 
    10167, March 24, 1992, and 57 FR 22222, May 27, 1992; Lennox 
    Industries, 55 FR 50224, December 5, 1990, and 57 FR 49700, November 3, 
    1992; Inter-City Products Corporation, 55 FR 51487, December 14, 1990, 
    and 56 FR 63945, December 6, 1991; DMO Industries, 56 FR 4622, February 
    5, 1991; Heil-Quaker Corporation, 56 FR 6019, February 14, 1991; 
    Carrier Corporation, 56 FR 6018, February 14, 1991, and 57 FR 38830, 
    August 27, 1992; Amana Refrigeration Inc., 56 FR 27958, June 18, 1991, 
    56 FR 63940, December 6, 1991, and 57 FR 23392, June 3, 1992; Snyder 
    General Corporation, 56 FR 54960, September 9, 1991; Goodman 
    Manufacturing Corporation, 56 FR 51713, October 15, 1991, and 57 FR 
    27970, June 23, 1992; The Ducane Company Inc., 56 FR 63943, December 6, 
    1991, and 57 FR 10163, March 24, 1992; Armstrong Air Conditioning, 
    Inc., 57 FR 899, January 9, 1992, 57 FR 10160, March 24, 1992, 57 FR 
    10161, March 24, 1992, 57 FR 39193, August 28, 1992, and 57 FR 54230, 
    November 17, 1992; Thermo Products, Inc., 57 FR 903, January 9, 1992; 
    Consolidated Industries Corporation, 57 FR 22220, May 27, 1992; Evcon 
    Industries, Inc., 57 FR 47847, October 20, 1992; and Bard Manufacturing 
    Company, 57 FR 53733, November 12, 1992. Thus, it appears likely that 
    the Petition for Waiver will be granted for blower time delay.
        In those instances where the likely success of the Petition for 
    Waiver has been demonstrated based upon DOE having granted a waiver for 
    a similar product design, it is in the public interest to have similar 
    products tested and rated for energy consumption on a comparable basis.
        Therefore, based on the above, DOE is granting Goodman an Interim 
    Waiver for its GMN series central furnaces. Pursuant to paragraph (e) 
    of Section 430.27 of the Code of Federal Regulations part 430, the 
    following letter granting the Application for Interim Waiver to Goodman 
    was issued.
        Pursuant to paragraph (b) of 10 CFR part 430.27, DOE is hereby 
    publishing the ``Petition for Waiver'' in its entirety. The petition 
    contains no confidential information. The Department solicits comments, 
    data, and information respecting the petition.
    
        Issued in Washington, DC, February 10, 1994.
    Christine A. Ervin,
    Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
    February 14, 1994.
    
    Mr. Peter H. Alexander,
    Vice President of Engineering, Goodman Manufacturing Company, 1501 
    Seamist, Houston, Texas 77008.
    
        Dear Mr. Alexander: This is in response to your November 29, 
    1993, Application for Interim Waiver and Petition for Waiver from 
    the Department of Energy (DOE) test procedure regarding blower time 
    delay for Goodman Manufacturing Company (Goodman) GMN series central 
    furnaces.
        Previous waivers for this type of timed blower delay control 
    have been granted by DOE to Coleman Company, 50 FR 2710, January 18, 
    1985; Magic Chef Company, 50 FR 41553, October 11, 1985; Rheem 
    Manufacturing Company, 53 FR 48574, December 1, 1988, 56 FR 2920, 
    January 25, 1991, 57 FR 10166, March 24, 1992, and 57 FR 34560, 
    August 5, 1992; Trane Company, 54 FR 19226, May 4, 1989, 56 FR 6021, 
    February 14, 1991, 57 FR 10167, March 24, 1992, and 57 FR 22222, May 
    27, 1992; Lennox Industries, 55 FR 50224, December 5, 1990, and 57 
    FR 49700, November 3, 1992; Inter-City Products Corporation, 55 FR 
    51487, December 14, 1990, and 56 FR 63945, December 6, 1991; DMO 
    Industries, 56 FR 4622, February 5, 1991; Heil-Quaker Corporation, 
    56 FR 6019, February 14, 1991; Carrier Corporation, 56 FR 6018, 
    February 14, 1991, and 57 FR 38830, August 27, 1992; Amana 
    Refrigeration Inc., 56 FR 27958, June 18, 1991, 56 FR 63940, 
    December 6, 1991, and 57 FR 23392, June 3, 1992; Snyder General 
    Corporation, 56 FR 54960, September 9, 1991; Goodman Manufacturing 
    Corporation, 56 FR 51713, October 15, 1991, and 57 FR 27970, June 
    23, 1992; The Ducane Company Inc., 56 FR 63943, December 6, 1991, 
    and 57 FR 10163, March 24, 1992; Armstrong Air Conditioning, Inc., 
    57 FR 899, January 9, 1992, 57 FR 10160, March 24, 1992, 57 FR 
    10161, March 24, 1992, 57 FR 39193, August 28, 1992, and 57 FR 
    54230, November 17, 1992; Thermo Products, Inc., 57 FR 903, January 
    9, 1992; Consolidated Industries Corporation, 57 FR 22220, May 27, 
    1992; Evcon Industries, Inc., 57 FR 47847, October 20, 1992; and 
    Bard Manufacturing Company, 57 FR 53733, November 12, 1992. Thus, it 
    appears likely that the Petition for Waiver will be granted for 
    blower time delay.
        Goodman's Application for Interim Waiver does not provide 
    sufficient information to evaluate what, if any, economic impact or 
    competitive disadvantage Goodman will likely experience absent a 
    favorable determination on its application. However, in those 
    instances where the likely success of the Petition for Waiver has 
    been demonstrated, based upon DOE having granted a waiver for a 
    similar product design, it is in the public interest to have similar 
    products tested and rated for energy consumption on a comparable 
    basis.
        Goodman shall be permitted to test its GMN series central 
    furnaces on the basis of the test procedures specified in 10 CFR 
    Part 430, Subpart B, Appendix N, with the modification set forth 
    below:
        (i) Section 3.0 in Appendix N is deleted and replaced with the 
    following paragraph:
        3.0 Test Procedure. Testing and measurements shall be as 
    specified in Section 9 in ANSI/ASHRAE 103-82 with the exception of 
    Sections 9.2.2, 9.3.1, and 9.3.2, and the inclusion of the following 
    additional procedures:
        (ii) Add a new paragraph 3.10 in Appendix N as follows:
        3.10 Gas- and Oil-Fueled Central Furnaces. After equilibrium 
    conditions are achieved following the cool-down test and the 
    required measurements performed, turn on the furnace and measure the 
    flue gas temperature, using the thermocouple grid described above, 
    at 0.5 and 2.5 minutes after the main burner(s) comes on. After the 
    burner start-up, delay the blower start-up by 1.5 minutes (t-) 
    unless: (1) The furnace employs a single motor to drive the power 
    burner and the indoor air circulation blower, in which case the 
    burner and blower shall be started together; or (2) the furnace is 
    designed to operate using an unvarying delay time that is other than 
    1.5 minutes, in which case the fan control shall be permitted to 
    start the blower; or (3) the delay time results in the activation of 
    a temperature safety device which shuts off the burner, in which 
    case the fan control shall be permitted to start the blower. In the 
    latter case, if the fan control is adjustable, set it to start the 
    blower at the highest temperature. If the fan control is permitted 
    to start the blower, measure time delay (t-) using a stop watch. 
    Record the measured temperatures. During the heat-up test for oil-
    fueled furnaces, maintain the draft in the flue pipe within 
    0.01 inch of water column of the manufacturer's 
    recommended on-period draft.
        This Interim Waiver is based upon the presumed validity of 
    statements and all allegations submitted by the company. This 
    Interim Waiver may be removed or modified at any time upon a 
    determination that the factual basis underlying the application is 
    incorrect.
        The Interim Waiver shall remain in effect for a period of 180 
    days or until DOE acts on the Petition for Waiver, whichever is 
    sooner, and may be extended for an additional 180-day period, if 
    necessary.
            Sincerely,
    Christine A. Ervin,
    Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
    November 29, 1993.
    
    Assistant Secretary, Conversation and Renewable Energy,
    United States Department of Energy,
    1000 Independence Ave., SW.,
    Washington, DC 20585.
    
    Re: Petition for Waiver and Application for Interim Waiver.
    
        Gentlemen: This is a Petition for Waiver and Application for 
    interim Waiver submitted pursuant to Title 10 CFR 430.27. Waiver is 
    requested from the test procedure for measuring Furnace Energy 
    Consumption as found in Appendix H to Subpart B of part 430.
        The current test procedure requires a 1.5 minute delay between 
    burner ignition and the start of the circulating air blower. Goodman 
    Manufacturing Co., L.P. is requesting waiver and authorization to 
    use a 40 second delay instead of the specified 1.5 minutes for the 
    blower to start after main burner ignition. Goodman Manufacturing 
    intends to use a fixed timing control on our GMN series central 
    furnaces to gain additional energy savings that are achieved with 
    the use of shorter blower on times.
        Test data for these furnaces with a 40 second delay indicated an 
    increase in AFUE of 0.6 to 1.0 percentage points. The use of a 40 
    second delay reduces the appliance flue losses and therefore 
    increases the furnace efficiency. Copies of confidential test data 
    confirming this energy savings will be provided to you at your 
    request.
        The current test procedure does not give Goodman Manufacturing 
    credit for energy savings that can be obtained using fixed blower 
    timings. The proposed ASRAE 103-1988 that is under consideration by 
    DOE address the use of timed blower operation.
        Goodman Manufacturing is confident that this Waiver will be 
    granted, and therefore we request an Interim Waiver be granted until 
    a final ruling is made. Goodman, as well as other manufacturers of 
    domestic furnaces, have been granted similar waivers.
        Manufacturers that domestically market similar products have 
    been sent a copy of this Petition for Waiver and Application for 
    Interim Waiver.
            Sincerely,
    Goodman Manufacturing Co., L.P.,
    
    Peter H. Alexander,
    Vice President of Engineering.
    [FR Doc. 94-4022 Filed 2-22-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6450-01-P-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/23/1994
Department:
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Office
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice.
Document Number:
94-4022
Dates:
DOE will accept comments, data, and information not later than March 25, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: February 23, 1994, Case No. F-067