96-4121. Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange, Inc.; Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Transactions in Currency Warrants by Registered Options Traders  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 7031-7032]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-4121]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-36852; File No. SR-Amex-95-38]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; American Stock Exchange, Inc.; 
    Order Approving Proposed Rule Change Relating to Transactions in 
    Currency Warrants by Registered Options Traders
    
    February 15, 1996.
        On September 29, 1995, the American Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Amex'' 
    or ``Exchange'') submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission 
    (``SEC'' or ``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b) of the 
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 
    thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to provide that proprietary 
    transactions executed on the Amex in currency warrants shall be 
    governed by, and effected in accordance with, Amex Rule 958 (Options 
    Transactions of Registered Traders).
    
        \1\ 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78s(b)(1) (1988 & Supp. V 1993).
        \2\ 17 CFR Sec. 240.19b-4 (1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Notice of the proposed rule change was published for comment and 
    appeared in the Federal Register on December 7, 1995.\3\ No comments 
    were received on the proposal. This order approves the proposal.
    
        \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 36535 (Nov. 30, 
    1995), 60 FR 62911.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Description of the Proposal
    
        The Amex proposes to amend Commentary .12 to Rule 111 (Restrictions 
    on Registered Traders), Commentary .14 to Rule 114 (Registered Equity 
    Market Makers) and Commentary .10 to Rule 958 (Options Transactions of 
    Registered Traders) to provide that proprietary transactions executed 
    on the Amex in currency warrants shall be governed by, and effected in 
    accordance with, Rule 958.
        In 1992, the Exchange amended its rules to permit regular members 
    to register as a Registered Trader under Rule 958\4\ to engage in 
    supplemental market making activity in stock index warrants and certain 
    other non-options derivative products. The Exchange enacted these 
    changes to conform its rules to those of other markets, and to provide 
    additional liquidity to the market for the Exchange's Portfolio 
    Depositary Receipts and LOR SuperUnits. Due to the limited purpose of 
    the 1992 rule changes, the Exchange did not seek at that time to extend 
    this treatment to the trading of listed currency warrants by Registered 
    Traders.
    
        \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 30768 (June 2, 
    1992). A Registered Trader under Rule 958 is also referred to as a 
    Registered Options Trade (``ROT'').
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        At present, the only traders (other than the assigned specialist) 
    permitted to trade currency warrants on the Amex are Registered Equity 
    Market Makers (``REMMs'') under the Exchange's equity trading rules, 
    pursuant to the provisions of Rule 114 (which includes applicable 
    provisions of Rule 111). Under the proposed rule changes, regular 
    members wishing to engage in supplemental market making activity in 
    currency warrants could register as a Registered Trader under Rule 958 
    and be assigned the particular currency warrant requested (``assigned 
    security''). Once registered under Rule 958, a ROT may trade the 
    assigned security of his own account pursuant to the provisions of that 
    Rule.
        In contrast to REMMs trading pursuant to Rules 111 and 114, Rule 
    958 imposes continuous affirmative market making obligations upon 
    Registered Traders.\5\ In particular, Rule 958(b) requires that 
    Registered Trader transactions constitute a course of dealings 
    reasonably calculated to contribute to the maintenance of a fair 
    
    [[Page 7032]]
    and orderly market and that no Registered Trader should enter into 
    transactions or make bids or offers that are inconsistent with such a 
    course of dealings.\6\ In recognition of this, such market makers are 
    designated as specialists on the Exchange for all purposes under the 
    Act (See Rule 958, Commentary .01), and are entitled to good faith 
    market maker margin with respect to transactions effected on the Amex 
    trading floor in these assigned securities.\7\ The Exchange anticipates 
    that application of Rule 958 requirements to supplemental Exchange 
    market making by its members in currency warrants will encourage 
    additional competition, thereby enhancing liquidity in such securities, 
    and also eliminate an anomalous regulatory disparity between currency 
    and stock index warrant trading.
    
        \5\ Moreover, as with options and stock index warrants, the 
    Exchange believes it is inappropriate to apply the stabilization 
    requirements applicable to REMMs to market maker transactions in 
    currency warrants (see Amex Rule 950, which excludes the application 
    of Rules 111 and 114 to transactions in options).
        \6\ See also Rule 958(c) which, among other things, imposes 
    additional requirements when a ROT is in the trading crowd to make 
    competitive bids and offers as reasonably necessary to contribute to 
    the maintenance of a fair and orderly market.
        \7\ Market maker margin for certain off-floor initiated 
    transactions may also be available. See Commentary .01 to Rule 958.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    II. Discussion
    
        The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
    with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
    thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in 
    particular, the requirements of Section 6(b)(5).\8\ In particular, the 
    Commission believes the proposal is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) 
    requirement that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just 
    and equitable principles of trade and not to permit unfair 
    discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, and dealers. 
    Because the proposed rule change would impose specialist obligations on 
    Registered Traders as specialists for the purpose of trading currency 
    warrants, the Commission also believes that the proposal is consistent 
    with Section 11(b) and Rule 11b-1 under the Act, which provide that the 
    rules of a national securities exchange may permit members to be 
    registered as specialists, subject to the requirement of maintaining 
    fair and orderly markets in their specialty securities.
    
        \8\ 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78f(b)(5) (1982).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Commission notes that the proposed rule change will conform the 
    treatment of currency warrants to that of stock index warrants and 
    other non-options derivative products. As a result, Registered Traders 
    that trade currency warrants on the Amex under Rule 958 will assume 
    continuous affirmative and negative market making obligations and be 
    treated as specialists under the Act, including for margin purposes. 
    This allows the extension and application of good faith margin 
    treatment for such transactions, thereby helping to attract more market 
    makers and liquidity in currency warrants. Furthermore, the 
    stabilization requirements applicable to REMMs will not apply to a 
    Registered Trader's transactions in currency warrants. Because of the 
    duty imposed on Registered Traders that all such transactions must 
    constitute a course of dealings reasonably calculated to contribute to 
    the maintenance of a fair and orderly market, the Commission believes 
    it is appropriate not to apply these provisions to Registered Traders. 
    In this respect, the Commission notes that Amex Rule 127, Minimum 
    Fractional Changes, will continue to apply to transactions in currency 
    warrants as will Rule 958(c)(i), which addresses bid-ask differentials.
        In summary, the Commission believes that the market making 
    obligations of an ROT together with the extension of good faith margin 
    could help to increase the depth and liquidity of the Amex currency 
    warrant market.
        It therefore is ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\9\ that the proposed rule change (SR-Amex-95-38) is approved.
    
        \9\ 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78s(b)(2) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
    
        \10\ 17 CFR Sec. 200.30-3(a)(12) (1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 96-4121 Filed 2-22-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/23/1996
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-4121
Pages:
7031-7032 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-36852, File No. SR-Amex-95-38
PDF File:
96-4121.pdf