98-4306. Federal Acquisition Regulation; Modular Contracting  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 35 (Monday, February 23, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 9068-9069]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-4306]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
    
    GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
    
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
    
    48 CFR Part 39
    
    [FAC 97-04; FAR Case 96-605; Item XV]
    RIN 9000-AH55
    
    
    Federal Acquisition Regulation; Modular Contracting
    
    AGENCIES: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
    (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense 
    Acquisition Regulations Council have agreed on a final rule amending 
    the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement Section 5202 of 
    the Information Technology Management Reform Act (ITMRA) of 1996, which 
    encourages maximum practicable use of modular contracting in acquiring 
    information technology. ITMRA is part of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 
    (Public Law 104-106). This regulatory action was not subject to Office 
    of Management and Budget review under Executive Order 12866, dated 
    September 30, 1993, and is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: April 24, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The FAR Secretariat, Room 4035, 1800 F 
    Street, NW, Washington, DC 20405 (202) 501-4755 for information 
    pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of 
    content, contact Ms. Linda Nelson, Procurement Analyst at (202) 501-
    1900. Please cite FAC 97-04, FAR case 96-605.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    A. Background
    
        A proposed rule with request for comment and notice of public 
    meeting was published in the Federal Register (62 FR 14756) on March 
    27, 1997. Comments were received from four respondents. All comments 
    were considered in the development of the final rule. The final rule 
    differs from the proposed rule by adding in paragraph 39.103(d) ``task 
    order contracts'' as another example.
    
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        The Department of Defense, the General Services Administration, and 
    the National Aeronautics and Space Administration certify that this 
    final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
    number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because, while it may affect 
    the structure of certain information technology (IT) acquisition 
    programs, it will not impose any specific cost burden on small 
    entities. The modular contracting approach should slightly benefit 
    small entities, because use of modular contracting techniques should 
    increase the number of business opportunities available to them. When a 
    modular contracting approach is used, large, complex IT systems 
    acquisitions will be divided into smaller, discrete increments that may 
    subsequently be made available to small entities for competition.
    
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the changes to 
    the FAR do not impose recordkeeping or information collection 
    requirements, or collections of information from offerors, contractors, 
    or members of the public which require the approval of the Office of 
    Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
    
    List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 39
    
        Government procurement.
    
        Dated: February 13, 1998.
    Edward C. Loeb,
    Director, Federal Acquisition Policy Division.
        Therefore, 48 CFR Part 39 is amended as set forth below:
    
    PART 39--ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
    
        1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 39 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 10 U.S.C. chapter 137; and 42 
    U.S.C. 2473(c).
    
        2. Section 39.002 is amended by adding in alphabetical order the 
    definition of ``Modular contracting'' to read as follows:
    
    
    39.002  Definitions.
    
        Modular contracting, as used in this part, means use of one or more 
    contracts to acquire information technology systems in successive, 
    interoperable increments.
    * * * * *
        3. Section 39.103 is added to read as follows:
    
    
    39.103  Modular contracting.
    
        (a) This section implements Section 5202, Incremental Acquisition 
    of Information Technology, of the Clinger-Cohen Act of 1996 (Public Law 
    104-106). Modular contracting is intended to reduce program risk and to 
    incentivize contractor performance while meeting the Governments need 
    for timely access to rapidly changing technology. Consistent with the 
    agency's information technology architecture, agencies should, to the 
    maximum extent practicable, use modular contracting to acquire major 
    systems (see 2.101) of information technology. Agencies may also use 
    modular contracting to acquire non-major systems of information 
    technology.
        (b) When using modular contracting, an acquisition of a system of 
    information technology may be divided into several smaller acquisition 
    increments that--
        (1) Are easier to manage individually than would be possible in one 
    comprehensive acquisition;
        (2) Address complex information technology objectives incrementally 
    in order to enhance the likelihood of achieving workable systems or 
    solutions for attainment of those objectives;
        (3) Provide for delivery, implementation, and testing of workable 
    systems or solutions in discrete increments, each of which comprises a 
    system or solution that is not dependent on any subsequent increment in 
    order to perform its principal functions;
        (4) Provide an opportunity for subsequent increments to take 
    advantage of any evolution in technology or needs that occur during 
    implementation and use of the earlier increments; and
        (5) Reduce risk of potential adverse consequences on the overall 
    project by
    
    [[Page 9069]]
    
    isolating and avoiding custom-designed components of the system.
        (c) The characteristics of an increment may vary depending upon the 
    type of information technology being acquired and the nature of the 
    system being developed. The following factors may be considered:
        (1) To promote compatibility, the information technology acquired 
    through modular contracting for each increment should comply with 
    common or commercially acceptable information technology standards when 
    available and appropriate, and shall conform to the agency's master 
    information technology architecture.
        (2) The performance requirements of each increment should be 
    consistent with the performance requirements of the completed, overall 
    system within which the information technology will function and should 
    address interface requirements with succeeding increments.
        (d) For each increment, contracting officers shall choose an 
    appropriate contracting technique that facilitates the acquisition of 
    subsequent increments. Pursuant to Parts 16 and 17 of the Federal 
    Acquisition Regulations, contracting officers shall select the contract 
    type and method appropriate to the circumstances (e.g., indefinite 
    delivery, indefinite quantity contracts, single contract with options, 
    successive contracts, multiple awards, task order contracts). 
    Contract(s) shall be structured to ensure that the Government is not 
    required to procure additional increments.
        (e) To avoid obsolescence, a modular contract for information 
    technology should, to the maximum extent practicable, be awarded within 
    180 days after the date on which the solicitation is issued. If award 
    cannot be made within 180 days, agencies should consider cancellation 
    of the solicitation in accordance with 48 CFR 14.209 or 15.206(e). To 
    the maximum extent practicable, deliveries under the contract should be 
    scheduled to occur within 18 months after issuance of the solicitation.
    
    [FR Doc. 98-4306 Filed 2-20-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/24/1998
Published:
02/23/1998
Department:
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-4306
Dates:
April 24, 1998.
Pages:
9068-9069 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
FAC 97-04, FAR Case 96-605, Item XV
RINs:
9000-AH55
PDF File:
98-4306.pdf
CFR: (1)
48 CFR 39