98-4542. Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From France, et al.; Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 35 (Monday, February 23, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 8908-8909]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-4542]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    International Trade Administration
    [A-427-801, A-428-801, A-475-801, A-588-804, A-485-801, A-559-801, A-
    401-801, A-549-801, A-412-801]
    
    
    Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and 
    Parts Thereof From France, et al.; Amended Final Results of Antidumping 
    Duty Administrative Reviews
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of final court decision and amended final results of 
    administrative reviews.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On October 15, 1997, the United States Court of Appeals for 
    the Federal Circuit affirmed the Department of Commerce's final remand 
    results affecting final assessment rates for the second administrative 
    reviews of the antidumping duty orders on antifriction bearings (other 
    than tapered roller bearings) and parts thereof from France, Germany, 
    Italy, Japan (except NSK), Singapore, Sweden, Thailand, and the United 
    Kingdom. The classes or kinds of merchandise covered by these reviews 
    are ball bearings and parts thereof, cylindrical roller bearings and 
    parts thereof, and spherical plain bearings and parts thereof. As there 
    is now a final and conclusive court decision in these actions (with the 
    exception noted above), we are amending our final results of reviews 
    and we will subsequently instruct the U.S. Customs Service to liquidate 
    entries subject to these reviews.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: February 23, 1998.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Ross or Richard Rimlinger, Import 
    Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
    Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 
    20230; telephone (202) 482-4733.
    
    Applicable Statute
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the Tariff Act of 
    1930, as amended (the Tariff Act), are references to the provisions in 
    effect as of December 31, 1994. In addition, unless otherwise 
    indicated, all citations to the Department of Commerce's (the 
    Department's) regulations are to the regulations as codified at 19 CFR 
    Part 353 (April 1, 1997).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On June 24, 1992, the Department published its final results of 
    administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders on antifriction 
    bearings (other than tapered roller bearings) and parts thereof, from 
    France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore, Sweden, Thailand, 
    and the United Kingdom, covering the period May 1, 1990 through April 
    30, 1991 (AFBs II) (57 FR 28360). These final results were amended on 
    July 24, 1992, and December 14, 1992, to correct clerical errors (see 
    57 FR 32969 and 57 FR 59080, respectively). The classes or kinds of 
    merchandise covered by these reviews are ball bearings and parts 
    thereof (BBs), cylindrical roller bearings and parts thereof (CRBs), 
    and spherical plain bearings and parts thereof (SPBs). Subsequently, 
    two domestic producers, the Torrington Company and Federal-Mogul, and a 
    number of other interested parties, filed lawsuits with the U.S. Court 
    of International Trade (CIT) challenging the final results. These 
    lawsuits were litigated at the CIT and the United States Court of 
    Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). In the course of this 
    litigation, the CIT issued a number of orders and opinions of which the 
    following have resulted in changes to the antidumping margins 
    calculated in AFBs II:
    
    Federal-Mogul Corp. v. United States, 862 F. Supp. 384 (CIT 1994), 872 
    F. Supp. 1011 (CIT 1994), and Slip Op. 95-184 (November 20, 1995) with 
    respect to France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Sweden, and the United 
    Kingdom;
    Torrington Company v. United States, 881 F. Supp. 622 (CIT 1995) and 
    926 F. Supp. 1151 (CIT 1996) with respect to France, Germany, Italy, 
    Japan, Singapore, Sweden, Thailand, and the United Kingdom;
    Koyo Seiko Company Ltd. v. United States, Slip Op. 96-168 (October 17, 
    1996) with respect to Japan;
    SKF USA Inc. v. United States, 874 F. Supp. 1395 (CIT 1995) with 
    respect to Italy;
    SKF USA Inc. v. United States, 875 F. Supp. 847 (CIT 1995) with respect 
    to Germany;
    SKF USA Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 95-11 (January 31, 1995) with 
    respect to the United Kingdom;
    SKF USA Inc. v. United States, 876 F. Supp. 275 (CIT 1995) with respect 
    to France;
    SKF USA Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 95-124 (July 5, 1995) with 
    respect to Sweden;
    Societe Nouvelle de Roulements v. United States, 927 F. Supp. 1558 (CIT 
    1996) with respect to France.
    
        In the context of the above-cited litigation, the CIT (in some 
    cases based on decisions by the CAFC) ordered the Department to make 
    methodological changes and to recalculate the antidumping margins for 
    certain firms under review. Specifically, the CIT ordered the 
    Department inter alia: (1) To change its methodology to account for 
    value-added taxes with respect to the comparison of U.S. and home 
    market prices, (2) not to deduct pre-sale inland freight incurred in 
    the home market if the Department determined that there was no 
    statutory authority to make such a deduction, (3) to develop a 
    methodology which removes post-sale price adjustments and rebates paid 
    on out-of-scope merchandise from any adjustment made to foreign market 
    value or to deny such an adjustment if a viable method could not be 
    found, and (4) to correct certain clerical errors.
        On October 15, 1997, the CAFC affirmed the Department's final 
    remand results affecting final assessment rates for all the above cases 
    (except the reviews involving NSK Ltd. of Japan which are still subject 
    to further litigation). See Torrington Co. v. United States, 127 F.3d 
    1077 (Fed. Cir. 1997). As there are now final and conclusive court 
    decisions in these actions, we are amending our final results of review 
    in these matters and we will subsequently instruct the U.S. Customs 
    Service to liquidate entries subject to these reviews.
    
    Amendment to Final Results
    
        Pursuant to 516A(e) of the Tariff Act, we are now amending the 
    final results of administrative reviews of the antidumping duty orders 
    on antifriction
    
    [[Page 8909]]
    
    bearings (other than tapered roller bearings) and parts thereof from 
    France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore, Sweden, Thailand, 
    and the United Kingdom, and the period May 1, 1990, through April 30, 
    1991. The revised weighted-average margins are as follows:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Company                   BBs          CRBs         SPBs   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     France                                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    SKF..............................         8.56          (1)          (3)
    SNR..............................         8.08        18.37          (2)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Germany                                
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    FAG..............................        20.10         7.83         1.05
    INA..............................        19.90         1.23          (1)
    SKF..............................        12.08         5.10         0.82
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Italy                                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    FAG..............................         7.50          (1)  ...........
    SKF..............................         8.78          (3)  ...........
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Japan                                 
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Fujino...........................         1.83          (2)          (2)
    IJK..............................         1.89          (3)          (2)
    Izumoto..........................        12.14          (2)          (2)
    Koyo Seiko.......................         6.95         1.39          (3)
    Nachi............................         7.90        22.61          (1)
    Nakai............................         6.47          (2)          (2)
    Nankai...........................         9.41          (2)          (2)
    NTN..............................         2.42         2.78         0.51
    Showa............................         7.51          (2)          (2)
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Singapore                               
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    NMB/Pelmec.......................         4.49  ...........  ...........
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Sweden                                
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    SKF..............................         7.67         4.18  ...........
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Thailand                               
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    NMB/Pelmec.......................        0.498  ...........  ...........
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  United Kingdom                            
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Barden Corporation...............         0.85          (1)  ...........
    FAG..............................        48.97          (3)  ...........
    RHP Bearings.....................        16.75        50.39  ...........
    SKF..............................         8.33          (1)  ...........
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    (1) No U.S. sales during the review period.                             
    (2) No review requested.                                                
    (3) No change to the last published margin. See AFBs II, 57 FR 28360, as
      amended by 57 FR 32969 and 57 FR 59080.                               
    
        The above rates will become the new antidumping duty deposit rates 
    for firms that have not had a deposit rate established for them in 
    subsequent reviews.
        Accordingly, the Department will determine and the U.S. Customs 
    Service will assess appropriate antidumping duties on entries of the 
    subject merchandise made by firms covered by these reviews. Individual 
    differences between United States price and foreign market value may 
    vary from the percentages listed above. The Department has already 
    issued appraisement instructions to the Customs Service for certain 
    companies whose margins have not changed from those announced in AFBs 
    II and the two previous amendments. For companies covered by these 
    amended results, the Department will issue appraisement instructions to 
    the U.S. Customs Service after publication of these amended final 
    results of reviews.
        This notice is published pursuant to section 751(a) of the Tariff 
    Act.
    
        Dated: February 11, 1998.
    Robert S. LaRussa,
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 98-4542 Filed 2-20-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/23/1998
Published:
02/23/1998
Department:
International Trade Administration
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of final court decision and amended final results of administrative reviews.
Document Number:
98-4542
Dates:
February 23, 1998.
Pages:
8908-8909 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-427-801, A-428-801, A-475-801, A-588-804, A-485-801, A-559-801, A- 401-801, A-549-801, A-412-801
PDF File:
98-4542.pdf