99-4367. Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF6-50, -80A1/ A3, and -80C2A Series Turbofan Engines  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 8762-8763]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-4367]
    
    
    
    [[Page 8762]]
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-ANE-54-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF6-50, -80A1/
    A3, and -80C2A Series Turbofan Engines
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-
    50, -80A1/A3, and -80C2A series turbofan engines installed on Airbus 
    A300 and A310 series aircraft. This proposal would require initial and 
    repetitive thrust reverser inspections and checks, and allow extended 
    repetitive inspection intervals if an optional double p-seal 
    configuration is installed. This proposal is prompted by the report of 
    a higher than anticipated center drive unit (CDU) cone brake failure 
    rate which reduces the overall thrust reverser system protection 
    against inadvertent deployment. The actions specified by the proposed 
    AD are intended to prevent inadvertent inflight thrust reverser 
    deployment, which can result in loss of control of the aircraft.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by March 25, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Regional 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-ANE-54-AD, 12 New England 
    Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299. Comments may also be sent 
    via the Internet using the following address: ``engineprop@faa.gov''. Comments sent via the Internet must contain the 
    docket number in the subject line. Comments may be inspected at this 
    location between 8:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except 
    Federal holidays.
        The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be 
    obtained from Middle River Aircraft Systems, Mail Point 446, 103 
    Chesapeake Park Plaza, Baltimore, MD, 21220-4295, attn: Warranty 
    Support, telephone: (410) 682-0098, fax: (410) 682-0100. This 
    information may be examined at the FAA, New England Region, Office of 
    the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William S. Ricci, Aerospace Engineer, 
    Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 
    New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (781) 
    238-7742, fax (781) 238-7199.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All 
    communications received on or before the closing date for comments, 
    specified above, will be considered before taking action on the 
    proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in 
    light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with 
    the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket Number 98-ANE-54-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 98-ANE-54-AD, 12 New England Executive 
    Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299.
    
    Discussion
    
        This proposed airworthiness directive (AD) is prompted by the 
    report of a higher than anticipated center drive unit (CDU) cone brake 
    failure rate that reduces the overall thrust reverser system protection 
    against inadvertent deployment. The Federal Aviation Administration 
    (FAA) has determined that thrust reverser inspections and checks are 
    necessary for all General Electric Company (GE) CF6 series turbofan 
    engine installations on Airbus aircraft. This condition, if not 
    corrected, could result in inadvertent inflight thrust reverser 
    deployment, which can result in loss of control of the aircraft.
        The FAA has reviewed and approved the technical contents of Middle 
    River Aircraft Systems CF6-50 Service Bulletin (SB) No. 78-3001, 
    Revision 2, dated December 18, 1997, CF6-80A1/A3 SB No. 78-1002, 
    Revision 3, dated January 21, 1999, and CF6-80C2 Alert Service Bulletin 
    (ASB) No. 78A1015, Revision 5, dated January 21, 1999, that describe 
    procedures for thrust reverser inspections and checks.
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop on other products of this same type design, the 
    proposed AD would require initial and repetitive thrust reverser 
    inspections and checks, and allows extended repetitive inspection 
    intervals if an optional double p-seal configuration is installed. This 
    AD would require these actions to be accomplished in accordance with 
    the service documents described previously. There are approximately 849 
    engines of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA 
    estimates that 193 engines installed on aircraft of U.S. registry would 
    be affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 5 
    work hours per engine to accomplish the proposed actions, and that the 
    average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the 
    total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to 
    be $57,900.
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed 
    regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under 
    Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT 
    Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 
    and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, 
    positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under 
    the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft 
    regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the 
    Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules 
    Docket at the
    
    [[Page 8763]]
    
    location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    General Electric Company: Docket No. 98-ANE-54-AD.
    
        Applicability: General Electric Company (GE) CF6-50, -80A1/A3, 
    and -80C2A series turbofan engines, installed on Airbus A300 and 
    A310 series aircraft.
    
        Note 1: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each engine 
    identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of 
    whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area 
    subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been 
    modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the 
    requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request 
    approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with 
    paragraph (b) of this AD. The request should include an assessment 
    of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the 
    unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition 
    has not been eliminated, the request should include specific 
    proposed actions to address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To prevent inadvertent inflight thrust reverser deployment, 
    which can result in loss of control of the aircraft, accomplish the 
    following:
        (a) Perform initial and repetitive thrust reverser inspections 
    and checks as follows:
        (1) For GE CF6-50 series engines, perform inspections and checks 
    in accordance with paragraph 2., Accomplishment Instructions, of 
    Middle River Aircraft Systems CF6-50 SB No. 78-3001, Revision 2, 
    dated December 18, 1997, as follows:
        (i) Perform the initial inspections and checks within 1,500 
    hours time in service (TIS) after the effective date of this AD.
        (ii) Thereafter, perform inspections and checks at intervals not 
    to exceed 6,000 hours TIS since last check.
        (2) For CF6-80A1/A3 series engines, perform inspections and 
    checks in accordance with paragraph 2., Accomplishment Instructions, 
    of Middle River Aircraft Systems CF6-80A1/A3 SB No. 78-1002, 
    Revision 3, dated January 21, 1999, as follows:
        (i) Perform the initial inspections and checks within 1,500 
    hours TIS after the effective date of this AD.
        (ii) Thereafter, perform inspections and checks at intervals not 
    to exceed 7,000 hours TIS since last check.
        (3) For CF6-80C2 series engines, perform inspections and checks 
    in accordance with paragraph 2., Accomplishment Instructions, of 
    Middle River Aircraft Systems CF6-80C2 Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) 
    No. 78A1015, Revision 5, dated January 21, 1999, as follows:
        (i) Perform the initial inspections and checks within 600 hours 
    TIS after the effective date of this AD.
        (ii) Thereafter, perform repetitive inspections and checks as 
    follows:
        (A) For engines with a double p-seal configuration, having 
    translating cowl part numbers 491B1613000-109 or D52B1000-9, perform 
    repetitive inspections and checks at intervals not to exceed 7,000 
    hours TIS since last inspection.
        (B) For all other engines, perform repetitive inspections and 
    checks at intervals not to exceed 600 hours TIS since last 
    inspection.
        (4) Perform corrective actions or deactivate the fan reverser in 
    accordance with paragraph 2., Accomplishment Instructions, of the 
    applicable SB or ASB prior to further flight.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office. 
    Operators shall submit their request through an appropriate FAA 
    Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send 
    it to the Manager, Engine Certification Office.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, 
    if any, may be obtained from the Engine Certification Office.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
    
        Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on February 16, 1999.
    David A. Downey,
    Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft 
    Certification Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-4367 Filed 2-22-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/23/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
99-4367
Dates:
Comments must be received by March 25, 1999.
Pages:
8762-8763 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-ANE-54-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-4367.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13