97-4371. Airworthiness Directives; I. A. M. Rinaldo Piaggio Model P180 Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 36 (Monday, February 24, 1997)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 8196-8198]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-4371]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 96-CE-56-AD]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; I. A. M. Rinaldo Piaggio Model P180 
    Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This document proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) that would apply to certain I. A. M. Rinaldo Piaggio (Piaggio) 
    Model P180 airplanes. The proposed action would require repetitively 
    inspecting for cracks around the vertical pin and the torque tube 
    bottom flange of the rudder and the fasteners that connect the torque 
    tube to the bottom flange. If cracks are evident, the proposed action 
    would require modifying the rudder torque tube bottom flange assembly 
    by replacing the cracked part with a part of improved design which 
    would terminate the repetitive inspection. The proposed AD is the 
    result of several reports of fatigue cracks around the pin that 
    vertically supports the rudder axle. The actions specified by the 
    proposed AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracks in the rudder torque 
    tube bottom flange which could result in loss of rudder control and 
    possible loss of the airplane.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 30, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation 
    Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief 
    Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-CE-56-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 
    12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Comments may be inspected at 
    this location between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
    holidays excepted.
        Service information that applies to the proposed AD may be obtained 
    from I. A. M. Rinaldo Piaggio, S.p.A., Via Cibrario, 4 16154 Genoa, 
    Italy. This information also may be examined at the Rules Docket at the 
    address above.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tom Rodriguez, Program Officer, 
    Brussels Aircraft Certification Division, FAA, Europe, Africa, and 
    Middle East Office, c/o American Embassy, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium; 
    telephone (322) 508.2715; facsimile (322) 230.6899; or Mr. Roman T. 
    Gabrys, Project Officer, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft 
    Certification Service, FAA, 1201 Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City, 
    Missouri 64106; telephone (816) 426-6934; facsimile (816) 426-2169.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Comments Invited
    
        Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the 
    proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as 
    they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number 
    and be submitted in triplicate to
    
    [[Page 8197]]
    
    the address specified above. All communications received on or before 
    the closing date for comments, specified above, will be considered 
    before taking action on the proposed rule. The proposals contained in 
    this notice may be changed in light of the comments received.
        Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, 
    economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All 
    comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing 
    date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested 
    persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned 
    with the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
        Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments 
    submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed, 
    stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments 
    to Docket No. 96-CE-56-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and 
    returned to the commenter.
    
    Availability of NPRMs
    
        Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request 
    to the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 
    Attention: Rules Docket No. 96-CE-56-AD, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, 
    Kansas City, Missouri 64106.
    
    Discussion
    
        The Registro Aeronautico Italiano (RAI), which is the airworthiness 
    authority for Italy, recently notified the FAA that an unsafe condition 
    may exist on certain Piaggio P180 airplanes. The RAI reports that 
    fatigue cracks are appearing in the area of the vertical pin support 
    and around the torque tube bottom flange of the rudder. These cracks 
    were discovered during routine inspections on high flight hour Piaggio 
    P180 airplanes. This condition, if not detected and corrected, could 
    result in loss of rudder control and possible loss of the airplane.
    
    Relevant Service Information
    
        Piaggio has issued Service Bulletin 80-0076, ORIGINAL ISSUE: May 
    30, 1995 which specifies procedures for inspecting for cracks and 
    modifying the torque tube bottom flange and fasteners, if cracks are 
    found.
        The RAI classified this service bulletin as mandatory and issued AD 
    No. 95-183, Issued July 3, 1995, in order to assure the continued 
    airworthiness of these airplanes in Italy.
    
    The FAA's Determination
    
        This airplane model is manufactured in Italy and is type 
    certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 
    section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and 
    the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this 
    bilateral airworthiness agreement, the RAI has kept the FAA informed of 
    the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the 
    RAI, reviewed all available information including the service 
    information referenced above, and determined that AD action is 
    necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for 
    operation in the United States.
    
    Explanation of the Provisions of the Proposed AD
    
        Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to 
    exist or develop in other Piaggio P180 airplanes of the same type 
    design registered in the United States, the proposed AD would require 
    inspecting for cracks around the torque tube bottom flange, the 
    fasteners, and vertical support pin of the rudder; and, if cracks are 
    found, modifying the rudder torque tube bottom flange assembly by 
    replacing the cracked part with a part of improved design. If no cracks 
    are found, the proposed action would require repetitively inspecting 
    the area until cracks appear and then modifying the rudder torque tube 
    bottom flange by replacing the cracked part with a part of improved 
    design. Accomplishment of the proposed modification would be in 
    accordance with Piaggio Service Bulletin 80-0076, ORIGINAL ISSUE: May 
    30, 1995.
    
    Differences Between the Proposed AD, Service Bulletin, and RAI AD
    
        I.A.M. Rinaldo Piaggio SB 80-0076, Original Issue May 30, 1995, and 
    the RAI AD No. 95-183, dated July 3, 1995, specify repetitively 
    inspecting every 500 hours time-in-service (TIS) using a dye penetrant 
    method, and if the crack lengths are greater than 6 mm, the part must 
    be replaced prior to further flight. If the crack lengths are greater 
    than 3 mm, but less than 6 mm, the part must be replaced within the 
    next 50 hours TIS; and, if the cracks are less than 3 mm, then the 
    parts must be replaced within the next 100 hours TIS. The proposed AD, 
    if adopted, would not allow any continued flight with any crack found. 
    FAA policy is to disallow airplane operation when known cracks exist in 
    primary structure (the rudder is considered primary structure).
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 4 airplanes in the U.S. registry would be 
    affected by the proposed AD, that it would take approximately 6 
    workhours per airplane to accomplish the proposed initial inspection 
    and that the average labor rate is approximately $60 an hour. Parts are 
    not accounted for in this cost analysis because, on some airplanes, 
    cracks may never be discovered during one of these inspections. Based 
    on these figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. 
    operators is estimated to be $1,440 ($360 per airplane). The FAA is not 
    taking into account the cost for the repetitive inspections because 
    there is no way to determine the number of repetitive inspections that 
    might be incurred over the life of the airplane.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this 
    proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant 
    the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if promulgated, 
    will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a 
    substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the 
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft regulatory evaluation 
    prepared for this action has been placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of 
    it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location 
    provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
    
    The Proposed Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 
    part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as 
    follows:
    
    [[Page 8198]]
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive 
    (AD) to read as follows:
    
    I.A.M. Rinaldo Piaggio: Docket No. 96-CE-56-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model P180 airplanes (all serial numbers), 
    certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (f) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required within the next 100 hours time-in-service 
    (TIS) after the effective date of this AD, and thereafter as 
    indicated in the body of this AD, unless already accomplished.
        To prevent fatigue cracks in the rudder torque tube bottom 
    flange which could result in loss of rudder control and possible 
    loss of the airplane, accomplish the following:
        (a) Inspect the area around the torque tube, bottom flange, and 
    vertical support pin of the rudder for cracks (using a dye penetrant 
    method) and visually inspect for cracks in the fasteners that 
    connect the torque tube to the bottom flange.
    
        Note 2: The inspection in Part A of the Compliance section of 
    Piaggio Service Bulletin (SB) 80-0076, ORIGINAL ISSUE: May 30, 1995, 
    uses different criteria than the inspection required in paragraph 
    (a) of this AD. This AD takes precedence over Piaggio SB 80-0076.
    
        (b) If cracks are found, prior to further flight, modify the 
    rudder torque tube bottom flange by replacing any cracked part with 
    a part of improved design in accordance with Part B and Attachment 
    #1 of the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS of Piaggio SB 80-0076, 
    ORIGINAL ISSUE: May 30, 1995.
        (c) If no cracks are found, continue to inspect at intervals not 
    to exceed 100 hours TIS thereafter until cracks appear. If cracks 
    appear during any inspection required by this AD, prior to further 
    flight, modify the rudder torque tube bottom flange by the replacing 
    cracked part with a part of improved design in accordance with Part 
    B and Attachment #1 of the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS of Piaggio SB 
    80-0076, ORIGINAL ISSUE: May 30, 1995.
        (d) Modifying the rudder torque tube flange by replacing a 
    cracked torque tube bottom flange, part number (P/N) 80-373108-103, 
    with an improved torque tube bottom flange (P/N 80-373201-001) is 
    considered a terminating action for the repetitive inspections 
    required in paragraph (c) of this AD.
        (e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (f) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    initial or repetitive compliance times that provides an equivalent 
    level of safety may be approved by the Manager, Brussels Aircraft 
    Certification Division, FAA, Europe, Africa, and Middle East Office, 
    c/o American Embassy, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium; or the Manager, 
    Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service, FAA, 
    1201 Walnut, suite 900, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. The request 
    shall be forwarded through an appropriate FAA Maintenance Inspector, 
    who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Brussels 
    Aircraft Certification Division or Manager, Small Airplane 
    Directorate.
    
        Note 3: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Brussels Aircraft Certification Division or the 
    Small Airplane Directorate.
    
        (g) All persons affected by this directive may obtain copies of 
    the documents referred to herein upon request to I. A. M. Rinaldo 
    Piaggio, S.p.A., Via Cibrario, 4 16154 Genoa, Italy; or may examine 
    these documents at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Assistant 
    Chief Counsel, Room 1558, 601 E. 12th Street, Kansas City, Missouri 
    64106.
    
        Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on February 14, 1997.
    James E. Jackson,
    Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 97-4371 Filed 2-21-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/24/1997
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Document Number:
97-4371
Dates:
Comments must be received on or before April 30, 1997.
Pages:
8196-8198 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 96-CE-56-AD
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
97-4371.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13