94-4297. Philadelphia Electric Company (Limerick Generating Station, Unit 1)  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 38 (Friday, February 25, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-4297]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: February 25, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket No. 50-352]
    
     
    
    Philadelphia Electric Company (Limerick Generating Station, Unit 
    1)
    
    Exemption
    
    I
    
        Philadelphia Electric Company (the licensee), is the holder of 
    Facility Operating License No. NPF-39, which authorizes operation of 
    the Limerick Generating Station (LGS), Unit 1. The license provides, 
    among other things, that the licensee is subject to all rules, 
    regulations, and orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the 
    Commission) now and hereafter in effect.
        The LGS, Unit 1 facility consists of a boiling water reactor 
    located in Chester and Montgomery Counties, Pennsylvania.
    
    II
    
        In its letter dated November 30, 1993, the licensee requested an 
    exemption from the Commission's regulations. The subject exemption is 
    from a requirement in appendix J to 10 CFR part 50 that a set of three 
    Type A tests (Containment Integrated Leakage Rate Tests, or CILRTs) be 
    performed, at approximately equal intervals, during each 10-year 
    service period. The exemption applies to the first 10-year service 
    period; subsequent service periods are not changed. In the same letter, 
    the licensee applied for an amendment to Operating License No. NPF-39 
    to change certain provisions of the LGS Technical Specifications (TSs).
        The type A test is defined in 10 CFR part 50, appendix J, section 
    II.F, as ``tests intended to measure the primary reactor containment 
    overall integrated leakage rate (1) after the containment has been 
    completed and is ready for operation, and (2) at periodic intervals 
    thereafter.'' The 10-year service period begins with the inservice 
    date. The first CILRT testing interval was 36 months, and the second 
    was 39 months. The time interval between CILRTs should be about 40 
    months based on performing three such tests at approximately equal 
    intervals during each 10-year service period.
        The request for a one-time exemption would allow the third Type A 
    CILRT within the first 10-year service period to be conducted during 
    the sixth refueling outage. This requested exemption is a one-time 
    schedular extension of the third interval to 65 months. It does not 
    affect the second 10-year service period.
        With respect to the subject exemption request, the NRC staff notes 
    that the first and second CILRTs of the set of three tests for the 
    first 10-year service period for LGS were conducted in August 1987 and 
    November 1990. The third of the first set of three CILRTs will be 
    scheduled for Refueling Outage 6, projected to start in January 1996, 
    pending approval of the exemption request. The current third test 
    period in the first 10-year service period will actually be exceeded by 
    approximately 15 months.
        Data from the first August 1989 and second November 1990 CILRT at 
    LGS, Unit 1 indicates that most of the measured leakage is from the 
    containment penetrations and not from the containment barrier. The 
    ``as-left'' leakage rate was well below the 10 CFR part 50 Appendix J 
    limit. Both Appendix J and the TS require that the leakage rate be less 
    than 75% of La to allow for deterioration in leakage paths between 
    tests. The allowable leakage rate, La, is 0.5 wt.%/day. Therefore, 
    the established acceptable limit is <0.375 wt.%/day.="" the="" ``as-left''="" leakage="" rates="" for="" the="" first="" two="" cilrts="" were="" 0.178="" and="" 0.334="" wt.%/day,="" which="" is="" below="" the="" acceptance="" limit.="" the="" type="" b="" and="" c="" test="" (local="" leakage="" rate="" test="" or="" llrt)="" program="" also="" provides="" assurance="" that="" containment="" integrity="" has="" been="" maintained.="" llrts="" demonstrate="" operability="" of="" components="" and="" penetrations="" by="" measuring="" penetration="" and="" valve="" leakage.="" additionally,="" there="" have="" been="" no="" modifications="" made="" to="" the="" plant="" that="" could="" adversely="" affect="" the="" test="" results.="" the="" licensee="" further="" notes="" that="" the="" performance="" of="" a="" fourth="" test="" in="" the="" first="" 10-year="" service="" period="" to="" meet="" the="" requirements="" of="" the="" tss="" and="" appendix="" j="" would="" result="" in="" additional="" radiation="" exposure="" to="" personnel.="" omitting="" the="" test="" will="" result="" in="" additional="" dose="" savings="" by="" eliminating="" contamination="" and="" by="" reducing="" exposure="" from="" venting="" and="" draining="" and="" from="" setups="" and="" restorations="" of="" instrumentation="" required="" to="" perform="" the="" test.="" these="" factors="" and="" the="" costs="" associated="" with="" a="" fourth="" test="" for="" a="" 15-month="" difference="" in="" interval="" time="" are="" not="" offset="" by="" the="" benefits="" of="" the="" fourth="" test.="" for="" the="" reasons="" set="" forth="" above,="" the="" nrc="" staff="" concludes="" that="" this="" deviation="" from="" the="" 10-year="" service="" period="" ending="" august="" 1994="" is="" not="" significant="" in="" terms="" of="" complying="" with="" the="" safety="" or="" scheduling="" requirements="" of="" section="" iii.d.1.(a)="" of="" appendix="" j.="" accordingly,="" the="" staff="" finds="" that="" the="" additional="" test="" would="" not="" provide="" substantially="" different="" information="" and="" that="" the="" intent="" of="" appendix="" j="" is="" met.="" therefore,="" the="" subject="" exemption="" request="" meets="" the="" special="" circumstances="" of="" 10="" cfr="" 50.12(a)(2)(ii),="" in="" that="" the="" fourth="" test="" is="" not="" necessary="" to="" achieve="" the="" underlying="" purpose="" of="" the="" rule.="" on="" this="" basis,="" the="" nrc="" staff="" finds="" that="" the="" licensee="" has="" demonstrated="" that="" special="" circumstances="" are="" present="" as="" required="" by="" 10="" cfr="" 50.12(a)(2).="" further,="" the="" staff="" also="" finds="" that="" extending="" the="" service="" period="" will="" not="" present="" an="" undue="" risk="" to="" the="" public="" health="" and="" safety;="" since="" the="" licensee="" has="" justified="" the="" leaktight="" integrity="" of="" the="" containment="" based="" on="" previous="" leakage="" test="" results,="" the="" staff="" concludes="" that="" a="" one-time="" extension="" of="" approximately="" 15="" months="" beyond="" the="" maximum="" permitted="" third="" test="" interval="" within="" the="" first="" 10-year="" service="" period="" will="" not="" have="" a="" significant="" safety="" impact.="" iii="" accordingly,="" the="" commission="" has="" determined="" that,="" pursuant="" to="" 10="" cfr="" 50.12,="" an="" exemption="" is="" authorized="" by="" law="" and="" will="" not="" endanger="" life="" or="" property="" or="" the="" common="" defense="" and="" security="" and="" is="" otherwise="" in="" the="" public="" interest="" and="" hereby="" grants="" the="" following="" exemption="" with="" respect="" to="" a="" requirement="" of="" 10="" cfr="" part="" 50,="" appendix="" j,="" section="" iii.d.1(a):="" for="" the="" limerick="" generating="" station,="" unit="" 1,="" the="" current="" third="" test="" period="" within="" the="" first="" 10-year="" service="" period="" may="" be="" extended="" by="" approximately="" 15="" months,="" so="" that="" the="" third="" periodic="" type="" a="" test="" may="" be="" performed="" during="" the="" sixth="" refueling="" outage="" scheduled="" for="" january,="" 1996.="" pursuant="" to="" 10="" cfr="" 51.32,="" the="" commission="" has="" determined="" that="" the="" granting="" of="" this="" exemption="" will="" not="" have="" a="" significant="" effect="" on="" the="" quality="" of="" the="" human="" environment="" (59="" fr="" 5785).="" this="" exemption="" is="" effective="" upon="" issuance.="" for="" the="" nuclear="" regulatory="" commission.="" dated="" at="" rockville,="" maryland="" this="" 16="" day="" of="" february="" 1994.="" gus="" c.="" lainas,="" acting="" director,="" division="" of="" reactor="" projects="" -="" i/ii,="" office="" of="" nuclear="" reactor="" regulation.="" [fr="" doc.="" 94-4297="" filed="" 2-24-94;="" 8:45="" am]="" billing="" code="" 7590-01-m="">

Document Information

Published:
02/25/1994
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-4297
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: February 25, 1994, Docket No. 50-352