99-4603. Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fisheries; Fishery Management Plan; Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fishery  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 37 (Thursday, February 25, 1999)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 9298-9303]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-4603]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
    
    50 CFR Part 635
    
    [Docket No. 990217050-9050-01; I.D. 010799A]
    RIN 0648-AM17
    
    
    Atlantic Highly Migratory Species Fisheries; Fishery Management 
    Plan; Atlantic Bluefin Tuna Fishery
    
    AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
    Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
    
    ACTION: Notice of availability and proposed rule; supplemental.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: NMFS by an earlier document proposed regulations to implement 
    the draft Fishery Management Plan (FMP) for Atlantic Tunas, Swordfish, 
    and Sharks (Highly Migratory Species or HMS). NMFS has prepared an 
    addendum to the draft HMS FMP (the Addendum). This document announces 
    the availability of the Addendum for public comment and supplements the 
    earlier document by proposing supplemental regulations to implement the 
    Addendum. The supplemental
    
    [[Page 9299]]
    
    proposed regulations would set Atlantic bluefin tuna (BFT) fishing 
    category quotas for 1999 and subsequent years, close an area off the 
    New England and mid-Atlantic coast to pelagic longline gear to reduce 
    BFT incidental catch, provide quota adjustment procedures to limit 
    catch of school BFT and to account for dead discards of BFT, and 
    clarify the mandatory nature of certain scientific information 
    collections. In addition, this document proposes BFT General category 
    effort control specifications for the 1999 fishing season. The 
    supplement to the earlier document is necessary to implement the 1998 
    recommendations of the International Commission for the Conservation of 
    Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), as required by the Atlantic Tunas Convention 
    Act (ATCA), and to achieve domestic fishery management objectives under 
    the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-
    Stevens Act).
    
    DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 4, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: For copies of the draft HMS FMP, the proposed regulations to 
    implement the draft HMS FMP, the draft HMS FMP Addendum, or the 
    schedule of public hearings, write to Rebecca Lent, Chief, Highly 
    Migratory Species Management Division, Office of Sustainable Fisheries 
    (F/SF1), NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910-3282, 
    (301) 713-2347. Send comments regarding the burden-hour estimates or 
    other aspects of the collection-of-information aspects of the 
    supplemental proposed regulations to Rebecca Lent and to the Office of 
    Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 
    20503 (Attention: NOAA Desk Officer).
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pasquale Scida or Sarah McLaughlin, 
    (978) 281-9260, or Chris Rogers at (301) 713-2347.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 26, 1998, NMFS announced the 
    availability of the draft HMS FMP (63 FR 57093). Information regarding 
    the management of HMS under the draft HMS FMP was provided in the 
    preamble to the proposed regulations to implement that FMP (64 FR 3154, 
    January 20, 1999) and is not repeated here.
        NMFS did not identify a preferred alternative for BFT stock 
    rebuilding in the draft HMS FMP because new information on stock status 
    and/or recovery trajectories from the September 1998 stock assessment 
    by the Standing Committee on Research and Statistics (SCRS), as well as 
    the results of negotiations at the November 1998 ICCAT meeting, was not 
    available at the time, and, if it had been available, it could have 
    resulted in the development of new rebuilding alternatives for the BFT 
    stock. NMFS had indicated that the preferred alternative for western 
    Atlantic BFT rebuilding would be identified following the November 1998 
    ICCAT meeting, that the preferred alternative and associated analyses 
    would be published as an Addendum to the draft HMS FMP, and that 
    proposed measures to implement the preferred rebuilding alternative 
    would be published in a supplement to the proposed rule.
        The Addendum contains only alternatives and updated information for 
    BFT; it specifically covers BFT rebuilding, domestic allocations, quota 
    adjustment procedures and measures to reduce dead discards of BFT. This 
    supplement to the proposed regulations would implement the rebuilding 
    and bycatch reduction measures of the FMP Addendum. Additionally, this 
    rule proposes BFT General category effort controls for the 1999 fishing 
    season and clarifies mandatory data collection requirements. Comments 
    on this supplement to the proposed regulations will be received at 
    hearings previously scheduled to receive public comment on the proposed 
    regulations to implement the draft HMS FMP, announced in the Federal 
    Register on January 22, 1999 (64 FR 3486).
    
    Bluefin Tuna Rebuilding Program
    
        ICCAT has identified the western stock of BFT as overexploited and 
    recommends fishing quotas for contracting parties. NMFS identified 
    western BFT as overfished in the September 1997 Report to Congress 
    required under the Magnuson-Stevens Act, which triggered the 
    requirement to develop a rebuilding program. Based on the 1998 revised 
    stock assessment, parties at the 1998 meeting of ICCAT adopted a 20-
    year BFT rebuilding program, beginning in 1999 and continuing through 
    2018. ICCAT has adopted an annual total allowable catch (TAC) of 2,500 
    metric tons (mt) of BFT inclusive of dead discards, to apply annually 
    until such time as the TAC is changed based on advice from SCRS. The 
    annual landing quota allocated to the United States was increased by 43 
    mt from 1,344 mt to 1,387 mt.
    
    Reducing Dead Discards
    
        The ICCAT rebuilding program specifies that all contracting and 
    non-contracting parties must monitor and report on all sources of BFT 
    fishing mortality, including dead discards, and must minimize BFT dead 
    discards to the extent practicable. The recommendation deducts 79 mt 
    from the TAC as an allowance for dead discards; the U.S. portion of 
    this allowance is 68 mt.
        The preamble to the proposed regulations to implement the draft HMS 
    FMP describes ongoing and proposed efforts to minimize, to the extent 
    practicable, bycatch and bycatch mortality of protected species and 
    finfish in HMS fisheries. Specifically for BFT, NMFS has analyzed 
    existing databases and examined several alternatives to reduce BFT dead 
    discards. Preliminary results of these analyses have been shared with 
    the public and at meetings of the HMS Advisory Panel throughout 1998. 
    In general, the public has been supportive of NMFS' efforts to reduce 
    BFT dead discards and has suggested various alternatives to effect 
    reduction.
        One of the findings of the analyses is that there is no 
    statistically significant relationship between the level of target 
    catch and the level of BFT bycatch. Although there has been extensive 
    public comment in support of changes to target catch requirements (thus 
    increasing landings of incidental catch), NMFS has no basis to conclude 
    that such changes would also result in reducing BFT dead discards. 
    However, the analyses did show that the majority of the dead discards 
    occur in a limited area over a relatively short time period and 
    primarily from the use of pelagic longline gear.
        In order to provide the greatest reduction in discards while 
    minimizing the negative impact to targeted fishing activities, NMFS 
    proposes to implement the preferred alternative: the closure of a 
    4 deg. x 4 deg. area (57,000 square nautical miles), from 
    37o to 41o N. lat. and from 70o to 
    74o W. long., for the month of June, to pelagic longline 
    gear. Based on BFT catch and discard rates from 1992 to 1997, it is 
    estimated that closure of this area (the Northeastern United States 
    closed area) would reduce total discards (alive and dead) of BFT by 
    approximately 60 percent.
        Although certain negative impacts would be expected, displacement 
    of vessels to other areas during June may mitigate these impacts to 
    some extent. Longline vessels operating outside the closed area would 
    still be able to catch the annual swordfish quota and could use 
    longline gear to target tunas other than BFT. Also, longline vessels 
    would still be allowed to transit the closed area during June provided 
    that their gear is stowed in accordance with the proposed regulations. 
    A separate NMFS proposal for vessel monitoring systems, if implemented, 
    would also enhance the
    
    [[Page 9300]]
    
    enforceability of the time-area closure while still allowing transit.
        Once implemented, NMFS would evaluate the efficacy of this closure 
    in reducing BFT dead discards, given the distribution of BFT and 
    expected redistribution of fishing effort. Further, NMFS would monitor 
    impacts to the users of pelagic longline gear to determine what, if 
    any, future action or modifications to the proposed time/area closure 
    may be necessary. Such actions could be accomplished by regulatory 
    amendment under the framework procedures of the HMS FMP.
    
    Domestic Quota Allocation
    
        In the proposed regulations to implement the draft HMS FMP, NMFS 
    proposed no changes to the baseline quotas previously established, 
    except that the Purse Seine category quota be no greater than the 1998 
    level set at 250 mt. Under this proposal, NMFS would maintain the 
    baseline annual quota specifications (i.e., percentage allocations to 
    each fishing category) until further changes are deemed necessary, 
    either to achieve domestic management objectives or to implement new 
    ICCAT rebuilding recommendations.
        Given the current ICCAT recommendation on rebuilding BFT, NMFS 
    proposes to specify fishing category allocations consistent with the 
    previously proposed allocation scheme and the 1387 mt U.S. allocation. 
    In specifying the 1999 BFT allocations, however, NMFS must also 
    consider carryover adjustments from the 1998 fishing year, new 
    provisions for the discard allowance and limitations on school BFT 
    catch, and additional adjustments to accommodate the establishment of 
    the proposed new fishing year.
        The current ICCAT BFT quota recommendation allows, and U.S. 
    regulations require, the addition or subtraction, as appropriate, of 
    any underharvest or overharvest in a fishing year to the appropriate 
    quota category for the following fishing year, provided that such 
    carryover does not result in overharvest of the total annual quota and 
    is consistent with all applicable ICCAT recommendations, including 
    restrictions on catch of school BFT. Therefore, NMFS proposes to adjust 
    the 1999 annual quota specifications for the BFT fishery to account for 
    underharvest and overharvest in 1998. At the end of 1998, the following 
    subquotas had not been harvested: 1 mt in the General category, 2 mt in 
    the Purse Seine category, 67 mt in the Angling category, and 26 mt in 
    the Incidental category; and additionally, 15 mt remained in the 
    Reserve.
        In the proposed regulations to implement the draft HMS FMP, NMFS 
    proposed an adjusted fishing year for Atlantic tunas of June 1 through 
    May 31 of the subsequent calendar year. Therefore, a separate quota 
    would be necessary for the bridge period of January 1-May 31, 1999. 
    Additionally, NMFS proposed to reorganize the Incidental quota category 
    into a Longline category and a Trap category (for pound nets and fish 
    weirs). Through this supplement to the proposed rule, NMFS proposes to 
    use the 1998 underharvest from the Angling and Incidental categories 
    for the bridge period, a time period in which only the Angling, 
    Longline, and Trap categories are open. Note that the reorganization of 
    the Incidental category into the Longline and Trap categories will not 
    take effect until the HMS FMP and implementing regulations are 
    finalized. Any underharvest from the bridge period would be added to 
    the annual quota for the adjusted 1999 fishing year, beginning June 1.
        NMFS proposes to subdivide the Angling category bridge period quota 
    of 79 mt as follows: Large school/small medium bluefin--75 mt, with 16 
    mt to the northern area and 59 mt to the southern area; and large 
    medium/giant bluefin--4 mt, allocated entirely to the southern area 
    given the likely distribution of large BFT during the proposed bridge 
    period.
        NMFS proposes to subdivide the Longline category bridge period 
    quota of 26 mt as follows: 1 mt to longline vessels operating north of 
    34 deg. N. lat. and 25 mt to longline vessels operating south of 
    34 deg. N. lat. Because the Incidental category subquota for gear other 
    than longlines was fully harvested in 1998, no bridge period allocation 
    would be made to the proposed Trap category.
        For fishing years beginning June 1, 1999, NMFS would make the 
    annual quota of 1,387 mt available. The proposed specifications for 
    1999 and beyond would set the General category quota at 653 mt, the 
    Harpoon category quota at 54 mt, the Purse Seine category quota at 250 
    mt, the Angling category quota at 273 mt, the Longline category quota 
    at 113 mt, the Trap category at 1 mt, and the Reserve at 43 mt.
        In the proposed regulations to implement the draft HMS FMP, NMFS 
    proposed geographic subdivision of the Angling and Longline category 
    allocations as percentages of the respective category quotas based on 
    historical catches reported for the respective fishing areas. 
    Additionally, NMFS proposed to establish a separate reserve allocation 
    for school BFT within the Angling category to ensure consistency with 
    the ICCAT recommendation to limit the take of school BFT. Taking these 
    proposals into account, the Angling category quota of 273 mt would be 
    divided as follows: School bluefin--111 mt (8 percent of the annual 
    1,387 mt), with 48 mt to the northern area (New Jersey and north), 42 
    mt to the southern area (Delaware and south), and 21 mt held in 
    reserve; large school/small medium bluefin--156 mt, with 83 mt to the 
    northern area and 73 mt to the southern area; and large medium/giant 
    bluefin--6 mt, with 2 mt to the northern area and 4 mt to the southern 
    area. Likewise, the annual Longline category quota of 113 mt would be 
    subdivided as follows: 24 mt to longline vessels operating north of 
    34 deg. N. lat. and 89 mt to longline vessels operating south of 
    34 deg. N. lat.
        Given the above baseline allocations and accounting for overharvest 
    or underharvest in the General, Purse Seine, and Angling categories in 
    1998, the adjusted quotas for the 1999 fishing year would be as 
    follows: 654 mt for the General category; 252 mt for the Purse Seine 
    category; and 99 mt for the Angling category school BFT subquota (with 
    43 mt to the northern area, 38 mt to the southern area, and 18 mt held 
    in reserve).
    
    General Category Effort Controls
    
        In the last 4 years, NMFS has implemented General category time 
    period subquotas and restricted fishing days (RFDs) to increase the 
    likelihood that fishing would continue throughout the summer and fall 
    for scientific monitoring purposes. The subquotas were also designed to 
    address concerns regarding allocation of fishing opportunities, to 
    allow for a late season fishery, and to improve market conditions.
        In the proposed regulations to implement the draft HMS FMP, NMFS 
    proposed to maintain the General category quota subdivisions as 
    established for 1998, as follows: 60 percent for June-August, 30 
    percent for September, and 10 percent for October-December. Given the 
    carryover quota for the General category, adjustments are necessary to 
    allocate the carryover across the established subperiods.
        These percentages would be applied only to the new coastwide 
    baseline quota for the General category of 643 mt, with the remaining 
    10 mt being reserved for the New York Bight fishery. Thus, of the 643 
    mt baseline General category quota, 386 mt would be available in the 
    period beginning June 1 and ending
    
    [[Page 9301]]
    
    August 31, 193 mt would be available in the period beginning September 
    1 and ending September 30, and 64 mt would be available in the period 
    beginning October 1 and ending December 31. Given the carryover of 1 mt 
    underharvest from 1998, the adjusted quota of 644 mt for the 1999 
    fishing season would be divided as follows: 387 mt would be available 
    in the period beginning June 1 and ending August 31, 193 mt would be 
    available in the period beginning September 1 and ending September 30, 
    and 64 mt would be available in the period beginning October 1 and 
    ending December 31.
        As indicated in the proposed regulations to implement the draft HMS 
    FMP, the remaining 10 mt of the annual General category quota would be 
    set aside for the General category New York Bight fishery. However, the 
    proposed regulatory text inadvertently omitted a change in the 
    administration of the set-aside effected by a prior final rule (63 FR 
    27862, May 21, 1998). That rule change provided NMFS greater 
    flexibility to open the set-aside fishery in any quota period rather 
    than to wait until the end of the General category fishing season. That 
    inadvertent omission is corrected in this supplement to the proposed 
    regulations.
        In the last 4 years, NMFS has also implemented RFDs in the General 
    category. In 1997, NMFS amended the Atlantic tunas regulations to 
    prohibit persons aboard General category vessels from fishing, 
    including tag-and-release, for all sizes of BFT on designated RFDs. The 
    proposed regulations to implement the draft HMS FMP states that NMFS 
    will annually publish a schedule of RFDs in the Federal Register.
        For the 1999 fishing year, NMFS proposes a schedule of RFDs similar 
    to that implemented for 1998, making the necessary calendar adjustments 
    to coordinate with Japanese market holidays. Persons aboard vessels 
    permitted in the General category would be prohibited from fishing, 
    including tag-and-release, for BFT of all sizes on the following days: 
    July 7, 11, 14, 18, 21, 25, and 28; August 1, 4, 8, 10 11, 12, 15, 18, 
    22, 25, and 29; September 1, 5, 8, 12, 15, 19, 22, 26, and 29; and 
    October 1. These proposed RFDs would improve distribution of fishing 
    opportunities without increasing BFT mortality.
    
    Quota Adjustment Procedures
    
        Although the ICCAT rebuilding recommendation for BFT requires 
    carryover of underharvest and overharvest, certain additional 
    provisions regarding dead discards and harvest of school BFT apply. 
    Specifically, if a contracting party's fishing activity results in an 
    amount of dead discards in excess of the allowance, it must deduct the 
    excess from the amount of BFT catch that can be retained. Conversely, 
    if the actual amount of dead discards is less than the allowance, one-
    half of the difference may be added to the allocation of BFT catch that 
    can be retained. NMFS proposes to amend the annual quota adjustment 
    procedures to incorporate the provisions of the dead discard allowance.
        The ICCAT rebuilding recommendation also requires that catch of 
    school BFT (less than 30 kg or 115 cm straight fork length) be limited 
    to no more than 8 percent by weight of the total domestic quota over 
    each 4-consecutive-year period. NMFS proposes to implement this 
    provision through the establishment of the school BFT reserve specified 
    here and through annual adjustments to the school BFT landings and 
    reserve categories as necessary to meet the ICCAT requirement. Given 
    the 4-year accounting period, NMFS proposes that adjustments for 
    estimated overharvest or underharvest of school BFT not be restricted 
    to automatic carryover between fishing years. Instead, flexible 
    adjustments would be made to enhance fishing opportunities and the 
    collection of information on a broad range of BFT size classes, 
    provided that the 8 percent landings limit is met over the applicable 
    4-year period.
    
    Scientific Data Collections
    
        ATCA and the Magnuson-Stevens Act authorize NMFS to require 
    permitting and reporting for commercial and recreational HMS fisheries. 
    The HMS FMP addresses the need for accurate and timely information for 
    the purposes of quota monitoring and stock assessment, as well as the 
    need for required studies on fishing communities and economic impacts 
    of regulations. To meet the needs of the HMS FMP, NMFS has implemented 
    logbooks, surveys, and specialized studies in addition to direct 
    reporting and observer programs.
        This supplement to the proposed regulations clarifies the 
    obligation to report by explicitly stating it as a condition for the 
    issuance of the required permits. Failure to report or to respond to 
    any information collection approved by the Office of Management and 
    Budget (OMB) is prohibited. Applications for permits will not be 
    considered complete if required reports have not been submitted or 
    applicants have not responded, as required, to specialized data 
    collections.
    
    Technical Correction
    
        In the proposed regulations to implement the draft HMS FMP, one 
    aspect of the BFT landings quota allocation was inadvertently omitted. 
    Given the proposed 250 mt cap on purse seine landings of BFT, any 
    excess that would result from applying the purse seine percent 
    allocation to the total landings quota must be redistributed. When it 
    occurs, NMFS proposes to allocate such excess to the Reserve category, 
    for inseason redistribution according to the established criteria.
    
    Classification
    
        This proposed rule is published under the authority of the 
    Magnuson-Stevens Act, 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., and the Atlantic Tunas 
    Convention Act, 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. Preliminarily, the Assistant 
    Administrator for Fisheries, NMFS, has determined that the 
    specifications and regulations contained in this proposed rule are 
    necessary to implement the recommendations of ICCAT and are necessary 
    for management of the Atlantic tuna fisheries.
        NMFS amended the Environmental Impact Statement prepared for the 
    proposed regulations to implement the draft HMS FMP with a preliminary 
    finding of no significant impact on the human environment for these 
    specific BFT provisions. In addition, a draft Regulatory Impact Review 
    was prepared with a preliminary finding of no significant impact. The 
    Assistant General Counsel for Legislation and Regulation of the 
    Department of Commerce has certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy 
    of the Small Business Administration that the supplemental proposed 
    regulations, if implemented, would not have a significant economic 
    impact on a substantial number of small entities as follows:
    
        The proposed supplemental regulations would set Atlantic bluefin 
    tuna (BFT) fishing category quotas for 1999 and subsequent years, 
    close an area off the New England and mid-Atlantic coast to pelagic 
    longline gear to reduce BFT incidental catch, provide quota 
    adjustment procedures to limit catch of school BFT and account for 
    dead discards of BFT, and clarify the mandatory nature of certain 
    scientific information collections, in accordance with rebuilding 
    and discard reduction recommendations of the International 
    Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas and domestic 
    fishery management objectives. The proposed supplemental regulations 
    also would specify General Category effort controls (time period 
    subquotas and restricted-fishing days) for the 1999 fishing season. 
    Because fishing category quota allocations would remain the same or 
    increase, and the designated restricted-
    
    [[Page 9302]]
    
    fishing days have been scheduled to correspond directly to Japanese 
    market closures, the likelihood of extending the fishing season is 
    increased and additional revenues would accrue to many small 
    businesses as market prices received by U.S. fishermen may improve. 
    The analysis predicts that only a minimal number of HMS longline 
    fishermen (5 in 1996, 2 in 1997) would experience a reduction in 
    gross revenues of over 5 percent. The analysis also predicts that no 
    pelagic longline fishermen would be forced to cease business 
    operations. Also, as this proposed regulation does not decrease the 
    quota in any fishery, fishermen would still have the opportunity to 
    landthe same amount of fish that they usually do. The proposed 
    measures to minimize dead discards of BFT to the extent practicable 
    would affect only the pelagic longline fleet, and reductions in 
    gross revenues to this sector of the fishery are expected to be 
    insignificant based on agency criteria for preparation of a 
    Regulatory Flexibility Analysis.
    
        Because of this certification, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility 
    Analysis was not prepared.
        This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for 
    purposes of E.O. 12866.
        NMFS initiated formal consultation for all HMS commercial fisheries 
    on September 25, 1996, under section 7 of the ESA. NMFS again 
    reinitiated formal consultation on the HMS FMP and Billfish Amendment 
    on May 12, 1998. The consultation request concerned the possible 
    effects of management measures in the Billfish Amendment and the HMS 
    FMP, including implementation of the Atlantic Offshore Cetacean Take 
    Reduction Plan measures for the pelagic longline fishery. In a 
    Biological Opinion issued on May 29, 1997, NMFS concluded that 
    operation of the longline and purse seine components of the Atlantic 
    tunas fishery may adversely affect, but is not likely to jeopardize, 
    the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species under 
    NMFS jurisdiction and that continued operation of the handgear 
    fisheries is not likely to adversely affect the continued existence of 
    any endangered or threatened species under NMFS jurisdiction. The 
    biological opinion was amended August 29, 1997, by identifying a 
    reasonable and prudent alternative regarding the driftnet component of 
    the swordfish and tuna fisheries, and is not relevant to the BFT 
    fishery.
        NMFS has determined that proceeding with this proposed rule would 
    not result in any irreversible and irretrievable commitment of 
    resources that would have the effect of foreclosing the formulation or 
    implementation of any reasonable and prudent alternative measures to 
    reduce adverse impacts on protected resources. This proposed rule would 
    implement a domestic quota slightly greater than that of 1998, with 
    minor quota adjustments to individual category quotas to account for 
    underharvest in 1998 and to specify BFT General category effort 
    controls (time period subquotas and restricted fishing days) for the 
    1999 fishing season and, therefore, would not likely increase fishing 
    effort nor shift activities to new fishing areas. The proposed time/
    area closure is intended to shift fishing effort away from areas with 
    high BFT discards without changing overall fishing effort. The areas 
    where fishing may be displaced are not expected to increase endangered 
    species or marine mammal interaction rates.
        This supplement to the proposed regulations refers to several 
    collections-of-information subject to review and approval by OMB under 
    the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The mandatory nature of required 
    reports has been clarified but the initial proposed regulations contain 
    the specific reporting requirements in question and has solicited 
    public comment on those requirements, which have been submitted to OMB 
    for approval. The supplement to the proposed regulations also makes it 
    mandatory for persons with permits to respond to surveys on fishing 
    activity; OMB approval for such surveys will be obtained prior to their 
    use and public comment on the specific surveys will be solicited at 
    that time.
        Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required 
    to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure 
    to comply with, a collection of information subject to the requirements 
    of the PRA unless that collection of information displays a currently 
    valid OMB Control Number.
        Comments on the Draft HMS FMP, the Addendum to the HMS FMP, the 
    proposed rule to implement the HMS FMP, and on this supplement to that 
    proposed rule are invited and will be accepted if received by March 4, 
    1999.
    
    List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 635
    
        Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
    Treaties.
        Dated: February 18, 1999.
    Hilda Diaz-Soltero,
    Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
    Service.
        For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR new part 635, as 
    proposed at 64 FR 3154, January 20, 1999, is proposed to be further 
    amended as follows:
    
    PART 635-ATLANTIC HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 635 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
    
        2. In Sec. 635.2, definition for ``Northeastern United States 
    closed area'' is added in alphabetical order to read as follows:
    
    
    
    
    Sec. 635.2  Definitions.
    
    * * * * *
        Northeastern United States closed area means the area bounded by 
    straight lines connecting the following coordinates in the order 
    stated: 41 deg.00' N. lat., 74 deg.00' W. long.; 41 deg.00' N. lat., 
    70 deg.00' W. long.; 37 deg.00' N. lat., 70 deg.00' W. long.; and 
    37 deg.00' N. lat., 74 deg.00' W. long.
    * * * * *
        3. In Sec. 635.4, paragraphs (j)(1) and (j)(2) are revised to read 
    as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 635.4  Permits and fees.
    
    * * * * *
        (j) Permit issuance. (1) Except for ILAPs, the Office Director or 
    the RA will issue a permit within 30 days of receipt of a complete and 
    qualifying application. An application is complete when all requested 
    forms, information, and documentation have been received, including all 
    reports and fishing or catch information required to be submitted under 
    this part.
        (2) NMFS will notify the applicant of any deficiency in the 
    application, including failure to provide information or reports 
    required to be submitted under this part. If the applicant fails to 
    correct the deficiency within 30 days following the date of 
    notification, the application will be considered abandoned.
    * * * * *
        4. In Sec. 635.5, paragraph (g) is revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 635.5  Recordkeeping and reporting.
    
    * * * * *
        (g) Additional data and inspection. Additional data on fishing 
    effort directed at Atlantic HMS or on catch of Atlantic HMS, whether or 
    not retained, may be collected by contractors and statistical reporting 
    agents, as designees of NMFS, and by authorized officers. As part of 
    OMB-approved surveys, a person issued a permit under Sec. 635.4 is 
    required to provide requested information about fishing activity, and a 
    person, whether or not issued a permit under Sec. 635.4, who possesses 
    an Atlantic HMS is required to make such fish or parts thereof 
    available for
    
    [[Page 9303]]
    
    inspection by NMFS or its designees upon request.
        5. In Sec. 635.21, paragraphs (c)(2)(v) and (c)(4) are added to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 635.21  Gear operation and deployment restrictions.
    
    * * * * *
        (c) * * *
        (2) * * *
        (v) (Northeastern United States closed area)--June 1 through June 
    30.
    * * * * *
        (4) Transiting. Notwithstanding paragraph (c)(2) of this section, 
    vessels carrying longline gear may transit the Northeastern United 
    States closed area provided that all anchors and buoys are secured and 
    all pelagic longline gear is stowed.
    * * * * *
        6. In Sec. 635.27, paragraph (a)(1)(iv) is removed, and paragraphs 
    (a) introductory text, (a)(1)(iii), (a)(2) introductory text, and 
    (a)(9) are revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 635.27  Quotas.
    
        (a) BFT. Consistent with ICCAT recommendations, NMFS will subtract 
    any allowance for dead discards from the fishing year's total amount of 
    BFT that can be caught and allocate the remainder to be retained, 
    possessed, or landed by persons and vessels subject to U.S. 
    jurisdiction. The total landing quota will be divided among the 
    General, Angling, Harpoon, Purse Seine, Longline, and Trap categories. 
    Consistent with these allocations and other applicable restrictions of 
    this part, BFT may be taken by persons aboard vessels issued Atlantic 
    Tunas permits or HMS Charter/Headboat permits. Allocations of quota 
    will be made according to the following percentages: General - 47.1 
    percent; Angling - 19.7 percent, which includes the school BFT held in 
    reserve as described under paragraph (a)(7)(ii) of this section; 
    Harpoon - 3.9 percent; Purse Seine - 18.6 percent or 250 mt, whichever 
    is less; Longline - 8.1 percent; and Trap - 0.1 percent. In addition, 
    NMFS is holding in reserve 2.5 percent of the BFT quota for inseason 
    adjustments, to compensate for overharvest in any category other than 
    the Angling category school BFT subquota or for fishery independent 
    research. Should the total landing quota, when multiplied by the Purse 
    Seine percent allocation, exceed 250 mt, the amount above 250 mt shall 
    be redistributed to the Reserve. NMFS may apportion a quota allocated 
    to any category to specified fishing periods or to geographic areas. 
    BFT quotas are specified in whole weight.
        (1) * * *
        (iii) When the coastwide General category fishery has been closed 
    in any quota period under Sec. 637.28(a)(1), NMFS may publish a 
    notification in the Federal Register to make available up to 10 mt of 
    the quota set aside for an area comprising the waters south and west of 
    a straight line originating at a point on the southern shore of Long 
    Island at 72 deg.27' W. long. (Shinnecock Inlet) and running SSE 150 
    true, and north of 38 deg.47' N. lat. The daily catch limit for the 
    set-aside area will be one large medium or giant BFT per vessel per 
    day. Upon the effective date of the set-aside fishery, fishing for, 
    retaining, or landing large medium or giant BFT is authorized only 
    within the set-aside area. Any portion of the set-aside amount not 
    harvested prior to the reopening of the coastwide General category 
    fishery in the subsequent quota period established under paragraph 
    (a)(1)(i) of this section may be carried over for the purpose of 
    renewing the set-aside fishery at a later date.
        (2) Angling category quota. The total amount of BFT that may be 
    caught, retained, possessed, and landed by anglers aboard vessels for 
    which an Angling Category Atlantic Tunas Permit or an HMS Charter/
    Headboat permit has been issued is 19.7 percent of the overall annual 
    U.S. BFT quota. No more than 2.3 percent of the annual Angling category 
    quota may be large medium or giant BFT and, over each 4-consecutive-
    year period, no more than 8 percent of the overall U.S. BFT quota may 
    be school BFT. The Angling category quota includes the amount of school 
    BFT held in reserve as specified under paragraph (a)(7)(ii) of this 
    section. The size class subquotas for BFT are further subdivided as 
    follows:
    * * * * *
        (9) Annual adjustments. If NMFS determines, based on landings 
    statistics and other available information, that a BFT quota in any 
    category or, as appropriate, subcategory has been exceeded or has not 
    been reached, NMFS may subtract the overharvest from, or add the 
    underharvest to, that quota category for the following fishing year, 
    provided that the total of the adjusted quotas and the reserve is 
    consistent with a recommendation of ICCAT regarding country quotas, the 
    take of school BFT, and the allowance for dead discards. Regardless of 
    the estimated catch in any year, NMFS may adjust the annual school BFT 
    quota to ensure that the average take of school BFT over each 4-
    consecutive-year period beginning in the 1999 fishing year does not 
    exceed 8 percent by weight of the total BFT quota allocated to the 
    United States for that period. If NMFS determines that the annual dead 
    discard allowance has been exceeded in one fishing year, NMFS shall 
    subtract the amount in excess of the allowance from the total amount of 
    BFT that can be landed in the subsequent fishing year. If NMFS 
    determines that the annual dead discard allowance has not been reached, 
    NMFS may add one-half of the remainder to the total amount of BFT that 
    can be landed. NMFS will file at the Office of the Federal Register a 
    notification of the amount to be subtracted or added and the basis for 
    the quota reductions or increases made pursuant to this paragraph.
    * * * * *
    [FR Doc. 99-4603 Filed 2-22-99; 10:42 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-22-F
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/25/1999
Department:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Notice of availability and proposed rule; supplemental.
Document Number:
99-4603
Dates:
Comments must be submitted on or before March 4, 1999.
Pages:
9298-9303 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 990217050-9050-01, I.D. 010799A
RINs:
0648-AM17: Addendum to Fishery Management Plan for Highly Migratory Species (HMSFMP)
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/0648-AM17/addendum-to-fishery-management-plan-for-highly-migratory-species-hmsfmp-
PDF File:
99-4603.pdf
CFR: (5)
50 CFR 635.2
50 CFR 635.4
50 CFR 635.5
50 CFR 635.21
50 CFR 635.27