98-4958. IES Utilities Inc. Central Iowa Power Cooperative, Corn Belt Power Cooperative; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License; Proposed No Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 38 (Thursday, February 26, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 9874-9875]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-4958]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-331]
    
    
    IES Utilities Inc. Central Iowa Power Cooperative, Corn Belt 
    Power Cooperative; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to 
    Facility Operating License; Proposed No Significant Hazards 
    Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No. 
    DPR-49 issued to IES Utilities Inc., Central Iowa Power Cooperative, 
    and Corn Belt Power Cooperative (the licensee) for operation of the 
    Duane Arnold Energy Center, located in Linn County, Iowa.
        The proposed amendment would revise the definitions of Cold 
    Condition and Cold Shutdown and add a new section, 3.17, Vessel 
    Hydrostatic Pressure and Leak Testing, to the Technical Specifications 
    to specifically allow reactor vessel hydrostatic pressure testing to be 
    performed during plant shutdown.
        Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission 
    will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
    amended (the Act) and the Commission's regulations.
        The Commission has made a proposed determination that the amendment 
    request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the 
    Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of 
    the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) 
    involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an 
    accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new 
    or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; 
    or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As 
    required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of 
    the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented 
    below:
    
        (1) The proposed amendment will not involve a significant 
    increase in the probability or consequences of an accident 
    previously evaluated. Under this proposed change the secondary 
    containment, secondary containment automatic isolation valves, and 
    standby gas treatment systems would be required to be operable 
    during the performance of hydrostatic and leak testing and would be 
    capable of handling any airborne radioactivity or steam leaks that 
    could occur. The required pressure testing conditions provide 
    adequate assurance that the consequences of a steam leak will be 
    conservatively bounded by the consequences of the postulated main 
    steam line break outside of primary containment. The proposed change 
    will not result in a significant change in the stored energy in the 
    reactor vessel during the performance of the testing.
        (2) The proposed amendment will not create the possibility of a 
    new or different kind of accident from any accident previously 
    evaluated. The proposed change will not alter the way hydrostatic 
    pressure and leak testing is performed or significantly change the 
    temperatures and pressures achieved to perform the test.
        3) The proposed amendment will not involve a significant 
    reduction in a margin of safety. The proposed changes and additions 
    result in increased system operability requirements above those that 
    currently exist during the performance of hydrostatic and leak 
    testing and are consistent with the requirements of NUREG 1433 Rev. 
    1, and the DAEC submittal for Improved Technical Specifications. The 
    incremental increase in stored energy in the vessel during testing 
    will be conservatively bounded by the consequences of the postulated 
    main steam line break outside of primary containment. Therefore, 
    this change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of 
    safety.
    
        The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on 
    this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 
    satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the 
    amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
        The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed 
    determination. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of 
    publication of this notice will be considered in making any final 
    determination.
        Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the 
    expiration of the 30-day notice period. However, should circumstances 
    change during the notice period such that failure to act in a timely 
    way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, 
    the Commission may issue the license amendment before the expiration of 
    the 30-day notice period, provided that its final determination is that 
    the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. The final 
    determination will consider all public and State comments received. 
    Should the Commission take this action, it will
    
    [[Page 9875]]
    
    publish in the Federal Register a notice of issuance and provide for 
    opportunity for a hearing after issuance. The Commission expects that 
    the need to take this action will occur very infrequently.
        Written comments may be submitted by mail to the Chief, Rules and 
    Directives Branch, Division of Administrative Services, Office of 
    Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 
    20555-0001, and should cite the publication date and page number of 
    this Federal Register notice. Written comments may also be delivered to 
    Room 6D22, Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, 
    Maryland, from 7:30 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. Federal workdays. Copies of 
    written comments received may be examined at the NRC Public Document 
    Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC.
        The filing of requests for hearing and petitions for leave to 
    intervene is discussed below.
        By March 30, 1998, the licensee may file a request for a hearing 
    with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility 
    operating license and any person whose interest may be affected by this 
    proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding 
    must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to 
    intervene. Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene 
    shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Rules of Practice 
    for Domestic Licensing Proceedings'' in 10 CFR part 2. Interested 
    persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.714 which is 
    available at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
    document room located at the Cedar Rapids Public Library, 500 First 
    Street, SE., Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401. If a request for a hearing or 
    petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the 
    Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, designated by the 
    Commission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
    Panel, will rule on the request and/or petition; and the Secretary or 
    the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of 
    hearing or an appropriate order.
        As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a petition for leave to intervene 
    shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in 
    the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of 
    the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons 
    why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the 
    following factors: (1) The nature of the petitioner's right under the 
    Act to be made party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of 
    the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the 
    proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which may be 
    entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition 
    should also identify the specific aspect(s) of the subject matter of 
    the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person 
    who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been 
    admitted as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of 
    the Board up to 15 days prior to the first prehearing conference 
    scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy 
    the specificity requirements described above.
        Not later than 15 days prior to the first prehearing conference 
    scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a supplement to 
    the petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions 
    which are sought to be litigated in the matter. Each contention must 
    consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be 
    raised or controverted. In addition, the petitioner shall provide a 
    brief explanation of the bases of the contention and a concise 
    statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support the 
    contention and on which the petitioner intends to rely in proving the 
    contention at the hearing. The petitioner must also provide references 
    to those specific sources and documents of which the petitioner is 
    aware and on which the petitioner intends to rely to establish those 
    facts or expert opinion. Petitioner must provide sufficient information 
    to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material 
    issue of law or fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within 
    the scope of the amendment under consideration. The contention must be 
    one which, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A 
    petitioner who fails to file such a supplement which satisfies these 
    requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be 
    permitted to participate as a party.
        Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, 
    subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, 
    and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the 
    hearing, including the opportunity to present evidence and cross-
    examine witnesses.
        If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final 
    determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The 
    final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held.
        If the final determination is that the amendment request involves 
    no significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the 
    amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the 
    request for a hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance 
    of the amendment.
        If the final determination is that the amendment request involves a 
    significant hazards consideration, any hearing held would take place 
    before the issuance of any amendment.
        A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must 
    be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and 
    Adjudications Staff, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public 
    Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, 
    by close of business on the above date. A copy of the petition should 
    also be sent to the Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, and to Jack Newman, 
    Al Gutterman, Morgan, Lewis & Brockius, 1800 M Street, NW., Washington, 
    DC 20036-5869, attorney for the licensee.
        Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended 
    petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not 
    be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding 
    officer or the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the 
    petition and/or request should be granted based upon a balancing of the 
    factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1)(i)-(v) and 2.714(d).
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    application for amendment dated February 3, 1998, which is available 
    for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the 
    Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local 
    public document room located at the Cedar Rapids Public Library, 500 
    First Street, SE., Cedar Rapids, Iowa 52401.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 20th day of February 1998.
    
    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    John B. Hickman,
    Acting Project Manager, Project Directorate III-3, Division of Reactor 
    Projects--III/IV, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 98-4958 Filed 2-25-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/26/1998
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-4958
Pages:
9874-9875 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 50-331
PDF File:
98-4958.pdf