98-4400. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -212, - 214, -231, -232, and -233 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 1998)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 9934-9935]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-4400]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 97-NM-152-AD; Amendment 39-10360; AD 98-04-49]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -212, -
    214, -231, -232, and -233 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to all Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232, 
    and -233 series airplanes, that requires repetitive ultrasonic 
    inspections to detect fatigue cracking in the wing/fuselage joint 
    cruciform fittings, and corrective actions, if necessary. This 
    amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness 
    information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions 
    specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct fatigue cracks 
    on the wing/fuselage joint cruciform fittings, which could result in 
    reduced structural integrity of the wing/fuselage.
    
    DATES: Effective April 3, 1998.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of April 3, 1998.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 
    Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules 
    Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of 
    the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager, 
    International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 
    1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 
    227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to all Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -
    212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 series airplanes was published in the 
    Federal Register on December 1, 1997 (62 FR 63476). That action 
    proposed to require repetitive ultrasonic inspections to detect fatigue 
    cracking in the wing/fuselage joint cruciform fittings, and corrective 
    actions, if necessary.
    
    Comments
    
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the comments received.
        All of the commenters support the proposed rule.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comments 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        The FAA estimates that 132 airplanes of U.S. registry will be 
    affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 8 work hours per 
    airplane to accomplish the required inspection, at an average labor 
    rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of 
    the inspection required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be 
    $63,360, or $480 per airplane.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD 
    action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    98-04-49  Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-10360. Docket 97-NM-152-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and 
    -233 series airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any 
    category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or
    
    [[Page 9935]]
    
    repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is 
    affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To detect and correct fatigue cracks on the wing/fuselage joint 
    cruciform fittings, which could result in reduced structural 
    integrity of the wing/fuselage, accomplish the following:
        (a) Prior to the accumulation of 28,000 total landings, or 
    within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs 
    later, perform an ultrasonic inspection to detect fatigue cracking 
    in the wing/fuselage joint cruciform fittings, in accordance with 
    Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1051, Revision 01, dated March 21, 
    1996.
        (1) If no cracking is detected, repeat the inspection thereafter 
    at intervals not to exceed 20,000 landings.
        (2) If any crack is detected, prior to further flight, repair it 
    in accordance with the service bulletin. Thereafter, repeat the 
    inspection at the times specified in paragraph (a)(2)(i) or 
    (a)(2)(ii) of this AD, as applicable.
        (i) If the crack that was detected and repaired was greater than 
    2.5 mm: Repeat the inspection prior to the accumulation of 32,000 
    landings since accomplishment of the repair; and thereafter at 
    intervals not to exceed 32,000 landings.
        (ii) If the crack that was detected and repaired was less than 
    or equal to 2.5 mm: Repeat the inspection prior to the accumulation 
    of 28,000 landings since accomplishment of the repair; and 
    thereafter at intervals not to exceed 20,000 landings.
        (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, 
    Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their request 
    through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may 
    add comments and then send it to the Manager, International Branch, 
    ANM-116.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
    
        (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus Service 
    Bulletin A320-57-1051, Revision 01, dated March 21, 1996, which 
    contains the specified effective pages:
    
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Revision level      Date shown on  
                 Page No.                 shown on page           page      
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    1-29, 31-37, 39-40...............  1.................  Mar. 21, 1996.   
    30, 38...........................  Original..........  Mar. 30, 1993.   
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of 
    the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 
    part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point 
    Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be 
    inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind 
    Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal 
    Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
    
        Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in French 
    airworthiness directive 96-299-094(B), dated December 18, 1996.
    
        (e) This amendment becomes effective on April 3, 1998.
    
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 13, 1998.
    Stewart R. Miller,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification. 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 98-4400 Filed 2-26-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-U
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
4/3/1998
Published:
02/27/1998
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
98-4400
Dates:
Effective April 3, 1998.
Pages:
9934-9935 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 97-NM-152-AD, Amendment 39-10360, AD 98-04-49
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
98-4400.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13