[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 39 (Monday, February 28, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page ]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-4471]
[Federal Register: February 28, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. EL94-24-000, et al.]
Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of
West Virginia, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Regulation Filings
February 18, 1994.
Take notice that the following filings have been made with the
Commission.
1. Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of
West Virginia, Maryland People's Counsel and Pennsylvania Office of
Consumer Advocate v. Allegheny Generating Company
[Docket No. EL94-24-000]
Take notice that on January 31, 1994, the Consumer Advocate
Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia
(hereinafter, ``WV Consumer Advocate''), the Maryland People's Counsel
(hereinafter ``People's Counsel'') and the Pennsylvania Office of
Consumer Advocate (hereinafter ``POCA'') submitted their joint
complaint against Allegheny Generating Company (AGC). In their
complaint WV Consumer Advocate, People's Counsel, and POCA request that
the Commission (1) join this complaint with other proceedings filed
concerning AGC's return on equity; (2) adjust AGC's allowed rate of
return on equity to no more than 8.53%, effective on and after April 1,
1994; and (3) establish a refund effective date no later than 60 days
after the filing of this complaint, or April 1, 1994, and that this
complaint be set for hearing at the earliest date.
Comment date: March 21, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
2. Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light
Company
[Docket No. EL94-28-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 1994, Seminole Electric
Cooperative, Inc. (Seminole) tendered for filing a complaint and motion
to consolidated against Florida Power & Light Company (FPL).
In its complaint Seminole seeks an order from the Commission to:
(1) Find the rate currently charged by FPL for partial requirements
services under the Aggregated Billing Partial Service Agreement between
FPL and Seminole, designated as FERC Rate Schedule 77, and for full
requirements services under the Agreement for Full Requirements
Electric Service Cooperative, Inc., are unjust and reasonable, produce
excessive revenues from Seminole, and should be reduced consistent
herewith; (2) establish a refund-effective date 60 days after the date
of filing this complaint; (3) set this matter for hearing; (4) order
consolidation of the consideration of the matters raised by this
complaint with the ongoing proceedings in Docket Nos. ER93-465-000; and
(5) afford Seminole such other relief as may be deemed appropriate.
Comment date: March 21, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
3. Southwestern Public Service Company
[Docket No. EL94-31-000]
Take notice that on February 4, 1994, Southwestern Public Service
Company (SPS) tendered for filing a statement as to the Absence of Need
for Waiver of Fuel Adjustment Clause Regulations or Alternative Request
for Waiver. SPS states that it will illustrate why a waiver of the
Commission's fuel adjustment clause (FAC) regulations was unnecessary
for SPS to properly include certain costs in the computation of its
fuel costs for wholesale FAC billings.
Comment date: March 7, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
4. New England Power Pool
[Docket No. ER93-985-000]
Take notice that on February 10, 1994, twenty-nine participants in
the New England Power Pool (the Filing Participants) submitted
additional information concerning the Thirtieth Amendment to the New
England Power Pool (NEPOOL) Agreement (the Amendment), which had been
filed with the Commission on September 29, 1993. This submittal
responds to the Commission's letter dated January 14, 1994, in the
captioned docket requesting additional information concerning the
Amendment. In the submittal, the Filing Participants also renew their
request that the Commission permit the Amendment to become effective as
of September 30, 1993.
The Filing Participants state that this submittal were served upon
all of the NEPOOL Participants, persons who have requested intervention
in the proceeding, and the electric utility regulators in the six
states in which the NEPOOL Participants are located and provide retail
service.
Comment date: March 7, 1994, in accordance with Standard Paragraph
E at the end of this notice.
Standard Paragraphs
E. Any person desiring to be heard or to protest said filing should
file a motion to intervene or protest with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 825 North Capitol Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules
of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 18 CFR 385.214). All such
motions or protests should be filed on or before the comment date.
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants
parties to the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must
file a motion to intervene. Copies of this filing are on file with the
Commission and are available for public inspection.
Lois D. Cashell,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 94-4471 Filed 2-25-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
