97-4979. Central Zone Noxious Weed Control Project; Idaho Panhandle National Forests, Kootenai and Shoshone Counties, Idaho  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 9156-9158]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-4979]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    Forest Service
    
    
    Central Zone Noxious Weed Control Project; Idaho Panhandle 
    National Forests, Kootenai and Shoshone Counties, Idaho
    
    AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact 
    statement (EIS) to disclose the potential
    
    [[Page 9157]]
    
    environmental effects of noxious weed treatment on the Fernan and 
    Wallace Districts (Central Zone). Treatment sites would be at various 
    locations across the zone and are within the Coeur d' Alene Basin 
    Ecosystem, Wallace and Fernan Ranger Districts, Idaho Panhandle 
    National Forests, Kootenai and Shoshone Counties, Idaho.
        The proposed action to control populations of noxious and 
    undesirable weeds is designed to prevent the spread of these weeds and 
    promote the retention and health of native and/or desirable plants 
    within this ecosystem. The proposed action would use an integrated pest 
    management approach to control weeds. This approach includes 
    mechanical, biological, cultural, and chemical control. Most treatment 
    sites are located near or along forest roads, trails, or recreation 
    sites.
        The major species considered for control include spotted knapweed 
    (Centaurea maculosa), orange hawkweed (Hieracium aurantiacum), meadow 
    hawkweed (Hieracium pratense), dalmation toadflax (Linaria dalmatica), 
    Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), common St. Johnswort (Hypercium 
    perforatum), hound's tongue (Cynoglossum officinale), rush skeletonweed 
    (Chondrilla juncea), leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) and purple 
    loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria). Other species may include common tansy 
    (Tanacetum vulgare), diffuse knapweed (Centaurea diffusa), yellow 
    toadflax (Linaria vulgaris), ox-eye daisy (Chrysanthemum leucanthemum), 
    sulphur cinquefoil (Potentilla recta), Viper's Bugloss (Echium 
    vulgare), Russian knapweed (Centaurea repens), musk thistle (Carduus 
    nutans), and bull thistle (Cirsium vulgare). New invader species which 
    are unknown at this time to occur on the zone would be a high priority 
    for control.
        This project-level EIS will tier to the Idaho Panhandle National 
    Forests Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) (USDA Forest 
    Service, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, September 1987), and 
    references the Idaho Panhandle National Forests Weed Pest Management 
    EIS, (USDA Forest Service, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, October 
    1989); the Bonners Ferry Ranger District Noxious Weed Management 
    Project Final EIS (USDA Forest Service, Idaho Panhandle National 
    Forests, September 1995), the Priest Lake Noxious Weed Control Final 
    EIS (USDA Forest Service, Idaho Panhandle National Forests, 1997) and 
    the St. Joe Noxious Weed Draft EIS (USDA Forest Service, Idaho 
    Panhandle National Forests, 1996).
    
    DATES: Written comments and suggestions should be received no later 
    than April 14, 1997.
    
    ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and suggestions on the proposed 
    management activities or requests to be placed on the project mailing 
    list to Kristen Philbrook, Project Leader, Fernan Ranger District, 2502 
    E. Sherman Ave., Coeur d' Alene, ID 83814.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Kristen Philbrook, EIS Team Leader, Fernan Ranger Station, (208) 769-
    3000.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The primary purposes for weed control are as 
    follows:
        (1) Prevent or limit the spread of noxious weeds that displace 
    native vegetation in the Coeur d' Alene ecosystem;
        (2) Eliminate new invaders before they become established;
        (3) Prevent or limit the spread of weeds into areas containing 
    little or no infestation in order to promote the retention and health 
    of native and/or desirable species;
        (4) Reduce weed seed sources along travel routes;
        (5) Comply with Federal and State laws regulating management of 
    noxious weeds.
        Approximately 60 treatment sites have been identified across the 
    Wallace and Fernan Ranger Districts. Infestations that are discovered 
    would be treated within the scope of the Final EIS and Record of 
    Decision. The Forest Plan provides guidance for management activities 
    within the potentially affected areas through its goals, objectives, 
    standards and guidelines, and management-area direction. The Forest 
    Plan directs that forest pests be managed by an integrated pest 
    management approach. The decisions to be made are what action, if any, 
    should be taken to control weeds in the Coeur d' Alene Ecosystem, where 
    treatment should be applied, and what types of treatment(s) should be 
    used.
        The Forest Service will consider a range of alternatives. One of 
    these will be the ``no action'' alternative in which none of the 
    proposed treatment activities would be implemented. Additional 
    alternatives will represent the range of control methods currently 
    available for treatment of weeds.
        Public participation in an important part of the analysis and will 
    play an important role in developing the alternatives. The mailing list 
    for public scoping will be developed from responses to this NOI, and to 
    a Scoping Notice sent out to interested individuals, organizations and 
    agencies. In addition, the public is encouraged to visit with Forest 
    Service officials during the analysis and prior to the decision. The 
    Forest Service will also be seeking information, comments, and 
    assistance from Federal, State, and local agencies and other 
    individuals or organizations who may be interested in or affected by 
    the proposed actions. Comments from the public and other agencies will 
    be used in preparation of the Draft EIS.
        The draft environmental impact statement is expected to be filed 
    with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and available for public 
    review in June, 1997, At that time, the EPA will publish a Notice of 
    Availability of the draft environmental impact statement in the Federal 
    Register. The comment period on the draft environmental impact 
    statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection 
    Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
        The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important 
    to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
    participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
    draft environmental impact statements must structure their 
    participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is 
    meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and 
    contentions (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 
    553 (1978)). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the 
    draft environmental statement stage but that are not raised until after 
    completion of the final environmental statement may be waived or 
    dismissed by the courts (City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 
    (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 
    1334, 2338 (E.D. Wis. 1980)). Because of these court rulings, it is 
    very important that those interested in this proposed action 
    participate by the close of the 45-day scoping comment period so that 
    substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest 
    Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to 
    them in the final environmental impact statement.
        To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues 
    and concerns regarding the proposed action, comments on the draft 
    environmental impact statement should be specific as possible. It is 
    also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the 
    draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft 
    environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives 
    formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer 
    to the
    
    [[Page 9158]]
    
    Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the 
    procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 
    CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points.
        I am the responsible official for this environmental impact 
    statement. My address is Fernan Ranger District, 2502 E. Sherman Ave. 
    Coeur d' Alene, ID 83814.
    
        Dated: February 18, 1997.
    Susan Matthews,
    District Ranger.
    [FR Doc. 97-4979 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/28/1997
Department:
Forest Service
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement.
Document Number:
97-4979
Dates:
Written comments and suggestions should be received no later than April 14, 1997.
Pages:
9156-9158 (3 pages)
PDF File:
97-4979.pdf