97-4997. Florida Power Corporation; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of Amendment to Facility Operating License, Proposed no Significant Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 40 (Friday, February 28, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 9214-9216]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-4997]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-302]
    
    
    Florida Power Corporation; Notice of Consideration of Issuance of 
    Amendment to Facility Operating License, Proposed no Significant 
    Hazards Consideration Determination, and Opportunity for a Hearing
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No. 
    DPR-72 issued to Florida Power Corporation, et al. (the licensee) for 
    operation of the Crystal River Nuclear Generating Plant, Unit No. 3, 
    located in Citrus County, Florida.
        The proposed amendment would change the Crystal River Unit 3 
    Technical Specifications (TS) to implement 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, 
    ``Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled 
    Reactors,'' Option B. This option allows to change from prescriptive 
    testing requirements to performance-based testing requirements based on 
    the leakage rate testing history of the containment and components. The 
    proposed TS changes include revision to TS 3.6.1, 3.6.3, and addition 
    of ``Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program'' to TS 5.0. The licensee 
    did not propose any deviations from methods approved by the Commission 
    and endorsed in the applicable regulatory guide.
        Before issuance of the proposed license amendment, the Commission 
    will have made findings required by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
    amended (the Act) and the Commission's regulations.
        The Commission has made a proposed determination that the amendment 
    request involves no significant hazards consideration. Under the 
    Commission's regulations in 10 CFR 50.92, this means that operation of 
    the facility in accordance with the proposed amendment would not (1) 
    involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an 
    accident previously evaluated; or (2) create the possibility of a new 
    or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; 
    or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. As 
    required by 10 CFR 50.91(a), the licensee has provided its analysis of 
    the issue of no significant hazards consideration, which is presented 
    below:
    
        (1) Does not involve a significant increase in the probability 
    or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
        The TS amendment does not involve a significant increase in the 
    probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
        The proposed changes to the TS are to implement Option B of 10 
    CFR 50, Appendix J, at CR-3. The proposed changes will result in 
    increased intervals between containment leakage tests based on the 
    leakage rate testing history. The proposed changes do not involve a 
    change to the plant design or operation and does not change the 
    testing methodology.
        NUREG-1493, ``Performance-Based Containment Leak-Test Program,'' 
    provides the technical basis of 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, Option B. 
    NUREG-1493 contains a detailed evaluation of the expected leakage 
    from containment and the associated consequences. The increased risk 
    due to increasing the intervals between containment leakage tests 
    was also evaluated. The NUREG used a statistical approach to 
    determine that the increase in the expected dose to the public due 
    to decreasing the testing frequency is extremely low. NUREG-1493 
    also concluded that a small increase is justifiable in comparison to 
    the benefits from decreasing the testing frequency. The primary 
    benefit is in the reduction in occupational radiation exposure.
        (2) Does not create the possibility of a new or different kind 
    of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
        The TS amendment does not create the possibility of a new or 
    different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated.
        The proposed TS amendment incorporates the performance-based 
    testing approach
    
    [[Page 9215]]
    
    authorized by 10 CFR 50 Appendix, J, Option B. Decreasing the 
    testing frequency allowed by this change does not involve a change 
    to plant design or operation. Safety related equipment and safety 
    functions are not altered as a result of this change. Decreasing the 
    testing frequency does not affect testing methodology. As a result, 
    the proposed change does not affect any of the parameters or 
    conditions that could contribute to the initiation of any accidents.
        (3) Does not involve a significant reduction in the margin of 
    safety.
        This TS amendment does not involve a significant reduction in 
    the margin of safety.
        The proposed TS amendment does not change the methodology of the 
    containment leakage rate testing program or program acceptance 
    criteria. The proposed TS change does affect the frequency of 
    containment leakage rate testing. With an increased interval between 
    tests, a small possibility exists that an increase in leakage could 
    go undetected for a longer period of time. Based on the operational 
    experience at CR-3, it has been demonstrated that the leak-tightness 
    of the containment building has consistently been significantly 
    below the allowable leakage limit. Adequate controls are in place to 
    ensure that required maintenance and modifications are performed.
    
        The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's analysis and, based on 
    this review, it appears that the three standards of 10 CFR 50.92(c) are 
    satisfied. Therefore, the NRC staff proposes to determine that the 
    amendment request involves no significant hazards consideration.
        The Commission is seeking public comments on this proposed 
    determination. Any comments received within 30 days after the date of 
    publication of this notice will be considered in making any final 
    determination.
        Normally, the Commission will not issue the amendment until the 
    expiration of the 30-day notice period. However, should circumstances 
    change during the notice period such that failure to act in a timely 
    way would result, for example, in derating or shutdown of the facility, 
    the Commission may issue the license amendment before the expiration of 
    the 30-day notice period, provided that its final determination is that 
    the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration. The final 
    determination will consider all public and State comments received. 
    Should the Commission take this action, it will publish in the Federal 
    Register a notice of issuance and provide for opportunity for a hearing 
    after issuance. The Commission expects that the need to take this 
    action will occur very infrequently.
        Written comments may be submitted by mail to the Chief, Rules 
    Review and Directives Branch, Division of Freedom of Information and 
    Publications Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear 
    Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, and should cite the 
    publication date and page number of this Federal Register notice. 
    Written comments may also be delivered to Room 6D22, Two White Flint 
    North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland, from 7:30 a.m. to 
    4:15 p.m. Federal workdays. Copies of written comments received may be 
    examined at the NRC Public Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L 
    Street, NW., Washington, DC.
        The filing of requests for hearing and petitions for leave to 
    intervene is discussed below.
        By March 31, 1997, the licensee may file a request for a hearing 
    with respect to issuance of the amendment to the subject facility 
    operating license and any person whose interest may be affected by this 
    proceeding and who wishes to participate as a party in the proceeding 
    must file a written request for a hearing and a petition for leave to 
    intervene. Requests for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene 
    shall be filed in accordance with the Commission's ``Rules of Practice 
    for Domestic Licensing Proceedings'' in 10 CFR Part 2. Interested 
    persons should consult a current copy of 10 CFR 2.714 which is 
    available at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public 
    document room located at the Coastal Region Library, 8619 W. Crystal 
    Street, Crystal River, Florida 32629. If a request for a hearing or 
    petition for leave to intervene is filed by the above date, the 
    Commission or an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, designated by the 
    Commission or by the Chairman of the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 
    Panel, will rule on the request and/or petition; and the Secretary or 
    the designated Atomic Safety and Licensing Board will issue a notice of 
    hearing or an appropriate order.
        As required by 10 CFR 2.714, a petition for leave to intervene 
    shall set forth with particularity the interest of the petitioner in 
    the proceeding, and how that interest may be affected by the results of 
    the proceeding. The petition should specifically explain the reasons 
    why intervention should be permitted with particular reference to the 
    following factors: (1) the nature of the petitioner's right under the 
    Act to be made party to the proceeding; (2) the nature and extent of 
    the petitioner's property, financial, or other interest in the 
    proceeding; and (3) the possible effect of any order which may be 
    entered in the proceeding on the petitioner's interest. The petition 
    should also identify the specific aspect(s) of the subject matter of 
    the proceeding as to which petitioner wishes to intervene. Any person 
    who has filed a petition for leave to intervene or who has been 
    admitted as a party may amend the petition without requesting leave of 
    the Board up to 15 days prior to the first prehearing conference 
    scheduled in the proceeding, but such an amended petition must satisfy 
    the specificity requirements described above.
        Not later than 15 days prior to the first prehearing conference 
    scheduled in the proceeding, a petitioner shall file a supplement to 
    the petition to intervene which must include a list of the contentions 
    which are sought to be litigated in the matter. Each contention must 
    consist of a specific statement of the issue of law or fact to be 
    raised or controverted. In addition, the petitioner shall provide a 
    brief explanation of the bases of the contention and a concise 
    statement of the alleged facts or expert opinion which support the 
    contention and on which the petitioner intends to rely in proving the 
    contention at the hearing. The petitioner must also provide references 
    to those specific sources and documents of which the petitioner is 
    aware and on which the petitioner intends to rely to establish those 
    facts or expert opinion. Petitioner must provide sufficient information 
    to show that a genuine dispute exists with the applicant on a material 
    issue of law or fact. Contentions shall be limited to matters within 
    the scope of the amendment under consideration. The contention must be 
    one which, if proven, would entitle the petitioner to relief. A 
    petitioner who fails to file such a supplement which satisfies these 
    requirements with respect to at least one contention will not be 
    permitted to participate as a party.
        Those permitted to intervene become parties to the proceeding, 
    subject to any limitations in the order granting leave to intervene, 
    and have the opportunity to participate fully in the conduct of the 
    hearing, including the opportunity to present evidence and cross-
    examine witnesses.
        If a hearing is requested, the Commission will make a final 
    determination on the issue of no significant hazards consideration. The 
    final determination will serve to decide when the hearing is held.
        If the final determination is that the amendment request involves 
    no significant hazards consideration, the Commission may issue the 
    amendment and make it immediately effective, notwithstanding the 
    request for a
    
    [[Page 9216]]
    
    hearing. Any hearing held would take place after issuance of the 
    amendment.
        If the final determination is that the amendment request involves a 
    significant hazards consideration, any hearing held would take place 
    before the issuance of any amendment.
        A request for a hearing or a petition for leave to intervene must 
    be filed with the Secretary of the Commission, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 
    Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Docketing and 
    Services Branch, or may be delivered to the Commission's Public 
    Document Room, the Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, 
    by the above date. Where petitions are filed during the last 10 days of 
    the notice period, it is requested that the petitioner promptly so 
    inform the Commission by a toll-free telephone call to Western Union at 
    1-(800) 248-5100 (in Missouri 1-(800) 342-6700). The Western Union 
    operator should be given Datagram Identification Number N1023 and the 
    following message addressed to Frederick J. Hebdon: petitioner's name 
    and telephone number, date petition was mailed, plant name, and 
    publication date and page number of this Federal Register notice. A 
    copy of the petition should also be sent to the Office of the General 
    Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, 
    and to A. H. Stephens, General Counsel, Florida Power Corporation, MAC-
    A5D, P.O. Box 14042, St. Petersburg, Florida 33733, attorney for the 
    licensee.
        Nontimely filings of petitions for leave to intervene, amended 
    petitions, supplemental petitions and/or requests for hearing will not 
    be entertained absent a determination by the Commission, the presiding 
    officer or the presiding Atomic Safety and Licensing Board that the 
    petition and/or request should be granted based upon a balancing of the 
    factors specified in 10 CFR 2.714(a)(1) (i)-(v) and 2.714(d).
        For further details with respect to this action, see the 
    application for amendment dated February 17, 1997, which is available 
    for public inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the 
    Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local 
    public document room located at the Coastal Region Library, 8619 W. 
    Crystal Street, Crystal River, Florida 32629.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of February 1997.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    L. Raghavan,
    Project Manager, Project Directorate II-3, Division of Reactor 
    Projects--I/II, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 97-4997 Filed 2-27-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/28/1997
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-4997
Pages:
9214-9216 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 50-302
PDF File:
97-4997.pdf