96-4702. Revision of User Fees for 1996 Crop Cotton Classification Services to Growers  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 41 (Thursday, February 29, 1996)]
    [Proposed Rules]
    [Pages 7756-7757]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-4702]
    
    
    
    ========================================================================
    Proposed Rules
                                                    Federal Register
    ________________________________________________________________________
    
    This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of 
    the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these 
    notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in 
    the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
    
    ========================================================================
    
    
    Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 41 / Thursday, February 29, 1996 / 
    Proposed Rules
    
    [[Page 7756]]
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Agricultural Marketing Service
    
    7 CFR Part 28
    
    [CN-96-001]
    
    
    Revision of User Fees for 1996 Crop Cotton Classification 
    Services to Growers
    
    AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Proposed rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) is proposing to 
    reduce user fees for cotton producers for 1996 crop cotton 
    classification services under the Cotton Statistics and Estimates Act 
    in accordance with the formula provided in the Uniform Cotton Classing 
    Fees Act of 1987 and remove obsolete regulations. The 1995 user fee for 
    the classification service was $1.60 per bale. This proposal would 
    reduce the fee for the 1996 crop to $1.50 per bale. The proposed 
    reduction in fees is due to increased efficiency in classing operations 
    and is sufficient to recover the costs of providing classification 
    services, including costs for administration, supervision, and 
    development and maintenance of standards.
    
    DATES: Comments must be received by April 1, 1996.
    
    ADDRESSES: Comments and inquiries should be addressed to Lee Cliburn, 
    Cotton Division, AMS, USDA, room 2641-S, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 
    20090-6456. Comments will be available for public inspection during 
    regular business hours at the above office in Rm. 2641-South Building, 
    14th & Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lee Cliburn, 202-720-2145.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule has been determined to be not 
    significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866, and has not been 
    reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
        This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12778, 
    Civil Justice Reform. It is not intended to have retroactive effect. 
    This rule would not preempt any state or local laws, regulations, or 
    policies unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule. 
    There are no administrative procedures which must be exhausted prior to 
    any judicial challenge to the provisions of this rule.
        The Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS), has 
    considered the economic impact of this proposal on small entities 
    pursuant to the requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility 
    Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
        The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of 
    businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will 
    not be disproportionately burdened. There are about 40,000 cotton 
    growers who voluntarily submit their cotton for the classification 
    service. The majority of the growers are small businesses under the 
    criteria established by the Small Business Administration. The 
    Administrator of AMS has certified that this action will not have a 
    significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
    as defined in the RFA because: (1) The fee reduction reflects a 
    decrease in the cost-per-unit currently borne by those entities 
    utilizing the services; (2) the cost reduction will not affect 
    competition in the marketplace; and (3) the use of classification 
    services is voluntary.
        In compliance with OMB regulations (5 CFR part 1320) which 
    implement the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et 
    seq.), the information collection requirements contained in the 
    provisions to be amended by this proposed rule have been previously 
    approved by OMB and were assigned OMB control number 0581-0009 under 
    the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
        It is anticipated that the proposed changes, if adopted, would be 
    made effective July 1, 1996, as provided by the Cotton Statistics and 
    Estimates Act.
    
    Fees for Classification Under the Cotton Statistics and Estimates Act 
    of 1927
    
        The user fee charged to cotton producers for High Volume Instrument 
    (HVI) classification services under the Cotton Statistics and Estimates 
    Act (7 U.S.C. 473a) was $1.60 per bale during the 1995 harvest season 
    as determined by using the formula provided in the Uniform Cotton 
    Classing Fees Act of 1987, as amended by Public Law 102-237. The fees 
    cover salaries, cost of equipment and supplies, and other overhead 
    costs, including costs for administration, supervision, development, 
    and maintenance of cotton standards.
        This proposed rule establishes the user fee charged to producers 
    for HVI classification at $1.50 per bale during the 1996 harvest 
    season.
        Public Law 102-237 amended the formula in the Uniform Cotton 
    Classing Fees Act of 1987 for establishing the producer's 
    classification fee so that the producer's fee is based on the 
    prevailing method of classification requested by producers during the 
    previous year. HVI classing was the prevailing method of cotton 
    classification requested by producers in 1995. Therefore, the 1996 
    producer's user fee for classification service is based on the 1995 
    base fee for HVI classification.
        The fee was calculated by applying the formula specified in the 
    Uniform Cotton Classing Fees Act of 1987, as amended by Public Law 102-
    237. The 1995 base fee for HVI classification exclusive of adjustments, 
    as provided by the Act, was $2.01 per bale. A 1.4 percent, or three 
    cents per bale increase due to the implicit price deflator of the gross 
    domestic product added to the $2.01 would result in a 1996 base fee of 
    $2.04 per bale. The formula in the Act provides for the use of the 
    percentage change in the implicit price deflator of the gross national 
    product (as indexed for the most recent 12-month period for which 
    statistics are available). However, this has been replaced by the gross 
    domestic product by the Department of Commerce as a more appropriate 
    measure for the short-term monitoring and analysis of the U.S. economy.
        The number of bales to be classed by the United States Department 
    of Agriculture from the 1996 crop is estimated at 19,024,000. The 1996 
    base fee was decreased 15 percent based on the estimated number of 
    bales to be classed (one percent for every 100,000 bales or portion 
    thereof above the base of 12,500,000, limited to a maximum adjustment 
    of 15 percent). This percentage factor amounts to a 31 cents 
    
    [[Page 7757]]
    per bale reduction and was subtracted from the 1996 base fee of $2.04 
    per bale, resulting in a fee of $1.73 per bale.
        Assuming a fee of $1.73 per bale, the projected operating reserve 
    would be 36.9 percent. The Act specifies that the Secretary shall not 
    establish a fee which, when combined with other sources of revenue, 
    will result in a projected operating reserve of more than 25 percent. 
    Accordingly, the fee of $1.73 must be reduced by 23 cents per bale, to 
    $1.50 per bale, to provide an ending accumulated operating reserve for 
    the fiscal year of 25 percent of the projected cost of operating the 
    program. This would establish the 1996 season fee at $1.50 per bale.
        Accordingly, Sec. 28.909, paragraph (b) would be revised to reflect 
    the reduction in the HVI classification fees.
        As provided for in the Uniform Cotton Classing Fees Act of 1987, as 
    amended, a five cent per bale discount would continue to be applied to 
    voluntary centralized billing and collecting agents as specified in 
    Sec. 28.909 (c).
        Growers or their designated agents would continue to incur no 
    additional fees if only one method of receiving classification data was 
    requested. The fee for each additional method of receiving 
    classification data in Sec. 28.910 (a) would remain at five cents per 
    bale, and it would be applicable even if the same method was requested. 
    Since the Cotton Division will no longer accept returned diskettes to 
    eliminate the possibility of computer virus infection, the cost of 
    computer tapes or diskettes not returned will no longer be billed 
    separately to the requestor. The fee in Sec. 28.910 (b) for an owner 
    receiving classification data from the central database would remain at 
    five cents per bale, but a minimum charge of $5.00 for services 
    provided per monthly billing period would be assessed. The provisions 
    of Sec. 28.910 concerning the fee for new classification memoranda 
    issued from the central database for the business convenience of an 
    owner without reclassification of the cotton would remain the same.
        The fee for review classification in Sec. 28.911 would be reduced 
    from $1.60 per bale to $1.50 per bale.
        The fee for returning samples after classification in Sec. 28.911 
    would remain at 40 cents per sample.
    
    List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 28
    
        Administrative practice and procedures, Cotton, Cotton samples, 
    Grades, Market news, Reporting and record keeping requirements, 
    Standards, Staples, Testing, Warehouses.
    
        For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR Part 28 is 
    proposed to be amended as follows:
    
    PART 28--[AMENDED]
    
        1. The authority citation for Part 28 would be revised to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 7 U.S.C. 471-476.
    
        2. In section 28.909, paragraph (b) would be revised to read as 
    follows:
    
    
    Sec. 28.909  Costs.
    
    * * * * *
        (b) The cost of High Volume Instrument (HVI) cotton classification 
    service to producers is $1.50 per bale.
    * * * * *
        3. Section 28.910 would be amended by revising the concluding text 
    of paragraph (a) and adding a sentence at the end of paragraph (b) to 
    read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 28.910  Classification of samples and issuance of classification 
    data.
    
        (a) * * *
        If the issuance of data to growers or to their agents is made by 
    more than one method, the fee for each bale issued by each additional 
    method shall be five cents. If provided as additional method of data 
    transfer, the minimum fee for each tape or diskette issued shall be 
    $10.00.
        (b) * * * The minimum charge assessed for services obtained from 
    the central database shall be $5.00 per monthly billing period.
    * * * * *
        4. In Section 28.911, the last sentence of paragraph (a) would be 
    revised to read as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 28.911  Review classification.
    
        (a) * * * The fee for review classification is $1.50 per bale.
    * * * * *
        Dated: February 23, 1996.
    Lon Hatamiya,
    Administrator.
    [FR Doc. 96-4702 Filed 2-28-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-02-P
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/29/1996
Department:
Agricultural Marketing Service
Entry Type:
Proposed Rule
Action:
Proposed rule.
Document Number:
96-4702
Dates:
Comments must be received by April 1, 1996.
Pages:
7756-7757 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
CN-96-001
PDF File:
96-4702.pdf
CFR: (3)
7 CFR 28.909
7 CFR 28.910
7 CFR 28.911