94-2392. Documents Containing Reporting or Recordkeeping Requirements: Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 23 (Thursday, February 3, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-2392]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: February 3, 1994]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
     
    
    Documents Containing Reporting or Recordkeeping Requirements: 
    Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Review
    
    AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
    
    ACTION: Notice of the OMB review of information collection.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The NRC has recently submitted to the OMB for review the 
    following proposal for the collection of information under the 
    provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. chapter 
    35).
    
    1. Type of submission, new, revision, or extension: Revision.
    2. The title of the information collection: Reactor Operator and Senior 
    Reactor Operator Licensing Training and Requalification Programs.
    3. The form number if applicable: N/A.
    4. How often the collection is required: Upon request by the NRC.
    5. Who will be required or asked to report: Power and non-power reactor 
    licensees.
    6. An estimate of the number of annual responses: 8 for power reactors 
    and 4 for non-power reactors.
    7. An estimate of the total number of hours needed to complete the 
    requirement or request: 32 hours annually for power reactors 
    (approximately 4 hours per response) and 2 hours annually for non-power 
    reactors (approximately 0.5 hours per response). There is an overall 
    reduction of 358 hours (3.3 hours per licensee) because licensees will 
    no longer submit material for NRC preparation of requalification 
    examinations.
    8. An indication of whether section 3504(h), Public Law 96-511 applies: 
    Not applicable.
    9. Abstract: The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is amending its 
    regulations at 10 CFR part 55 to: (1) Delete the prerequisite for 
    license renewal that each licensed operator pass a comprehensive 
    requalification written examination and an operating test conducted by 
    the NRC during the term of the operator's 6-year license, (2) require 
    facility licensees to submit upon request copies of each annual 
    operating test or comprehensive written examination used for operator 
    requalification to the NRC for review, and (3) amend the ``Scope'' 
    provisions of the regulations pertaining to operators' licenses to 
    include facility licensees. This information is needed to monitor 
    licensed operator performance and to support the Commission's 
    inspection program. It is concluded that these amendments will result 
    in a substantial increase in the overall protection of public health 
    and safety.
    
        Copies of the submittal may be inspected or obtained for a fee from 
    the NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW. (Lower Level), 
    Washington, DC 20555.
        Comments and questions should be directed to the OMB reviewer: Troy 
    Hillier, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, (3150-0018 and 
    3150-0101), NEOB-3019, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 
    20503.
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    [Docket Nos. 50-277 and 50-278]
    
    Philadelphia Electric Co., et al.; Notice of Issuance of 
    Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License Nos. 
    DPR-44 and DPR-56, issued to the Philadelphia Electric Company, et al. 
    (the licensee), for operation of the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, 
    Units 2 and 3, located in York County, Pennsylvania.
    
    Summary of Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of Proposed Action
    
        The proposed amendment would consist of changes to the Peach Bottom 
    Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3, operating licenses DPR-44 and DPR-
    56, respectively, to extend the expiration dates of the operating 
    licenses from January 31, 2008 to August 8, 2013 and July 2, 2014, 
    respectively. The amendments are in response to the licensee's 
    application dated May 21, 1992. The revised dates provide for a 
    licensed operating period of 40 years from issuance of the respective 
    unit operating license. The Commission's staff has prepared an 
    environment assessment of the proposed action, ``Environmental 
    Assessment by the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Related to the 
    Change in the Expiration Date of Facility Operating Licenses DPR-44 and 
    DPR-56, Philadelphia Electric Company, Public Service Electric and Gas 
    Company, Delmarva Power and Light Company, Atlantic City Electric 
    Company, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3,'' dated 
    January 24, 1994.
        The NRC staff has reviewed the potential environmental impact of 
    the proposed change in the expiration dates of the operating licenses 
    for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 (Peach Bottom, 
    Units 2 and 3). The staff reviewed the ``Final Environmental Statement 
    Related to Operation of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Units 2 and 
    3,'' dated April 1973 (FES) and the information provided in the 
    licensee's May 21, 1992 license amendment application to determine if 
    any significant environmental impacts, other than those previously 
    considered, would be associated with the proposed license extension.
    
    Radiological Impact
    
        The NRC staff concludes that, although the population in the 
    vicinity of Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station has increased, the 
    population growth was less than projections provided in the FES. Based 
    on updated census information and updated population growth estimates, 
    the existing FES is expected to remain bounding with respect to 
    population projections.
        Station radiological effluents to unrestricted areas during normal 
    operation have been well within Commission regulations regarding ``as 
    low as reasonably achievable'' (ALARA) limits and are expected to 
    remain within ALARA limits. Based on the continued operation of 
    existing liquid and gaseous radwaste treatment systems coupled with the 
    current radiological monitoring program, the NRC staff anticipates 
    liquid and gaseous effluent doses during the period covered by the 
    requested amendment will remain a fraction of the 10 CFR part 50, 
    Appendix I, limits and will not adversely impact the environment.
        With regard to normal plant operation, occupational radiation 
    exposures to personnel have decreased as a result of recent plant 
    improvements. Further reductions in radiation dose rates are expected 
    as a result of the ALARA program.
        Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes that, as a result of the 
    license extension, the radiological impact on the general public would 
    not increase over that previously evaluated in the FES and the 
    occupational exposure will be at least consistent with the industry 
    average and in accordance with 10 CFR Part 20.
        The NRC staff has in the past concluded that the environmental 
    impacts associated with the uranium fuel cycle are very small when 
    compared with the dose commitments resulting from natural background 
    sources.
        The environmental impacts attributable to transportation of fuel 
    and waste to and from Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, with respect 
    to normal conditions of transport and possible accidents in transport, 
    would be founded as set forth in Summary Table S-4 of 10 CFR 51.52. The 
    values in Table S-4 would continue to represent the contribution of 
    transportation to the environmental costs associated with reactor 
    operation.
    
    Nonradiological Impacts
    
        The NRC staff has concluded that the proposed extension would not 
    cause a significant increase in the nonradiological impact to the 
    environment and would not change any conclusions previously reached by 
    the NRC staff.
    
    Alternate Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of resources not previously 
    considered in the FES.
    
    Agencies and Persons Contacted
    
        The NRC staff reviewed the licensee's request and contacted the 
    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Bureau of Radiation Protection, which had 
    no objection to the proposed license extension.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The NRC staff has reviewed the proposed change to the expiration 
    dates of the Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station, Units 2 and 3 operating 
    licenses relative to the requirements set forth in 10 CFR part 51. 
    Based on the environmental assessment, the Commission concluded that 
    there are no significant radiological or nonradiological impacts 
    associated with the proposed action and that the proposed license 
    amendment will not have a significant effect on the quality of the 
    human environment. Therefore, the Commission has determined, pursuant 
    to 10 CFR 51.31, not to prepare an environmental impact statement for 
    the proposed amendment.
        For further details with respect to this action, see: (1) The 
    application for amendment dated May 21, 1992; (2) the ``Final 
    Environmental Statement Related to Operation of Peach Bottom Power 
    Station, Units 2 and 3,'' issued April 1973; and (3) the Environmental 
    Assessment dated January 24, 1994.
        These documents are available for public inspection at the 
    Commission's Public Document Room, The Gelman Building, 2120 L Street, 
    NW., Washington, DC 20555 and at the local public document room located 
    at the State Library of Pennsylvania, (Regional Depository) Government 
    Publications Section, Education Building, Walnut Street and 
    Commonwealth Avenue, Box 1601, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17105.
    
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 24th day of January 1994.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Charles L. Miller,
    Director, Project Directorate I-2, Division of Reactor Projects--I/II, 
    Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 94-2392 Filed 2-2-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/03/1994
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of the OMB review of information collection.
Document Number:
94-2392
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: February 3, 1994