99-2514. Yankee Atomic Electric Company; Yankee Nuclear Power Station Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 1999)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 5320-5321]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-2514]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    [Docket No. 50-29]
    
    
    Yankee Atomic Electric Company; Yankee Nuclear Power Station 
    Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Commission) is considering 
    issuance of an amendment to Possession Only License (POL) No. DPR-3 
    issued to the Yankee Atomic Electric Company (YAEC or licensee) for the 
    Yankee Nuclear Power Station (YNPS or plant). The plant is located in 
    Rowe Township, Franklin County, Massachusetts.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would revise the POL through the following 
    three changes to the Technical Specifications (TS) by (1) deletion of 
    the definition of SITE BOUNDARY, (2) moving the Site Boundary and Plant 
    Exclusion Area map from the TS to the Final Safety Analysis Report 
    (FSAR) and (3) Deletion of TS 5.1.1--EXCLUSION AREA.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for amendment dated August 20, 1998.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would, for item (1) above, remove an obsolete 
    and unneeded definition from the TS. For Item (2), the TS that is being 
    relocated to a licensee controlled document, the FSAR, is not required 
    to be in the TS under 10 CFR 50.36 requirements. The licensee may 
    revise the FSAR under the provisions of 10 CFR 50.59, which provides 
    appropriate procedural means to control such revisions. Furthermore, 
    this change is consistent with the NRC guidance in NUREG-1625, Proposed 
    Standard Technical Specifications for Permanently Defueled Westinghouse 
    Plants. Item (3) would delete an unneeded section of the TS as its only 
    function was to reference the map being moved to the FSAR.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action 
    and concludes that the proposed action will not have any impact on the 
    environment as the proposed changes are administrative in nature. The 
    licensee does not propose any disposal nor relocation of fuel by this 
    action. This action is considered administrative in nature.
    
    [[Page 5321]]
    
        The proposed action will not increase the probability or 
    consequences of accidents, no changes are being made in the types of 
    any effluents that may be released off site, and there is no 
    significant increase in occupational or public radiation exposure. 
    Therefore, there are no significant radiological environmental impacts 
    associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential non-radiological impacts, the proposed 
    action does not involve any historic sites. It does not affect non-
    radiological plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. 
    Therefore, there are no significant non-radiological environmental 
    impacts associated with the proposed action.
        Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    
    Alternative to the Proposed Action
    
        As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff considered 
    denial of the proposed action. Denial of the application would result 
    in no change in current environmental impacts. The environmental 
    impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action are similar.
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not evaluated 
    in previous environmental reviews for the YNPS.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, on December 15, 1998, the 
    staff consulted with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts State liaison 
    officer, Jim Muckerheide of the Massachusetts Civil Defense Agency, 
    regarding the environmental impact of the proposed action. The 
    Commonwealth official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        On the basis of the environmental assessment, the Commission 
    concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect 
    on the quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission 
    has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
    YAEC's letter of August 20, 1998, which is available for public 
    inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, the Gelman 
    Building, 2120 L Street, NW., Washington, D.C., and at the Local Public 
    Document Room located in the Library of the Greenfield Community 
    College, 1 College Drive, Greenfield, Massachusetts 01301.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 28th day of January 1999.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    Seymour H. Weiss,
    Director, Non-Power Reactors, and Decommissioning Project Directorate, 
    Division of Reactor Program Management, Office of Nuclear Reactor 
    Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 99-2514 Filed 2-2-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/03/1999
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
99-2514
Pages:
5320-5321 (2 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 50-29
PDF File:
99-2514.pdf