97-2799. State and Community-Based Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program and Surveillance of Blood Lead Levels in Children; Notice of Availability of Funds for Fiscal Year 1997  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 5423-5428]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-2799]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    [Announcement 721]
    
    
    State and Community-Based Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention 
    Program and Surveillance of Blood Lead Levels in Children; Notice of 
    Availability of Funds for Fiscal Year 1997
    
    Introduction
    
        The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announces the 
    availability of funds in fiscal year (FY) 1997 for new and competing 
    continuation State and community-based childhood lead poisoning 
    prevention projects, and to build statewide capacity to conduct 
    surveillance of blood lead levels in children.
        The CDC is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease 
    prevention objectives of Healthy People 2000, a national activity to 
    reduce morbidity and mortality and improve the quality of life. This 
    announcement is related to the priority area of Environmental Health. 
    (To order a copy of Healthy People 2000, see the Where to Obtain 
    Additional Information section.)
    
    [[Page 5424]]
    
    Authority
    
        This program is authorized under sections 301(a), 317A and 317B of 
    the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. 241(a), 247b-1, and 247b-3], 
    as amended. Program regulations are set forth in Title 42, Code of 
    Federal Regulations, Part 51b.
    
    Smoke-Free Workplace
    
        The CDC strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a 
    smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products, 
    and Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking 
    in certain facilities that receive Federal funds in which education, 
    library, day care, health care, and early childhood development 
    services are provided to children.
    
    Environmental Justice Initiative
    
        Activities conducted under this announcement should be consistent 
    with the Federal Executive Order No. 12898 entitled, ``Federal Actions 
    to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income 
    Populations.'' Grantees, to the greatest extent practicable and 
    permitted by law, shall make achieving environmental justice part of 
    its program's mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, 
    disproportionately high and adverse human health and environmental 
    effects of lead on minority populations and low-income populations.
    
    Eligible Applicants
    
        Eligible applicants for State childhood lead prevention programs 
    are State health departments or other State health agencies or 
    departments deemed most appropriate by the State to direct and 
    coordinate the State's childhood lead poisoning prevention program, and 
    agencies or units of local government that serve jurisdictional 
    populations greater than 500,000. This eligibility includes health 
    departments or other official organizational authority (agency or 
    instrumentality) of the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of 
    Puerto Rico, and any territory or possession of the United States.
        Applicants for prevention program grants from eligible units of 
    local jurisdiction must elect either to apply directly to CDC as a 
    grantee, or to apply as part of a statewide grant application. Local 
    jurisdictions cannot submit applications directly to CDC and also apply 
    as part of a Statewide grant application.
    
    For Surveillance Funds Only
    
        Eligible applicants are State health departments or other State 
    health agencies or departments deemed most appropriate by the State to 
    direct and coordinate the State's childhood lead poisoning prevention 
    and surveillance program. Eligible applicants must have regulations for 
    reporting of PbB levels by both public and private laboratories or 
    provide assurances that such regulations will be in place within six 
    months of awarding the grant. This program is intended to initiate and 
    build capacity for surveillance of childhood PbB levels. Therefore, any 
    applicant that already has in place a PbB level surveillance activity 
    must demonstrate how these grant funds will be used to enhance, expand 
    or improve the current activity, in order to remain eligible for 
    funding. CDC funds should be added to blood-lead surveillance funding 
    from other sources, if such funding exists. Funds for these programs 
    may not be used in place of any existing funding for surveillance of 
    PbB levels.
        If a State agency applying for grant funds is other than the 
    official State health department, written concurrence by the State 
    health department must be provided.
    
    Availability of Funds
    
    State and Community-based Prevention Program Grant Funds
    
        Approximately $8,000,000 will be available in FY 1997 to fund a 
    selected number of new and competing continuation childhood lead 
    poisoning prevention projects. The CDC anticipates that awards for the 
    first budget year will range from $200,000 to $1,500,000. Applications 
    exceeding the funding limit of $1,500,000 will be returned as non-
    responsive to the program announcement. This includes both direct and 
    indirect cost amounts.
    
    Surveillance Grant Funds
    
        Approximately $300,000 will be available in FY 1997 to fund up to 
    four new grants to support the development of PbB surveillance 
    activities. Surveillance awards are expected to range from $60,000 to 
    $75,000. Applications exceeding the funding limit of $75,000 will be 
    returned as non-responsive to the program announcement. This includes 
    both direct and indirect cost amounts.
        The new awards are expected to begin on or about July 1, 1997.
        New awards are made for 12-month budget periods within project 
    periods not to exceed 3 years. Estimates outlined above are subject to 
    change based on the actual availability of funds and the scope and 
    quality of applications received. Continuation awards within the 
    project period will be made on the basis of satisfactory progress and 
    availability of funds.
        Grant awards cannot supplant existing funding for childhood lead 
    poisoning prevention programs or surveillance activities. Grant funds 
    should be used to increase the level of expenditures from State, local, 
    and other funding sources.
        Applicants may apply for either a prevention program grant or a 
    surveillance grant, but NOT both. Applicants from State health agencies 
    applying for prevention program grant funds must address surveillance 
    issues in their application.
        Awards will be made with the expectation that program activities 
    will continue when grant funds are terminated.
    
    Note
    
         Grant funds may not be expended for medical care and 
    treatment or for environmental remediation of lead sources. However, 
    the applicant must provide an acceptable plan to ensure that these 
    program activities are appropriately carried out.
         Not more than 10 percent (exclusive of Direct 
    Assistance) of any grant may be obligated for administrative costs. 
    This 10 percent limitation is in lieu of, and replaces, the indirect 
    cost rate.
    
    Background and Definitions
    
    Background
    
        State and community health agencies have traditionally been the 
    principal delivery points for childhood lead screening and related 
    medical and environmental management activities; however, limited 
    resources and changing public health infrastructures have required 
    public health agencies to develop new strategies to ensure the delivery 
    of comprehensive services to prevent childhood lead poisoning.
        In 1991, CDC recommended universal screening for children under six 
    years old except in communities where the prevalence of elevated blood 
    lead levels was known to be very low. In areas where the majority of 
    children are at low risk for lead exposure, universal screening is not 
    a practical or cost-beneficial investment of limited resources. Thus, 
    screening activities should be targeted to children at elevated risk of 
    lead exposure. As the prevalence of blood lead levels continues to 
    diminish in the United States, targeting screening to those children 
    who remain at elevated risk of lead exposure will become increasingly 
    important.
        Based on this scientific information and practical experience, to 
    prevent childhood lead poisoning State and community health agencies 
    will need to
    
    [[Page 5425]]
    
    re-examine their current screening policies and practices. State and 
    local health agencies must have in place sound policies and programs to 
    assess the risk for lead exposure and assure that appropriate and 
    timely actions take place to protect children at risk of lead exposure. 
    As State and local health departments revise their screening policies, 
    it is anticipated that the screening and follow-up of children who most 
    need services will be expanded or enhanced, thereby diminishing the 
    screening of children in areas where they are not exposed to lead.
        Blood lead levels in the United States have fallen dramatically 
    over the past decade--by about 78 percent between 1978 and 1991. 
    Nevertheless, the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination 
    Survey (NHANES III) shows that, despite a dramatic decline in lead 
    exposure among children, approximately 1.7 million children ages 1-5 
    still have blood lead levels 10 g/dL, a level at 
    which there has been shown to be subtle effects on children's cognitive 
    development. Poor, urban, black children and Mexican-American children 
    are at especially high risk for harmful levels of lead in their blood.
        We have made great progress in reducing lead in important sources 
    for the U.S. population--gasoline and food. However, there are still 
    important sources of lead that pose a serious health threat to 
    children. The remaining sources of lead exposure for children--lead in 
    paint, dust, and soil--are far more difficult to address, since these 
    can only be reduced by actions in individual homes. Without a concerted 
    effort to reduce exposure from these sources, elevated lead levels in 
    children will continue to be a public health problem.
    
    Definitions
    
        Program: A designated unit within an agency responsible for 
    implementing and coordinating a systematic and comprehensive approach 
    to prevent childhood lead poisoning in high-risk communities.
        Program Elements: Include (1) identifying infants and young 
    children with elevated blood lead levels, (2) identifying and assuring 
    the remediation of possible sources of lead exposure throughout the 
    community, (3) monitoring the medical and environmental management of 
    lead poisoned children, (4) providing information on childhood lead 
    poisoning and its prevention and management to the public, health 
    professionals, and policy and decision makers, (5) encouraging and 
    supporting community-based programs directed to the goal of eliminating 
    childhood lead poisoning, (6) developing and providing laboratory 
    support, and (7) maintaining a data management component that assists 
    in the day-to-day management of the childhood lead poisoning prevention 
    program and documents program activities.
        High-Risk or Targeted Community: Geographically defined 
    community or neighborhood where there is significant childhood lead 
    exposure (documented by the presence of children with elevated blood 
    lead levels) or potential childhood lead exposure (documented by the 
    presence of sources of lead exposure, especially older, deteriorating 
    housing.)
        Lead Hazard: Accessible paint, dust, soil, water, or other 
    source or pathway that contains lead or lead compounds that can 
    contribute to or cause lead poisoning.
        Lead Hazard Remediation: The elimination, reduction, or 
    containment of known and accessible lead sources.
        Care coordination: The total care of a child with lead 
    poisoning, including appropriate and timely medical and environmental 
    follow-up.
        Surveillance: For the purpose of this program, a complete 
    PbB surveillance activity is defined as a process which: (1) 
    systematically collects information over time about children with 
    elevated PbB levels using laboratory reports as the data source; (2) 
    provides for the follow-up of cases, including field investigations 
    when necessary; and (3) provides timely and useful analysis and 
    reporting of the accumulated data including an estimate of the rate of 
    elevated PbB levels among all children receiving blood tests.
    
    Purpose
    
    Prevention Grant Program
    
        The purpose of this grant program is to provide impetus for the 
    development and operation of State and community-based childhood lead 
    poisoning prevention programs in places where there is a determined 
    risk of childhood lead exposure and to develop Statewide capacity for 
    conducting surveillance of elevated blood-lead levels.
        Grant-supported programs are expected to serve as catalysts and 
    models for the development of non-grant-supported programs and 
    activities in other States and communities. Further, grant-supported 
    programs should create community awareness of the problem (e.g., among 
    community and business leaders, medical community, parents, educators, 
    and property owners). It is expected that State health agencies will 
    play a lead role in the development of community-based childhood lead 
    poisoning prevention programs, including ensuring coordination and 
    integration with maternal and child health programs; State Medicaid 
    Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment, (EPSDT) programs; 
    community and migrant health centers; and community-based organizations 
    providing health and social services in or near public housing units, 
    as authorized under Section 340A of the PHS Act.
        The prevention grant program will provide financial assistance and 
    support to State and local government agencies to:
        1. Establish, expand, or improve services to assure that children 
    in high risk areas are screened. Screening should focus on: (1) Making 
    certain children not currently served by existing health care services 
    are screened, (2) integrating screening efforts with maternal and child 
    health programs; State Medicaid programs, such as the EPSDT programs; 
    community and migrant health centers; and community-based organizations 
    providing health and social services in or near public housing units, 
    as authorized under Section 340A of the PHS Act, and (3) guaranteeing 
    that high-risk children seen by private providers are screened.
        2. Intensify care coordination efforts to ensure that children with 
    elevated blood lead levels receive appropriate and timely follow-up 
    services.
        3. Establish, expand, or improve environmental investigations to 
    rapidly identify and reduce sources of lead exposure throughout a 
    community.
        4. Plan and develop activities for the primary prevention of 
    childhood lead poisoning in demonstrated high-risk areas to be 
    conducted in collaboration with other government and community-based 
    organizations.
        5. Develop and implement efficient information management/data 
    systems compatible with CDC guidelines for monitoring and evaluation.
        6. Improve the actions of other appropriate agencies and 
    organizations to facilitate the rapid remediation of identified lead 
    hazards in high-risk communities.
        7. Enhance knowledge and skills of program staff through training 
    and other methods.
        8. Based upon program findings, provide information on childhood 
    lead poisoning to the public, policy-makers, academic community, and 
    other interested parties.
        9. Develop State-based systems for surveillance of blood lead 
    levels among
    
    [[Page 5426]]
    
    children, and use surveillance data to assess prevention activities and 
    target resources.
    
    Surveillance Grant Funds
    
        The surveillance component of this announcement is intended to 
    assist State health departments or other appropriate agencies to 
    implement a complete surveillance activity for PbB levels in children. 
    Development of surveillance systems at the local, State and national 
    levels is essential for targeting interventions to high-risk 
    populations and for tracking progress in eliminating childhood lead 
    poisoning.
        The childhood blood-lead surveillance program has the following 
    five goals:
        1. Increase the number of State health departments with 
    surveillance systems for elevated PbB levels;
        2. Build the capacity of State-or territorial-based PbB level 
    surveillance systems;
        3. Use data from these systems to conduct national surveillance of 
    elevated PbB levels;
        4. Disseminate data on the occurrence of elevated PbB levels to 
    government agencies, researchers, employers, and medical care 
    providers; and
        5. Direct intervention efforts to reduce environmental lead 
    exposure.
    
    Program Requirements
    
        A copy of the Program Guidance Document will be included with the 
    application package. Please refer to this document (Program Guidance) 
    for important information and procedures in developing and completing 
    your application.
    
    Prevention Grant Program
    
        The following are requirements for Childhood Lead Poisoning 
    Prevention Projects:
        1. A director/coordinator with authority and responsibility to 
    carry out the requirements of the program.
        2. Provide qualified staff, other resources, and knowledge to 
    implement the provisions of the program.
        3. Revise program efforts based on CDC's plans to issue new 
    recommendations on childhood lead poisoning prevention.
        4. Provide a comprehensive statewide plan that includes strategies, 
    identifies where lead exposed children are, and provides appropriate 
    screening and timely follow-up for those children.
        5. Provide a plan to develop an automated data-management system 
    designed to collect and maintain laboratory data on the results of 
    blood lead testing and care coordination data for children with 
    elevated blood lead levels. This automated data-management systems 
    should be used to monitor and evaluate all major program activities and 
    services.
        6. Establishment and maintenance of a system to monitor the 
    notification and follow-up of children who are confirmed with elevated 
    blood lead levels and who are referred to local Public Housing 
    Authorities (PHAs).
        7. Effective, well-defined working relationships within public 
    health agencies and with other agencies and organizations at national, 
    State, and community levels (e.g., housing authorities, environmental 
    agencies, maternal and child health programs, State Medicaid EPSDT 
    programs; or, community and migrant health centers; community-based 
    organizations providing health and social services in or near public 
    housing units, as authorized under Section 340A of the PHS Act, State 
    epidemiology programs, State and local housing rehabilitation offices, 
    schools of public health and medical schools, and environmental 
    interest groups) to appropriately address the needs and requirements of 
    programs (e.g., data management systems to facilitate the follow-up and 
    tabulation of children reported with elevated blood lead levels, 
    training to ensure the safety of abatement workers) in the 
    implementation of proposed activities. This includes the establishment 
    of networks with other State and local agencies with expertise in 
    childhood lead poisoning prevention programming.
        8. Assurances that income earned by the childhood lead poisoning 
    prevention program is returned to the program for use by the program.
        9. For awards to State agencies, there must be a demonstrated 
    commitment to provide technical, analytical, and program evaluation 
    assistance to local agencies interested in developing or strengthening 
    childhood lead poisoning prevention programs.
        10. SPECIAL REQUIREMENT regarding Medicaid provider-status of 
    applicants: Pursuant to section 317A of the Public Health Service Act 
    (42 U.S.C. 247b-1) as amended by Sec. 303 of the ``Preventive Health 
    Amendments of 1992'' (Public Law 102-531), applicants AND current 
    grantees must meet the following requirements: For Childhood Lead 
    Poisoning Prevention Program services which are Medicaid-reimbursable 
    in the applicant's State:
         Applicants who directly provide these services must be 
    enrolled with their State Medicaid agency as Medicaid providers.
         Providers who enter into agreements with the applicant to 
    provide such services must be enrolled with their State Medicaid agency 
    as providers.
        An exception to this requirement will be made for providers whose 
    services are provided free of charge and who accept no reimbursement 
    from any third-party payer. Such providers who accept voluntary 
    donations may still be exempted from this requirement.
        11. For State Prevention Programs, a Surveillance component defined 
    as a process which: (1) Systematically collects information over time 
    about children with elevated PbB levels using laboratory reports as the 
    data source; (2) provides for the follow-up of cases, including field 
    investigations when necessary; (3) provides timely and useful analysis 
    and reporting of the accumulated data including an estimate of the rate 
    of elevated PbB levels among all children receiving blood tests; and 
    (4) reports data to CDC in the appropriate format.
        To achieve these goals, programs must be able to: (1) provide 
    qualified staff, other resources, and knowledge to implement the 
    provisions of this program. Applicants requesting grant supported 
    positions must provide assurances that such positions will be approved 
    by the applicant's personnel system; (2) revise, refine, and implement, 
    in collaboration with CDC, the methodology for surveillance as proposed 
    in the respective program application; (3) have demonstrated experience 
    or access to professionals knowledgeable in conducting and evaluating 
    public health programs; and (4) have the ability to translate data to 
    State and local public health officials, policy and decision-makers, 
    and to others seeking to strengthen program efforts.
    
    For Surveillance Grants
    
        The following are requirements for surveillance only grant 
    projects:
        1. A full-time director/coordinator with authority and 
    responsibility to carry out the requirements of surveillance program 
    activities.
        2. Ability to provide qualified staff, other resources, and 
    knowledge to implement the provisions of this program. Applicants 
    requesting grant supported positions must provide assurances that such 
    positions will be approved by the applicant's personnel system.
        3. Effective, well-defined working relationships with childhood 
    lead poisoning prevention programs within the applicant's State.
        4. Revise, refine, and implement, in collaboration with CDC, the 
    methodology for surveillance as
    
    [[Page 5427]]
    
    proposed in the respective program application.
        5. Collaborate with CDC in any interim and/or final evaluation of 
    the surveillance activity.
        6. Monitor and evaluate all major program activities and services.
        7. Demonstrated experience in conducting and evaluating public 
    health programs or having access to professionals who are knowledgeable 
    in conducting such activities.
        8. Ability to translate data to State and local public health 
    officials, policy and decision-makers, and to others seeking to 
    strengthen program efforts.
    
    Technical Reporting Requirements
    
        Quarterly progress reports are required of all grantees. The 
    quarterly report should not exceed 25 pages. Time lines for the 
    quarterly reports will be established at the time of award, but are 
    typically due 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter. A 
    progress report is required as a part of the continuation application. 
    Note that surveillance only grantees are not required to submit 
    quarterly quantitative data.
        Annual Financial Status Reports (FSRs) are due 90 days after the 
    end of the budget period. The final progress report and FSR shall be 
    prepared and submitted no later than 90 days after the end of the 
    project period. Submit the original and 2 copies of the reports to the 
    Grants Management Office indicated under ``Where to Obtain Additional 
    Information'' section.
    
    Evaluation Criteria
    
        The review of applications will be conducted by an objective review 
    committee who will review the quality of the application based on the 
    strength and completeness of the plan submitted. The budget 
    justification will be used to assess how well the technical plan is 
    likely to be carried out using available resources. The maximum ratings 
    score of an application is 100 points.
    
    A. The Factors To Be Considered in the Evaluation of Prevention Program 
    Grant Applications Are:
    
        1. Evidence of the Childhood Lead Poisoning Problem (40 points).
        (a) Applicants should describe and document the extent of the 
    problem as defined by data from recent screening, demographic, 
    environmental, and other data. (Population-based data or estimates 
    should be compared to NHANES III data discussed in the Background and 
    Definition Section of this program announcement). (20 points)
        (b) Applicants' ability to identify high-risk targeted areas within 
    their public health jurisdictions defined by such factors as: evidence 
    of children with elevated blood lead levels, documentation of pre-1950 
    housing and/or other evidence of old, deteriorating houses as well as 
    the percent and number of children under six years of age living in 
    poverty. Other known or suspected sources of lead poisoning should also 
    be discussed. (20 points)
        2. Technical Approach (30 points).
        The quality of the technical approach in carrying out the proposed 
    activities including:
        (a) Goals and Objectives: The extent to which the applicant has 
    included clearly identified goals and objectives which are specific, 
    measurable, and relevant to the purpose of this proposal (10 points).
        (b) Approach: The extent to which the applicant provides a detailed 
    description of the proposed activities which are likely to achieve each 
    objective for the budget period (10 points).
        (c) Timeline: The extent to which the applicant provides a 
    reasonable schedule for implementation of the activities (5 points).
        (d) Evaluation: The extent to which the evaluation plan addresses 
    the achievement of objectives (5 points).
        3. Applicant Capability (10 points).
        Capability of the applicant to initiate and carry out proposed 
    program activities successfully within the time frames set forth in the 
    application. Proposed staff skills must match the proposed program of 
    work described. Elements to consider include:
        (a) Demonstrated knowledge and experience of the proposed project 
    director or manager and staff in planning and managing large and 
    complex interdisciplinary programs involving public health, 
    environmental management, and housing rehabilitation. The percentage of 
    time the project manager will devote to this project is a significant 
    factor, and must be indicated (5 points).
        (b) Written assurances that proposed positions can and will be 
    filled as described in the application (3 points).
        (c) Evidence of institutional capacity, demonstrated by the 
    experience and continuing capability of the jurisdiction, to initiate 
    and implement similar environmental and housing projects. The applicant 
    should describe these related efforts and the current capacity of its 
    agency (2 points).
        4. Collaboration (20 points).
        (a) Extent to which the applicant demonstrates that proposed 
    activities are being conducted in conjunction with, or through, 
    organizations with known and established ties in the target 
    communities. Evidence of support and participation from appropriate 
    community-based or neighborhood-based organizations in the form of 
    memoranda of understanding or other agreements of collaboration. (10 
    points)
        (b) Extent to which the applicant documents established 
    collaboration with appropriate governmental agencies responding to 
    childhood lead poisoning prevention issues such as environmental 
    health, housing, medical management, etc., through specific commitments 
    for consultation, employment, or other activities, as evidenced by the 
    names and proposed roles of these participants and letters of 
    commitment. Absence of letters describing specific participation will 
    result in a reduced rating under this factor. (10 points)
        5. Budget Justification and Adequacy of Facilities (NOT SCORED).
        The budget will be evaluated for the extent to which it is 
    reasonable, clearly justified, and consistent with the intended use of 
    grant funds. The adequacy of existing and proposed facilities to 
    support program activities also will be evaluated.
    
    B. The Factors to be Considered in the Evaluation of Applications for 
    Surveillance Program Grant Applications are:
    
        1. Surveillance Activity : (35 points).
        The clarity, feasibility, and scientific soundness of the 
    surveillance approach. Also, the extent to which a proposed schedule 
    for accomplishing each activity and methods for evaluating each 
    activity are clearly defined and appropriate. The following points will 
    be specifically evaluated:
        (a) How laboratories report PbB levels.
        (b) How data will be collected and managed.
        (c) How the quality of data and completeness of reporting will be 
    assured.
        (d) How and when data will be analyzed.
        (e) How summary data will be reported and disseminated.
        (f) Protocols for follow-up of individuals with elevated PbB 
    levels.
        (g) Provisions to obtain denominator data.
        2. Progress Toward Complete Blood-Lead Surveillance (30 points).
        The extent to which the proposed activities are likely to result in 
    substantial progress towards establishing a complete State-based PbB 
    surveillance activity (as defined in the ``Purpose'' section).
        3. Project Sustainability (20 points).
        The extent to which the proposed activities are likely to result in 
    the long-
    
    [[Page 5428]]
    
     term maintenance of a complete State-based PbB surveillance system. In 
    particular, specific activities that will be undertaken by the State 
    during the project period to ensure that the surveillance program 
    continues after completion of the project period.
        4. Personnel (10 points).
        The extent to which the qualifications and time commitments of 
    project personnel are clearly documented and appropriate for 
    implementing the proposal.
        5. Use of Existing Resources (5 points).
        The extent to which the proposal would make effective use of 
    existing resources and expertise within the applicant agency or through 
    collaboration with other agencies.
        6. BUDGET (Not Scored).
        The extent to which the budget is reasonable, clearly justified, 
    and consistent with the intended use of funds.
    
    Executive Order 12372 Review
    
        Applications are subject to Intergovernmental Review of Federal 
    Programs as governed by Executive Order (E.O.) 12372. E.O. 12372 sets 
    up a system for State and local government review of proposed Federal 
    assistance applications. Applicants should contact their State Single 
    Point of Contact (SPOC) as early as possible to alert them to the 
    prospective applications and receive any necessary instructions on the 
    State process. For proposed projects serving more than one State, the 
    applicant is advised to contact the SPOC for each affected State. A 
    current list of SPOCs is included in the application kit. If they have 
    comments it should be sent to Lisa G. Tamaroff, Grants Management 
    Specialist, Grants Management Branch, Procurement and Grants Office, 
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 255 East Paces Ferry 
    Road, NE., Atlanta, GA 30305, no later than 60 days after the 
    application due date. The Program Announcement Number and Program Title 
    should be referenced on the document. The granting agency does not 
    guarantee to ``accommodate or explain'' State process recommendations 
    it receives after that date.
    
    Public Health System Reporting Requirement
    
        This program is not subject to the Public Health System Reporting 
    Requirements.
    
    Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number
    
        The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number is 93.197.
    
    Other Requirements
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        Projects that involve the collection of information from 10 or more 
    individuals and funded by the grant will be subject to review by the 
    Office of Management and Budget(OMB)under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
    
    Application Submission and Deadline
    
        The original and two copies of the PHS 5161-1 (OMB Number 0937-
    0189) must be submitted to Lisa G. Tamaroff, Grants Management 
    Specialist, Grants Management Branch, Procurement and Grants Office, 
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 255 East Paces Ferry 
    Road, NE., Room 300, Atlanta, GA 30305, on or before April 9, 1997.
    
    1. Deadline
    
        Applications shall be considered as meeting the deadline if they 
    are either:
        A. Received on or before the deadline date, or
        B. Sent on or before the deadline date and received in time for 
    submission for the review process. Applicants must request a legibly 
    dated U.S. Postal Service Postmark or obtain a legibly dated receipt 
    from a commercial carrier or U.S. Postal Service. Private metered 
    postmarks shall not be acceptable as proof of timely mailing.
    
    2. Late Applications
    
        Applications which do not meet the criteria in 1.A. or 1.B. above 
    are considered late applications. Late applications will not be 
    considered in the current competition and will be returned to the 
    applicant.
        A one-page, single-spaced, typed abstract must be submitted with 
    the application. The heading should include the title of the grant 
    program, project title, organization, name and address, project 
    director and telephone number.
    
    Where to Obtain Additional Information
    
        To receive additional written information call (404) 332-4561. You 
    will be asked to leave your name, address, and phone number and will 
    need to refer to Announcement 721. You will receive a complete program 
    description, information on application procedures and application 
    forms.
        If you have questions after reviewing the contents of all 
    documents, business management technical assistance may be obtained 
    from Lisa G. Tamaroff, Grants Management Specialist, Grants Management 
    Branch, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and 
    Prevention (CDC), 255 East Paces Ferry Road, NE., Room 300, Mailstop E-
    13, Atlanta, GA 30305, telephone (404) 842-6796. Internet address 
    [email protected]
        This and other CDC announcements are also available through the CDC 
    homepage on the Internet. The address for the CDC homepage is http://
    www.cdc.gov.
        CDC will not send application kits by facsimile or express mail.
        Please refer to Announcement Number 721 when requesting information 
    and submitting an application.
        Technical assistance on prevention activities may be obtained from 
    Claudette A. Grant, Acting Chief, Program Services Section, Lead 
    Poisoning Prevention Branch, Division of Environmental Hazards and 
    Health Effects, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for 
    Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 4770 Buford Highway, NE., 
    Mailstop F-42, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, telephone (770) 488-7330, 
    Internet address cag4@ceh.cdc.gov.
        Technical assistance on surveillance activities may be obtained 
    from Carol Pertowski, M.D., Medical Epidemiologist, Surveillance and 
    Programs Branch, Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects, 
    National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control 
    and Prevention (CDC), 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop F-42, Atlanta, 
    GA 30341-3724, telephone (770) 488-7330, Internet address 
    cap4@ceh.cdc.gov.
        Potential applicants may obtain a copy of Healthy People 2000 (Full 
    Report, Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or Healthy People 2000 (Summary 
    Report, Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of 
    Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325, 
    telephone (202) 512-1800.
    
        Dated: January 30, 1997.
    Joseph R. Carter,
    Acting Associate Director, Management and Operations, Centers for 
    Disease Control and Prevention.
    [FR Doc. 97-2799 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/05/1997
Department:
Health and Human Services Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
97-2799
Pages:
5423-5428 (6 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Announcement 721
PDF File:
97-2799.pdf