97-2822. Unitization  

  • [Federal Register Volume 62, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 1997)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 5329-5332]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 97-2822]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
    Minerals Management Service
    
    30 CFR Part 250
    
    RIN 1010-AC19
    
    
    Unitization
    
    AGENCY: Minerals Management Service (MMS), Interior.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This rule amends the unitization regulations by removing the 
    two model unit agreements--one for exploration, development, and 
    production units and the other for development and production units. 
    The model agreements will be available from the Regional Supervisor. 
    The rule is written in ``plain English.'' We take this action to 
    support the President's initiative to reform Government regulations. 
    Our objective is to shorten the regulation and clarify the wording.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective on March 7, 1997.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith M. Wilson, Engineering and 
    Standards Branch, telephone (703) 787-1600.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The rules on unitization in 30 CFR part 250, 
    implementing section 5(a)7 of the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) Lands 
    Act Amendments of 1978, are intended to prevent waste (defined in 
    Sec. 250.2), conserve natural resources (protection of marine life was 
    incorporated into conservation in 1971; also refers to deterring 
    unnecessary facilities), and/or protect correlative rights. The rules 
    include provisions to:
         Explain the authority and requirements for unitization;
         Provide for compulsory or voluntary unitization;
         Explain requirements for competitive reservoir operations;
         Explain how a lessee may request a determination of 
    whether a reservoir is competitive;
         Explain how to submit a joint development and production 
    plan;
         Explain the process for voluntary unitization;
         Explain the process for compulsory unitization; and
         Explain the role of a model agreement.
        This final rule does not intend any substantive changes to the 
    regulations. It shortens existing regulations by removing the model 
    unit agreements. The ``plain English'' clarifies the existing rule.
        There are two model unit agreements--one for exploration, 
    development, and production units and the other for development and 
    production units. The model agreements will be available from the 
    Regional Supervisor. The Regional Supervisor
    
    [[Page 5330]]
    
    can still approve variations from the model agreements for good cause. 
    If MMS changes the model unit agreements, MMS will publish the revised 
    model unit agreements in the Federal Register.
    
    Comments
    
        The Federal Register published the proposed rule on June 5, 1996 
    (61 FR 28525). During the 74-day comment period, MMS received 10 sets 
    of comments on the proposed rule. Six commenters did not agree with 
    using ``plain English'' and removing the model unit agreements from the 
    Code of Federal Regulations. Overall, those who opposed ``plain 
    English'' are comfortable with the existing language and understand it. 
    One specific comment on the proposed rule language included that it did 
    not clarify that ``Pugh'' concepts (State law authorizes unitized 
    leases to be segregated) do not apply to the OCS, and it omitted 
    potential hydrocarbon accumulations from the definition of a unit area. 
    Commenters concerned about removal of the model unit agreements 
    expressed a need to operate in a climate of greater certainty. The four 
    remaining comments support the proposed rule change.
    
    Response to Comments
    
        We appreciate the comments we received on the proposed rule. While 
    there was some opposition to using ``plain English,'' MMS supports the 
    President's initiative, and we will continue to improve our regulations 
    with ``plain English.'' ``Plain English'' allows us to express legal 
    requirements clearly and accurately and communicate information to a 
    wide audience.
        We incorporated many of the specific editorial comments in an 
    effort to further clarify the rule. Regarding the ``Pugh'' concept, the 
    1982 Department of the Interior (DOI) Solicitor's Opinion M-36927, 
    concludes that the Secretary of the Interior does not have the legal 
    authority to require segregation of unitized portions of leases from 
    the remainder of leases. We clarified the language in the final rule to 
    maintain that portions of leases, as well as whole leases, may be 
    included in units.
        It continues to be our policy that we may approve exploratory units 
    before a successful exploratory well is completed when geophysical data 
    reasonably support including a lease in the unit. The unit area is 
    limited to the leases that encompass the productive area of a 
    reservoir, for reservoir units, or to the leases containing all or part 
    of a geologic structure, i.e., a potential hydrocarbon accumulation.
        In Sec. 250.191(2)(c), we retain the word ``minimum'' for the 
    number of leases, or portions of leases, in a unit area. Industry 
    suggested we use the word ``appropriate.'' Our policy is designed to 
    minimize the number of unitized leases necessary for efficient 
    exploration, development, and production.
        The model unit agreements will be withdrawn. MMS will publish any 
    ``permanent'' changes made to those agreements in the Federal Register 
    for public notice and comment.
        In this rulemaking, MMS is also correcting a typographical error in 
    30 CFR part 250. The error occurs in Sec. 250.124(a)(3)(i). This 
    technical amendment amends the sentence in paragraph (i) from ``All PSH 
    or PSL'' to ``All PSH and PSL.'' This has always been the intent of the 
    requirement.
    
    Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
    
        This rule is not a significant rule requiring the Office of 
    Management and Budget (OMB) review under E.O. 12866.
    
    Regulatory Flexibility Act
    
        Since this amendment has no economic effects, DOI has determined 
    that this rule will have no effect on a substantial number of small 
    entities.
    
    Paperwork Reduction Act
    
        The information collection requirements in 30 CFR Part 250, Subpart 
    M, Unitization, are approved by OMB as required by the Paperwork 
    Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The OMB control number 
    is 1010-0068. The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 provides that an 
    agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to 
    respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently 
    valid OMB control number.
        MMS collects the information under regulations implementing the OCS 
    Lands Act. MMS uses the information to determine if unitized operations 
    will conserve natural resources, prevent waste, and protect correlative 
    rights and Government interests. The information is required to obtain 
    or retain a benefit as specified in the OCS Lands Act. MMS will protect 
    information considered confidential or proprietary under applicable law 
    and under regulations at 30 CFR 250.18 (Data and information to be made 
    available to the public) and 30 CFR part 252 (OCS Oil and Gas 
    Information Program).
        MMS estimates the annual reporting burden to be approximately 2,424 
    hours, an average of 45.7 hours per response. This includes the time 
    for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering 
    and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 
    information collection. MMS received no comments on the information 
    collection aspects of the proposed rule during the public comment 
    period.
        You may direct comments on the burden estimate or any other aspect 
    of this collection to the Information Collection Clearance Officer, 
    Mail Stop 2053, Minerals Management Service, 381 Elden Street, Herndon, 
    VA 20170-4817; and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
    Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for the Department of the 
    Interior (OMB No. 1010-0068), Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW., 
    Washington, D.C. 20503.
    
    Takings Implication Assessment
    
        The DOI certifies that this rule does not represent a governmental 
    action capable of interference with constitutionally protected property 
    rights. A Takings Implication Assessment prepared pursuant to E.O. 
    12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally 
    Protected Property Rights, is not required.
    
    Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
    
        The DOI has determined and certifies according to the Unfunded 
    Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this rule will not 
    impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given year on State, 
    local, and tribal governments, or the private sector.
    
    E.O. 12988
    
        DOI has certified to OMB that this rule meets the applicable civil 
    justice reform standards provided in sections 3(b)(2) of E.O. 12988.
    
    National Environmental Policy Act
    
        MMS has examined the rulemaking and has determined that this rule 
    does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the 
    quality of the human environment pursuant to section 102(2)(c) of the 
    National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(c)).
    
    List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 250
    
        Continental shelf, Environmental impact statements, Environmental 
    protection, Government contracts, Incorporation by reference, 
    Investigations, Mineral royalties, Oil and gas development and 
    production, Oil and gas exploration, Oil and gas reserves, Penalties, 
    Pipelines, Public lands--mineral resources, Public lands--rights-of-
    way, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulphur development and 
    production, Sulphur exploration, Surety bonds.
    
    
    [[Page 5331]]
    
    
        Dated: January 27, 1997.
    
    Sylvia V. Baca,
    Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management.
    
        For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Minerals Management 
    Service amends 30 CFR part 250 as follows:
    
    PART 250--OIL AND GAS AND SULFUR OPERATIONS IN THE OUTER 
    CONTINENTAL SHELF
    
        1. The authority citation for part 250 continues to read as 
    follows:
    
        Authority: 43 U.S.C. 1334.
    
    Subpart H--Oil and Gas Production Safety Systems
    
        2. In Sec. 250.124, paragraph (a)(3)(i) is revised as follows:
    
    
    Sec. 250.124  Production safety-system testing and records.
    
        (a) * * *
        (3) * * *
        (i) All PSH and PSL,
    * * * * *
    
    Subpart M--Unitization
    
        3. Subpart M is revised to read as follows:
    
    Subpart M--Unitization
    
    Sec.
    250.190  What is the purpose of this subpart?
    250.191  What are the requirements for unitization?
    250.192  What if I have a competitive reservoir on a lease?
    250.193  How do I apply for voluntary unitization?
    250.194  How will MMS require unitization?
    
    Subpart M--Unitization
    
    
    Sec. 250.190  What is the purpose of this subpart?
    
        This subpart explains how Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) leases are 
    unitized. If you are an OCS lessee, use the regulations in this subpart 
    for both competitive reservoir and unitization situations. The purpose 
    of joint development and unitization is to:
        (a) Conserve natural resources;
        (b) Prevent waste; and/or
        (c) Protect correlative rights, including Federal royalty 
    interests.
    
    
    Sec. 250.191  What are the requirements for unitization?
    
        (a) Voluntary unitization. You and other OCS lessees may ask the 
    Regional Supervisor to approve a request for voluntary unitization. The 
    Regional Supervisor may approve the request for voluntary unitization 
    if unitized operations:
        (1) Promote and expedite exploration and development; or
        (2) Prevent waste, conserve natural resources, or protect 
    correlative rights, including Federal royalty interests, of a 
    reasonably delineated and productive reservoir.
        (b) Compulsory unitization. The Regional Supervisor may require you 
    and other lessees to unitize operations if unitized operations are 
    necessary to:
        (1) Prevent waste;
        (2) Conserve natural resources; or
        (3) Protect correlative rights, including Federal royalty 
    interests, of a reasonably delineated and productive reservoir.
        (c) Unit area. The area that a unit includes is the minimum number 
    of leases that will allow the lessees to minimize the number of 
    platforms, facility installations, and wells necessary for efficient 
    exploration, development, and production of mineral deposits, oil and 
    gas reservoirs, or potential hydrocarbon accumulations. A unit may 
    include whole leases or portions of leases.
        (d) Unit agreement. You, the other lessees, and the unit operator 
    must enter into a unit agreement. The unit agreement must: allocate 
    benefits to unitized leases, designate a unit operator, and specify the 
    effective date of the unit agreement. The unit agreement must terminate 
    when: the unit no longer produces unitized substances, and the unit 
    operator no longer conducts drilling or well-workover operations 
    (Sec. 250.13) under the unit agreement, unless the Regional Supervisor 
    orders or approves a suspension of production under Sec. 250.10.
        (e) Unit operating agreement. The unit operator and the owners of 
    working interests in the unitized leases must enter into a unit 
    operating agreement. The unit operating agreement must describe how all 
    the unit participants will apportion all costs and liabilities incurred 
    maintaining or conducting operations. When a unit involves one or more 
    net-profit-share leases, the unit operating agreement must describe how 
    to attribute costs and credits to the net-profit-share lease(s), and 
    this part of the agreement must be approved by the Regional Supervisor. 
    Otherwise, you must provide a copy of the unit operating agreement to 
    the Regional Supervisor, but the Regional Supervisor does not need to 
    approve the unit operating agreement.
        (f) Extension of a lease covered by unit operations. If your unit 
    agreement expires or terminates, or the unit area adjusts so that no 
    part of your lease remains within the unit boundaries, your lease 
    expires unless:
        (1) Its initial term has not expired;
        (2) You conduct drilling, production, or well-reworking operations 
    on your lease consistent with applicable regulations; or
        (3) MMS orders or approves a suspension of production or operations 
    for your lease.
        (g) Unit operations. If your lease, or any part of your lease, is 
    subject to a unit agreement, the entire lease continues for the term 
    provided in the lease, and as long thereafter as any portion of your 
    lease remains part of the unit area, and as long as operations continue 
    the unit in effect.
        (1) If you drill, produce or perform well-workover operations on a 
    lease within a unit, each lease, or part of a lease, in the unit will 
    remain active in accordance with the unit agreement. Following a 
    discovery, if your unit ceases drilling activities for a reasonable 
    time period between the delineation of one or more reservoirs and the 
    initiation of actual development drilling or production operations and 
    that time period would extend beyond your lease's primary term or any 
    extension under Sec. 250.13, the unit operator must request and obtain 
    MMS approval of a suspension of production under Sec. 250.10 in order 
    to keep the unit from terminating.
        (2) When a lease in a unit agreement is beyond the primary term and 
    the lease or unit is not producing, the lease will expire unless:
        (i) You conduct a continuous drilling or well reworking program 
    designed to develop or restore the lease or unit production; or
        (ii) MMS orders or approves a suspension of operations under 
    Sec. 250.10.
    
    
    Sec. 250.192  What if I have a competitive reservoir on a lease?
    
        (a) The Regional Supervisor may require you to conduct development 
    and production operations in a competitive reservoir under either a 
    joint Development and Production Plan or a unitization agreement. A 
    competitive reservoir has one or more producing or producible well 
    completions on each of two or more leases, or portions of leases, with 
    different lease operating interests. For purposes of this paragraph, a 
    producible well completion is a well which is capable of production and 
    which is shut in at the well head or at the surface but not necessarily 
    connected to production facilities and from which the operator plans 
    future production.
    
    [[Page 5332]]
    
        (b) You may request that the Regional Supervisor make a preliminary 
    determination whether a reservoir is competitive. When you receive the 
    preliminary determination, you have 30 days (or longer if the Regional 
    Supervisor allows additional time) to concur or to submit an objection 
    with supporting evidence if you do not concur. The Regional Supervisor 
    will make a final determination and notify you and the other lessees.
        (c) If you conduct drilling or production operations in a reservoir 
    determined competitive by the Regional Supervisor, you and the other 
    affected lessees must submit for approval a joint plan of operations. 
    You must submit the joint plan within 90 days after the Regional 
    Supervisor makes a final determination that the reservoir is 
    competitive. The joint plan must provide for the development and/or 
    production of the reservoir. You may submit supplemental plans for the 
    Regional Supervisor's approval.
        (d) If you and the other affected lessees cannot reach an agreement 
    on a joint Development and Production Plan within the approved period 
    of time, each lessee must submit a separate plan to the Regional 
    Supervisor. The Regional Supervisor will hold a hearing to resolve 
    differences in the separate plans. If the differences in the separate 
    plans are not resolved at the hearing and the Regional Supervisor 
    determines that unitization is necessary under Sec. 250.191(b), MMS 
    will initiate unitization under Sec. 250.194.
    
    
    Sec. 250.193  How do I apply for voluntary unitization?
    
        (a) You must file a request for a voluntary unit with the Regional 
    Supervisor. Your request must include:
        (1) A draft of the proposed unit agreement;
        (2) A proposed initial plan of operation;
        (3) Supporting geological, geophysical, and engineering data; and
        (4) Other information that may be necessary to show that the 
    unitization proposal meets the criteria of Sec. 250.190.
        (b) The unit agreement must comply with the requirements of this 
    part. MMS will maintain and provide a model unit agreement for you to 
    follow. If MMS revises the model, MMS will publish the revised model in 
    the Federal Register. If you vary your unit agreement from the model 
    agreement, you must obtain the approval of the Regional Supervisor.
        (c) After the Regional Supervisor accepts your unitization 
    proposal, you, the other lessees, and the unit operator must sign and 
    file copies of the unit agreement, the unit operating agreement, and 
    the initial plan of operation with the Regional Supervisor for 
    approval.
    
    
    Sec. 250.194  How will MMS require unitization?
    
        (a) If the Regional Supervisor determines that unitization of 
    operations within a proposed unit area is necessary to prevent waste, 
    conserve natural resources of the OCS, or protect correlative rights, 
    including Federal royalty interests, the Regional Supervisor may 
    require unitization.
        (b) If you ask MMS to require unitization, you must file a request 
    with the Regional Supervisor. You must include a proposed unit 
    agreement as described in Secs. 250.191(d) and 250.193(b); a proposed 
    unit operating agreement; a proposed initial plan of operation; 
    supporting geological, geophysical, and engineering data; and any other 
    information that may be necessary to show that unitization meets the 
    criteria of Sec. 250.190. The proposed unit agreement must include a 
    counterpart executed by each lessee seeking compulsory unitization. 
    Lessees who seek compulsory unitization must simultaneously serve on 
    the nonconsenting lessees copies of:
        (1) The request;
        (2) The proposed unit agreement with executed counterparts;
        (3) The proposed unit operating agreement; and
        (4) The proposed initial plan of operation.
        (c) If the Regional Supervisor initiates compulsory unitization, 
    MMS will serve all lessees of the proposed unit area with a proposed 
    unitization plan and a statement of reasons for the proposed 
    unitization.
        (d) The Regional Supervisor will not require unitization until MMS 
    provides all lessees of the proposed unit area written notice and an 
    opportunity for a hearing. If you want MMS to hold a hearing, you must 
    request it within 30 days after you receive written notice from the 
    Regional Supervisor or after you are served with a request for 
    compulsory unitization from another lessee.
        (e) MMS will not hold a hearing under this paragraph until at least 
    30 days after MMS provides written notice of the hearing date to all 
    parties owning interests that would be made subject to the unit 
    agreement. The Regional Supervisor must give all lessees of the 
    proposed unit area an opportunity to submit views orally and in writing 
    and to question both those seeking and those opposing compulsory 
    unitization. Adjudicatory procedures are not required. The Regional 
    Supervisor will make a decision based upon a record of the hearing, 
    including any written information made a part of the record. The 
    Regional Supervisor will arrange for a court reporter to make a 
    verbatim transcript. The party seeking compulsory unitization must pay 
    for the court reporter and pay for and provide to the Regional 
    Supervisor within 10 days after the hearing three copies of the 
    verbatim transcript.
        (f) The Regional Supervisor will issue an order that requires or 
    rejects compulsory unitization. That order must include a statement of 
    reasons for the action taken and identify those parts of the record 
    which form the basis of the decision. Any adversely affected party may 
    appeal the final order of the Regional Supervisor under 30 CFR part 
    290.
    
    [FR Doc. 97-2822 Filed 2-4-97; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4310-MR-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/7/1997
Published:
02/05/1997
Department:
Minerals Management Service
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
97-2822
Dates:
This rule is effective on March 7, 1997.
Pages:
5329-5332 (4 pages)
RINs:
1010-AC19: Unitization
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/1010-AC19/unitization
PDF File:
97-2822.pdf
CFR: (8)
30 CFR 250.2)
30 CFR 250.10
30 CFR 250.124
30 CFR 250.190
30 CFR 250.191
More ...