95-2751. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. and the Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc., Relating to the Off-Site Storage of Customer Options ...  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 24 (Monday, February 6, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 7089-7091]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-2751]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-35298; File Nos. SR-NYSE-94-48 and SR-PSE 94-37]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
    Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the New York 
    Stock Exchange, Inc. and the Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc., Relating to 
    the Off-Site Storage of Customer Options Account Information
    
    January 30, 1995.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''),\1\ notice is hereby given that on December 20, 1994, the New 
    York Stock Exchange, Inc. (``NYSE''),\2\ and on December 23, 1994, the 
    Pacific Stock Exchange, Inc. (``PSE'') (together, the ``Exchanges''), 
    submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or 
    ``Commission'') the proposed rule changes as described in Items I and 
    II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchanges. The 
    Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
    proposed rule changes from interested persons.
    
        \1\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \2\On January 27, 1995, the NYSE submitted a letter requesting 
    accelerated approval of its proposal. See Letter from James E. Buck, 
    Senior Vice President and Secretary, NYSE, to Glenn Barrentine, Team 
    Leader, Division of Market Regulation, Commission, dated January 27, 
    1995.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Changes
    
        Currently, paragraph (c), ``Maintenance of Customer Records,'' of 
    NYSE Rule 722, ``Supervision of Accounts,'' and paragraph (d)(3), 
    ``Maintenance of Customer Records,'' of PSE Rule 9.18, ``Doing a Public 
    Business in Options,'' require that background and financial 
    information of customers be maintained at both the branch office 
    servicing the customer's account and at the principal supervisory 
    office with jurisdiction over the branch office. NYSE Rule 722(c) and 
    PSE Rule 9.18(d)(3) also require that copies of account statements of 
    options customers be maintained at both the branch office supervising 
    the accounts and at the principle supervisory office with jurisdiction 
    over that branch for the most recent six-month period. The Exchanges 
    propose to amend their rules to provide that the customer information 
    and account statements currently maintained at the principal 
    supervisory office may be maintained at a location other than the 
    principal supervisory office if the documents and information are 
    readily accessible and promptly retrievable.
        The text of the proposed rule changes is available at the Office of 
    the Secretary, NYSE, at the Office of the Secretary, PSE, and at the 
    Commission.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Changes
    
        In their filings with the Commission, the self-regulatory 
    organizations included statements concerning the purpose of and basis 
    for the proposed rule changes and discussed any comments they received 
    on the proposed rule changes. The text of these statements may be 
    examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory 
    organizations have prepared summaries, set forth in Section (A), (B), 
    and (C) below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    (A) Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statements of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Changes
    
        Currently, the rules of the NYSE and the PSE require that both the 
    branch [[Page 7090]] office servicing an options customer's account and 
    the principal supervisory office having jurisdiction over the branch 
    office retain account statements and other financial and background 
    information for the account for supervisory purposes. With advances in 
    data storage and retrieval capability available through optical disks, 
    fax machines, microfiche and computers, coupled with the escalating 
    costs of storing records on-site, member organizations increasingly are 
    storing their records away from their principal supervisory offices.
        According to the NYSE, NYSE members have obtained no-action 
    positions from the Options Self-Regulatory Council (``OSRC'')\3\ on a 
    case-by-case basis when moving their operational facilities off-site. 
    The OSRC has determined that these arrangements are consistent with the 
    record retention requirement rules so long as the documents are readily 
    accessible and promptly retrievable. In view of the number of requests 
    received by the options self-regulatory organizations (``SROs''), the 
    OSRC has asked each of the options exchanges and NASD to consider 
    amending their rules to permit the principal supervisory office to 
    store customer account information off-site.
    
        \3\The ORSC is a committee comprised of representatives from 
    each of the options exchanges and the National Association of 
    Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD''). The OSRC was created pursuant 
    to the plan submitted by the options SROs under Rule 17d-2 of the 
    Act (``17d-2 Plan''). The 17d-2 Plan was adopted to reduce 
    regulatory duplication relative to options-related sales practice 
    matters for a large number of firms which are currently members of 
    two or more SROs. The purpose of the OSRC is: (1) to administer the 
    17d-2 Plan; and (2) to address options-related sales practice 
    matters in a common forum.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchanges propose to amend their rules accordingly. The 
    Exchanges believe that the off-site storage arrangements are consistent 
    with the record retention requirement rules, provided the documents are 
    readily accessible and promptly retrievable.\4\ In addition, the 
    Exchanges do not believe that the supervisory obligations of member 
    organizations will be compromised by the proposal since members will 
    continue to be required to maintain customer option account documents 
    and information at the branch office servicing the customer's account. 
    To ensure compliance with the provisions of the rules, the Exchanges 
    state that they will periodically examine the document retrieval 
    capabilities of member firms using off-site document storage 
    arrangements.
    
        \4\The NYSE defines ``readily accessible and promptly 
    retrievable'' to mean that the requested information will be 
    available by noon of the next business day. The PSE defines 
    ``readily accessible and promptly retrievable'' to mean that the 
    requested information can be returned to the principal supervisory 
    office generally within 24 hours.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchanges believe that the proposed rule changes are consistent 
    with Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and further the objectives of 
    Section 6(b)(5), in particular, in that they are designed to prevent 
    fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and 
    equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination 
    with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, and to 
    remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
    market and a national market system and in general to protect investors 
    and the public interest.
        Additionally, the NYSE believes that the proposal will promote the 
    maintenance of fair and orderly markets because it will provide member 
    organizations with the opportunity to discharge their supervisory 
    responsibilities in a more cost-effective manner, thereby improving the 
    efficiency of NYSE member organizations, and, in turn, benefitting 
    investors in the marketplace. Moreover, because the NYSE does not 
    believe that the proposal will compromise the ability of members to 
    satisfy their supervisory obligations, the NYSE believes the proposal 
    is consistent with the protection of investors.
    
    (B) Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        The Exchanges do not believe that the proposed rule changes will 
    impose any burden on competition that are not necessary or appropriate 
    in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    
    (C) Self-Regulatory Organizations' Statement on Comments on the 
    Proposed Rule Changes Received From Members, Participants or Others.
    
        No written comments were either received or requested.
    
    III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Changes and Timing for 
    Commission Action
    
        The Exchanges have requested that the proposed rule changes be 
    given accelerated effectiveness pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act.
        The Commission believes that the proposed rule changes are 
    consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and 
    regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange, 
    and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) in that they 
    are designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, 
    to facilitate transactions in securities, and to protect investors and 
    the public interest.\5\
    
        \5\15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Specifically, by allowing off-site storage of customer account 
    information maintained at supervisory offices, the Commission believes 
    that the proposal should provide the Exchanges' members with a cost-
    effective means to utilize computers, facsimile machines, optical 
    disks, and other technology to store the required customer account 
    information off-site while ensuring that member firms will continue to 
    have easy access to all of the customer account information necessary 
    to discharge their supervisory responsibilities. In this regard, the 
    proposals provide that options customer account information stored off-
    site must be ``readily accessible and promptly retrievable,''\6\ 
    thereby preserving the ability of the Exchanges to access and 
    investigate customer account records. The Commission notes that the 
    Exchanges plan to periodically examine the document retrieval 
    capabilities of member firms using off-site storage arrangements. Thus, 
    the Commission believes that both proposals strike a reasonable balance 
    between the Exchanges' interest in allowing member organizations to 
    reduce the cost of storing customer account information and ensuring 
    that the information continues to be available for supervisory 
    purposes.
    
        \6\See note 4, supra.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In addition, the Commission believes that it is reasonable for the 
    Exchanges to allow off-site storage of customer account information 
    maintained at supervisory offices, but not of account information 
    stored at branch offices, because branch offices are responsible for 
    the day-to-day administration of customer accounts and require 
    immediate access to account information. For example, by continuing to 
    require branch offices to store customer account information on-site, 
    the proposal facilitates broker compliance with the suitability 
    requirements applicable to options customers.
        The Commission finds good cause for approving the Exchanges' 
    proposals prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of 
    notice of filing thereof in the Federal Register because the proposals 
    are identical to previously approved proposals submitted by the Chicago 
    Board Options Exchange, Inc. (``CBOE''), the Philadelphia Stock 
    Exchange, Inc. (``PHLX'') and the American Stock Exchange, Inc. 
    [[Page 7091]] (``Amex'').\7\ The CBOE and PHLX proposals were subject 
    to the full notice and comment period and the Commission received no 
    comments on those proposals. Therefore, the Commission believes it is 
    consistent with Sections 6(b)(5) and 19(b)(2) of the Act to approve the 
    Exchanges' proposals on an accelerated basis.
    
        \7\See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 34899 (October 26, 
    1994), 59 FR 54929 (November 2, 1994) (order approving File No. SR-
    CBOE-94-30); 34909 (October 27, 1994), 59 FR 55144 (November 3, 
    1994) (order approving File No. SR-PHLX-94-35); and 34913 (October 
    28, 1994), 59 FR 55300 (November 4, 1994) (order approving File No. 
    SR-Amex-94-37).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    IV. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submitt written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying at the 
    Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street, NW., 
    Washington, DC. Copies of each filing will also be available for 
    inspection and copying at the principal office of the respective above-
    mentioned self-regulatory organization. All submissions should refer to 
    the file number in the caption above and should be submitted by 
    February 24, 1995.
        It Is Therefore Ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\8\ that the proposed rule changes (File Nos. SR-NYSE-94-48 and SR-
    PSE-94-37) are approved.
    
        \8\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2) (1982).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
    
        \9\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1994).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 95-2751 Filed 2-3-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/06/1995
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-2751
Pages:
7089-7091 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-35298, File Nos. SR-NYSE-94-48 and SR-PSE 94-37
PDF File:
95-2751.pdf