98-3010. Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Providing a Definition of Foreign Broker-Dealer  

  • [Federal Register Volume 63, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 1998)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 6247-6249]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 98-3010]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    
    [Release No. 34-39604; File No. SR-CBOE-97-66]
    
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Order 
    Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change by the Chicago 
    Board Options Exchange, Incorporated Providing a Definition of Foreign 
    Broker-Dealer
    
    January 30, 1998.
        Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
    (``Act''), 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1), notice is hereby given that on December 
    17, 1997, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (``CBOE'') 
    filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the 
    proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items 
    have been prepared by the CBOE. The Commission is publishing this 
    notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
    persons and to grant accelerated approval to the proposed rule change.
    
    I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
    of the Proposed Rule Change
    
        CBOE proposes to amend Rules 7.4(a) and 8.51(a) and adopt new Rule 
    1.1(xx) to provide that a foreign broker-dealer is considered a broker-
    dealer for certain purposes under Exchange Rules.
        The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Office of 
    the Secretary, CBOE and at the Commission.
    
    II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        In its filing with the Commission, CBOE included statements 
    concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
    discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
    text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
    Item III below. The CBOE has
    
    [[Page 6248]]
    
    prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the 
    most significant aspects of such statements.
    
    A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
    Statutory basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend certain rules 
    of the Exchange applicable to the options transactions of broker-
    dealers so that they may apply consistently to all broker-dealers 
    irrespective of the country in which they conduct their activities. 
    This will assure that broker-dealers operating outside the United 
    States do not enjoy a competitive advantage over their U.S. 
    counterparts.
        CBOE Rules 7.4(a) and 8.51(a) currently distinguish between orders 
    for broker-dealers and orders for non-broker-dealers. Under these 
    rules, and certain rules governing the Exchange's automatic execution 
    system (the Retail Automatic Execution System or ``RAES'') which 
    incorporate Rule 7.4(a) by reference, only the market or limit orders 
    of non-broker-dealer customers may be placed with an Order Book 
    Official, or may utilize RAES, or may be eligible for a guaranteed 
    minimum execution of ten contracts (or more, depending on the option 
    class) on the floor of the Exchange.\1\ The proposed rule change 
    defines the term ``broker-dealer,'' as used in these rules, to include 
    a foreign broker-dealer. To accomplish this, the Exchange proposes to 
    adopt the following definition of ``foreign broker-dealer'' for 
    purposes of Rules 7.4(a) and 8.51(a):
    
        \1\ CBOE Rule 7.4(a) provides that ``[n]o member shall place, or 
    permit to be placed, an order with a Board Broker or Order Book 
    Official for an account in which * * * any non-member broker-dealer 
    has an interest.'' Rule 6.8, one of the rules governing RAES, limits 
    its use to ``[s]uch order * * * as defined in Rule 7.4(a) regarding 
    placing of orders on the public customer book.'' Rule 8.51(a) 
    provides that ``[o]nly non-broker dealer customer orders shall be 
    entitled to an execution'' under that Rule.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        ``The term `foreign broker-dealer' means any person or entity 
    that is registered, authorized or licensed by a foreign governmental 
    agency or foreign regulatory organization (or is required to be so 
    registered, authorized or licensed) to perform the function of a 
    broker or dealer in securities, or both. For purposes of this 
    definition, the terms `broker' and `dealer' have the same meaning as 
    provided in Section 3(a)(4) and 3(a)(5) of the Exchange Act, except 
    that a `broker' or `dealer' may be a bank.\2\
    
        \2\ Sections 3(a)(4) and 3(a)(5) of the Act provide:
        ``(4) The term `broker' means any person engaged in the business 
    of effecting transactions in securities for the account of other, 
    but does not include a bank.
        (5) The term `dealer' means any person engaged in the business 
    of buying and selling securities for his own account, through a 
    broker or otherwise, but does not include a bank, or any person 
    insofar as he buys or sells securities for his own account, either 
    individually or in some fiduciary capacity, but not as a part of a 
    regular business.''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchange believes that the proposed definition is sufficiently 
    specific to ensure fair enforcement of the Rules to which it applies. 
    It should not be difficult for the Exchange to determine whether a 
    person or entity is registered by a foreign governmental agency or a 
    foreign regulatory organization to perform specified functions, or is 
    required to be so registered. As a member of the Intermarket 
    Surveillance Group (``ISG''), CBOE may promptly obtain from ISG members 
    and affiliates information on the accounts of persons or entities 
    entering orders for execution on CBOE, including whether such orders 
    have been entered for the account of a broker or dealer.\3\ The 
    Exchange may also obtain this information from foreign exchanges or 
    foreign regulatory authorities with which it has an effective 
    surveillance sharing agreement or that are subject to a memorandum of 
    understanding with the Commission that would require those entities to 
    provide such information to the Exchange upon request.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \3\ ISG was created in February 1981 to design, develop and 
    implement a coordinated intermarket surveillance system among 
    securities markets in the United States. On July 14 1983, the 
    exchanges participating in the ISG entered into an agreement to 
    coordinate more effectively surveillance and investigative 
    information sharing agreements in stock and options markets. In 
    1989, with the active participation of the SEC and Commodity Futures 
    Trading Commission, the ISG created an ``affiliate'' category for 
    futures exchanges and non-U.S. SROs. Currently, the ISG is comprised 
    of nine members and 15 affiliates.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Pacific Exchange (``PCX'') recently sought and received 
    Commission approval for a rule change similar to the proposed rule 
    change that is the subject of this filing.\4\ In its filing, the PCX 
    noted that based upon its review of the applicable regulatory 
    structures of various foreign jurisdictions, it believed that the 
    proposed definition was sufficiently specific to cover the foreign 
    equivalents of the U.S. brokers and dealers in a number of foreign 
    jurisdictions, including Australia, Canada, the Czech Republic, France, 
    Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the 
    Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, South Korea, the Slovak Republic, 
    Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \4\ See, File No. SR-PSE-96-46 approved in Exchange Act Release 
    No. 38420 (March 19, 1997), 62 FR 14488 (March 26, 1997).
        \5\ Furthermore, on December 2, 1997, the Commission approved a 
    proposed rule change filed by the Philadelphia Stock Exchange 
    (``Phlx'') to amend its definition of ``foreign broker-dealer'' 
    along the same lines as the PCX. See, Exchange Act Release No. 39382 
    (December 2, 1997), 62 FR 64903 (December 9, 1997).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        The Exchange also notes that the proposed definition of ``foreign 
    broker-dealer'' contains objective criteria for its application and is 
    narrower in scope than the definition of ``foreign broker or dealer'' 
    specified in Rule 15a-6(b)(3) under the Act.\6\ In addition, the 
    Exchange believes the proposed definition is substantially similar in 
    form and substance to Rule 17a-7(c) under the Act (definition of 
    nonresident brokers and dealers) and Sections 3(a)(50) and (52) of the 
    Act (definitions of foreign securities authority and foreign regulatory 
    authority).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\ Rule 15a-6(b)(3) provides: ``the term `foreign broker or 
    dealer' shall mean any non-U.S. resident person (including any U.S. 
    persons engaged in business as a broker or dealer entirely outside 
    the United States, except as otherwise permitted by this rule) that 
    is not an office or branch of, or a natural person associated with, 
    a registered broker or dealer, whose securities activities, if 
    conducted in the United States, would be described by the definition 
    of `broker' or `dealer' in sections 3(a)(4) or 3(a)(5) of the Act.''
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
    
        CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any 
    burden on competition.
    
    C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
    Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others
    
        No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
    proposed rule change.
    
    III. Solicitation of Comments
    
        Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
    arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
    change is consistent with the Act. Persons making written submissions 
    should file six copies thereof with the Secretary, Securities and 
    Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. 
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
    statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
    the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
    rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
    that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
    of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the 
    Commission's Public Reference Section, 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
    
    [[Page 6249]]
    
    Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such filing will also be available 
    for inspection and copying at the principal office of the CBOE. All 
    submissions should refer to file number SR-CBOE-97-66 and should be 
    submitted by [insert date 21 days from the date of publication].
    
    IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of 
    the Proposed Rule Change
    
        The Commission finds the proposed rule change is consistent with 
    Section 6(b) of the Act \7\ in general and furthers the objectives of 
    Section 6(b)(5) in particular in that, by eliminating unintended 
    differences in treatment between broker-dealers acting within the 
    United States and those acting in other countries, it is designed to 
    promote just and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to 
    and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national 
    market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public 
    interest. In addition, the CBOE's proposal is consistent with Section 
    11A of the Act because it will promote fair competition among brokers 
    and dealers.\8\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\ 15 U.S.C. Sec. 78f(b).
        \8\ In approving this rule, the Commission notes that it has 
    considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, 
    and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        In particular, with regard to the CBOE's rules governing the 
    Exchange's automatic execution system that distinguish between broker-
    dealer orders and non-broker-dealer orders, the Commission finds it is 
    fair to treat foreign broker-dealers in a manner similar to U.S. 
    broker-dealers for purposes of such rules. Accordingly, all broker-
    dealers, whether U.S. registered or foreign will be prohibited from 
    placing market or limit orders with an Order Book Official, utilizing 
    RAES, or benefiting from guaranteed minimum executions.
        As mentioned in the PCX's approval order, the Commission believes 
    that the proposed definition of foreign broker-dealer provides an 
    objective and verifiable standard that is capable of fair enforcement. 
    In particular, the Exchange's surveillance staff should be able to 
    confirm relatively quickly whether a person or entity is registered, 
    authorized or licensed by a foreign governmental agency or foreign 
    regulatory organization to perform the functions of a broker or dealer 
    as defined in the Act.
        The proposed rule change will make the CBOE's rules consistent with 
    those of the PCX and Phlx. Because the PCX's nearly identical filing 
    was approved after being noticed for the applicable comment period, the 
    Commission finds good cause for approving the proposed rule change 
    prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of notice 
    thereof in the Federal Register.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
    Act,\9\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CBOE-97-66) is hereby 
    approved on an accelerated basis.
    
        \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 98-3010 Filed 2-5-98; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/06/1998
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
98-3010
Pages:
6247-6249 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Release No. 34-39604, File No. SR-CBOE-97-66
PDF File:
98-3010.pdf