94-2724. Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Convert OCC's Index Option Escrow Receipt Program From Pilot to Permanent Status  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 25 (Monday, February 7, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-2724]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: February 7, 1994]
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
    [Release No. 34-33549; File No. SR-OCC-89-4]
    
     
    
    Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; 
    Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Convert OCC's Index Option 
    Escrow Receipt Program From Pilot to Permanent Status
    
    January 31, 1994.
        On May 2, 1989, The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') filed a 
    proposed rule change (File No. SR-OCC-89-04) under Section 19(b)(1) of 
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')\1\ to convert OCC's index 
    option escrow receipt program from pilot to permanent status,\2\ to 
    revise portions of OCC's index option escrow receipt form, and to amend 
    certain OCC rules concerning index option escrow receipts. The 
    Commission published notice of the proposal in the Federal Register on 
    June 26, 1989.\3\ OCC amended the proposal on February 28 and July 3, 
    1990.\4\ No public comments were received. For the reasons discussed 
    below, the Commission is approving the proposal.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \1\15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1) (1988).
        \2\The Commission approved the program on a pilot basis on 
    August 13, 1985. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 22324 (August 
    13, 1985), 50 FR 33443.
        \3\Securities Exchange Act Release No. 26951 (June 21, 1989), 54 
    FR 27840.
        \4\These amendments made technical, non-substantive revisions to 
    OCC's proposal and, therefore, were not published for comment.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I. Description
    
    A. Background
    
        The program permits OCC clearing members to deposit index option 
    escrow receipts with OCC to satisfy the margin requirements arising 
    from short call positions on index options in their customers' 
    accounts. An OCC-approved custodian bank that holds an escrow deposit 
    issues an index option escrow receipt to acknowledge that it holds a 
    specific deposit of assets for the account of a specific customer of an 
    OCC clearing member and to acknowledge that it will not release the 
    property without OCC's written consent. An index option escrow receipt 
    covers specific index options and obligates the issuing bank to hold 
    the escrow deposit until OCC releases the escrow receipt or until OCC 
    directs the issuing bank to make payment on the escrow receipt.
    
    B. The Proposal
    
        The proposal converts the index option escrow receipt program from 
    pilot to permanent status with several amendments. First, the proposal 
    increases the cap on the value of index option escrow receipts an 
    issuing bank may have outstanding. The index option escrow receipt 
    currently requires the issuing bank to certify that the value of the 
    cash and securities held by it pursuant to outstanding index option 
    escrow receipts or the intrinsic value of all options covered by its 
    outstanding index option escrow receipts does not exceed 25% of the 
    equity attributable to that bank's outstanding capital stock. The 
    proposal increases that cap from 25% to 100% of the issuing bank's 
    outstanding capital stock.
        Second, the proposal alters requirements regarding the type of 
    property acceptable as an escrow deposit. The proposal eliminates 
    certificates of deposit and banker's acceptances as permissible escrow 
    deposits and adds as a permissible escrow deposit U.S. government 
    securities having one year or less until maturity.\5\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \5\Cash, common stocks listed on a national securities exchange, 
    and marginable over-the-counter stocks also are permissible escrow 
    deposits.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Third, the proposal gives OCC the authority to close out short 
    option positions of a suspended member covered by index option escrow 
    receipts and to draw on the proceeds of the escrow receipt to cover 
    costs associated with such closing transactions.\6\ OCC may exercise 
    this authority if the value of collateral deposited under the escrow 
    receipt falls below a certain maintenance level, OCC requests an 
    additional margin deposit to cover the deficit, and OCC suspends the 
    member.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \6\Currently, OCC must maintain short positions of a suspended 
    member covered by an index option escrow receipt until it receives 
    instructions from that suspended member or its representative.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        Fourth, the proposal eliminates from the index option escrow 
    receipt a clause requiring issuing banks to certify that they will not 
    permit customers to subject the escrow deposit to any lien or 
    encumbrance. The proposal adds language to the escrow receipt which 
    precludes the issuing bank from subjecting the escrow deposit to any 
    right (including any right of set-off), charge, security interest, 
    lien, or claim of any kind in favor of the issuing bank or any person 
    claiming through the issuing bank.
        Fifth, the proposal revises the index option escrow receipt to 
    permit issuing banks to value escrow deposits at the end of the day 
    rather than throughout the day in connection with their obligation to 
    request additional customer collateral or to notify OCC of a collateral 
    deficiency. Currently, an issuing bank must (1) request from the 
    customer a supplemental escrow deposit if at any time the value of the 
    escrow deposit decreases below 55% of the underlying index option's 
    value and (2) notify OCC if at any time the value of the escrow deposit 
    decreases below 50% of the underlying index option's value. Under the 
    proposal, these obligations will not be triggered unless the applicable 
    thresholds are hit at the close of any business day rather than at any 
    time. Banks have represented to OCC that they are unable to conduct 
    intraday monitoring of the value of escrow deposits.
        Finally, the proposal contains several technical amendments to the 
    index option escrow receipt and corresponding OCC rules. For instance, 
    the index option escrow receipt now specifies that written notification 
    from an issuing bank to OCC of a collateral deficiency may be by 
    facsimile or other electronic transmission if followed by immediate 
    telephone confirmation. Throughout Rule 1801, the proposal replaces the 
    term ``market value'' with the term ``value'' when referring to 
    deposited property because the methods for valuing the various types of 
    property eligible for deposit are described in OCC Rule 1801(f). The 
    proposal also eliminates ``initial position value'' as a definitional 
    term in Rule 1801(c) because that term is not used elsewhere in OCC 
    Rule 1801. The proposal replaces the term ``agent'' with the term 
    ``duly authorized representative'' in the index option escrow receipt. 
    The proposal revises the index option escrow receipt to require issuing 
    banks to include the value of collateral backing index participation 
    escrow receipts in computing limitations on the amount of escrow 
    receipts they can issue. The revised index option escrow receipt 
    requires issuing banks to certify that they hold escrow deposits as 
    ``trustee or custodian'' for the account of customers rather than 
    merely as ``custodian'' and specifies that the issuing banks hold the 
    escrow deposits in accordance with the terms of the index option escrow 
    receipt rather than in accordance with OCC rules.
    
    II. Discussion
    
        The Commission believes that OCC's proposal is consistent with the 
    Act and in particular with section 17A(b)(3)(F) thereunder.\7\ That 
    section requires, among other things, that the rules of a clearing 
    agency be designed to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism 
    of a national system for the prompt and accurate clearance and 
    settlement of securities transactions and to assure the safeguarding of 
    funds and securities in the clearing agency's custody or control or for 
    which it is responsible.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \7\15 U.S.C. 78q-1(b)(3)(F) (1988).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        With regard to OCC's safeguarding obligations under the Act, OCC 
    has implemented procedures designed to diminish the risks associated 
    with the program. As discussed above and in the Commission order 
    approving the program on a pilot basis,\8\ these risk reduction 
    measures include: (1) The requirement that the issuing bank monitor 
    daily the value of escrow deposits and take appropriate action (i.e., 
    collection of additional collateral and/or notification to OCC) if that 
    value falls below certain thresholds;\9\ (2) escrow deposit eligibility 
    standards whereby only liquid assets are eligible to underlie escrow 
    receipts; and (3) OCC's new authority to close out the short positions 
    of a suspended clearing member covered by index option escrow receipts 
    and to draw on the proceeds of those receipts to cover liquidation 
    costs.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \8\Securities Exchange Act Release No. 22324 (August 13, 1985), 
    50 FR 33443.
        \9\If the value of the deposit decreases below 55% of the index 
    option's value, the issuing bank must notify the clearing member and 
    request that the deposit be supplemented. If the value of the 
    deposit decreases below 50% of the index option's value, the issuing 
    bank must notify OCC. In that event, OCC may disregard the escrow 
    receipt and may require margin on the short positions.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        OCC also has rules and procedures governing banks designated by OCC 
    as custodian banks (i.e., banks authorized to issue index option escrow 
    receipts). These controls include: (1) financial standards (e.g., 
    issuing banks must have shareholder equity of not less than $20 
    million); (2) regulatory standards (e.g., issuing banks must be 
    supervised and examined by state or federal authorities); and (3) 
    depository standards (e.g., issuing banks must file certain financial 
    statements with OCC). Moreover, OCC requires each custodian bank to 
    supply OCC with a letter from the bank's independent auditors 
    describing the adequacy of the custodian bank's procedures relating to 
    the issuance of index option escrow receipts.
    
    III. Conclusion
    
        In conclusion, the Commission believes that OCC's index option 
    escrow receipt program should encourage broader participation in the 
    index options market and is designed to provide adequate safeguards to 
    protect OCC and its clearing members from financial loss.
        On the basis of the foregoing, the Commission finds that the 
    proposed rule change is consistent with the Act and, in particular, 
    with Section 17A of the Act.
        It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, 
    that the proposed rule change (File No. SR-OCC-89-04) be, and hereby 
    is, approved.
    
        For the Commission by the Division of Market Regulation, 
    pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
        \10\17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12) (1993).
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    Margaret H. McFarland,
    Deputy Secretary.
    [FR Doc. 94-2724 Filed 2-4-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 8010-01-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/07/1994
Department:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Document Number:
94-2724
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: February 7, 1994, Release No. 34-33549, File No. SR-OCC-89-4