[Federal Register Volume 60, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 1995)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7158-7160]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 95-2915]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Fall Creek Postfire Project, Payette National Forest, Idaho
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In the summer and fall of 1994, the Blackwell Fire covered
56,000 acres of Payette National Forest northeast of McCall, Idaho. The
Forest Service intends to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
the Fall Creek portion of the wildfire area to assess and disclose the
environmental effects of a proposal. The purpose of the Proposed Action
is to remove fire-killed and imminently dead timber, recover its
economic value and meet socio-economic demands of local communities,
reduce fuel loading, reforest the area, and retain and enhance wildlife
habitat. [[Page 7159]]
All actions include provisions for snags, dead and down woody
debris, visual quality, cultural resources and TES species, and would
comply with the Bull Trout Conservation Agreement and PACFISH
guidelines for water quality and fisheries.
This project would be accomplished through a salvage sale of burned
timber on about 1,000 acres and commercial thinning of about 100 acres
of western larch stands, using helicopter logging (no road construction
or reconstruction); planting of conifer seedlings; and establishing owl
and goshawk nest structures. The salvage sale proceeds would finance
the other activities.
The project is approximately three miles northeast of McCall, in
the Fall Creek drainage, a tributary to Payette Lake. It lies within
the Secesh Roadless Area.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Fitch, McCall District Ranger (208 634-0400); or Chris Brunner,
Interdisciplinary Team Leader (208 634-0421).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: From July to October 1994, wildfires covered
a total of about 290,000 acres of Payette National Forest. The
Blackwell Fire was ignited in early August by lightning strikes three
miles northeast of the city of McCall, and eventually covered about
56,000 acres until stopped by winter weather in mid-October. Within
this perimeter, it burned in a mosaic pattern of fire intensities
including some unburned areas.
In October, Payette National Forest convened three
interdisciplinary groups of Forest resource specialists to assess the
landscapes affected by the fires: one each for the Blackwell landscape,
the Corral landscape, and the Chicken landscape. Each landscape was
composed of two or more watersheds. The Blackwell landscape encompassed
over 93,000 acres in the Upper North Fork Payette River and Payette
Lake watersheds. The Forest also convened a team to assess the broad-
scale area, which encompasses the three landscapes plus the Thunderbolt
landscape to the south.
In January 1995, each landscape team produced a landscape
assessment encompassing their analysis area. The teams used a
ecosystem-based approach to assess the fires' effects and to propose
target landscape conditions, based on the Forest Plan and the historic
range of variation. Each team identified management opportunities that
could be implemented this year and in the future to move their postfire
landscape toward the target landscape design. The Forest leadership
team selected a package of proposed actions for each landscape to bring
forward into the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis
process.
The Proposed Action for Fall Creek described herein is one product
of the Blackwell landscape assessment: it proposes the high-priority
short term projects related to timber salvage and other postfire
resource opportunities consistent with the target landscape design for
the Blackwell landscape.
Burn intensities, as defined by degree of three mortality, in the
Blackwell landscape varied from intensely burned to unburned. Within
the Blackwell landscape, which includes portions of both the Blackwell
and Corral fires, approximately 29,000 acres burned at high intensity
(tree mortality greater than 90%), 12,800 acres at moderate intensity
(tree mortality greater than 30% and less than 90%), and 6,400 acres at
low intensity (tree mortality less than 30%). The remainder of the
landscape did not burn.
An estimated 28,100 acres of the Secesh Roadless Area lie within
the Blackwell landscape.
Simultaneous with this Notice of Intent, Payette National Forest is
also publishing two Notices of Intent for other postfire proposals. The
``Lower South Fork Salmon River Postfire Project'' EIS will cover the
Chicken landscape, and the ``Main Salmon River Postfire Projects'' EIS
will cover the Corral landscape. The Forest Service will analyze the
two projects concurrently with this ``Fall Creek Postfire Project''
proposal. It will also analyze in an environmental assessment (EA) the
``North Fork Payette River Postfire Project'' proposal covering another
portion of the Blackwell landscape.
Purpose and Need
The need is to move toward the desired future conditions, goals and
objectives as described in the Payette Forest Plan and the target
landscape design in the Blackwell Landscape Assessment. The Blackwell
Landscape Assessment was tiered to the Forest Plan and identifies a
strategy to implement the plan in an exosystem management context. The
proposed action is derived from management opportunities in the
landscape assessment. The purpose of each element of the proposed
action is:
Salvage: To recover economic value of burned timber for counties
and timber-related industries and provide wood fiber for society. Past
experience with wildfire timber recovery in south-central Idaho
indicates that prompt harvest is needed to recover the economic value
of fire-killed trees. The trees in the project area, mostly Douglas-
fir, grand fir, and lodgepole pine, are expected to lose an estimated
50% of their economic value by the end of 1996. Part of the salvage
sale proceeds will finance the regeneration and wildlife habitat
elements of the project.
Thinning: To perpetuate a larch stand for wildlife habitat and
reduce fuel loading adjacent to State and private land. This harvest
needs to take place concurrently with the salvage due to economic
efficiency.
Regeneration: To promptly return to production those lands within
the suited base that contribute to the allowable sale quantity.
Wildlife: To replace habitat components lost in the fire.
Proposed Action
The Proposed Action has the following components:
1. Salvage harvest fire-killed and imminently dead trees on
approximately 1,000 acres. Harvest by helicopter to protect domestic
watershed conditions and fish habitat. Construct two helicopter
landings: no road construction or reconstruction is proposed.
Harvesting would comply with the Draft Bull Trout Conservation
Agreement. The proposal would not harvest within PACFISH Riparian
Habitat Conservation Areas, which include riparian corridors along
perennial and intermittent streams, wetlands, landslides, and landslide
prone areas, where riparian-dependent resources receive primary
emphasis. Site specific integrated prescriptions to provide for snags/
large wood debris, visual quality, cultural resource protection, and
TES plant and animal needs would be developed consistent with the
Forest Plan, landscape assessment, and current policy/research.
2. Commercially thin unburned western larch stands on 100 acres.
Harvest by helicopter only; no road construction or reconstruction is
proposed.
3. Regenerate productive forest suited acres within the project
area by planting conifer seedlings or ensuring natural regeneration.
4. Construct great gray owl and goshawk nest platforms adjacent to
burned areas.
Forest Plan Amendment
Amendment to the Forest Plan may be needed to:
1. Allow plantation stocking levels below Forest Plan standards and
guidelines to reflect natural stand conditions. [[Page 7160]]
2. Allow postfire activities as described in the Fall Creek
Postfire Project to proceed without on Order 2 soil survey. Soil
information of sufficient detail to address NEPA issues and required
effects disclosure will be provided.
Preliminary Issues
The Forest Service has identified six preliminary issues raised by
the Proposed Action:
1. Effects on water quality in the North Fork Payette River and
Payette Lake, which supplies domestic water to McCall. The river is
designated a Stream Segment of Concern by the State of Idaho.
2. Effects on fish habitat in the North Fork Payette River and its
tributaries, habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and former habitat
for bull trout (sensitive species). The North Fork Payette River is a
key watershed in the draft Bull Trout Conservation Agreement between
Idaho Fish and Game, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Forest
Service.
3. Effects on sensitive wildlife species including the boreal owl
and three-toed woodpecker.
4. Effects on visual quality as seen from the city of McCall.
5. Effects on wilderness characteristics within the Secesh Roadless
Area.
6. The economic efficiency of proposed projects, and effects on
soci-economic and social systems around the Payette National Forest.
Possible Alternatives
The Forest Service has identified two alternatives to the Proposed
Act: a no action alternative, and an alternative that uses tractor,
skyline, and helicopter logging with road construction. As the public
raises additional logging with road construction. As the public raises
additional issues and provides more information, the Forest may develop
additional alternatives.
Decisions To Be Made
The Payette National Forest Supervisor will decide:
Whether to allow salvage logging and/or thinning.
If so, where and how to harvest.
Whether to plant after harvest.
Whether to implement the wildlife projects.
What management requirements and mitigation measures are required
as part of the project.
What monitoring requirements are appropriate to evaluate project
implementation. And,
What Forest Plan amendment(s) are required.
Public Involvement Meetings
The Forest will hold five public scoping meetings to introduce the
Proposed Actions for the three burned landscapes and to invite public
comment: Riggins--February 15, 4-9 p.m., City Hall. McCall--February
16, 4-9 p.m., McCall Smokejumper Base. Council--February 21, 4-9 p.m.,
Council Ranger District office. Boise--February 23, 4-9 p.m., Red Lion
Downtowner. Grangeville--February 27, 1-3 p.m., Nez Perce National
Forest Supervisor's office. In addition, Forest Service personnel will
make added public presentations on request.
Agency/Public Contacts
The Forest is mailing a summary of the Proposed Action, preliminary
issues, and background information on the analysis to key individuals,
groups, and agencies for comment. The mailing list includes those on
the Payette postfire mailing list and those generally interested in
Payette National Forest NEPA projects.
Schedule
Draft Environmental Impact Statement, May 1995. Final EIS, August
1995. Implementation, September 1995.
Comments
Comments on the Proposed Action and analysis should be received in
writing on or before March 10, 1995. Send comments to: Forest
Supervisor, Payette National Forest, P.O. Box 1026, 106 W. Park Street,
McCall, ID 83638; telephone (208) 634-0700; FAX (208) 634-0281.
The comment period on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement will
be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes
the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of
draft environmental impact statements must structure their
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and
contentions [Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,
553 (1978)]. Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the
Draft Environmental Impact Statement stage but that are not raised
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may
be waived or dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d
1016, 1002 (9th Cir., 1986): and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris,
490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court
rulings, it is important that those interested in this Proposed Action
participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that
substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest
Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider and respond to them
in the final environmental impact statement.
To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues
raised by the Proposed Action, comments on the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful
if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement.
Comments may also address the adequacy of the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and
discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council
on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in
addressing these points.
Responsible Official
David F. Alexander, Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest,
P.O. Box 1026, 106 West Park, McCall, ID 83638.
Dated: January 31, 1995.
David F. Alexander,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 95-2915 Filed 2-6-95; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
