95-2917. Lower South Fork Salmon River Postfire Project, Payette National Forest, Idaho  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 7163-7165]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-2917]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Lower South Fork Salmon River Postfire Project, Payette National 
    Forest, Idaho
    
    AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare environmental impact statement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: In the summer and fall of 1994, the Chicken Fire covered 
    103,000 acres of Payette National Forest northeast of McCall, Idaho. 
    The Forest Service intends to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement 
    for a portion of the wildfire area to assess and disclose the 
    environmental effects of a proposal. The purpose of the Proposed Action 
    is to remove fire-killed and imminently dead timber, recover its 
    economic value and meet socio-economic demands of local communities, 
    reforest the area, retain and enhance wildlife habitat, reduce soil 
    erosion and decrease sedimentation, improve fish habitat, and provide 
    recreation access.
        All actions include provisions for snags, dead and down woody 
    debris, visual quality, cultural resources, TES species, and wild and 
    scenic river study corridors, and would comply with the Bull Trout 
    Conservation Agreement and PACFISH guidelines for water quality and 
    fisheries.
        This project would be accomplished through a salvage sale of burned 
    timber on about 4,850 acres, using helicopter logging (no road 
    construction); planting of conifer seedlings; repairing and improving 
    drainage conditions on seven existing roads; converting a road to a 
    trail; and constructing nest platforms for great gray owls. The salvage 
    sale proceeds would help finance the other activities.
        The project lies 25-40 miles northeast of McCall, in the lower 
    South Fork Salmon River watershed, in the Smith Creek, Pony Creek, and 
    Elk Creek drainages. It lies partly within the Secesh and Cottontail 
    Point/Pilot Peak Roadless Areas.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Fred Dauber, Krassel District Ranger (208 634-0600); or Dan Anderson, 
    Interdisciplinary Team Leader (208 634-0631).
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: From July to October 1994, wildfires covered 
    a total of about 290,000 acres of Payette National Forest. The Chicken 
    Fire was ignited in mid-August by several lightning strikes east of the 
    town of Warren near the South Fork Salmon River, and eventually covered 
    about 103,000 acres until stopped by winter weather in mid-October. 
    Within this perimeter, it burned in a mosaic pattern of fire 
    intensities including some unburned areas.
        In October, Payette National Forest convened three 
    interdisciplinary groups of Forest resources specialists to assess the 
    landscapes affected by the fires: one each for the Blackwell landscape, 
    the Corral landscape, and the Chicken landscape. Each landscape was 
    composed of two or more watersheds. The Chicken landscape encompassed 
    nearly 180,000 acres in the Lower South Fork and Elk Creek watersheds. 
    The Forest also convened a team to assess the broad-scale area, which 
    encompasses the three landscapes plus the Thunderbolt landscape to the 
    south.
        In January 1995, each landscape team produced a landscape 
    assessment encompassing their fire area. The teams used an ecosystem-
    based approach to assess the fires' effects and to propose target 
    landscape conditions, based on the Forest Plan and the historic range 
    of variation. Each team identified management opportunities that could 
    be implemented this year and in the future to move their respective 
    postfire landscape toward the target landscape design. The Forest 
    leadership team selected a package of proposed actions for each 
    landscape to bring forward into the National Environmental Policy Act 
    (NEPA) analysis process.
        The Proposed Action for the Lower South Fork Salmon River described 
    herein is one product of the Chicken landscape assessment: it proposes 
    the high-priority short term projects related to timber salvage and 
    other postfire resources opportunities consistent with the target 
    landscape design for the Chicken Landscape.
        Burn intensities, as defined by degree of tree mortality, in the 
    Chicken landscape varied from intensely burned to unburned. Within the 
    Chicken landscape, which includes a portion of the Chicken Fire, 
    approximately 36,900 acres burned at high intensity (tree mortality 
    greater than 90%), 23,700 acres at moderate intensity (tree mortality 
    greater than 30% and less than 90%), and 28,200 acres at low intensity 
    (tree mortality less than 30%). The remainder of the landscape did not 
    burn.
        An estimated 83,300 acres of the Secesh Roadless Area and 30,900 
    acres of the Cottontail Point/Pilot Peak Roadless Area lie within the 
    Chicken landscape, of which about 34,500 acres and 21,000 acres were 
    burned, respectively.
        The primary management emphasis in the South Fork Salmon River 
    drainage is restoration of harvestable, robust, self-sustaining 
    populations of naturally reproducing salmon and trout. The South Fork 
    Salmon River was the single largest producer of summer chinook salmon 
    in the Columbia River Basin by the 1950's. Since then this run has 
    continued to decline significantly, partially due to habitat 
    degradation caused by management-induced sediment. The Snake River 
    spring/summer and fall chinook salmon are now listed as endangered 
    species. The South Fork's steelhead, bull trout, and westslope 
    cutthroat trout are listed by the Forest Service as sensitive. Some 
    spawning areas and major winter habitats for both endangered and 
    sensitive fishes are influenced by the project area. Numerous road-
    related sediment sources continue to deliver sediment to the South Fork 
    and tributaries, adversely affecting fish habitat.
        Simultaneous with this Notice of Intent, Payette National Forest is 
    also publishing two Notices of Intent for other postfire proposals. The 
    ``Fall Creek Postfire Project'' EIS will cover part of the Blackwell 
    landscape, and the ``Main Salmon River Postfire Project'' EIS will 
    cover the Corral landscape. The Forest Service will analyze the two 
    projects concurrently with this ``Lower South Fork Salmon River 
    Postfire Project'' proposal.
    
    Purpose and Need
    
        The need is to adapt to the changed conditions in the South Fork 
    Salmon River drainage and move toward the desired future conditions, 
    goals and objectives as described in the Payette Forest Plan and the 
    target landscape design in the Chicken Landscape Assessment. The 
    Chicken Landscape Assessment was tiered to the Forest Plan and 
    identifies a strategy to implement the plan in an ecosystem management 
    context. The proposed action is derived from management opportunities 
    in the landscape assessment. The purpose of each element of the 
    proposed action is:
        Salvage: To recover economic value of burned timber for counties 
    and timber-related industries and provide wood fiber for society. Past 
    experience with wildfire timber recovery in south-central Idaho 
    indicates that prompt harvest is needed to recover the economic value 
    of fire-killed trees. The trees in this project area, mostly ponderosa 
    pine, Douglas-fir, grand fir, and lodgepole pine, are expected to lose 
    [[Page 7164]] 30-40% of their economic value by the end of 1996. Part 
    of the salvage sale proceeds will finance the regeneration, watershed 
    improvement, recreation and wildlife habitat elements of the project.
        Regeneration: To promptly return to production those lands within 
    the suited base that contribute to the allowable sale quantity.
        Watershed Projects: To improve watershed conditions to meet 
    beneficial uses (fish habitat and domestic water supply).
        Recreation: To improve recreation user access.
        Wildlife: To enhance habitat components for sensitive species.
    
    Proposed Action
    
        The Proposed Action has the following components:
        1. Salvage harvest fire-killed and imminently-dead trees on 
    approximately 4,850 acres. Harvest by helicopter only. Construct seven 
    helicopter landings. Reconstruct about 5.5 miles of road in four 
    segments to facilitate log haul; no road construction is proposed. 
    Specifically, on road #337, reconstruct \1/4\ mile of road by 
    increasing the radius on 1 switchback; road #340, reconstruct 2\1/4\ 
    miles of road by increasing the radius on two switchbacks and 
    realigning multiple tight radius turns; road #355, reconstruct 1\1/2\ 
    miles of road by increasing the radius on one switchback, and improve 
    the running surface where degraded by large rocks; road #359, 
    reconstruct 1\1/5\ miles of road by improving stream crossings, 
    improving several tight radius turns, and improving the running surface 
    by better drainage. The proposal would not harvest within the South 
    Fork Salmon River wild and scenic study corridor. It would not harvest 
    within PACFISH Riparian Habitat Conservation Areas, which include 
    riparian corridors, wetlands, landslides, and landslide-prone areas, 
    where riparian-dependent resources receive primary emphasis. The 
    proposal would not harvest on land having a combination of high erosion 
    hazard and high sediment delivery to streams. Harvesting would comply 
    with the Draft Bull Trout Conservation Agreement. Site specific 
    integrated prescriptions to provide for snags/large woody debris 
    retention, visual quality, cultural resource protection, and TES plant 
    and animal needs would be developed consistent with the Forest Plan, 
    landscape assessment and current policy/research.
        2. Regenerate productive forest suited acres within the project 
    area by planting conifer seedlings or ensuring natural regeneration.
        3. Repair and improve drainage conditions on seven existing roads. 
    Specifically, apply gravel, line inslope ditches, improve cross-
    drainage, stabilize cuts and fills, improve stream crossings, and/or 
    stabilize gullies on segments of the: Hays Station Road (#337), Warren-
    Profile Gap Road (#340), China Glen Road (#357), Smith Knob Road 
    (#355), Warren Wagon Road (Forest Highway 21), and Pony Meadows Road 
    (#359).
        4. Convert the Bear Lake Road (#1211) to a non-motorized trail.
        5. Establish a trailhead at the end of Hays Station Road (#337).
        6. Construct nest platforms for great gray owls in the Pony Meadows 
    area.
        7. Close to all vehicle traffic a non-system road from Warren 
    Summit going west to just above Pony Meadows.
        Methodologies, rationale, and findings associated with the Chicken 
    landscape assessment and site specific environmental analysis are to be 
    reviewed by a proposed Federal interagency science panel with panel 
    members selected from Forest Service research and system branches, and 
    other Federal agencies. Recommendations made by this panel could be 
    used by line officers in directing the environmental analysis, 
    formulating alternatives, disclosing environmental consequences, 
    developing a monitoring plan, and making the final decision. This may 
    include the option of not moving ahead with any or part of the proposed 
    action or action alternatives if conclusive information shows that the 
    action would be damaging to anadromous fish.
    
    Forest Plan Amendment
    
        The Payette National Forest Plan has specific management direction 
    for the South Fork Salmon River management areas. The Proposed Action 
    is designed to improve watershed conditions and fish habitat, and is 
    consistent with the objectives and goals of the Forest Plan. However, 
    amendment to standards and guidelines in the Plan may be needed to:
        1. Allow postfire activities including salvage logging of fire-
    killed and imminently dead trees as proposed in the Lower South Fork 
    Salmon River Postfire Project where the cumulative effect of all 
    proposed projects results in a net improvement in potential sediment 
    delivery to the South Fork Salmon River.
        2. Allow postfire activities as described in the Lower South Fork 
    Salmon River Postfire Project to proceed without an Order 2 soil 
    survey. Soil information of sufficient detail to address NEPA issues 
    and required effects disclosure will be provided.
        3. Allow plantation stocking levels below Forest Plan standards and 
    guidelines to reflect natural stand conditions.
        4. Allow helicopter logging one-way flying distances beyond the 
    Forest Plan standard and guideline of 1.5 miles but within 2.5 miles of 
    existing roads.
        5. In Management Area 16, allow postfire salvage logging by 
    helicopter as proposed in the Lower South Fork Salmon River Postfire 
    Project.
    
    Preliminary Issues
    
        The Forest Service has identified seven preliminary issues raised 
    by the Proposed Action:
        1. Effects on water quality in the South Fork Salmon River and its 
    tributaries and their beneficial use for spring/summer chinook salmon, 
    bull trout, and other fish species habitat. The lower South Fork is a 
    Stream Segment of Concern and a Water Quality Limited Segment (State of 
    Idaho, Division of Environmental Quality).
        2. Impacts of not implementing the Forest Plan recovery strategy 
    for the South Fork Salmon River before implementing new timber entry.
        3. Effects on sensitive wildlife species including white-headed 
    woodpecker and goshawk.
        4. Effects on wilderness characteristics within the Secesh and 
    Cottontail Point/Pilot Peak Roadless Areas.
        5. Effects on human use and access due to closing roads to reduce 
    sediment.
        6. Effects on the ability of the project areas to provide long term 
    growth and yield of timber. Where the Chicken Fire burned hot, it left 
    no live trees. Where fire burned at low or moderate intensities, it 
    left a mixture of dead, live, and damaged trees. Trees with crowns and 
    trunks scorched are at risk of dying from fire damage or insect 
    infestation. Grasses and shrubs can invade disturbed sites faster than 
    trees can naturally reforest.
        7. The economic efficiency of proposed projects, and effects on 
    socio-economic and social systems around the Payette National Forest.
    
    Possible Alternatives
    
        The Forest Service has identified three alternatives to the 
    Proposed Action: a no action alternative, an alternative that would not 
    salvage harvest in the roadless areas, and an alternative that salvage 
    harvests by helicopter additional acres on more sensitive soil types. 
    As the public raises additional issues and provides more information, 
    the Forest may develop additional alternatives. [[Page 7165]] 
    
    Decisions To Be Made
    
        The Payette National Forest Supervisor will decide:
        Whether to allow salvage logging.
        If so, where and how to harvest.
        Whether to plant after harvest.
        Whether to implement the sediment reducing, recreation, and 
    wildlife improvement projects.
        What management requirements and mitigation measures are required 
    as part of the project.
        What monitoring requirements are appropriate to evaluate project 
    implementation. And,
        What Forest Plan amendment(s) are required.
    
    Public Involvement Meetings
    
        The Forest will hold five public scoping meetings to introduce the 
    Proposed Actions for the three burned landscapes and to invite public 
    comment: Riggins--February 15, 4-9 pm, City Hall. McCall--February 16, 
    4-9 pm, McCall Smokejumper Base. Council--February 21, 4-9 pm, Council 
    Ranger District office. Boise--February 23, 4-9 pm, Red Lion 
    Downtowner. Grangeville--February 26, 1-3 pm, Nez Perce National Forest 
    Supervisor's office. In addition, Forest Service personnel will make 
    added public presentations on request.
    
    Agency/Public Contacts
    
        The Forest is mailing a summary of the Proposed Action, preliminary 
    issues, and background information on the analysis to key individuals, 
    groups, and agencies for comment. The mailing list includes those on 
    the Payette postfire mailing list and those generally interested in 
    Payette National Forest NEPA projects.
    
    Schedule
    
        Draft Environmental Impact Statement, May 1995. Final EIS, August 
    1995. Implementation, September 1995.
    
    Comments
    
        Comments on the Proposed Action and analysis should be received in 
    writing on or before March 10, 1995. Send comments to: Forest 
    Supervisor, Payette National Forest, P.O. Box 1026, 106 W. Park Street, 
    McCall, ID 83638; telephone (208) 634-0700; FAX (208) 634-0281.
        The comment period on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement will 
    be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes 
    the notice of availability in the Federal Register.
        The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important 
    to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
    participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
    draft environmental impact statements must structure their 
    participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is 
    meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and 
    contentions [Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 
    553 (1978)]. Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the 
    Draft Environmental Impact Statement stage but that are not raised 
    until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may 
    be waived or dismissed by the courts [City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 
    1016, 1002 (9th Cir,. 1986); and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 
    490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980)]. Because of these court 
    rulings, it is important that those interested in this Proposed Action 
    participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that 
    substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest 
    Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider and respond to them 
    in the final environmental impact statement.
        To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues 
    raised by the Proposed Action, comments on the Draft Environmental 
    Impact Statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful 
    if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. 
    Comments may also address the adequacy of the Draft Environmental 
    Impact Statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and 
    discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council 
    on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural 
    provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in 
    addressing these points.
    
    Responsible Official
    
        David F. Alexander, Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest, 
    P.O. Box 1026, 106 West Park, McCall, ID 83638.
    
        Dated: January 31, 1995.
    David F. Alexander,
    Forest Supervisor.
    [FR Doc. 95-2917 Filed 2-6-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/07/1995
Department:
Agriculture Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of intent to prepare environmental impact statement.
Document Number:
95-2917
Pages:
7163-7165 (3 pages)
PDF File:
95-2917.pdf