94-2837. Twelve Lakes Stabilization Project, Wasatch-Cache National Forest, Summit County, UT  

  • [Federal Register Volume 59, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 8, 1994)]
    [Unknown Section]
    [Page 0]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 94-2837]
    
    
    [[Page Unknown]]
    
    [Federal Register: February 8, 1994]
    
    
                                                        VOL. 59, NO. 26
    
                                              Tuesday, February 8, 1994
    =======================================================================
    
    DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
    
    Forest Service
    
     
    
    Twelve Lakes Stabilization Project, Wasatch-Cache National 
    Forest, Summit County, UT
    
    AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Forest Service will prepare an environmental impact 
    statement on a proposal to stabilize Big Elk, Crystal, Duck, Fire, 
    Island, Long, Marjorie, Pot, Star, Teapot, Wall, and Weir Lake 
    reservoirs located in non-motorized backcountry adjacent to the Mirror 
    Lake Highway. These lakes will no longer be used for water storage 
    purposes. Restoration of watershed resources, fishery and wildlife 
    habitat, and previous recreation impacts will occur. This project is 
    mitigation for lost fishery and recreational opportunities related to 
    the construction of Jordanelle Reservoir (Central Utah Project).
    
    DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received 
    in writing by March 8, 1994.
    
    ADDRESSES: Send written comments to POB 68, Kamas, Utah 84036.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Mead Hargis, Kamas Ranger District, 801-783-4338.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Wasatach-Cache National Forest is the 
    lead agency.
    
        The Kamas Ranger District invites comments on the proposed action 
    and alternatives. Scoping will include written, phone or personal 
    comments. No meetings are scheduled. District employees will meet with 
    any person who requests a meeting.
        The decisions to be made include whether or not to stabilize these 
    lakes and if so at what lake surface elevation and what, if any, 
    recreation and natural resource restoration will be necessary.
        Preliminary issues include cost, fishery benefits, roadless 
    character, wetlands, cultural resources, potential impacts of 
    stablization attracting more recreational use to these lakes.
        Preliminary alternatives include No Action, stabilization at 
    natural lake levels, low hazard dam levels, and levels above low hazard 
    dam elevations.
        A 404 Dredge and Fill permit from the Army Corps of Engineers and 
    Utah State Stream Alternation permits will be necessary.
        The Responsible Official is Melissa Blackwell, District Ranger, 
    Kamas Ranger District.
        Estimated dates of availability: Draft EIS August 1994, final EIS 
    November 1994.
        The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement will 
    be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency's notice 
    of availability appears in the Federal Register. It is very important 
    that those interested in this proposed action participate at that time. 
    To be the most helpful, comments on the draft environmental impact 
    statement should be as specific as possible and may address the 
    adequacy of the statement or the merits of the alternatives discussed 
    (see The Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing 
    the procedural provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 
    40 CFR 1503.3).
        In addition, Federal court decisions have established that 
    reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their 
    participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is 
    meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewers' position and 
    contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519, 
    553 (1978). Environmental objections that could have been raised at the 
    draft stage may be waived if not raised until after completion of the 
    final environmental impact statement. City of Angoon v. Hodel, (9th 
    Circuit, 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 S. Supp. 
    1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). The reason for this is to ensure that 
    substantive comments and objections are made available to the Forest 
    Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to 
    them in the final.
    
        Dated: February 1, 1994.
    Melissa Blackwell,
    District Ranger.
    [FR Doc. 94-2837 Filed 2-7-94; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
    
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/08/1994
Department:
Forest Service
Entry Type:
Uncategorized Document
Action:
Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
Document Number:
94-2837
Dates:
Comments concerning the scope of the analysis should be received in writing by March 8, 1994.
Pages:
0-0 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Federal Register: February 8, 1994