[Federal Register Volume 59, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 1994)]
[Unknown Section]
[Page 0]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 94-2700]
[[Page Unknown]]
[Federal Register: February 9, 1994]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[OPP-180919; FRL 4757-6]
Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemptions to use Propazine;
Solicitation of Public Comment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA has received a specific exemption request from the
Oklahoma Department of Agriculture (hereafter referred to as the
``Applicant'') to use the pesticide propazine (CAS 139-40-2) to treat
up to 280,000 acres of sorghum to control various weeds. The Applicant
proposes the use of a new (unregistered) chemical; therefore, in
accordance with 40 CFR 166.24, EPA is soliciting public comment before
making the decision whether or not to grant the exemption.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 24, 1994.
ADDRESSES: Three copies of written comments, bearing the identification
notation ``OPP-180919,'' should be submitted by mail to: Public
Response and Program Resource Branch, Field Operations Division
(7506C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460. In person, bring comments to: Rm.
1132, Crystal Mall #2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA.
Information submitted in any comment concerning this notice may be
claimed confidential by marking any part or all of that information as
``Confidential Business Information.'' Information so marked will not
be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR
part 2. A copy of the comment that does not contain Confidential
Business Information must be provided by the submitter for inclusion in
the public record. Information not marked confidential may be disclosed
publicly by EPA without prior notice. All written comments filed
pursuant to this notice will be available for public inspection in Rm.
1132, Crystal Mall No. 2, 1921 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA,
from 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: By mail: Andrea Beard, Registration
Division (7505W), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW, Washington, DC 20460. Office location
and telephone number: Floor 6, Crystal Station #1, 2800 Jefferson Davis
Highway, Arlington, VA, (703-308-8791).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 18 of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) (7 U.S.C. 136p),
the Administrator may, at her discretion, exempt a state agency from
any registration provision of FIFRA if she determines that emergency
conditions exist which require such exemption. The Applicant has
requested the Administrator to issue a specific exemption for the use
of propazine on sorghum to control pigweed. Information in accordance
with 40 CFR part 166 was submitted as part of this request.
Sorghum is grown as a rotational crop with cotton and wheat, in
order to comply with the soil conservation requirements. Propazine,
which was formerly registered for use on sorghum, was voluntarily
canceled by the former Registrant, who did not wish to support its re-
registration. The Applicant claims that this has left many sorghum
growers with no pre-emergent herbicides that will adequately control
certain broadleaf weeds, especially pigweed. Until recently, growers
have been using up existing stocks of propazine. The Applicant states
that other available herbicides have serious limitations on their use,
making them unsuitable for control of pigweed in sorghum. Although the
original Registrant of propazine has decided not to support this
chemical through re-registration, another company has committed to
support the data requirements for this use. Propazine was once
registered for this use, but has now been voluntarily canceled and is
therefore considered to be a new chemical.
The Applicant states that, because growers have been using existing
stocks of propazine since the time of its voluntary cancellation,
yields have not shown a decrease. However, this is the first season
where most growers have depleted their stocks of propazine, and the
Applicant claims that significant economic losses will occur without
the availability of propazine.
The Applicant proposes to apply propazine at a maximum rate of 1.2
lbs. active ingredient (a.i.), (2.4 pts. of product) per acre, by
ground or air, with a maximum of one application per crop growing
season. Therefore, use under this exemption could potentially amount to
a maximum total of 336,000 lbs. of active ingredient (84,000 gal. of
product). This is the first time that Oklahoma has applied for this use
of propazine on sorghum.
Requests for exemptions were also received earlier this year from
New Mexico and Texas, and Texas was issued an exemption for this use
for last growing season. This notice does not constitute a decision by
EPA on the application itself. The regulations governing section 18
require publication of a notice of receipt of an application for a
specific exemption proposing use of a new chemical (i.e., an active
ingredient not contained in any currently registered pesticide). Such
notice provides for opportunity for public comment on the application.
Accordingly, interested persons may submit written views on this
subject to the Field Operations Division at the address above.
The Agency, accordingly, will review and consider all comments
received during the comment period in determining whether to issue the
emergency exemption requested by the Oklahoma Department of
Agriculture.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests, Crisis exemptions.
Dated: January 26, 1994.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 94-2700 Filed 2-8-94; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-F
