95-3233. Northeast Nuclear Energy Company; Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 7800-7801]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-3233]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    
    NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
    
    Northeast Nuclear Energy Company; Millstone Nuclear Power 
    Station, Unit No. 3; Environmental Assessment and Finding of No 
    Significant Impact
    
        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) is 
    considering issuance of an amendment to Facility Operating License No. 
    NPF-49, issued to Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (the licensee), for 
    operation of the Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3, located 
    in New London County, Connecticut.
    
    Environmental Assessment
    
    Identification of the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would revise Technical Specification (TS) 
    3.5.2.a by granting a one-time extension of the allowable Residual Heat 
    Removal (RHR) pump outage time for mechanical seal replacement and 
    related modifications from 72 hours to 120 hours. This exception would 
    only be used one time per pump and expire on April 30, 1995. The 
    amendment would clearly define the times in which each RHR pump and 
    associated RHR heat exchanger must be restored to an operable state.
        The proposed action is in accordance with the licensee's 
    application for amendment dated August 16, 1994, as supplemented by 
    letter dated January 10, 1995.
    
    The Need for the Proposed Action
    
        The proposed action would reduce the potential for an unnecessary 
    plant shutdown, thus, eliminating a source of unnecessary challenges to 
    the plant's safety systems.
    
    Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action
    
        The Commission has completed its evaluation of the proposed action 
    and concludes that one-time extension of the RHR pump outage time from 
    72 hours to 120 hours to acceptable.
        The change will not increase the probability or consequences of 
    accidents, no changes are being made in the types of any effluents that 
    may be released offsite, and there is no significant increase in the 
    allowable individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. 
    Accordingly, the Commission concludes that there are no significant 
    radiological environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
        With regard to potential nonradiological impacts, the proposed 
    action does involve features located entirely within the restricted 
    area as defined in 10 CFR part 20. It does not affect nonradiological 
    plant effluents and has no other environmental impact. Accordingly, the 
    Commission concludes that there are no significant nonradiological 
    environmental impacts associated with the proposed action.
    
    Alternatives to the Proposed Action
    
        Since the Commission has concluded there is no measurable 
    environmental impact associated with the proposed action, any 
    alternatives with equal or greater environmental impact need not be 
    evaluated. As an alternative to the proposed action, the staff 
    considered denial of the proposed action. Denial of the application 
    would result in no change in current environmental impacts. The 
    environmental impacts of the proposed action and the alternative action 
    are similar. [[Page 7801]] 
    
    Alternative Use of Resources
    
        This action does not involve the use of any resources not 
    previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement for the 
    Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit No. 3.
    
    Agencies and Persons Consulted
    
        In accordance with its stated policy, the staff consulted with the 
    Connecticut State official regarding the environmental impact of the 
    proposed action. The State official had no comments.
    
    Finding of No Significant Impact
    
        Based upon the environmental assessment, the Commission concludes 
    that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the 
    quality of the human environment. Accordingly, the Commission has 
    determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the 
    proposed action.
        For further details with respect to the proposed action, see the 
    licensee's letter dated August 16, 1994, as supplemented by letter 
    dated January 10, 1995, which are available for public inspection at 
    the Commission's Public Document Room, The Gelman Building, 2120 L 
    Street, NW., Washington, DC, and at the local public document room 
    located at the Learning Resource Center, Three Rivers Community-
    Technical College, Thames Valley Campus, 574 New London Turnpike, 
    Norwich, CT 06360.
    
        Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day of February 1995.
    
        For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
    Phillip F. McKee,
    Director, Project Directorate I-4, Division of Reactor Projects--I/II, 
    Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
    [FR Doc. 95-3233 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 7590-01-M
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/09/1995
Department:
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
95-3233
Pages:
7800-7801 (2 pages)
PDF File:
95-3233.pdf