95-3294. Food Labeling; General Requirements for Nutrition Labeling of Dietary Supplements; General Requirements for Nutrient Content Claims for Dietary Supplements  

  • [Federal Register Volume 60, Number 27 (Thursday, February 9, 1995)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 7710-7712]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 95-3294]
    
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    [[Page 7711]]
    
    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
    
    Food and Drug Administration
    
    21 CFR Part 101
    
    [Docket No. 95N-0025]
    
    
    Food Labeling; General Requirements for Nutrition Labeling of 
    Dietary Supplements; General Requirements for Nutrient Content Claims 
    for Dietary Supplements
    
    AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
    
    ACTION: Notice of intent.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that, 
    given the need to modify its regulations on nutrition labeling and 
    nutrient content claims for dietary supplements to respond to the 1994 
    Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (the 1994 DSHEA), it does 
    not intend to enforce those regulations until after December 31, 1996. 
    FDA is issuing this notice of intent in response to inquiries from the 
    dietary supplement industry.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Virginia L. Wilkening, Center for Food 
    Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-165), Food and Drug Administration, 
    200 C St. SW., Washington, DC 20204, 202-205-5483.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    I. Background
    
        The Nutrition Labeling and Education Act (the 1990 amendments) was 
    enacted on November 8, 1990. This law amended the Federal Food, Drug, 
    and Cosmetic Act (the act) to require that virtually all foods, 
    including conventional foods and dietary supplements, bear nutrition 
    labeling (section 403(q) of the act (21 U.S.C. 343(q)), and that if 
    they bear claims about the level of nutrients that they contain, those 
    claims be made in accordance with definitions adopted by FDA (see 
    section 403(r) of the act). The 1990 amendments required that FDA issue 
    proposed rules implementing these provisions within 12 months from the 
    date of their enactment and final rules within 24 months (sections 2(b) 
    and 3(b) of the 1990 amendments). The final rules were to be effective 
    6 months after they were issued, although FDA was authorized to delay 
    application of the rules for up to 1 year if it found that compliance 
    with the nutrition labeling and nutrient content claim provisions would 
    cause undue economic hardship (section 10(a) of the 1990 amendments).
        FDA issued proposed rules on November 27, 1991 (see 56 FR 60366 and 
    60421). On October 29, 1992, however, shortly before the final rules 
    were to be issued, the Dietary Supplement Act of 1992 (the 1992 DS act) 
    (Title II of Pub. L. 102-571) was enacted. This law took dietary 
    supplements out of the rulemaking schedule that had been established 
    under the 1990 amendments. It provided that FDA issue new proposals on 
    the nutrition labeling of, and nutrient content claims for, dietary 
    supplements by June 15, 1993, and that the agency issue final rules by 
    December 31, 1993. However, the provisions of the 1990 amendments that 
    made the final rules effective 6 months after issuance, and that gave 
    FDA discretion to delay their applicability for 1 year, continued to 
    apply to dietary supplements.
        Consistent with the 1990 amendments and the 1992 DS act, on June 
    18, 1993 (58 FR 33715 and 33731), FDA issued proposed rules on the 
    nutrition labeling and nutrient content claims for dietary supplements. 
    On January 4, 1994 (59 FR 354 and 378), FDA issued the final rules. As 
    stated above, under the 1990 amendments, these final rules were to be 
    effective 6 months from December 31, 1993, or on July 1, 1994. However, 
    in conjunction with the publication of the final rules, FDA made a 
    finding that requiring compliance by that date would cause dietary 
    supplement manufacturers undue economic hardship (59 FR 350, January 4, 
    1994). Therefore, FDA stated that these manufacturers need not comply 
    with the final rules on nutrition labeling and nutrient content claims 
    until July 1, 1995.
        Having completed these rulemakings, FDA anticipated that dietary 
    supplement firms would begin taking steps to come into compliance with 
    the new rules, and dietary supplement manufacturers have apparently 
    done so. For example, in 1994, a number of dietary supplement trade 
    associations held conferences about the new rules, and FDA received 
    inquiries from a number of firms about what steps are required.
        In October 1994, however, a significant ambiguity was introduced 
    into the regulation of the labeling of dietary supplements. At that 
    time, the 1994 DSHEA (Pub. L. 103-417) was enacted. This new law 
    amended both the nutrition labeling and nutrient content claim 
    provisions of the act (see sections 7(b) and (c) of the 1994 DSHEA). It 
    made limited changes in how nutrition information is to be presented in 
    the labeling of dietary supplements, although it made implementation of 
    these changes subject to regulations adopted by the Secretary of Health 
    and Human Services (and, by delegation, FDA) (section 403(q)(5)(F) of 
    the act). It also limited in one respect the nutrient content claims 
    for dietary supplements that must be defined by regulation by FDA 
    (section 403(r)(2)(F) of the act).
        With respect to the effective date of these amendments and to the 
    other labeling provisions enacted as part of the new law, the 1994 
    DSHEA stated that dietary supplements may be labeled in accordance with 
    its provisions after its date of enactment, and that they must be 
    labeled in compliance with its provisions after December 31, 1996 
    (section 7(e) of the 1994 DSHEA). The new law was silent, however, with 
    respect to its effect on the July 1, 1995, applicability date 
    established under the 1990 amendments and the 1992 DS act for FDA's 
    regulations on the nutrition labeling and nutrient content claim 
    requirements for dietary supplements.
    
    II. Statement
    
        In the wake of the new law, FDA has received inquiries from the 
    dietary supplement industry about how the agency intends to enforce the 
    law. One trade association wrote that its members are making efforts to 
    comply with the July 1, 1995, effective date established under the 1990 
    amendments and the 1992 DS act, but that, as a practical matter, that 
    effective date should not be enforced to allow the process of 
    implementing the 1994 DSHEA to proceed in a reasonable fashion. The 
    trade association cautioned that if FDA did not follow such a course, 
    companies would be put in the untenable position of needing to relabel 
    in July 1995, only to relabel again by the end of 1996 (Ref. 1).
        FDA believes that it is appropriate, in response to these 
    inquiries, to issue a statement on how it intends to enforce its 
    nutrition labeling and nutrient content claim regulations with respect 
    to dietary supplements in light of the passage of the 1994 DSHEA (Ref. 
    2). In formulating this statement, FDA has carefully considered 
    Congress' goals in passing the 1994 DSHEA and the 1990 amendments, as 
    well as the needs of the companies that are required to label their 
    products in accordance with the act and of consumers to whom the 
    information in question is to be provided.
        In the 1990 amendments, Congress required that food labels bear 
    information that will help consumers to maintain healthy dietary 
    practices and established timeframes for the implementation of the 
    legislation to [[Page 7712]] ensure that it would be given effect 
    without undue delay. In the 1994 DSHEA, Congress, while embracing most 
    of what FDA has done under the 1990 amendments with respect to dietary 
    supplements, sought to provide for the inclusion of additional 
    information on the nutrition label and to provide additional 
    flexibility in how that information is presented. The dietary 
    supplement industry is left facing an applicability date for FDA's 
    nutrition labeling and nutrient content claim regulations for dietary 
    supplements of July 1, 1995, without complete guidance on how the 
    nutrition label is ultimately to be presented on these products. As for 
    consumers, they are currently provided with nutrition information on 
    many, but by no means all, dietary supplements, but that information is 
    not being presented in a form that is consistent with the ``Nutrition 
    Facts'' panel that appears on conventional foods.
        Having considered these factors, FDA advises that, while the 
    nutrition labeling and nutrient content claim regulations implementing 
    the 1990 amendments for dietary supplements will go into effect on July 
    1, 1995, it does not intend to enforce those regulations until it has 
    modified them to reflect the 1994 DSHEA, and until after dietary 
    supplement manufacturers are required to label their products in 
    accordance with the 1994 DSHEA; that is, not until after December 31, 
    1996.
        FDA considers this course of action appropriate for several 
    reasons. First, FDA recognizes the merit in the dietary supplement 
    industry's argument that it should not be required to relabel its 
    products until it has a full understanding of what its alternatives and 
    obligations are. Enforcing the nutrition labeling and nutrient content 
    claims regulations on July 1, 1995, would require dietary supplement 
    manufacturers to choose between relabeling their products twice, the 
    first time to come into compliance and the second to take advantage of 
    the flexibility provided by the new law, or foregoing that flexibility. 
    To force dietary supplement manufacturers to make such a choice would 
    be a result that the agency does not believe Congress contemplated or 
    would have intended in enacting the 1994 DSHEA.
        The 1994 DSHEA provides for flexibility in the dietary ingredients 
    that can be included in the ``Nutrition Facts'' box and in the 
    presentation of ingredient information. FDA, pursuant to the 1994 
    DSHEA, is at work on regulations that define this flexibility. FDA 
    agrees that industry should have an opportunity to take advantage of 
    this flexibility without being forced to relabel twice to do so. FDA 
    acknowledges that it will not be possible for the agency to have its 
    regulations in place, nor for the industry to have adequate time to 
    design its labeling in accordance with these regulations, by July of 
    this year. Thus, the interests of industry and the policies embodied in 
    the 1994 DSHEA will be advanced if FDA declines to enforce the 
    nutrition labeling and nutrient content claim regulations that apply to 
    dietary supplements until after December 31, 1996, when they will be 
    fully modified to reflect the 1994 DSHEA.
        While the purposes of the 1990 amendments will not be as clearly 
    advanced by such a course of action, they will also not be contravened. 
    Implementation of the 1994 DSHEA will move FDA forward toward its goal 
    of full implementation of the 1990 amendments. Moreover, while Congress 
    sought to rule out undue delay in implementation of the 1990 
    amendments, a delay caused by implementation of another law enacted by 
    Congress can hardly be considered ``undue.''
        Finally, it is true that consumers face an additional delay before 
    dietary supplements bear nutrition information that is as consistent as 
    possible, both in content and presentation, with that on other foods, 
    and until there is full compliance by dietary supplements with the 
    nutrient content claim provisions of the act. These facts are 
    mitigated, however, by the fact that there is information listing 
    nutrients and their levels on many dietary supplements, and that many 
    dietary supplements do not bear nutrient content claims.
        Thus, having fully considered these factors, the agency advises 
    that it does not intend to enforce the nutrition labeling and nutrient 
    content claims regulations that apply to dietary supplements until 
    after December 31, 1996. The agency is at work developing a proposal 
    that implements the labeling provisions of the 1994 DSHEA and expects 
    to publish it in the near future.
    
    III. References
    
        The following references have been placed on display in the Dockets 
    Management Branch (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, rm. 1-23, 
    12420 Parklawn Dr., Rockville, MD 20857, and may be seen by interested 
    persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
    
        1. Cordaro, John, President, Council for Responsible Nutrition, 
    letter to David A. Kessler, Commissioner, FDA, December 7, 1994.
        2. Shank, Fred, R., Director, Center for Food Safety and Applied 
    Nutrition, FDA, letter to John B. Cordaro, President, Council for 
    Responsible Nutrition, January 30, 1995.
    
        Dated: February 6, 1995.
    William B. Schultz,
    Deputy Commissioner for Policy.
    [FR Doc. 95-3294 Filed 2-8-95; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4160-01-F
    
    

Document Information

Published:
02/09/1995
Department:
Food and Drug Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Notice of intent.
Document Number:
95-3294
Pages:
7710-7712 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 95N-0025
PDF File:
95-3294.pdf
CFR: (1)
21 CFR 101