96-2911. Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Sodium Azide From Japan  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Page 4959]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-2911]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    [A-588-839]
    
    
    Initiation of Antidumping Duty Investigation: Sodium Azide From 
    Japan
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: February 9, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Beck at (202) 482-3464 or 
    Jennifer Stagner at (202) 482-1673, Office of Antidumping 
    Investigations, Import Administration, International Trade 
    Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
    Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20230.
    
    INITIATION OF INVESTIGATION:
    
    The Applicable Statute
    
        Unless otherwise indicated, all citations to the statute are 
    references to the provisions effective January 1, 1995, the effective 
    date of the amendments made to the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) by the 
    Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA).
    
    The Petition
    
        On January 16, 1996, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
    received a petition filed in proper form by the American Azide 
    Corporation (the petitioner), the sole U.S. producer of sodium azide. A 
    supplement to the petition was filed on January 29, 1996.
        In accordance with section 732(b) of the Act, the petitioner 
    alleges that imports of sodium azide from Japan are being, or are 
    likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value within 
    the meaning of section 731 of the Act, and that such imports are 
    materially injuring, or threatening material injury to, a U.S. 
    industry.
        The petitioner states that it has standing to file the petition 
    because it is an interested party, as defined under section 771(9)(C) 
    of the Act.
    
    Determination of Industry Support for the Petition
    
        Section 732(c)(4)(A) of the Act requires the Department to 
    determine, prior to the initiation of an investigation, that a minimum 
    percentage of the domestic industry supports an antidumping petition. A 
    petition meets these minimum requirements if (1) the domestic producers 
    or workers who support the petition account for at least 25 percent of 
    the total production of the domestic like product; and (2) the domestic 
    producers or workers who support the petition account for more than 50 
    percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by that 
    portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to, the 
    petition.
        A review of the data provided in the petition and other information 
    readily available to the Department indicates that the petitioner is 
    the sole producer of sodium azide in the United States. The Department 
    received no expressions of opposition to the petition from any 
    interested party. Accordingly, the Department determines that this 
    petition is supported by the domestic industry.
    
    Scope of the Investigation
    
        The product covered by this investigation is sodium azide 
    (NaN3) regardless of use, and whether or not combined with silicon 
    oxide (SiO2) or any other inert flow assisting agent. The 
    merchandise under investigation is currently classifiable under item 
    2850.00.50.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States 
    (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and 
    customs purposes, our written description of the scope of this 
    investigation is dispositive.
    
    Export Price and Normal Value
    
        The petitioner based export price on delivered prices in the United 
    States quoted by a Japanese producer. These prices were adjusted by the 
    petitioner for U.S. and foreign inland freight, ocean freight, U.S. 
    duties, and the U.S. trading company mark-up.
        The petitioner based normal value on delivered prices in Japan 
    quoted by a Japanese producer. The unit price quotes denominated in 
    Japanese yen were converted by the petitioner to U.S. dollars using the 
    exchange rate in effect at the beginning of the third quarter of 1995. 
    An adjustment was made for foreign inland freight.
        Based on comparisons of export price to normal value, the estimated 
    dumping margins for sodium azide from Japan range from 58.50 to 65.80 
    percent.
    
    Fair Value Comparisons
    
        Based on the data provided by the petitioner, there is reason to 
    believe that imports of sodium azide from Japan are being, or likely to 
    be, sold at less than fair value. If it becomes necessary at a later 
    date to consider this petition as a source of facts available under 
    section 776 of the Act, we may review further the calculations.
    
    Initiation of Investigation
    
        We have examined the petition on sodium azide and have found that 
    it meets the requirements of section 732 of the Act, including the 
    requirements concerning allegations of the material injury or threat of 
    material injury to the domestic producers of a domestic like product by 
    reason of the complained-of imports, allegedly sold at less than fair 
    value. Therefore, we are initiating an antidumping duty investigation 
    to determine whether imports of sodium azide from Japan are being, or 
    are likely to be, sold in the United States at less than fair value. 
    Unless extended, we will make our preliminary determination by June 24, 
    1996.
    
    Distribution of Copies of the Petition
    
        In accordance with section 732(b)(3)(A) of the Act, a copy of the 
    public version of the petition has been provided to the representatives 
    of the government of Japan. We will attempt to provide copies of the 
    public versions of the petition to all the exporters named in the 
    petition.
    
    International Trade Commission (ITC) Notification
    
        We have notified the ITC of our initiation, as required by section 
    732(d) of the Act.
    
    Preliminary Determination by the ITC
    
        The ITC will determine by March 1, 1996, whether there is a 
    reasonable indication that imports of sodium azide from Japan are 
    causing material injury, or threatening to cause material injury, to a 
    U.S. industry. A negative ITC determination will result in the 
    investigation being terminated; otherwise, this investigation will 
    proceed according to statutory and regulatory time limits.
    
        Dated: February 5, 1996.
    Susan G. Esserman,
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
    [FR Doc. 96-2911 Filed 2-8-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/9/1996
Published:
02/09/1996
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Document Number:
96-2911
Dates:
February 9, 1996.
Pages:
4959-4959 (1 pages)
Docket Numbers:
A-588-839
PDF File:
96-2911.pdf