96-2912. Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Thailand; Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review  

  • [Federal Register Volume 61, Number 28 (Friday, February 9, 1996)]
    [Notices]
    [Pages 4959-4961]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 96-2912]
    
    
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
    [C-549-804]
    
    
    Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings From Thailand; Final Results 
    of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review
    
    AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
    Department of Commerce.
    
     
    [[Page 4960]]
    
    ACTION: Notice of Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 
    Review.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: On November 22, 1995, the Department of Commerce (the 
    Department) published in the Federal Register its preliminary results 
    of administrative review of the countervailing duty order on carbon 
    steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Thailand. The review covers the 
    period January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1992. We have completed 
    this review and determine the net subsidy to be de minimis. The 
    Department will instruct the U.S. Customs Service to liquidate, without 
    regard to countervailing duties, all shipments of the subject 
    merchandise from Thailand exported on or after January 1, 1992, and on 
    or before December 31, 1992.
    
    EFFECTIVE DATE: February 9, 1996.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Albright or Cameron Cardozo, 
    Office of Countervailing Compliance, Import Administration, 
    International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
    Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230; 
    telephone: (202) 482-2786.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    
    Background
    
        On November 22, 1995, the Department published in the Federal 
    Register (60 FR 57849) the preliminary results of its administrative 
    review of the countervailing duty order on carbon steel butt-weld pipe 
    fittings from Thailand. The Department has now completed this 
    administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act 
    of 1930, as amended (the Act). We invited interested parties to comment 
    on the preliminary results. We received no comments. The review covers 
    the period January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1992. The review 
    involves two companies, Awaji Sangyo (Thailand) Co. (AST), and TTU 
    Industrial Corp. (TTU), which account for virtually all exports of the 
    subject merchandise from Thailand, and fifteen programs.
    
    Applicable Statute and Regulations
    
        The Department is conducting this administrative review in 
    accordance with section 751(a) of the Act. Unless otherwise indicated, 
    all citations to the statute and to the Department's regulations are in 
    reference to the provisions as they existed on December 31, 1994.
    
    Scope of the Review
    
        The merchandise subject to this review (hereinafter subject 
    merchandise) is certain carbon steel butt-weld pipe fittings, having an 
    inside diameter of less than 360 millimeters (fourteen inches), 
    imported in either finished or unfinished form. These formed or forged 
    pipe fittings are used to join sections in piping systems where 
    conditions require permanent, welded connections, as distinguished from 
    fittings based on other fastening methods (e.g., threaded, grooved, or 
    bolted fittings), as currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff 
    Schedule (HTS). The products covered in this review are provided for 
    under item number 7307.93.30 of the HTS. The HTS subheadings are 
    provided for convenience and Customs purposes; our written description 
    of the scope of this proceeding is dispositive.
    
    Calculation Methodology for Assessment and Cash Deposit Purposes
    
        We calculated the net subsidy on a country-wide basis by first 
    calculating the subsidy rate for each company subject to the 
    administrative review. We then weight-averaged the rate received by 
    each company using as the weight its share of total Thai exports to the 
    United States of subject merchandise, including all companies, even 
    those with de minimis and zero rates. We then summed the individual 
    companies' weight-averaged rates to determine the subsidy rate from all 
    programs benefitting exports of subject merchandise to the United 
    States.
        Since the country-wide rate calculated using this methodology was 
    de minimis, as defined by 19 CFR Sec. 355.7(1994), no further 
    calculations were necessary.
    
    Analysis of Programs
    
        Based upon our analysis of the questionnaire response and 
    verification we determine the following:
    
    I. Programs Conferring Subsidies
    
    Tax Exemptions Under Section 31 of the 1977 Investment Promotions Act 
    (IPA)
    
        In the preliminary results, we found that this program conferred 
    countervailable benefits on the subject merchandise. Since we received 
    no comments on our preliminary results, our findings remain unchanged 
    in these final results.
    
    II. Programs Not Conferring Subsidies
    
    Duty Drawback
    
        In the preliminary results, we found that this program did not 
    confer countervailable benefits on the subject merchandise. Since we 
    received no comments on our preliminary results, our findings remain 
    unchanged in these final results.
    
    III. Programs Found Not to be Used
    
        In the preliminary results, we found that neither AST nor TTU 
    applied for or received benefits under the following programs during 
    the period of review (POR):
    
    A. Tax Certificates for Exporters
    B. Export Packing Credits
    C. Tax and Duty Exemptions Under Section 28 of the (IPA)
    D. Electricity Discounts for Exporters
    E. Rediscount of Industrial Bills
    F. International Trade Promotion Fund
    G. Export Processing Zones
    H. Reduced Business Taxes for Producers of Intermediate Goods for 
    Export Industries
    I. Additional Incentives under the IPA
        1. Goodwill and Royalties Tax Exemption
        2. Tax Deduction of Foreign Marketing Expenses and Foreign Taxes
        3. Exemption of Sales Taxes for Promoted Industries
        4. Exemption on Export Duties and Business Taxes on Products 
    Produced or Assembled by Promoted Firms
        5. Deduction from Assessable Income of an Amount Equal to 5% of the 
    Increase over the Previous Year of Income Derived from Exports
    
        Since we received no comments on our preliminary results, our 
    findings remain unchanged in these final results.
    
    Final Results of Review
    
        For the period January 1, 1992 through December 31, 1992, we 
    determine the net subsidy to be 0.22 percent ad valorem for all 
    companies. In accordance with 19 CFR 355.7, any rate less than 0.5 
    percent ad valorem is de minimis.
        The Department will instruct the Customs Service to liquidate, 
    without regard to countervailing duties, all shipments of the subject 
    merchandise from Thailand exported on or after January 1, 1992, and on 
    or before December 31, 1992.
        This countervailing duty order was determined to be subject to 
    section 753 of the Act (as amended by the Uruguay Round Agreements Act 
    of 1994). Countervailing Duty Order; Opportunity to Request a Section 
    753 Injury Investigation, 60 FR 27,963 (May 26, 1995). Because no 
    domestic interested parties exercised their right under section 753(a) 
    of the Act to request an injury investigation, the International 
    
    [[Page 4961]]
    Trade Commission made a negative injury determination with respect to 
    this order, pursuant to section 753(b)(4) of the Act. As a result, the 
    Department revoked this countervailing duty order, effective January 1, 
    1995, pursuant to section 753(b)(3)(B) of the Act. Revocation of 
    Countervailing Duty Orders, 60 FR 40,568 (August 9, 1995). Accordingly, 
    this notice assesses duties for the period of review and does not issue 
    further cash deposit instructions.
        This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
    administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
    concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
    APO in accordance with 19 C.F.R. 355.34(d). Timely written notification 
    of return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial 
    protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the 
    regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.
        This administrative review and notice are in accordance with 
    section 751(a)(1) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)(1)) and 19 CFR 355.22.
    
        Dated: January 31, 1996.
    Susan G. Esserman,
    Assistant Secretary for Import Administration
    [FR Doc. 96-2912 Filed 2-8-96; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
2/9/1996
Published:
02/09/1996
Department:
Commerce Department
Entry Type:
Notice
Action:
Notice of Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review.
Document Number:
96-2912
Dates:
February 9, 1996.
Pages:
4959-4961 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
C-549-804
PDF File:
96-2912.pdf