[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 1998)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 6496]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-3027]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 721
[FRL-5959-4]
Technical Amendments to Ethane, 1,1,1 Trifluoro-; Revocation of a
Significant New Use Rule; Correction of Effective Date Under
Congressional Review Act (CRA)
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correction of effective date under CRA.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On June 27, 1996 (61 FR 33374), the Environmental Protection
Agency published in the Federal Register a final rule revocating a
significant new use rule promulgated under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic
Substances Control Act for ethane, 1,1,1 trifluoro, based on receipt of
new data, which established an effective date of July 29, 1996. This
document corrects the effective date of the rule to February 9, 1998 to
be consistent with sections 801 and 808 of the Congressional Review Act
(CRA), enacted as part of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 and 808.
EFFECTIVE DATE: This rule is effective on February 9, 1998.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Hofmann, OPPTS at (202) 260-
2922.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 801 of the CRA precludes a rule from taking effect until
the agency promulgating the rule submits a rule report, which includes
a copy of the rule, to each House of Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the General Accounting Office (GAO). EPA recently discovered
that it had inadvertently failed to submit the above rule as required;
thus, although the rule was promulgated on June 27, 1996 (61 FR 33374)
by operation of law, the rule did not take effect on July 29, 1996, as
stated therein. Now that EPA has discovered its error, the rule is
being submitted to both Houses of Congress and the GAO. This document
amends the effective date of the rule consistent with the provisions of
the CRA.
Section 553 of the Administration Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, an agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. EPA has determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because EPA merely is correcting
the effective date of the promulgated rule to be consisted with the
congressional review requirements of the Congressional Review Act as a
matter of law and has no discretion in this matter. Thus, notice and
public procedure are unnecessary. The Agency finds that this
constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Moreover, since
today's action does not create any new regulatory requirements and
affected parties have known of the underlying rule since June 27, 1996,
EPA finds that good cause exists to provide for an immediate effective
date pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and 808(2). Because the delay in
the effective date was caused by EPA's inadvertent failure to submit
the rule under the CRA, EPA does not believe that affected entities
that acted in good faith relying upon the effective date stated in the
June 27, 1996, Federal Register should be penalized if they were
complying with the rule as promulgated.
II. Administrative Requirements
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. In addition,
this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104-4), or require prior consultation with State
officials as specified by Executive Order 12875 (58 FR 58093, October
28, 1993), or involve special consideration of environmental justice
related issues as required by Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994). Because this action is not subject to notice-and-
comment requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any
other statute, it is not subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
EPA's compliance with these statutes and Executive Orders for the
underlying rule is discussed in June 27, 1996, Federal Register
document.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), as added by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives and the Comptroller General of the
General Accounting Office; however, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 808(2),
this rule is effective on February 9, 1998. This rule is not a ``major
rule'' as defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
This final rule only amends the effective date of the underlying
rule; it does not amend any substantive requirements contained in the
rule. Accordingly, to the extent it is available, judicial review is
limited to the amended effective date.
Dated: January 30, 1998.
Carol Browner,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 98-3027 Filed 2-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-M
