[Federal Register Volume 63, Number 26 (Monday, February 9, 1998)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6501-6502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 98-3128]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. 97-NM-337-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A310 and A300-600 Series
Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document proposes the adoption of a new airworthiness
directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A310 and
A300-600 series airplanes. This proposal would require a one-time,
detailed visual inspection for discrepancies of the electrical bundles
in the power generation compartment, and corrective actions, if
necessary. This proposal is prompted by issuance of mandatory
continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness
authority. The actions specified by the proposed AD are intended to
prevent chafing and consequent damage to the electrical generation
wires in the 101VU panel, which could result in a loss of electrical
generation channels.
DATES: Comments must be received by March 11, 1998.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114,
Attention: Rules Docket No. 97-NM-337-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW.,
Renton, Washington 98055-4056. Comments may be inspected at this
location between 9:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
The service information referenced in the proposed rule may be
obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norman B. Martenson, Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425)
227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
Interested persons are invited to participate in the making of the
proposed rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as
they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number
and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified above. All
communications received on or before the closing date for comments,
specified above, will be considered before taking action on the
proposed rule. The proposals contained in this notice may be changed in
light of the comments received.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed rule. All
comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing
date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested
persons. A report summarizing each FAA-public contact concerned with
the substance of this proposal will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
submitted in response to this notice must submit a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to Docket Number 97-NM-337-AD.'' The postcard will be date stamped and
returned to the commenter.
Availability of NPRMs
Any person may obtain a copy of this NPRM by submitting a request
to the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules
Docket No. 97-NM-337-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington
98055-4056.
Discussion
The Direction Generale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the
airworthiness authority for France, notified the FAA that an unsafe
condition may exist on certain Airbus Model A310 and A300-600 series
airplanes. The DGAC advises that an A300-600 series airplane
experienced the loss of both main alternating current (AC) electrical
generation channels during a landing rollout due to wire chafing and
short circuiting of the electrical generation wires in the 101VU panel
in the forward avionic compartment. Investigation revealed that such
chafing may result if a cable-tie is missing, or if the wire bundle is
routed too close to a bracket, or if the bundle is not properly formed
and cables consequently balloon. Prior to the incident, the airplane's
wiring in the associated area had been modified in accordance with
Airbus Service Bulletins A300-24-6064 and A300-24-6058. The wiring
discrepancy has been attributed to inadequate installation of this
modification during production. A similar modification for Model A310
series airplanes could result in similar discrepancies on that model.
Such discrepancies, if not corrected, could result in chafing and
consequent damage to the electrical generation wires in the 101VU
panel, which could result in a loss of electrical generation channels.
Explanation of Relevant Service Information
Airbus has issued All Operator Telex (AOT) 24-08, dated April 17,
1997, which describes procedures for a one-time, detailed visual
inspection for discrepancies (damage, risk of chafing, loom ballooning,
or loose or missing cable ties) of the electrical bundles in the power
generation compartment, and corrective actions, if necessary. The
corrective actions include repairing damaged wires, repositioning the
bundles and securing the routing with cable ties to ensure adequate
clearance, and checking certain clearances. The DGAC classified this
AOT as mandatory and issued French airworthiness directive 97-152-
225(B), dated July 16, 1997, in order to assure the continued
airworthiness of these airplanes in France.
FAA's Conclusions
These airplane models are manufactured in France and are type
[[Page 6502]]
certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of
Sec. 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the
applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this
bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed
of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of
the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD
action is necessary for products of this type design that are
certificated for operation in the United States.
Explanation of Requirements of Proposed Rule
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered
in the United States, the proposed AD would require accomplishment of
the actions specified in the AOT described previously.
Cost Impact
The FAA estimates that 94 airplanes of U.S. registry would be
affected by this proposed AD, that it would take approximately 2 work
hours per airplane to accomplish the proposed inspection, and that the
average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be
$11,280, or $120 per airplane.
The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that
no operator has yet accomplished any of the proposed requirements of
this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in
the future if this AD were not adopted.
Regulatory Impact
The regulations proposed herein would not have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this
proposal would not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant
the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this proposed
regulation (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
and (3) if promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact,
positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under
the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the draft
regulatory evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the
Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules
Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend
part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as
follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
Airbus: Docket 97-NM-337-AD.
Applicability: Model A310 and A300-600 series airplanes on which
any of the following Airbus service bulletins (or earlier versions)
has been accomplished: A310-24-2067, Revision 1, dated March 18,
1997; A310-24-2072, Revision 1, dated February 4, 1997; A300-24-
6058, Revision 1, dated January 23, 1997; or A300-24-6064, Revision
1, dated February 4, 1997; certificated in any category.
Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the
preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been
otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the
requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified,
altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of
this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an
alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of
this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of
the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition
addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been
eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to
address it.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent chafing and consequent damage to the electrical
generation wires in the 101VU panel, which could result in a loss of
electrical generation channels, accomplish the following:
(a) Within 400 flight hours or 60 days after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first, perform a one-time, detailed
visual inspection of the 101VU panel electrical bundles installation
for any discrepancy, in accordance with Airbus All Operator Telex
(AOT) 24-08, dated April 17, 1997. If any discrepancy is found,
prior to further flight, correct the discrepancy in accordance with
the AOT.
(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the
compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their
requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector,
who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116.
Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved
alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be
obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.
(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with
sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14
CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where
the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
Note 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in French
airworthiness directive 97-152-225(B), dated July 16, 1997.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 2, 1998.
Darrell M. Pederson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 98-3128 Filed 2-6-98; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-U