99-2723. Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes  

  • [Federal Register Volume 64, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 1999)]
    [Rules and Regulations]
    [Pages 6189-6191]
    From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
    [FR Doc No: 99-2723]
    
    
    =======================================================================
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
    
    Federal Aviation Administration
    
    14 CFR Part 39
    
    [Docket No. 98-NM-144-AD; Amendment 39-11025; AD 99-04-01]
    RIN 2120-AA64
    
    
    Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747 Series Airplanes
    
    AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
    
    ACTION: Final rule.
    
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), 
    applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, that requires 
    repetitive inspections of the outboard nacelle struts to detect fatigue 
    cracking of the strut skin and spring beam support fittings, and to 
    detect cracked or loose fasteners of the support fittings; and 
    corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment also provides for 
    optional terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements. 
    This amendment is prompted by reports indicating that several cracked 
    or broken spring beam support fittings were found on the outboard 
    nacelle struts. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect 
    and correct such fatigue cracking and loose fasteners, which could 
    result in failure of the outboard nacelle struts and consequent 
    separation of the engine.
    
    DATES: Effective March 16, 1999.
        The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in 
    the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as 
    of March 16, 1999.
    
    ADDRESSES: The service information referenced in this AD may be 
    obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, 
    Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal 
    Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules 
    Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of 
    the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, 
    Washington, DC.
    
    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamara L. Anderson, Aerospace 
    Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., 
    Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2771; fax (425) 227-
    1181.
    
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal 
    Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness 
    directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series 
    airplanes was published in the Federal Register on November 24, 1998 
    (63 FR 64913). That action proposed to require repetitive inspections 
    of the outboard nacelle struts to detect fatigue cracking of the strut 
    skin and spring beam support fittings, and to detect cracked or loose 
    fasteners of the support fittings; and corrective actions, if 
    necessary. That action also proposed to provide for optional 
    terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements.
        Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate 
    in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to 
    the single comment received.
        The commenter supports the proposed AD.
    
    Conclusion
    
        After careful review of the available data, including the comment 
    noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public 
    interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
    
    Cost Impact
    
        There are approximately 145 Model 747 series airplanes of the 
    affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 9 
    airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will 
    take approximately 16 work hours per airplane to accomplish the 
    required inspection, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work 
    hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact
    
    [[Page 6190]]
    
    of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $8,640, or $960 per 
    airplane, per inspection cycle.
        The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that 
    no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD 
    action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the 
    future if this AD were not adopted.
        Should an operator elect to accomplish the fastener hole inspection 
    and modification, it would take approximately 20 work hours (excluding 
    removal of the strut and spring beam) to accomplish it, at an average 
    labor rate of $60 per hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of 
    this optional terminating action is estimated to be $1,200 per strut.
        Should an operator elect to accomplish the replacement of the 
    spring beam support fittings with new support fittings, it would take 
    approximately 108 work hours (excluding removal of the strut and spring 
    beam) to accomplish it, at an average labor rate of $60 per hour. Based 
    on these figures, the cost impact of this optional terminating action 
    is estimated to be $6,480 per support fitting.
    
    Regulatory Impact
    
        The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct 
    effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
    government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
    responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in 
    accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final 
    rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the 
    preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
        For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is 
    not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 
    (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and 
    Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a 
    significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial 
    number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory 
    Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action 
    and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained 
    from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption 
    ADDRESSES.
    
    List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
    
        Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by 
    reference, Safety.
    
    Adoption of the Amendment
    
        Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the 
    Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of 
    the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
    
    PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
    
        1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
    
        Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
    
    
    Sec. 39.13  [Amended]
    
        2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new 
    airworthiness directive:
    
    99-04-01  Boeing: Amendment 39-11025. Docket 98-NM-144-AD.
    
        Applicability: Model 747 series airplanes, line numbers 202 
    through 886 inclusive, equipped with General Electric Model CF6-45/
    50 and Pratt & Whitney Model JT9D-70 series engines; on which the 
    strut/wing modification has not been accomplished in accordance with 
    AD 95-13-07, amendment 39-9287; certificated in any category.
    
        Note 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the 
    preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been 
    otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the 
    requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, 
    altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of 
    this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an 
    alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (h) of 
    this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of 
    the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition 
    addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been 
    eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to 
    address it.
    
        Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished 
    previously.
        To detect and correct fatigue cracking of the strut skin and 
    spring beam support fittings on the outboard nacelle struts, and 
    cracked or loose fasteners of the support fittings, which could 
    result in failure of the outboard nacelle struts and consequent 
    separation of the engine, accomplish the following:
        (a) Prior to the accumulation of 13,000 total flight cycles, or 
    within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever 
    occurs later, perform a detailed visual inspection of the outboard 
    nacelle struts, as specified by paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), 
    and (a)(4) of this AD, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service 
    Bulletin 747-54A2172, dated February 23, 1995, or Boeing Service 
    Bulletin 747-54A2172, Revision 1, dated January 4, 1996.
        (1) Inspect the spring beam support fittings to detect cracks of 
    the support fittings.
        (2) Inspect the spring beam support fittings at the fasteners, 
    using a borescope to detect cracks of the support fittings.
        (3) Inspect the fasteners of the outer spring beam support 
    fittings to detect cracked or loose fasteners.
        (4) Inspect the strut skin to detect cracks.
        (b) If no discrepancy is found during any inspection required by 
    paragraph (a) of this AD, perform detailed visual inspections of the 
    outboard nacelle struts to detect any discrepancies specified in 
    paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), and (b)(4) of this AD, in 
    accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-54A2172, dated 
    February 23, 1995; or Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54A2172, Revision 
    1, dated January 4, 1996. Perform the inspection at the times 
    specified in paragraph (c) or (d) of this AD, as applicable.
        (1) Perform a detailed visual inspection, using a borescope, of 
    only the outer spring beam support fittings at the fasteners through 
    the horizontal flange to detect cracks of the support fittings.
        (2) Perform a detailed visual inspection, using a borescope, of 
    the fasteners through the vertical flange of only the outer spring 
    beam support fittings to detect loose collars.
        (3) Perform an external detailed visual inspection of only the 
    outer spring beam support fittings to detect cracked or loose 
    fastener heads.
        (4) Perform a detailed visual inspection of the strut skin to 
    detect cracks.
        (c) For Model 747-SR series airplanes equipped with General 
    Electric Model CF6-45 series engines, on which no discrepancy is 
    found during any inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD: 
    Perform the inspection required by paragraph (b) of this AD within 
    1,600 flight cycles following the accomplishment of the inspection 
    required by paragraph (a) of this AD; and thereafter at intervals 
    not to exceed 1,600 flight cycles until accomplishment of the 
    optional terminating action specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.
        (d) For Model 747 series airplanes other than those identified 
    in paragraph (c) of this AD, on which no discrepancy is found during 
    any inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD: Perform the 
    inspection required by paragraph (b) of this AD within 1,000 flight 
    cycles following the accomplishment of the inspection required by 
    paragraph (a) of this AD; and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 
    1,000 flight cycles until accomplishment of the optional terminating 
    action specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.
        (e) If any cracking is found in the spring beam support fittings 
    during any inspection required by this AD, prior to further flight, 
    replace the support fitting with a new support fitting, in 
    accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions in Part IV. of 
    Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54A2172, Revision 1, dated January 4, 
    1996. Accomplishment of this replacement constitutes terminating 
    action for the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD for 
    only the new support fitting. Continue the repetitive inspections 
    required by paragraph (b) of this AD for the other support fitting 
    locations until accomplishment of the terminating action specified 
    by paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
        (f) If any crack is found on the strut skin, or if any cracked 
    or loose fastener or collar
    
    [[Page 6191]]
    
    is found during any inspection required by this AD, prior to further 
    flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, 
    Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate; or in accordance with data meeting the type 
    certification basis of the airplane approved by a Boeing Company 
    Designated Engineering Representative who has been authorized by the 
    Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings.
        (g) Accomplishment of an open-hole high frequency eddy current 
    (HFEC) inspection, in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 
    747-54A2172, dated February 23, 1995, or Boeing Service Bulletin 
    747-54A2172, Revision 1, dated January 4, 1996; and either paragraph 
    (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable; constitutes terminating 
    action for the requirements of this AD.
        (1) If no discrepancy is found during the HFEC inspection, prior 
    to further flight, rework the fastener holes and install new 
    fasteners, in accordance with Figures 6 and 7 of Boeing Alert 
    Service Bulletin 747-54A2172, dated February 23, 1995, or Boeing 
    Service Bulletin 747-54A2172, Revision 1, dated January 4, 1996.
        (2) If any cracking is found during the HFEC inspection, prior 
    to further flight, replace any cracked spring beam support fitting 
    with a new support fitting, in accordance with Part IV. of the 
    Accomplishment Instructions specified by Boeing Service Bulletin 
    747-54A2172, Revision 1, dated January 4, 1996.
        (h) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the 
    compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be 
    used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification 
    Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall 
    submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal 
    Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the 
    Manager, Seattle ACO.
    
        Note 2: Information concerning the existence of approved 
    alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be 
    obtained from the Seattle ACO.
    
        (i) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 
    sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 
    CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where 
    the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.
        (j) Except as provided by paragraph (f), (g), (g)(1), and (g)(2) 
    of this AD, the actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing 
    Alert Service Bulletin 747-54A2172, dated February 23, 1995, and 
    Boeing Service Bulletin 747-54A2172, Revision 1, dated January 4, 
    1996, as applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved by 
    the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 
    552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing 
    Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
    2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane 
    Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the 
    Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 
    700, Washington, DC.
        (k) This amendment becomes effective on March 16, 1999.
        Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 1, 1999.
    Dorenda D. Baker,
    Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification 
    Service.
    [FR Doc. 99-2723 Filed 2-8-99; 8:45 am]
    BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
    
    
    

Document Information

Effective Date:
3/16/1999
Published:
02/09/1999
Department:
Federal Aviation Administration
Entry Type:
Rule
Action:
Final rule.
Document Number:
99-2723
Dates:
Effective March 16, 1999.
Pages:
6189-6191 (3 pages)
Docket Numbers:
Docket No. 98-NM-144-AD, Amendment 39-11025, AD 99-04-01
RINs:
2120-AA64: Airworthiness Directives
RIN Links:
https://www.federalregister.gov/regulations/2120-AA64/airworthiness-directives
PDF File:
99-2723.pdf
CFR: (1)
14 CFR 39.13